Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About EC
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Eukaryotic Cell
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About EC
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
Articles

Phenotypic and Gene Expression Changes among Clonal Type I Strains of Toxoplasma gondii

Asis Khan, Michael S. Behnke, Ildiko R. Dunay, Michael W. White, L. David Sibley
Asis Khan
1Department of Molecular Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael S. Behnke
1Department of Molecular Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110
2Department of Veterinary Molecular Biology, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ildiko R. Dunay
1Department of Molecular Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael W. White
2Department of Veterinary Molecular Biology, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717
3Departments of Molecular Medicine and Global Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33612
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. David Sibley
1Department of Molecular Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sibley@borcim.wustl.edu
DOI: 10.1128/EC.00150-09
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    Schematic representation of propagation history of RH since it was isolated in 1939 (40). RH-JSR was maintained in mice since primary isolation, adapted for in vitro culture in 1988, and then cryopreserved. The RH strain was cloned by E. Pfefferkorn, Dartmouth Medical School, in 1977 to generate RH-ERP77 (36), which has been cryopreserved since. RH-ERP88 was propagated continuously until 1988 and then cryopreserved, whereas RH-ERP2009 was maintained by continuous passage in vitro.

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    Plaque formation assay using different type I strains. (A) Example of plaques formed by RH-ERP2009 and GT1 when grown on HFF monolayers in six-well plates. On the left is a low-magnification image of one entire well. Scale bar, 1 cm. The image on the right was obtained by microscopic examination and shows a single plaque formed by GT1. Scale bar, 0.2 mm. (B) Quantification of the area of plaques developed by RH-ERP2009 and other type I strains. Plaques developed by RH-ERP77, RH-ERP88, and RH-ERP2009 were significantly (P ≤ 0.005) larger than other type I strains including from RH-JSR. Values are means ± the SEM (n = three separate experiments, 50 plaques/experiment) for RH-ERP77, RH-ERP88, RH-ERP2009, GT1, and GT1-LP, and means ± the standard deviation (SD) for each of two experiments, for remaining isolates.

  • FIG. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 3.

    Comparison of intracellular growth and extracellular survival between strains of T. gondii. (A) Comparison of intracellular growth rate between RH-ERP2009 and GT1. Monolayers of HFF cells were infected with parasites, grown for 30 h, fixed, and stained with MAb DG52 to detect surface antigen SAG1. The average numbers of parasites present per vacuole was determined by microscopic examination and counting of 50 vacuoles/coverslip. GT1 contained significantly more vacuoles with 16 parasites/vacuole (*, P ≤ 0.05), while the number of vacuoles with 32 parasites was significantly higher in RH-ERP (**, P ≤ 0.005). Values indicate means ± the SEM (n = three separate experiments with three coverslips each). (B) Comparison of extracellular survival between RH-ERP2009, RH-JSR, and both low- and high-passage GT1. The number of tachyzoites surviving after natural egress was determined by incubation of parasites for at 37°C with CO2 in complete medium and subsequent plaque assay. The viability of RH-ERP2009 was higher at the outset and viability dropped by 50% over the next 24 h (**, P ≤ 0.005, comparison of 2 h versus 24 h). The initial viability of GT1 was significantly lower at 0 h after egress (**, P ≤ 0.005), and this dropped further to almost negligible levels by 12 h after egress (**, P ≤ 0.005, comparison of 2 h versus 12 h). There was also a significant difference in the viability of low passaged GT1-LP and RH-JSR isolates versus GT1 even at early time points (*, P < 0.05). Values are means ± the SEM (n = three experiments).

  • FIG. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 4.

    Differentiation of tissue cysts after in vitro culture. Parasites were induced to differentiate by high-pH culture for 7 days (“Induced”), and cyst development was detected by staining with fluoresceinated lectin DBL (green), followed by MAb to the parasite surface protein SAG1 conjugated to Alexa 594 (red). GT1 readily formed cysts under these conditions, whereas RH-ERP2009 did not. Neither strain converted to tissue cysts under normal growth conditions used for the plaque assay (“Normal”). All pictures shown were recorded under similar optical conditions, imaged with the same exposure time, and processed identically. Scale bars: 15 μm in the top panel and 40 μm in the remaining panels.

  • FIG. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 5.

    Acute virulence of RH-ERP2009 and GT1 strains as monitored by infection in outbred mice. (A) All animals inoculated with RH-ERP2009 died within 12 days, regardless of dose. (B) Animals injected with 4 or 40 tachyzoites of GT1 also died rapidly. Most of mice injected with 0.4 GT1 tachyzoites survived; however, surviving mice were not infected, as shown by a negative serological response in Western blot (*). The results shown are the combination of two experiments with five mice per group each. Inocula have been adjusted for viability based on efficiency of plaque formation (see Materials and Methods).

  • FIG. 6.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 6.

    Global gene expression differences between GT1, RH-ERP2009, and RH-JSR. After hybridization to T. gondii Affymetrix microarrays, two independent methods were used to identify genes with significant expression differences, and the combined set is shown here graphically. The color bar at the far right applies to both the heat map (A) and graph (B), where orange/red represents increased expression, and blue indicates decreased expression relative to RH-ERP2009. (A) Heat map of 113 differentially expressed genes, including 72 that showed greater expression in GT1 and RH-JSR and 41 that showed greater expression in RH-ERP2009. (B) Graphic display of the differences in gene expression of 113 genes that showed similar expression in RH-JSR and GT1 but that were upregulated (red) or downregulated (blue) in RH-ERP2009.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
  • TABLE 1.

    Genotypes of T. gondii strains used in this study

    Embedded Image
    • a ATCC, American Type Culture Collection.

    • b OH, Ohio; MD, Maryland; CA, California.

    • c As defined previously (17).

    • d The same genotype was obtained for RH-ERP77 and RH-ERP2009.

    • e CT, congenital toxoplasmosis.

  • TABLE 2.

    Comparison of gene expression levels by qRT-PCRa

    ToxoDB IDbCommon nameFold difference determined by microarrayFold difference determined by qRT-PCRc
    ActinGAPDH
    RH-JSRGT1RH-JSRGT1RH-JSRGT1
    540.m00325Hypothetical protein3.59561.5940.28146.2000.41387.426
    49.m03125Multidrug resistance protein, putative/ABC transporter0.2430.3750.0140.1880.0320.355
    50.m03178ABC transporter0.2840.2080.0020.1300.0040.246
    31.m00887ABC1 domain-containing protein0.3030.2230.00010.0760.00030.145
    80.m02212ABC2 membrane0.3750.0550.0140.0960.0320.182
    583.m09210Hypothetical protein0.1620.0750.0120.1240.0280.235
    83.m02139Hypothetical protein0.3590.0460.0070.0470.0160.088
    • ↵ a Fold differences are determined compared to RH-ERP2009.

    • ↵ b That is, the ToxoDB annotation 3 accession number.

    • ↵ c Actin and GAPDH are normalization controls.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental material

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental file 1 - Supplemental Table S1, listing gene expression differences.
      Zipped PDF file, 63K.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Phenotypic and Gene Expression Changes among Clonal Type I Strains of Toxoplasma gondii
Asis Khan, Michael S. Behnke, Ildiko R. Dunay, Michael W. White, L. David Sibley
Eukaryotic Cell Dec 2009, 8 (12) 1828-1836; DOI: 10.1128/EC.00150-09

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Email

Thank you for sharing this Eukaryotic Cell article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Phenotypic and Gene Expression Changes among Clonal Type I Strains of Toxoplasma gondii
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Eukaryotic Cell
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Eukaryotic Cell.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Phenotypic and Gene Expression Changes among Clonal Type I Strains of Toxoplasma gondii
Asis Khan, Michael S. Behnke, Ildiko R. Dunay, Michael W. White, L. David Sibley
Eukaryotic Cell Dec 2009, 8 (12) 1828-1836; DOI: 10.1128/EC.00150-09
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Gene Expression Regulation
Toxoplasma

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About EC
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript to mSphere

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 1535-9778; Online ISSN: 1535-9786