Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About EC
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Eukaryotic Cell
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About EC
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
Articles

Glycogen Phosphorylase in Acanthamoeba spp.: Determining the Role of the Enzyme during the Encystment Process Using RNA Interference

Jacob Lorenzo-Morales, Jarmila Kliescikova, Enrique Martinez-Carretero, Luis Miguel De Pablos, Bronislava Profotova, Eva Nohynkova, Antonio Osuna, Basilio Valladares
Jacob Lorenzo-Morales
1University Institute of Tropical Diseases and Public Health of the Canary Islands, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jarmila Kliescikova
2Department of Tropical Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Enrique Martinez-Carretero
1University Institute of Tropical Diseases and Public Health of the Canary Islands, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luis Miguel De Pablos
3Institute of Biotechnology, Department of Parasitology, University of Granada, Campus de Fuentenueva 18071, Granada, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bronislava Profotova
2Department of Tropical Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eva Nohynkova
2Department of Tropical Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Antonio Osuna
3Institute of Biotechnology, Department of Parasitology, University of Granada, Campus de Fuentenueva 18071, Granada, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Basilio Valladares
1University Institute of Tropical Diseases and Public Health of the Canary Islands, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: bvallada@ull.es
DOI: 10.1128/EC.00316-07
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    Results from agarose gel electrophoresis showing PCR amplifications with the AGP primer pair. Lanes: 1, 100-bp DNA ladder; 2, A. astronyxis; 3, SWT-22; 4, MN-7; 5, A. castellanii Neff; 6, empty; 7, negative control.

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    Analyses of glycogen phosphorylase expression during encystation. (a and b) Northern blot analysis of glycogen phosphorylase expression during encystation in siRNA-treated (b) and control (a) cultures of Acanthamoeba. Total RNA extracted at different time points during encystation was electrophoresed at 80 V, blotted onto a nylon membrane, and probed with cDNA for glycogen phosphorylase. Top lanes, total RNA hybridized with cDNA corresponding to the catalytic domain of Acanthamoeba glycogen phosphorylase. Bottom lanes, hybridization with 18S mRNA as a control. Numbers indicate the hours after the induction of encystation. (c and d) Western blot analysis of glycogen phosphorylase during encystation in siRNA-treated (d) and control (c) cultures of Acanthamoeba. Protein extracts from different time points during encystation were incubated with polyclonal anti-human glycogen phosphorylase (BB) rabbit antibody, and results were developed with digoxigenin. Numbers indicate the hours after the induction of encystation. (e) Analysis of glycogen phosphorylase activity during encystation of Acanthamoeba. Proteins were isolated in time course experiments and separated by nondenaturing PAGE on a gel containing glycogen. Zymograms were developed by iodine staining of polyglucan synthesized from glucose-1-phosphate. Numbers indicate the hours after the induction of encystation. Lane C, positive control with glycogen phosphorylase b from rabbit muscle.

  • FIG. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 3.

    Distribution of trophozoites, immature precysts, and mature cysts during the course of encystment in the presence (a) or absence (b) of glycogen phosphorylase siRNA. The cell distribution (percentages of different cell types at different time points after the induction of encystation) was determined by counting cells viewed under an inverse microscope. The minimum number of cells counted per time point was 130; the maximum number of cells counted per time point was 600. All experiments were repeated five times. Black columns, trophozoites; gray columns, immature precysts; white columns, mature cysts.

  • FIG. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 4.

    Morphology of the living acanthamoebae at different time points after the induction of encystation. (a to d) Control culture. (a) Twelve hours after the induction of encystation, the trophozoites are detaching from the flask and starting to round up. (b) Twenty-four hours after the induction of encystation, immature cysts with a single-layered cyst wall are present; the first mature cysts with both layers of the cyst wall are also shown. (c and d) From 48 to 72 h after the induction of encystation, the number of mature cysts with both walls gradually increases, and at 72 h, the population of acanthamoebae consists mainly of mature cysts. (e to h) siRNA-treated cultures. (e) Twelve hours after the induction of encystation, trophozoites are starting to round up, similar to those in the control culture. (f) Twenty-four hours after the induction of encystation, single-layered “pseudocysts” are observed as a main cell type. (g) No mature cysts are observed 48 h after the induction of encystation. The main cell type present is the single-layered immature cyst. (h) Immature cysts represent approximately 70% of the cell population; the first mature cysts are also observed. T, trophozoite; PC, immature precyst; C, mature cyst. Scale bar, 10 μm.

  • FIG. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 5.

    Phases of cyst wall formation as detected by calcofluor staining. (a) The rounded trophozoite with cellulose patches on the cell surface appears approximately 12 h after the induction of encystation. (b) Immature precyst with a continuous cell wall containing cellulose (approximately 24 h after the induction of encystation). A single layer of the cell wall is indicated by arrows. (c) Two mature cysts with both layers of the cell wall: a wrinkled exocyst (arrows) and an endocyst (arrowheads) containing a larger amount of cellulose than the exocyst.

  • FIG. 6.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 6.

    Cyst types characteristic of stages of Acanthamoeba encystment in the presence or absence of siRNA for glycogen phosphorylase. (a and b) siRNA-treated culture after 24 h (a) or 48 h (b) of encystment. (c and d) Untreated control culture after 24 h (c) or 48 h (d) of encystment. The single-layered immature precysts represented the main cell type in the siRNA-treated cultures at both time points, whereas in the untreated cultures, the mature cysts with both cyst wall layers were already present after 24 h and prevailed after 48 h of encystment. Scale bar, 10 μm.

  • FIG. 7.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 7.

    Phases of cyst wall formation as detected by scanning electron microscopy. (a) The rounded trophozoite with cellulose patches on the cell surface appears approximately 12 h after the induction of encystation. (b) Immature precyst with a continuous cell wall (approximately 24 h after the induction of encystation). A single layer of the cell wall is indicated by arrows. (c) Three mature cysts. The wrinkled exocyst is clearly recognizable. (d) RNAi-treated acanthamoebae were not able to form a mature cyst. Mag, magnification; 12.00 K X, ×12,000.

  • FIG. 8.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 8.

    Sensitivity to 0.5% SDS of 72-h-old cyst stages formed in siRNA-treated and untreated cultures. (a) The mature cyst from the control cultures shows no affected morphology after a 5-min exposure to SDS. Scale bar, 10 μm. (b) The immature precyst from the siRNA-treated culture is undergoing lysis after a 3-min treatment with SDS. (c) The empty single-layered cyst wall shelter is a residuum of the SDS-treated precyst.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Glycogen Phosphorylase in Acanthamoeba spp.: Determining the Role of the Enzyme during the Encystment Process Using RNA Interference
Jacob Lorenzo-Morales, Jarmila Kliescikova, Enrique Martinez-Carretero, Luis Miguel De Pablos, Bronislava Profotova, Eva Nohynkova, Antonio Osuna, Basilio Valladares
Eukaryotic Cell Mar 2008, 7 (3) 509-517; DOI: 10.1128/EC.00316-07

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Email

Thank you for sharing this Eukaryotic Cell article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Glycogen Phosphorylase in Acanthamoeba spp.: Determining the Role of the Enzyme during the Encystment Process Using RNA Interference
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Eukaryotic Cell
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Eukaryotic Cell.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Glycogen Phosphorylase in Acanthamoeba spp.: Determining the Role of the Enzyme during the Encystment Process Using RNA Interference
Jacob Lorenzo-Morales, Jarmila Kliescikova, Enrique Martinez-Carretero, Luis Miguel De Pablos, Bronislava Profotova, Eva Nohynkova, Antonio Osuna, Basilio Valladares
Eukaryotic Cell Mar 2008, 7 (3) 509-517; DOI: 10.1128/EC.00316-07
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Acanthamoeba
Cell Wall
Glycogen Phosphorylase
Protozoan Proteins

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About EC
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript to mSphere

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 1535-9778; Online ISSN: 1535-9786