Neurofibromin Homologs Ira1 and Ira2 Affect Glycerophosphoinositol Production and Transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Identification of IRA genes as affecting GroPIns metabolism.

To identify genes involved in the metabolic process by which GroPIns is used as a phosphate source, we screened the MATα viable yeast knockout collection (Research Genetics) for strains displaying compromised growth when GroPIns rather than low P_i was supplied as the phosphate source. Synthetic complete medium, high-P_i (10 mM KH₂PO₄) medium, low-P_i (0.2 mM KH₂PO₄) medium, and GroPIns+ (70 μM) medium were made as described previously (2). Mutants were transferred by hand pinner from a master plate to a 96-well plate containing low-P_i medium and allowed to grow at 30°C for 3 days. From low-P_i medium, cell inocula were transferred to plates containing GroPIns+ medium. Growth was monitored at 595 nm after 4 days of incubation at 30°C. The ratio of absorbance in low-P_i medium to absorbance in GroPIns+ medium was determined. This screening was performed twice. Mutants with a value of 3 or greater for the ratio of absorbance in low-P_i medium to absorbance in GroPIns+ medium were subjected to a second screening by the monitoring of their growth in test tubes. As expected, the GIT1 gene was required for growth, and no other mutant displayed a complete growth abatement phenotype (Fig. 1). In particular, we did not identify a gene likely to encode a glycerophosphodiesterase responsible for GroPIns catabolism. A likely explanation for this result is that multiple gene products are involved in the mechanism(s) by which GroPIns enters cellular metabolism. However, a number of strains exhibited a slow-growth phenotype, one of which was the ira2Δ mutant (Fig. 1A). To confirm the validity of this result, we analyzed growth on GroPIns in strains of the unrelated Σ1278b background (gifts from M. Cardenas, Duke University), and found that not only the ira2Δ mutant but also the ira1Δ mutant and the ira1Δ ira2Δ double mutant (Table 1) exhibited greatly reduced growth on GroPIns (Fig. 1B). The ira1Δ mutant was not present in the deletion set screened initially.

• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

FIG. 1.

Ira1 and Ira2 are required for optimal growth of cells using GroPIns as a phosphate source. Strains in the BY4742 (A) or Σ1278b (B) background were grown overnight in low-P_i medium. Cells were transferred to low-P_i or GroPIns+ medium (A₆₀₀ = 0.005). Absorbance was recorded after 48 h of growth at 30°C. Wild-type cells transformed with empty vector pRS415 (vector) or plasmid pPHY453, containing the hyperactive RAS2 allele RAS2-V19 (RAS2^V19), were also assayed (A). Readings are means ± standard errors of the means of results of at least two independent experiments.

To probe the role of the RAS/cAMP in GroPIns metabolism, we analyzed other strains bearing alterations in the pathway. Interestingly, a pde2Δ mutant that, like the ira2Δ mutant, exhibits increased cAMP levels (15) was not defective for growth on GroPIns. Similarly, a strain bearing a plasmid-borne hyperactive allele of RAS2, RAS2-V19 (a gift from P. Herman, Ohio State University) (9, 10, 22), was not defective for growth on GroPIns (Fig. 1A). Thus, upregulation of the RAS/cAMP pathway may not be the primary reason for the growth defect seen in the absence of Ira1 or Ira2. Not surprisingly, ras1Δ and ras2Δ mutants, expected to downregulate the RAS/cAMP pathway, were not defective for growth on GroPIns (data not shown).

A trivial explanation for the inability of strains bearing mutations in the IRA genes to utilize GroPIns as a phosphate source is that the cells are less robust than wild-type cells and die before they are able to induce the metabolism required to utilize GroPIns. To test this, we compared the survival of the wild type and an ira1Δ ira2Δ mutant upon phosphate starvation and found no difference between the two strains (data not shown).

An ira1Δ ira2Δ mutant exhibits altered GroPIns transport activity.

To determine the cause of the defect in GroPIns utilization that occurs upon deletion of IRA1 or IRA2, we measured GroPIns transport activity (1) under low-P_i conditions. In cells harboring single-deletion mutations, GroPIns transport was similar to that of the wild-type strain or only slightly reduced (Fig. 2A). However, the simultaneous deletion of IRA1 and IRA2 resulted in a clear reduction in activity. These results do not explain the growth defects seen in the single-deletion mutants, but they do indicate a role for Ira1 or Ira2 in regulating Git1. A complete understanding of the nature of the regulation of GroPIns transport by Ira1 or Ira2 will be the focus of future studies.

• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

FIG. 2.

Ira1 and Ira2 affect GroPIns transport activity and GroPIns production. (A) Cells grown to log phase in low-P_i medium were assayed for GroPIns transport activity. Data represent means ± standard errors of the means of results of two independent experiments performed in duplicate. (B) Cells prelabeled with [³H]inositol were reinoculated into fresh high-P_i medium, and the amount of extracellular GroPIns was determined following 22 h of growth. Data are means ± standard errors of the means of results of at least three independent experiments and are reported as the percentage of total [³H]inositol label found as extracellular GroPIns normalized for culture density.

Deletion of IRA1 or IRA2 increases the extracellular accumulation of GroPIns.

We next monitored the effect of Ira1 or Ira2 upon extracellular production of GroPIns via PI deacylation. Cells were grown overnight in medium containing 3 μCi/ml of [2-³H]inositol. Cells were harvested, washed, and reinoculated to an A₆₀₀ of 0.2 in high-P_i medium, the condition under which extracellular GroPIns accumulates (17). At various times, aliquots of the cultures were centrifuged, and the inositol compounds in the supernatant were separated (16). The ira1Δ, ira2Δ, and ira1Δ ira2Δ mutants accumulated roughly twice as much extracellular GroPIns as the wild-type strain (Fig. 2B) upon entrance to stationary phase. The lack of an additive effect upon GroPIns formation in the double mutant compared to formation in the single mutants may be explained by substrate availability. In other words, there may be a limited amount of plasma membrane-associated PI available for PLB-mediated turnover. Whereas an ira1Δ ira2Δ double mutant exhibits an increase in PLB1 and PLB3 transcript levels as measured by real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (data not shown), no such increase was detectable in the ira1Δ or ira2Δ mutant. Thus, Ira1 or Ira2 regulation of the PLB activity leading to GroPIns formation likely occurs at multiple levels and will be the focus of future studies. Another explanation is that yet another, uncharacterized, phospholipase exists for the formation of GroPIns in the absence of Ira1 or Ira2. Importantly, GroPIns transport does not occur under the growth conditions of the experiment (high P_i), so diminished transport cannot explain the increased accumulation of GroPIns in the absence of Ira1 or Ira2.

In summary, this study indicates a role for Ira1 and Ira2 in regulation of both the production of extracellular GroPIns and its transport into the cell. In addition, we show that Ira1 and Ira2 are required for the utilization of GroPIns as a phosphate source under conditions in which transport of GroPIns into the cell is normal. However, we were unable to show a linkage between hyperactivation of the RAS/cAMP pathway, which occurs upon deletion of IRA1 or IRA2, and the growth phenotype. Future studies will focus on determining the mechanism(s) for the growth disturbance, including whether it involves the RAS/cAMP pathway or other, less defined functions of Ira and Ira2. Growth is a multifactorial process, and a combination of disturbances, some involving heightened signaling through the RAS/cAMP pathway and some not, may contribute to alterations in the cell's ability to utilize GroPIns as a phosphate source. Ira1 and Ira2 are large proteins, each over 3,000 amino acids. The RAS GAP-related domain of each protein is contained within a few hundred amino acids, and C-terminal regions of approximately 200 amino acids bind to Gpb1 or Gpb2 and are important for protein stability (8). In addition, yeast Ira1 and Ira2 proteins and the human neurofibromin type 1 protein all contain bipartite phospholipid binding modules consisting of a Sec14 homologous segment and a pleckstrin homology-like domain (6). Both in vitro phospholipid binding and lipid exchange activity have been documented for neurofibromin (24), suggesting that Ira1 and Ira2 may have similar activities. Indeed, Ira1 appears to play a membrane-anchoring role for adenylate cyclase in addition to its role as a RAS GAP (14). It is tempting to speculate that Ira1 or Ira2 might also play a role in the membrane association or activation of an enzyme or enzymes responsible for the metabolism of internalized GroPIns. A test of that hypothesis awaits the identification of the gene products involved in the process by which GroPIns enters cellular metabolism.