Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About EC
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Eukaryotic Cell
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About EC
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
Articles

The Conjugation-Specific Die5 Protein Is Required for Development of the Somatic Nucleus in both Paramecium and Tetrahymena

Atsushi Matsuda, Annie Wan-Yi Shieh, Douglas L. Chalker, James D. Forney
Atsushi Matsuda
1Department of Biochemistry, Purdue University, 175 S. University Street, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-2063
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Annie Wan-Yi Shieh
2Biology Department, Washington University in St. Louis, Campus Box 1137, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, Missouri 63130
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Douglas L. Chalker
2Biology Department, Washington University in St. Louis, Campus Box 1137, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, Missouri 63130
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James D. Forney
1Department of Biochemistry, Purdue University, 175 S. University Street, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-2063
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: forney@purdue.edu
DOI: 10.1128/EC.00379-09
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    DIE5 is a developmentally regulated gene encoding a nuclear protein in Paramecium. (A) Northern blot of total RNA (20 μg per lane) from Paramecium probed with ParameciumDIE5a. Ethidium bromide staining of rRNA was used as a loading control. (B) Cellular localization of GFP-Die5a expressed from an extrachromosomal DNA driven by the DIE5a promoter. Fluorescent images are projections of optical sections obtained by confocal microscopy. The GFP fluorescence exclusively localized to the new macronuclei, which show weaker propidium iodide staining (DNA) than the old macronuclear fragments. The image corresponds to a cell approximately 14 h after the start of mating. The bar corresponds to 20 μm.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Silencing of DIE5 disrupts nuclear events during conjugation. (A) Progeny from conjugation treated with RNAi. Survival (%) and phenotype of the marker genes are shown. Both parental strains for conjugation were homozygous for Mendelian recessive mutant alleles of different marker genes (pwA and pwB; required for ciliary reversal); thus, successful conjugation should produce the wild-type phenotype of backward swimming, while failure in either nuclear exchange, fertilization, or formation of the new macronucleus should result in the mutant phenotype, i.e., no backward swimming upon stimulation. (B) Representative DAPI-stained Paramecium exconjugants with normal and defective cytological phenotypes observed after RNAi treatments. Each picture contains a single cell with or without the new macronucleus (arrowheads) and old macronuclear fragments. Phenotypic classes were assigned to white, gray, or black, as indicated below the pictures and plotted in the graphs in panel C. mac, macronucleus.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Silencing of DIE5 inhibits excision of IESs. (A) A partial map of the micronuclear version of the A-51 allele showing locations of IESs (boxes), SspI recognition sites (arrowheads), and sizes of fragments generated by SspI digestion. Positions of expected PCR products (pp1 to pp3) and probes for Southern hybridization are also indicated. Arrows show positions of the primers relative to IESs not drawn to scale. (B) Whole-cell semiquantitative PCRs of RNAi-treated exconjugants, using one primer in the macronuclear sequence and the other primer inside the IESs. Each lane represents whole-cell PCR products taken at 2-h intervals from 6 to 22 h after induction of conjugation. The predicted PCR products correspond to pp1 to pp3 in panel A. Due to excision of smaller IESs during rearrangement, two bands are expected for each primer set. (C) SspI-digested total genomic Southern blots of RNAi-treated exautogamous cells probed with either a HincII-PstI fragment or IES4578, as indicated in panel A. Total DNA (∼10 μg) was isolated from an exautogamous cell culture when about 50% of control cells (RNAi using empty vector) had undergone the first cell division. Most IESs in the micronuclear version of the A-51 allele contain SspI sites (single arrow heads in panel A), while only one site is present in the macronuclear-destined sequence of the A-51 allele (the double arrow head in panel A). Thus, for probe HincII-PstI, 1.3- and 2.0-kb fragments are expected for unprocessed DNA, while a 5.7-kb fragment is expected for the processed DNA, including abundant old macronuclear DNA in exconjugants. Probe IES4578 contains only the IES sequence and detects 0.5-kb fragments if the IES is present at high levels in exautogamous cells.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Tetrahymena homologue (TtDIE5) is developmentally expressed. (A) Pairwise alignment of Paramecium Die5 protein from paralog a (PtDIE5a) and Tetrahymena Die5p sequences. The boxes around three amino acids indicate differences between the two Paramecium sequences (the differences are C, D, D, respectively). The underlined regions indicate potential nuclear localization signals in the Paramecium sequence. (B) Northern blot analysis of total RNA (20 μg per lane) extracted from growing (log), starved, or conjugating cells (between 2 and 25 h after mixing populations of compatible mating types). Ethidium bromide staining of rRNA was used as a loading control.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    TtDIE5 zygotic expression is essential to complete conjugation. (A) Diagram of the gene disruption construct showing replacement of the coding sequence with the neo3 selectable cassette (47). Restriction enzyme sites (BstBI) and the region corresponding to the radiolabeled probe fragment used for Southern blot analysis are indicated. WT, wild type; MTT1pr, metallothionein gene 1 promoter. (B) Southern blot hybridization of DNA isolated from the wild type (lane 1), DIE5 micronuclear-knockout lines (lanes 2 to 5), and the DIE5 complete knockout line (lane 6) using the probe shown in panel A. Longer exposure of the blot reveals the 3.5-kb band in DIE5 micronuclear-knockout samples corresponding to the two copies of DIE5 disrupted by the neo3 cassette in their micronuclei. (C) RT-PCR for expression of DIE5 transcripts in conjugating wild-type (wt) and DIE5 complete knockout (Δ) cells at indicated time points. The bottom panel shows control RT-PCR with HHP1 primers. Both DIE5 and HHP1 primers span an intron of their respective genes. g, Tetrahymena genomic DNA used as a control for amplification. (D) Fluorescent images of representative DAPI-stained wild-type (WT), micronuclear-knockout (ΔDIE5), and ΔPDD1 strains at 9 h, 14 h, and 33 h postmixing. For each mating strain, the percentage of cells exhibiting their respective arrest phenotype at 33 h is indicated on the right. Asterisks, arrows, and arrowheads indicate old/parental macronuclei, new macronuclei, and the micronuclei, respectively. (E) The nuclear envelope remains intact in arrested ΔDIE5 micronuclear-knockout cells (ΔDIE5). Postconjugative ΔDIE5mic cells were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde and stained with αNopp52 antibody and DAPI. New macronuclei and micronuclei are indicated as described for panel D.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Cellular localization of GFP-Die5p in conjugating Tetrahymena cells at 6 h, 8 h, and 12 h. The cells were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde and counterstained with DAPI. Asterisks, arrows, and arrowheads indicate old/parental macronuclei, new macronuclei, and the micronuclei, respectively.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Germ line TtDIE5 is required for Tetrahymena-programmed DNA rearrangement. Total genomic DNA was isolated from starved wild-type (WT) and DIE5 micronuclear-knockout strains (ΔDIE5), as well as from cells 16 h after crosses of DIE5 micronuclear knockouts to the wild type (WT × ΔDIE5) and two DIE5 micronuclear knockouts (ΔDIE5 × ΔDIE5). The DNA was used for PCR-based IES excision assays (A and B) or Southern blot analyses for chromosome breakage (C and D). (A) Schematic of PCR-based IES excision assay strategy. Arrows denote forward and reverse primers used to amplify across the M element. Alternative rearrangement products resulting from deletion of 0.6-kbp (Δ0.6) or 0.9-kbp (Δ0.9) are shown. (B) M-element excision PCR. Arrow indicates new IES excision. (C) Diagram shows the macronuclear chromosomal scaffold surrounding the LIA1 gene, which lies within 2.2 kbp of a chromosomal-breakage sequence (CBS) (white star). Relevant EcoRI (RI) restriction sites used for the Southern blot analysis are shown. The probe spans the central EcoRI site and detects a 7.8-kbp fragment common to both nuclei as well as to either the 10.5-kbp micronucleus-specific fragment or a 2.5- to 2.6-kbp macronucleus-specific fragment (2.2 kbp of unique sequence plus 300 to 400 bp of telomeric DNA). Tel, telomere. (D) Southern blot analysis to assess chromosome breakage. Arrow indicates the product of de novo breakage.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Germ line knockout of TtDIE5 does not inhibit critical events leading to IES excision. (A) H3K27me3 and H3K9me2 histone mark deposition is unaffected in TtDIE5 germ line knockouts. Nine-hour-conjugating wild type (WT) and micronuclear-knockout (ΔDIE5) cells were fixed with Schaudinn's fixative and stained with either H3K27me3 or H3K9me2 antibodies at 9 h into conjugation. The cells were counter stained with DAPI. (B) Formation of PDD1 foci is not disrupted in ΔDIE5mic cells. Conjugating wild-type and DIE5 micronuclear-knockout cells (ΔDIE5) expressing an inducible PDD1-YFP transgene were fixed at 14 h with 2% paraformaldehyde and counter stained with DAPI. Asterisks, arrows, and arrowheads indicate old/parental macronuclei, new macronuclei, and the micronuclei, respectively.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
The Conjugation-Specific Die5 Protein Is Required for Development of the Somatic Nucleus in both Paramecium and Tetrahymena
Atsushi Matsuda, Annie Wan-Yi Shieh, Douglas L. Chalker, James D. Forney
Eukaryotic Cell Jul 2010, 9 (7) 1087-1099; DOI: 10.1128/EC.00379-09

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Email

Thank you for sharing this Eukaryotic Cell article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Conjugation-Specific Die5 Protein Is Required for Development of the Somatic Nucleus in both Paramecium and Tetrahymena
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Eukaryotic Cell
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Eukaryotic Cell.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The Conjugation-Specific Die5 Protein Is Required for Development of the Somatic Nucleus in both Paramecium and Tetrahymena
Atsushi Matsuda, Annie Wan-Yi Shieh, Douglas L. Chalker, James D. Forney
Eukaryotic Cell Jul 2010, 9 (7) 1087-1099; DOI: 10.1128/EC.00379-09
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Conjugation, Genetic
Macronucleus
Paramecium
Protozoan Proteins
Tetrahymena

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About EC
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript to mSphere

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 1535-9778; Online ISSN: 1535-9786