Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About EC
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Eukaryotic Cell
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About EC
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
Articles

Target of Rapamycin and LST8 Proteins Associate with Membranes from the Endoplasmic Reticulum in the Unicellular Green Alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

Sandra Díaz-Troya, Francisco J. Florencio, José L. Crespo
Sandra Díaz-Troya
Instituto de Bioquímica Vegetal y Fotosíntesis, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas and Universidad de Sevilla, Centro de Investigaciones Científicas Isla de la Cartuja, 41092 Seville, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francisco J. Florencio
Instituto de Bioquímica Vegetal y Fotosíntesis, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas and Universidad de Sevilla, Centro de Investigaciones Científicas Isla de la Cartuja, 41092 Seville, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
José L. Crespo
Instituto de Bioquímica Vegetal y Fotosíntesis, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas and Universidad de Sevilla, Centro de Investigaciones Científicas Isla de la Cartuja, 41092 Seville, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: crespo@ibvf.csic.es
DOI: 10.1128/EC.00361-07
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The highly conserved target of rapamycin (TOR) kinase is a central controller of cell growth in all eukaryotes. TOR exists in two functionally and structurally distinct complexes, termed TOR complex 1 (TORC1) and TORC2. LST8 is a TOR-interacting protein that is present in both TORC1 and TORC2. Here we report the identification and characterization of TOR and LST8 in large protein complexes in the model photosynthetic green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. We demonstrate that Chlamydomonas LST8 is part of a rapamycin-sensitive TOR complex in this green alga. Biochemical fractionation and indirect immunofluorescence microscopy studies indicate that TOR and LST8 exist in high-molecular-mass complexes that associate with microsomal membranes and are particularly abundant in the peri-basal body region in Chlamydomonas cells. A Saccharomyces cerevisiae complementation assay demonstrates that Chlamydomonas LST8 is able to functionally and structurally replace endogenous yeast LST8 and allows us to propose that binding of LST8 to TOR is essential for cell growth.

The Ser/Thr kinase target of rapamycin (TOR) is a central regulator of cell growth and metabolism in all eukaryotes (recently reviewed by Wullschleger et al. [54]). Studies of TOR signaling in yeast and mammals have demonstrated that TOR controls cell growth in response to nutrients and different stresses (10, 54). The TOR kinases are large (about 270 kDa) proteins that assemble into two structurally and functionally distinct multisubunit complexes of 1.5 to 2.0 MDa termed TOR complex 1 (TORC1) and TORC2. The similar composition of TORCs in widely divergent kingdoms such as metazoans and fungi suggests that these complexes are broadly conserved across all eukaryotes. The two TORCs were initially identified in yeast (34, 52) and subsequently in mammals (18, 23, 26, 44). In yeast, TORC1 contains either TOR1 or TOR2, KOG1, TCO89, and LST8, whereas TORC2 includes TOR2 (but not TOR1), LST8, BIT61, AVO1, AVO2, and AVO3 (34, 41, 52). Mammalian TOR (mTOR) associates with raptor (homologue of yeast KOG1) and mLST8 to constitute mTORC1, while mTORC2 consists of mLST8, rictor (homologue of yeast AVO3), hSIN1 (homologue of yeast AVO1), and mTOR (15, 18, 22, 23, 27, 34, 44, 57). With the exception of the yeast proteins TCO89, BIT61, and AVO2, all TOR partners are essential for growth of yeast and mammalian cells (16, 34, 42).

Studies performed in yeast and mammalian cells demonstrate that TORC1 mediates the rapamycin-sensitive signaling branch that regulates translation, ribosome biogenesis, autophagy, and nitrogen and carbon degradative pathways (54). Some of these readouts are mediated via the AGC kinases S6K1 (mammals) and Sch9 (yeast), which are phosphorylated and thus activated by TORC1 (4, 21, 50). TORC2, on the other hand, is insensitive to rapamycin and controls actin cytoskeleton organization (23, 34, 44), presumably via its direct AGC kinase substrates Akt/PKB (mammals) and YPK1/2 (yeast) (24, 36, 45). Recently, it has been reported that TORC1 and TORC2 are multimeric supercomplexes in yeast, flies, and mammals, and oligomerization of TORCs has been proposed as an important mechanism for the regulation of TOR activity (49, 55, 58).

Several studies have investigated the cellular localization of mammalian and yeast TORCs by different techniques, including subcellular fractionation, indirect immunofluorescence (IF) microscopy, and immunoelectron microscopy. Albeit with significant discrepancies, these studies all agree that TORCs are primarily membrane associated. Yeast TORC1 has been reported to be associated to the plasma, vacuolar and endosomal membranes, and, more recently, TOR1 has been found to shuttle in and out of the nucleus (3, 5, 30, 32, 52). Localization of TOR in mammalian cells is also controversial since mTOR has been reported to be associated with mitochondrial, endoplasmic reticulum, and Golgi apparatus membranes, as well as in the nucleus (13, 14, 28). The functional significance of TORCs association with multiple membranes is at present unknown.

Despite the relevance of TOR signaling in eukaryotes, little is known about control of cell growth by TOR in photosynthetic organisms. TOR has been identified in Arabidopsis thaliana (35, 37) and in the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (9). Unlike other eukaryotes, plants are insensitive to rapamycin (37), likely due to the inability of plant FKBP12 to bind this drug and to form the active rapamycin-FKBP12 complex that potently inhibits TOR activity (56). In contrast to Arabidopsis, Chlamydomonas is sensitive to rapamycin because unlike plant FKBP12, Chlamydomonas FKBP12 is able to bind rapamycin in vivo and to interact, in complex with this drug, with the FKBP12-rapamycin binding (FRB) domain of TOR (9). Treatment of Chlamydomonas cells with rapamycin results in the induction of autophagy-like processes, indicating that CrTOR may control autophagy in photosynthetic organisms (9). Disruption of AtTOR results in premature arrest of endosperm and embryo development, indicating that AtTOR is essential for plant cell growth (37). Two raptor homologues have been identified in Arabidopsis, AtRaptor1 and AtRaptor2 (1, 2, 12, 35), although the essential role of these proteins for cell growth is controversial (2, 12). Direct interaction of AtRaptor1 with the HEAT repeats of AtTOR has been demonstrated (35), indicating that at least TORC1 might be conserved in plants. This model is strongly supported by the finding that AtRaptor1 is able to bind and modulate the activity of plant S6K1 homolog (35), a downstream target of mTORC1 (4). It remains to be determined whether LST8 and TORC2-specific members are functionally conserved in plants. Moreover, no studies regarding the cellular localization of TORCs have been reported in photosynthetic organisms.

The present study was undertaken to investigate the localization of TOR complexes in a photosynthetic cell, using Chlamydomonas as a model system. We identified the Chlamydomonas homologue of LST8, which we termed CrLST8. By biochemical fractionation and IF microscopy, we demonstrate that CrTOR and CrLST8 exist in high-molecular-mass complexes that associate with microsomal membranes and are abundant in the peri-basal body region. Pull-down experiments revealed that CrLST8 forms part of a rapamycin-sensitive TOR complex. We also provide evidence that CrLST8 is able to functionally and structurally complement the deficiency of LST8 in yeast. Finally, the identification of three residues that are critical for CrLST8 function and TOR binding led us to propose that binding of LST8 to TOR is essential for cell growth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains and growth conditions. Chlamydomonas reinhardtii wild-type strain 6C+ was obtained from the laboratory of J.-D. Rochaix (University of Geneva). Cells were grown as described by Harris (19) under continuous illumination at 25°C. If required, media (Tris-acetate phosphate medium and high-salt minimal medium) were solidified with 1.2% Bacto agar (Difco). Saccharomyces cerevisiae wild-type (TB50a) and lst8 mutant (RL57-2d) strains have been previously described (34). RL99-3c [TB50a tor2::kanMX4 (kanMX4)-GAL1p-LST8/pRS314TOR2(HA)3] strain was obtained from the laboratory of Robbie Loewith (University of Geneva). Cells were grown in rich (YPD) or synthetic (SD or SGal) media as described previously (46). Rapamycin was added to Chlamydomonas or yeast media to the indicated concentrations from a 1-mg/ml stock in 90% ethanol-10% Tween 20.

Cloning of Chlamydomonas LST8 cDNA.The full-length cDNA for Chlamydomonas LST8 was amplified by PCR from a Chlamydomonas cDNA library using the following primers: CrLST8-5′ (5′-ATGGCGTCCTCTAGCGTAGTAC-3′) and CrLST8-3′ (5′-TTAACCCGTCCACGTCGCGCCCC-3′). The amplified product was cloned into the pGEM-T vector (Promega) for sequencing analysis.

Antibody production.The anti-CrTOR antibody was raised against the FRB domain of CrTOR. A 282-bp DNA fragment encoding the entire FRB domain of CrTOR (residues 1961 to 2055) was obtained by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) using the primers FRB-BamHI (5′-CTGTGGCACGAGATGTGGCAC-3′) and FRB-XhoI (5′-TTACTGCTTGTTGATGCGCTT). TTA was added to the 5′ end of the reverse primer to create in-frame stop codon. The RT-PCR product was cloned into the pGEX-4T-1 plasmid (Amersham) and introduced into Escherichia coli DH5α. Expression of the glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion protein was induced by adding 1 mM IPTG (isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside) for 3 h at 37°C. The recombinant protein was further purified on glutathione-Sepharose 4B (Amersham), eluted by glutathione incubation, and resuspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) buffer. The purified recombinant protein was used to immunize two rabbits according to standard immunization protocols. A His6-CrLST8 fusion protein was generated by cloning the full-length cDNA of the CrLST8 gene into pQE81L (Qiagen). SalI sites were added to forward and reverse primers. The insoluble, His6-CrLST8 fusion protein was solubilized from inclusion bodies by incubation with 8 M urea, purified on a nickel column, and injected into two rabbits. CrTOR and CrLST8 antibodies were purified on a protein A-Sepharose column (Millipore).

Protein preparation and Western blotting. Chlamydomonas cells from liquid cultures in log phase were collected by centrifugation (3,000 × g, 5 min), washed once in 10 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.0), and resuspended in a minimal volume of the same solution supplemented with 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Cells were lysed by two cycles of slow freezing to −80°C, followed by thawing to room temperature. The soluble cell extract was separated from the insoluble fraction by centrifugation (15,700 × g, 15 min) at 4°C, and stored at −80°C until they were analyzed. Proteins were quantitated with the Coomassie blue dye binding method (Bio-Rad). Yeast extracts from logarithmically growing cells were prepared in lysis buffer (1× phosphate-buffered saline [PBS], 10% [wt/vol] glycerol, 0.5% Tween 20, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) by vortexing them 10 times for 30 s each time with glass beads. Crude extracts were cleared by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C.

For immunoblot analysis, proteins were fractionated on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and immunoblotted with the corresponding antibody: CrTOR, 1:1,000; CrLST8, 1:1,000; BiP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), 1:2,000; CrFKBP12 (9), 1:10,000; vacuolar ATPase (kindly provided by J. R. Perez-Castineira and D. K. Apps), 1:10,000; D1 (kindly provided by M Lindahl), 1:10,000; COXIIb (Agrisera), 1:10,000; and FOX1 (Agrisera), 1:10,000. The ECL Plus immunoblotting system (GE Healthcare) was used to detect these proteins with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibodies.

Gel filtration and fractionation.Total soluble extract (SE) from 5 × 108 cells was prepared as indicated above by two cycles of freezing and thawing. Three milligrams of protein (in 200 μl) was loaded onto a Superose 6 HR 10/30 column (Amersham). The flow rate was adjusted to 0.5 ml/min, and 0.5-ml fractions were collected. Elution profiles of CrTOR and CrLST8 were analyzed by Western blotting and compared to the elution profile of known standards (Bio-Rad). For fractionation assays, whole-cell extract was prepared from 109 wild-type cells as described above. Microsomal fraction was obtained by centrifuging soluble cell extract in a 80-Ti rotor in a Beckman Coulter ultracentrifuge at 120,000 × g for 2 h at 4°C. The total SE was removed and held on ice, and the pellet (P) was resuspended in an adequate volume of cold lysis buffer. For sedimentation analysis, 600 μl of microsomal fraction was loaded onto a 12-ml linear 16 to 55% (wt/wt) sucrose gradient made in lysis buffer and centrifuged in a Beckman Coulter ultracentrifuge at 100,000 × g for 16 h at 4°C. Then, 1-ml fractions were collected from the top of the gradient and processed for Western blot analysis.

Cross-linking and pull-downs.GST-CrFKBP12 recombinant protein was obtained and purified from E. coli as described previously (9) and incubated with 4 μM rapamycin or drug vehicle (90% ethanol-10% Tween 20) for 30 min on ice. GST-CrFKBP12 prebound to rapamycin was added to Chlamydomonas total extracts with or without 2 mM DTSSP (Pierce) and incubated for 2 h on ice. Cross-linking reactions were quenched by adding Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) to a final concentration of 100 mM, followed by an additional 30 min of incubation. Fusion protein complexes were immobilized on glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads. After 4 h of incubation at 4°C on a rotary incubator, beads were washed four times with lysis buffer, resuspended in 30 μl of SDS gel-loading buffer, and resolved by SDS-PAGE. To study the interaction of CrLST8 and CrTOR proteins, a cDNA fragment containing the kinase domain (residues 2042 to 2373) of Chlamydomonas TOR was obtained by RT-PCR using the primers kinase-5′ (5′-TGGGACCTGTACTACCACGTC-3′) and kinase-3′ (5′-GAGCAGGCGCCAGTTGATGAG-3′). The PCR product was cloned into the pMAL expression vector (New England Biolabs) for expression in bacteria as maltose-binding protein (MBP) fusion. For pull-down assay, 10 μg of the purified fusion protein retained on amylose resin were incubated with 0.5 mg of Chlamydomonas protein extracts in 0.4 ml of PBS. After 4 h of incubation at 4°C on a rotary incubator, beads were washed four times with the same buffer, resuspended in 30 μl of SDS gel-loading buffer, and resolved by SDS-PAGE.

Immunoprecipitation.For immunoprecipitation, yeast extracts from cells expressing hemagglutinin (HA)-TOR2 were prepared as indicated above. A total of 20 μl of monoclonal anti-HA immobilized on agarose (Sigma) was added to the extracts, and the tubes were rotated for 3 h at 4°C. Beads were collected by centrifugation, washed three times with 1 ml of lysis buffer, and resuspended in 2× SDS-PAGE sample buffer for electrophoresis. After SDS-PAGE, proteins were electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membranes and immunoblotted with monoclonal anti-HA antibody (Sigma). Proteins were detected with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibody and ECL Plus reagents (GE Healthcare).

Yeast complementation.For expression of CrLST8 in yeast cells, the cDNA of the CrLST8 gene was cloned into the SmaI site of the p425GPD vector under control of the constitutive glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GPD) promoter (39). Wild-type and lst8 strains were transformed with empty vector or the p425GPD-CrLST8 plasmid. For depletion of endogenous pGAL1-driven LST8, cells were grown in SD medium for 15 h. Cultures were normalized and subjected to 10-fold serial dilutions, and spotted onto SD or SGal-Leu plates. Cells were incubated at 30°C for 3 days.

Fluorescence microscopy.Wild-type Chlamydomonas cells were fixed and stained for IF microscopy by the alternate protocol of Cole et al. (7). The primary antibodies used were rabbit polyclonal anti-CrTOR, rabbit polyclonal anti-CrLST8, and a mouse monoclonal anti-acetylated tubulin (Sigma). For signal detection, a fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled goat anti-rabbit (FITC) and a Texas Red-labeled goat anti-mouse antibody were used. Preparations were photographed on a DM6000 microscope (Leica) with a DFC350FX camera (Leica) and processed with the LasAF software package (Leica).

RNA isolation and Northern blot analysis. Chlamydomonas total RNA was isolated as previously described (9). For the analysis of yeast genes, yeast cells growing exponentially in SGal medium were shifted to glucose medium for 15 h. Yeast RNA preparation and Northern blot analysis were performed as reported (8). DNA probes were obtained by PCR using the primers 5′-TCGAAGGTCGTTGGTGATCTG-3′ and 5′-TCATGCCTTAGTTTCAACAGGAAC-3′ (PYC1), 5′-ATGGTGCTTAGTGATTC-3′ and 5′-ATGTTGTGGGTGAGATTG-3′ (DAL80), and 5′-TTGGAGAGGGCAACTTTGG-3′ and 5′-CAGGATCGGTCGATTGTGC-3′ (25S rDNA).

RESULTS

TOR-interacting proteins in Chlamydomonas: identification of CrLST8.A survey of the Chlamydomonas draft nuclear genome for orthologs to the conserved TOR partner proteins raptor/KOG1, LST8, hSIN1/AVO1, and rictor/AVO3 revealed the presence of genes encoding at least one LST8 homologue and one raptor/KOG1 homologue. TBLASTN analysis using yeast or mammalian LST8 as the query identified a gene product on scaffold 59 of the version 3.0 draft genome sequence (http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Chlre3/Chlre3.home.html ). It has been reported that the nuclear genome of Arabidopsis thaliana contains two putative LST8 genes (54). However, we have been able to identify only a single gene with significant homology to yeast or plant LST8s on the available Chlamydomonas genome database. Single LST8 homologues were also identified in Oriza sativa and the marine green alga Ostreococcus lucimarinus (Fig. 1C). The analysis of the putative CrLST8 gene revealed that this gene spans about 3 kb of genomic DNA and consists of six exons and five introns. The complete CrLST8 cDNA was cloned by PCR from a Chlamydomonas cDNA library (see Materials and Methods). The CrLST8 gene encodes 315 amino acids with a predicted molecular mass of 35 kDa. An evolutionary study of CrLST8 evidenced that this protein is clustered with plant LST8s (Fig. 1C), being 65 and 54% identical to AtLST8.1 and AtLST8.2, respectively, and 52% identical to yeast LST8. The CrLST8 protein is composed entirely of seven WD-40 repeats (Fig. 1A) and, based on a modeling study of the protein (Fig. 1B), the predicted structure of CrLST8 is very similar to the beta-propeller fold of WD-repeat proteins (48). We have also identified a putative homologue to raptor/KOG1 on scaffold 64 of the Chlamydomonas nuclear genome, although the DNA sequence of this gene is still incomplete, and the available sequence only covers ca. 35% of the gene.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

(A) Amino acid sequence and alignment of the seven WD-40 repeats in CrLST8. Residues that meet the criteria for a consensus WD repeat (48) are highlighted in gray. Each WD repeat consists of four β-strands, indicated by arrows A, B, C, and D. Critical residues for CrLST8 function identified in our screen are typed in red. Mutations identified in yeast and mammalian LST8 are typed in green and yellow, respectively. Mutations that were originally isolated in yeast LST8 (33, 42) and subsequently reproduced in mLST8 (27) are typed in blue. (B) Modeling analysis of CrLST8. The model was created by Swiss-Model (17), based on the homology of CrLST8 and the C-terminal WD-40 domain of TUP1 and LIS1/ALFA2. The image was prepared by using MOLMOL software. Red dots indicate the location of D106G, T228A, and S230N mutations. (C) Neighbor-joining tree of LST8s. The bootstrap values represent 1,000 replications. Genes used in the phylogenetic analysis of LST8s are as follows: C. reinhardtii, gwH.54.116.1 (ChlamyDB locus name); A. thaliana LST8.1, At3g18140 (TIGR locus name); A. thaliana LST8.2, At2g22040 (TIGR locus name); O. lucimarinus, eugene.0600010187 (JGI locus name); O. sativa, Os03g47780 (TIGR locus name); S. cerevisiae, LST8; S. pombe, Wat1/Pop3; D. melanogaster, CG3004 (FlyBase gene name); and H. sapiens, mLST8.

CrTOR localizes in high-molecular-mass complexes.The presence of TOR kinases in high-molecular-mass complexes has been reported in yeast and mammalian cells. To investigate whether TOR may localize in large complexes in a photosynthetic organism, we examined the elution profile of CrTOR by gel filtration chromatography using a specific antibody generated against the FRB domain of CrTOR (see Materials and Methods). Western blots of whole-cell protein demonstrated that the anti-CrTOR antibody recognizes a protein of about 270 kDa (Fig. 2A), a finding in agreement with the predicted molecular mass of CrTOR (9). Gel filtration chromatography assays revealed that CrTOR has an apparent molecular mass of approximately 2 MDa (Fig. 2B), indicating that CrTOR is in large complexes. Moreover, the absence of a CrTOR signal in fractions of lower size strongly suggests that almost the entire amount of CrTOR present in the total SE is forming part of these high-molecular-mass complexes. To estimate the percentage of CrTOR present in the SE from the total amount of CrTOR in the cell, we treated the insoluble fraction resulting after cell disruption with a high concentration of salt and/or a nonionic detergent and examined the presence of CrTOR in the released material. Our results indicated that most CrTOR was extracted in the initial soluble fraction, whereas no signal was detected in the cellular debris (Fig. 2C).

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Localization of CrTOR and CrLST8 in large, membrane-associated complexes. (A) Whole-cell extracts were made from wild-type cells and probed with CrTOR and CrLST8 antibodies or preimmune antisera (pre). Arrows indicate single bands at the predicted molecular masses of ∼280 and ∼35 kDa recognized by CrTOR and CrLST8 antibodies, respectively. (B) Gel filtration elution profiles of CrTOR and CrLST8. Whole-cell lysates prepared from wild-type cells were loaded onto a Superose 6 sizing column. Fractions (0.5 ml) were collected and processed for immunodetection of CrTOR and CrLST8. The elution patterns of known molecular mass standards are indicated. (C) Fraction of CrTOR present in an SE versus total CrTOR in the cell. SE was prepared as described in Materials and Methods by freezing and thawing cells. Intact cells were removed from the cellular debris pellet by centrifugation at 400 × g for 1 min. The remaining insoluble membranous fraction was washed three times with PBS buffer and then treated or not (control) with salt and/or a nonionic detergent for 30 min on ice. The amount of CrTOR present in the SE, in the solubilized material, and in the remaining pellet (P) from the untreated control sample was monitored by Western blotting. (D) A portion of CrTOR and CrLST8 associate with microsomes. Biochemical fractionation of Chlamydomonas cell extracts was performed as described in Materials and Methods. Total SE was subjected to ultracentrifugation to separate soluble proteins that remain in the supernatant (S) from proteins that associate with the pelleted, membranous fraction (P). SEs were treated or not (control) with agents that disrupt membranes and membrane-protein interactions for 1 h at 4°C prior to ultracentrifugation. The presence of CrTOR, CrLST8, CrFKBP12, COXIIb, FOX1, the ER marker protein BiP, a vacuolar membrane ATPase (vATPase), and the chloroplast membrane protein D1 in these fractions was examined by Western blotting. D1 and COXIIb localization were also analyzed in the insoluble membrane fraction (M) that results after cell lysis. The asterisk indicates a presumed degradation product of CrLST8. (E) Sucrose density gradient profiles of CrTOR, CrLST8, BiP, vATPase, and FOX1. The microsomal fraction was fractionated on a 12-ml, 16 to 55% sucrose gradient. Fractions (1 ml) were collected from the top of the gradient and processed for Western blot analysis.

TOR has been reported to be partially associated with internal membranes such as the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), Golgi, or plasma membranes in yeasts and mammals (14, 30, 52). To examine whether CrTOR associates with membranes, we performed biochemical fractionation of Chlamydomonas lysates. An SE from Chlamydomonas cells was subjected to ultracentrifugation to separate soluble and microsomal fractions. We found that about half of CrTOR is pelleted with the membranous microsomal fraction (Fig. 2D), indicating that at least part of CrTOR is membrane associated. The presence of microsomes in the insoluble fraction after ultracentrifugation was confirmed by immunodetection of the luminal binding protein BiP, an established ER marker, in this fraction (Fig. 2D). Vacuolar and plasma membranes were also detected in the microsomal fraction by using antibodies generated against a plant vacuolar membrane ATPase or the plasma membrane ferroxidase FOX1 (31), respectively (Fig. 2D). Parallel immunoblot assays with antisera specific to D1, a chloroplast membrane protein, to COXIIb, a mitochondrial membrane protein, or to CrFKBP12, a cytoplasmic soluble protein (9, 51), showed that the microsome-containing fraction is not significantly contaminated with thylakoidal and mitochondrial membranes or soluble cytoplasmic proteins (Fig. 2D). To determine the nature of CrTOR association with internal membranes, we treated the SE prior to ultracentrifugation with agents that disrupt membranes or membrane-protein interactions, as previously reported for yeast TOR complexes (6, 52). High concentration of salt in combination or not with a nonionic detergent significantly, but not completely, converted CrTOR into a soluble form, whereas treatment with an ionic detergent or with sodium carbonate had only a minor effect (Fig. 2D). These results suggest that CrTOR is tightly associated to internal membranes.

CrLST8 associates with CrTOR and membranes.LST8 was originally identified in yeast as a component of the exocytic secretory pathway (42) and later on as a negative regulator of the RTG1/3 transcription factors (33). To our knowledge, no published studies have reported the characterization of LST8 from photosynthetic organisms, prompting us to initiate a detailed analysis of CrLST8. To characterize CrLST8, we generated a polyclonal antibody against the recombinant CrLST8 protein, which recognizes a protein of 35 kDa from a Chlamydomonas SE (Fig. 2A). We also observed that CrLST8 is more abundant than CrTOR in Chlamydomonas cells (Fig. 2B and unpublished data). To explore the possible association of CrLST8 to CrTOR, we first examined whether, similar to CrTOR, CrLST8 localizes in high-molecular-mass complexes. We found that a fraction of CrLST8 elutes from a gel filtration column in the same high-molecular-mass fractions than CrTOR, but most CrLST8 eluted separately from CrTOR (Fig. 2B). Biochemical fractionation of Chlamydomonas lysates evidenced that part of CrLST8 is, like CrTOR, present in the microsomal fraction, suggesting that CrLST8 is membrane associated (Fig. 2D). Treatment of cell extracts with detergent and/or salts resulted in the complete extraction of CrLST8 to the soluble fraction, indicating that CrLST8 was peripherally associated with membranes (Fig. 2D). These results also indicate that the binding of CrLST8 to membranes is qualitatively weaker than the one observed for CrTOR. To further investigate the cofractionation of CrLST8 and CrTOR with internal membranes, we performed sucrose gradient sedimentation of the microsomal fraction. Membrane-associated CrTOR cosedimented with the ER marker BiP and part of CrLST8; however, no significant cofractionation of CrTOR was detected with vacuolar or plasma membrane markers (Fig. 2E). Therefore, our results are consistent with the notion that CrLST8 and CrTOR are components of an ER-associated complex(es).

To investigate whether CrLST8 and CrTOR are in the same complex, we performed pull-down assays from Chlamydomonas total extract using purified Chlamydomonas FKBP12 (CrFKBP12) prebound to rapamycin, based on the finding that the CrFKBP12-rapamycin complex interacts with the FRB domain of CrTOR (9). As expected, a weak, but reproducible interaction was observed between CrTOR and CrFKBP12 in the presence of rapamycin, whereas no binding was detected in the absence of the drug (Fig. 3A). Similarly, we found that CrLST8 copurified with CrFKBP12 and CrTOR only when CrFKBP12-rapamycin was used in the pull-down assay (Fig. 3A), indicating that CrLST8 forms part of a rapamycin-sensitive TOR complex in Chlamydomonas. Given the weakness detected in the interaction of CrTOR and CrLST8 to CrFKBP12, we performed similar pull-down assays with the reversible cross-linker DTSSP, which significantly enhanced the interaction between these proteins and confirmed the presence of CrLST8 in a rapamycin-sensitive TOR complex (Fig. 3A). It has been reported that LST8 binds to the kinase domain of TOR in yeast and mammalian cells (27, 55). To further characterize the interaction of CrLST8 with CrTOR, we sought to determine whether the kinase domain of CrTOR, when immobilized, could precipitate CrLST8 from Chlamydomonas total extracts. Total SEs from Chlamydomonas cells were incubated with recombinant MBP or MBP-CrTORkinase purified from E. coli. Amylose resin was then added to immobilize the MBP fusion protein. After several washes, the bound fractions were analyzed by immunoblotting using anti-CrLST8 antibody (Fig. 3B). We observed that CrLST8 interacts with the kinase domain of CrTOR, whereas no binding to the MBP control was detected.

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

CrLST8 interacts with CrTOR through its kinase domain. (A) A 25-μg portion of purified GST-CrFKBP12 was bound to rapamycin and incubated with 1 mg of Chlamydomonas total extracts in the presence or absence of the reversible cross-linker DTSSP (for details, see Materials and Methods). Fusion protein complexes were immobilized on glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads and resolved by SDS-PAGE. CrTOR and CrLST8 were detected by Western blotting. (B) Pull-down assays were performed with the kinase domain of CrTOR fused to MBP (MBP-CrTORkinase) or MBP alone and total SE from Chlamydomonas cells. About 10 μg of MBP or MBP fusion protein were incubated with 4 mg of Chlamydomonas total extract. Endogenous CrLST8 bound to MBP-kin was detected by Western blotting with CrLST8 antibody.

Localization of CrTOR and CrLST8 by indirect IF microscopy.Biochemical fractionation of CrTOR and CrLST8 indicated that part of these proteins may associate with membranes in Chlamydomonas (see Fig. 2). We used rabbit polyclonal anti-CrTOR and anti-CrLST8 purified antibodies to further examine the subcellular localization of these proteins by IF microscopy. CrTOR was localized to discrete punctae that are more abundant in regions adjacent to the plasma membrane and the apical end of the cell, close to the basal bodies (Fig. 4A). The signal of CrLST8 by IF microscopy was more diffused than the one observed for CrTOR, although punctate staining was also visible (Fig. 4A). Similar to CrTOR, CrLST8 was concentrated in the proximity of basal bodies, but, unlike CrTOR, CrLST8 was more abundant around the nucleus (Fig. 4A). No significant signal was detected with secondary antibody alone or in combination with preimmune sera (data not shown). Double staining with a mouse anti-tubulin antibody revealed that the signal we observed of CrTOR and CrLST8 at the flagella base corresponds to the peri-basal body region (Fig. 4B). To determine whether internal membranes are abundant in this part of the cell, we also examined the cellular localization of BiP using a rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against plant BiP that specifically recognized the Chlamydomonas BiP protein. As expected for an ER protein, BiP was detected all over the cell by IF microscopy, although the signal was more intense in the surroundings of basal bodies, indicating that indeed this region is membrane enriched (Fig. 4A). Thus, in agreement with the membrane association observed for CrTOR and CrLST8 by biochemical fractionation, the staining pattern of CrTOR and CrLST8 strongly suggest that these proteins might localize in membranous structures such as the ER system, which is abundant near the nucleus and the peri-basal body region.

FIG. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 4.

Immunofluorescence localization of CrTOR, CrLST8, and BiP proteins in Chlamydomonas cells. (A) Exponentially growing wild-type cells were collected and processed for IF microscopy analysis as described in Materials and Methods. The antigens of interest are shown in green (FITC), whereas DNA staining is shown in blue (DAPI). Merge images show a merge of the green and blue channels. (B) Double staining of α-tubulin and CrTOR (top) or CrLST8 (down). CrTOR and CrLST8 are shown in green (FITC), α-tubulin in red (tubulin), and DNA in blue (DAPI). Merge images show a merge of the green, red, and blue channels.

CrLST8 is able to functionally and structurally replace yeast LST8.To investigate the possible role of the CrLST8 protein identified in Chlamydomonas in TORC signaling, we studied the functionality of CrLST8 expressed in yeast mutant cells lacking endogenous LST8. The LST8 gene is essential in yeast and mammalian cells (16, 42), and depletion of LST8 in yeast cells results in a rapid arrest of cell growth (34, 42). We used a yeast mutant strain (lst8) with the LST8 gene under control of the glucose-repressible and galactose-inducible GAL1 promoter. This strain allows disruption of TORC1 and TORC2 simply by shifting cells from galactose- to glucose-containing medium (34). Therefore, lst8 cells cannot grow on glucose medium (Fig. 5A and (34). We found that in contrast to lst8 mutant cells transformed with an empty vector, lst8 cells expressing CrLST8 are able to grow on glucose medium, indicating that CrLST8 functionally substitutes for yeast LST8 (Fig. 5A).

FIG. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 5.

CrLST8 functionally and structurally substitutes yeast LST8. (A) CrLST8 complements a yeast lst8 mutant. Wild-type TB50a cells were transformed with empty vector (wt). Cells expressing LST8 from the glucose-repressible and galactose-inducible GAL1 promoter were transformed empty vector (vector) or with plasmids expressing wild-type CrLST8 or D106G, T228A, or S230N CrLST8 mutants. Cells were grown in glucose-containing, liquid medium for 15 h, normalized, subjected to 10-fold serial dilutions, and spotted onto SGal (galactose) or SD (glucose) plates. (B) CrLST8 is able to regulate the TOR-controlled transcription factors GLN3 and RTG1/3. Wild-type cells and GAL1-driven lst8 cells expressing wild-type CrLST8 or the different CrLST8 mutants were grown for 15 h in SD medium (for the analysis of GLN3 targets) or in SD medium supplemented with 3% l-glutamine (for the analysis of RTG1/3 targets). Cells were treated with drug vehicle (90% ethanol-10% Tween 20) or rapamycin for 30 min. Total RNA was probed with 32P-labeled DNA probes specific for the GLN3 target DAL80 or the RTG1/3 target PYC1. 25S rRNA was used as a loading control. (C) Wild-type CrLST8 coimmunoprecipitates with yeast TOR2. A yeast strain expressing HA-tagged TOR2 and GAL1-driven LST8 was transformed with plasmids harboring wild-type or mutant CrLST8s. Cells were depleted of endogenous LST8 by incubation for 15 h in SD medium. Lysates were prepared and subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-HA. Immunoprecipitates were probed with anti-CrLST8 to detect immunoprecipitated CrLST8 (lower panel).

To explore the functionality of CrLST8 in yeast cells, we decided to examine the ability of this protein to mediate LST8-controlled processes with regards to TOR signaling. LST8 has been implicated in the regulation of the GLN3 and RTG1/3 transcription factors. Depletion of LST8 results in RTG1/3 activation, whereas certain mutations on the LST8 gene cause GLN3 deregulation (6, 33, 34). Therefore, to investigate whether CrLST8 functionally replaces yeast LST8 in the control of transcription factors, we compared the expression of DAL80 and PYC1 genes, which are GLN3 and RTG1/3 targets, respectively (11, 29), in wild-type, lst8, and CrLST8-complemented lst8 cells. Furthermore, we analyzed the expression of these genes in cells treated with rapamycin or drug vehicle (90% ethanol-10% Tween 20). As expected, rapamycin treatment induced expression of DAL80 and PYC1 in wild-type cells (Fig. 5B, compare lanes 1 and 2), due to the TOR-mediated activation of GLN3 and RTG1/3, respectively. LST8 depletion resulted in constitutive activation of RTG1/3 but not GLN3 (Fig. 5B, compare lanes 1 and 3), as previously reported (34). Interestingly, cells lacking LST8 were able to partially activate GLN3 upon rapamycin treatment (Fig. 5B, compare lanes 2 and 4), indicating that there must be a LST8-independent pathway that controls GLN3 under TOR inactivating conditions. Expression of CrLST8 in cells depleted of endogenous LST8 fully restored rapamycin-mediated activation of GLN3 and RTG1/3 (Fig. 5B, compare lanes 2, 4, and 6) and partially suppressed the constitutive activation of RTG1/3 in nontreated cells (Fig. 5B, compare lanes 1, 3, and 5). Thus, CrLST8 is able to control GLN3 and RTG1/3 similarly to endogenous yeast LST8.

Our results indicate that CrLST8 is able to replace endogenous yeast LST8, and strongly suggest that the Chlamydomonas protein must integrate into TOR complexes to perform its regulatory functions. To explore this hypothesis, we performed coimmunoprecipitation assays with yeast HA-tagged TOR2, which is present in TORC1 and TORC2, and the precipitates were then examined for the presence of CrLST8. We found that TOR2 coimmunoprecipitated with CrLST8 (Fig. 5C), demonstrating that the Chlamydomonas protein is able to integrate into yeast TOR complexes.

Identification of residues critical for CrLST8 function.Taking advantage of the simple yeast complementation assay of lst8 mutant cells with the CrLST8 gene, we screened for residues that are critical for CrLST8 function. A number of residues required for the normal function of the protein have been identified in yeast and mammalian LST8s (27, 33) (Fig. 1A). By PCR random mutagenesis of the CrLST8 cDNA, we identified three residues whose substitution results in the complete loss of CrLST8 function: Asp106, Thr228, and Ser230. CrLST8 alleles bearing mutations D106G, T228A, or S230N were unable to promote growth of lst8 cells on glucose medium (Fig. 5A), indicating that these residues are essential for CrLST8 activity. Mutation D106G was localized in strand C of WD-repeat 3, whereas mutations T228A and S230N were localized in strand B of WD-repeat 6 (Fig. 1A). Mutation D106G affects the WD dipeptide characteristic of WD-repeats, and mutations T228A and S230N might influence on the proper folding of the WD-repeat, since a correct orientation of strands B and C is important for Gβ propeller blade structure (48). Structural modeling of CrLST8 suggests that all mutations localize on the surface of the protein (Fig. 1B).

To further investigate the effects of these mutations on CrLST8 function, we examined GLN3 and RTG1/3 regulation in LST8-depleted cells expressing the different CrLST8 mutant alleles. In agreement with the inability of CrLST8 mutants to functionally complement lst8 cells, we observed that GLN3 and RTG1/3 were similarly deregulated in cells lacking LST8 or in cells expressing any one of the mutant alleles (Fig. 5B).

Binding of LST8 to TOR has been demonstrated to be required for TOR function in yeasts and mammals (27, 55). Mutations on mLST8 that strongly reduce its association to mTOR also affect the kinase activity of mTOR (27). However, no direct correlation has been established between the capacity of LST8 to bind TOR and the requirement of a functional LST8 to promote cell growth. To answer this question, we decided to examine whether mutations identified in CrLST8 may affect the interaction of CrLST8 with yeast TOR2. Unlike wild-type CrLST8, none of the CrLST8 mutants were able to coimmunoprecipitate with TOR2 (Fig. 5C). Thus, our results strongly suggest that CrLST8 mutants cannot functionally replace endogenous yeast LST8 due to the inability of these mutants to bind TOR and directly link cell growth to LST8-TOR interaction.

DISCUSSION

In this study we report the identification of CrTOR and CrLST8 proteins in membrane-associated, high-molecular-mass complexes in the photosynthetic model organism Chlamydomonas. TORC1 and TORC2 complexes have been described in animal and yeast cells, and most TOR partners seem to be evolutionarily conserved. TORC1 might also be conserved in photosynthetic organisms since a raptor homologue has been recently described in Arabidopsis (1, 2, 12, 35), and the Chlamydomonas genome (http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Chlre3/Chlre3.home.html ) seems to contain a single gene with high identity to yeast and plant raptor (our unpublished observation). No obvious homologues exist for the TORC2-specific proteins AVO1/hSIN1 and AVO3/rictor in plants and algae (54; our unpublished observations), raising the question of whether TORC2 is structurally conserved in photosynthetic organisms. It is possible, however, that plants and algae functionally maintain a TORC2 complex, although the proteins that constitute this putative complex may substantially differ from their yeast and mammalian counterparts. The identification in Chlamydomonas of a homologue to the TORC1- and TORC2-shared protein LST8 suggests that TORC2 might be conserved in photosynthetic organisms. We found that CrLST8 is part of, at least, a possible TORC1 complex sensitive to rapamycin in Chlamydomonas, since CrLST8 copurifies with CrTOR and CrFKBP12 in the presence of rapamycin (Fig. 3A). LST8 binds to the kinase domain of yeast and mammalian TORs, and this interaction is required for full catalytic activity of TOR (27, 55). We found that CrLST8 is able to bind to purified kinase domain of CrTOR (Fig. 3B), suggesting that LST8 may perform a similar function in CrTOR. However, we have been unable to detect interaction of CrLST8 and the kinase domain of CrTOR by yeast two-hybrid assays (unpublished data), indicating that additional factors may be required for the stable association of CrLST8 to the kinase domain of CrTOR in vivo, as previously proposed for other components of yeast TORC2 (55).

We found that only a portion of CrLST8 coelutes with CrTOR from a gel filtration column (Fig. 2B), in agreement with previous studies with yeast LST8 (34). Interestingly, most of CrLST8 that elutes separately from CrTOR is still in complex with other proteins since we detect a peak of CrLST8 with an apparent molecular mass of ∼160 kDa (Fig. 2B). These observations might be explained by partial disruption of the CrTOR-CrLST8 complex in gel filtration assays or by TOR-independent functions of CrLST8. Our results strongly suggest that CrLST8 is more abundant than CrTOR (Fig. 2B and unpublished data), and therefore CrLST8 may likely perform other functions independently to TOR signaling. Studies in fission yeast indicate that LST8 is likely to participate in signaling pathways other than TOR. Mutations in the LST8 ortholog Wat1p result in multiple phenotypes not necessarily associated with defects in the TOR pathway (25, 40). Other evidence that might indicate additional functions of CrLST8 is the limited colocalization found between this protein and the ER marker BiP (Fig. 2 and 4), which suggests that, unlike its yeast homologue (42), CrLST8 might be involved in other cellular processes besides the exocytic secretory pathway in Chlamydomonas. Accordingly, our IF microscopy studies indicated that the cellular distribution of CrLST8 significantly differs from the plasma and endosomal membrane association previously reported for yeast LST8 (6, 52).

Biochemical fractionation of Chlamydomonas cell extracts revealed that CrTOR and CrLST8 are peripherally associated to internal membranes (Fig. 2) and therefore suggests that TOR complexes might localize on these membranous sites. Attachment to membrane seems to be stronger for CrTOR than for CrLST8, as revealed by treatment of Chlamydomonas SEs with salt and/or detergents (Fig. 2C). This finding indicates that TOR complexes are not anchored to membranes through CrLST8. Accordingly, it has been reported in yeast that TOR1 is still associated with internal membranes in a lst8 mutant (6). Mammalian and yeast TORs have been detected in different cellular compartments, including plasma, vacuolar, and ER membranes, as well as the nucleus, the mitochondria, and the Golgi apparatus (5, 13, 14, 28, 30, 52). Therefore, the site(s) of action of TOR complexes still remains controversial, although recent studies in yeast and flies have revealed a close correlation between TOR function and the endocytic pathway (3, 20). Our study of CrTOR and CrLST8 localization in Chlamydomonas cells strongly suggests that TOR complexes might associate with membranes from the ER system. However, we cannot exclude other locations for TOR complexes such as endosomal membranes, since no components of the endocytic pathway have been described in Chlamydomonas thus far. As would be expected for membrane-bound proteins, the cellular distribution of CrTOR was coincident in some aspects with the staining pattern of the ER marker BiP, such as localization to discrete bodies and accumulation in the peri-basal body region. Flagellar growth is conducted from the region surrounding the basal body through the transport of building blocks to the distal end of flagella in a process known as intraflagellar transport (for a recent review, see reference 43). Flagellar proteins are synthesized on the rough ER and carried by vesicles from the Golgi apparatus to the base of the flagellum, where they fuse with the plasma membrane of the cell (43). The peri-basal body region is therefore membrane enriched and might also constitute an important place for regulation of polarized growth in the cell. Why do TOR complexes concentrate in the peri-basal body region in Chlamydomonas? A high demand of protein synthesis at the flagella base may explain localization of TOR complexes at this site since TOR promotes cell growth by positively regulating translation in all eukaryotes (54). Another possibility is that CrTOR performs more specific function(s) in the flagellum or in the peri-basal body region. A link has been recently established between mTOR and proteins that localize to primary cilia or to the basal bodies in epithelial cells from kidney cysts. Defects in the ciliary protein polycystin-1 (PC1) cause autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease (reviewed in reference 53). Interestingly, it has been found that mTOR activity is upregulated in renal epithelial cells where PC1 or other proteins from the basal body are inactive (47). Moreover, it has been proposed that PC1 inhibits mTOR activity by interacting with tuberin (47), an mTOR regulatory protein (54). It remains to be determined whether a functional relationship exists between CrTOR and flagella, as proposed for mTOR and cilia function (38, 47).

Most of the components of TORC1 and TORC2 are evolutionarily conserved from yeast to humans. Our yeast complementation assays demonstrate that CrLST8 is able to functionally and structurally replace yeast LST8 (Fig. 5), indicating that LST8 functions must be conserved in photosynthetic organisms as well. LST8 is an essential protein in yeast and mammalian cells (16, 42), and it is likely that CrLST8 might be also required for cell growth in Chlamydomonas; accordingly, we have not been able to reduce expression of this gene by RNA interference (data not shown). Physical interaction of CrLST8 with CrTOR and possibly with other proteins must play important roles in regulating the CrTOR pathway since CrLST8 consists entirely of seven WD-40 repeats (Fig. 1), and this domain mediates protein-protein interactions (48). In agreement with this hypothesis, we have identified three residues that are critical for CrLST8 function. Mutations at positions Asp106, Thr228, or Ser230 of CrLST8 resulted in the complete inactivation of the protein as revealed by yeast complementation assays (Fig. 5A), and a failure to interact with yeast TOR2 (Fig. 5C). Our results also demonstrate that inactive CrLST8 mutants are unable to properly regulate TOR-controlled functions in yeast cells (Fig. 5B) and directly link cell growth to the interaction of LST8 and TOR proteins. In animals, the analysis of mutations in mLST8 that reduce or abolish interaction of this protein with mTOR have correlated the ability of mLST8 to bind and activate mTOR (27), although it has not been determined whether the same mutations affect cell growth.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by the Spanish ministry of Science and Technology (grant BFU2007-60805/BMC to J.L.C., grant no. BFU2004-00050/BMC to F.J.F., and a Ramon y Cajal contract to J.L.C.) and the Junta de Andalucia (predoctoral fellowship to S.D.-T.).

We thank Robbie Loewith for the generous gift of yeast strain RL99-3c and critical comments on the manuscript, Antonio Diaz Quintana for technical assistance with CrLST8 modeling, and Jean-David Rochaix and Michael N. Hall for providing strains and plasmids.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 1 October 2007.
    • Accepted 13 November 2007.
  • Copyright © 2008 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Anderson, G. H., and M. R. Hanson. 2005. The Arabidopsis Mei2 homologue AML1 binds AtRaptor1B, the plant homologue of a major regulator of eukaryotic cell growth. BMC Plant Biol.5:2-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Anderson, G. H., B. Veit, and M. R. Hanson. 2005. The Arabidopsis AtRaptor genes are essential for post-embryonic plant growth. BMC Biol.3:12-22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Aronova, S., K. Wedaman, S. Anderson, J. Yates III, and T. Powers. 2007. Probing the membrane environment of the TOR kinases reveals functional interactions between TORC1, actin, and membrane trafficking in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell18:2779-2794.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Burnett, P. E., R. K. Barrow, N. A. Cohen, S. H. Snyder, and D. M. Sabatini. 1998. RAFT1 phosphorylation of the translational regulators p70 S6 kinase and 4E-BP1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA95:1432-1437.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Cardenas, M. E., and J. Heitman. 1995. FKBP12-rapamycin target TOR2 is a vacuolar protein with an associated phosphatidylinositol-4 kinase activity. EMBO J.14:5892-5907.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Chen, E. J., and C. A. Kaiser. 2003. LST8 negatively regulates amino acid biosynthesis as a component of the TOR pathway. J. Cell Biol.161:333-347.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Cole, D. G., D. R. Diener, A. L. Himelblau, P. L. Beech, J. C. Fuster, and J. L. Rosenbaum. 1998. Chlamydomonas kinesin-II-dependent intraflagellar transport (IFT): IFT particles contain proteins required for ciliary assembly in Caenorhabditis elegans sensory neurons. J. Cell Biol.141:993-1008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Crespo, J. L., K. Daicho, T. Ushimaru, and M. N. Hall. 2001. The GATA transcription factors GLN3 and GAT1 link TOR to salt stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem.276:34441-34444.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Crespo, J. L., S. Diaz-Troya, and F. J. Florencio. 2005. Inhibition of target of rapamycin signaling by rapamycin in the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Physiol.139:1736-1749.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Crespo, J. L., and M. N. Hall. 2002. Elucidating TOR signaling and rapamycin action: lessons from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.66:579-591.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Cunningham, T. S., and T. G. Cooper. 1991. Expression of the DAL80 gene, whose product is homologous to the GATA factors and is a negative regulator of multiple nitrogen catabolic genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is sensitive to nitrogen catabolite repression. Mol. Cell. Biol.11:6205-6215.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Deprost, D., H. N. Truong, C. Robaglia, and C. Meyer. 2005. An Arabidopsis homolog of RAPTOR/KOG1 is essential for early embryo development. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.326:844-850.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    Desai, B. N., B. R. Myers, and S. L. Schreiber. 2002. FKBP12-rapamycin-associated protein associates with mitochondria and senses osmotic stress via mitochondrial dysfunction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA99:4319-4324.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Drenan, R. M., X. Liu, P. G. Bertram, and X. F. Zheng. 2004. FKBP12-rapamycin-associated protein or mammalian target of rapamycin (FRAP/mTOR) localization in the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi apparatus. J. Biol. Chem.279:772-778.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    Frias, M. A., C. C. Thoreen, J. D. Jaffe, W. Schroder, T. Sculley, S. A. Carr, and D. M. Sabatini. 2006. mSin1 is necessary for Akt/PKB phosphorylation, and its isoforms define three distinct mTORC2s. Curr. Biol.16:1865-1870.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    Guertin, D. A., D. M. Stevens, C. C. Thoreen, A. A. Burds, N. Y. Kalaany, J. Moffat, M. Brown, K. J. Fitzgerald, and D. M. Sabatini. 2006. Ablation in mice of the mTORC components raptor, rictor, or mLST8 reveals that mTORC2 is required for signaling to Akt-FOXO and PKCα, but not S6K1. Dev. Cell11:859-871.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    Guex, N., A. Diemand, and M. C. Peitsch. 1999. Protein modeling for all. Trends Biochem. Sci.24:364-367.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    Hara, K., Y. Maruki, X. Long, K. Yoshino, N. Oshiro, S. Hidayat, C. Tokunaga, J. Avruch, and K. Yonezawa. 2002. Raptor, a binding partner of target of rapamycin (TOR), mediates TOR action. Cell110:177-189.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    Harris, E. H. 1989. The Chlamydomonas Sourcebook. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA.
  20. 20.↵
    Hennig, K. M., J. Colombani, and T. P. Neufeld. 2006. TOR coordinates bulk and targeted endocytosis in the Drosophila melanogaster fat body to regulate cell growth. J. Cell Biol.173:963-974.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    Isotani, S., K. Hara, C. Tokunaga, H. Inoue, J. Avruch, and K. Yonezawa. 1999. Immunopurified mammalian target of rapamycin phosphorylates and activates p70 S6 kinase alpha in vitro. J. Biol. Chem.274:34493-34498.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    Jacinto, E., V. Facchinetti, D. Liu, N. Soto, S. Wei, S. Y. Jung, Q. Huang, J. Qin, and B. Su. 2006. SIN1/MIP1 maintains rictor-mTOR complex integrity and regulates Akt phosphorylation and substrate specificity. Cell127:125-137.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    Jacinto, E., R. Loewith, A. Schmidt, S. Lin, M. A. Ruegg, A. Hall, and M. N. Hall. 2004. Mammalian TOR complex 2 controls the actin cytoskeleton and is rapamycin insensitive. Nat. Cell Biol.6:1122-1128.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    Kamada, Y., Y. Fujioka, N. N. Suzuki, F. Inagaki, S. Wullschleger, R. Loewith, M. N. Hall, and Y. Ohsumi. 2005. Tor2 directly phosphorylates the AGC kinase Ypk2 to regulate actin polarization. Mol. Cell. Biol.25:7239-7248.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    Kemp, J. T., M. K. Balasubramanian, and K. L. Gould. 1997. A wat1 mutant of fission yeast is defective in cell morphology. Mol. Gen. Genet.254:127-138.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    Kim, D. H., D. D. Sarbassov, S. M. Ali, J. E. King, R. R. Latek, H. Erdjument-Bromage, P. Tempst, and D. M. Sabatini. 2002. mTOR interacts with raptor to form a nutrient-sensitive complex that signals to the cell growth machinery. Cell110:163-175.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    Kim, D. H., D. D. Sarbassov, S. M. Ali, R. R. Latek, K. V. Guntur, H. Erdjument-Bromage, P. Tempst, and D. M. Sabatini. 2003. GbetaL, a positive regulator of the rapamycin-sensitive pathway required for the nutrient-sensitive interaction between raptor and mTOR. Mol. Cell11:895-904.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    Kim, J. E., and J. Chen. 2000. Cytoplasmic-nuclear shuttling of FKBP12-rapamycin-associated protein is involved in rapamycin-sensitive signaling and translation initiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA97:14340-14345.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    Komeili, A., K. P. Wedaman, E. K. O'Shea, and T. Powers. 2000. Mechanism of metabolic control. Target of rapamycin signaling links nitrogen quality to the activity of the Rtg1 and Rtg3 transcription factors. J. Cell Biol.151:863-878.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    Kunz, J., U. Schneider, I. Howald, A. Schmidt, and M. N. Hall. 2000. HEAT repeats mediate plasma membrane localization of Tor2p in yeast. J. Biol. Chem.275:37011-37020.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    La Fontaine, S., J. M. Quinn, S. S. Nakamoto, M. D. Page, V. Gohre, J. L. Moseley, J. Kropat, and S. Merchant. 2002. Copper-dependent iron assimilation pathway in the model photosynthetic eukaryote Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Eukaryot. Cell1:736-757.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    Li, H., C. K. Tsang, M. Watkins, P. G. Bertram, and X. F. Zheng. 2006. Nutrient regulates Tor1 nuclear localization and association with rDNA promoter. Nature442:1058-1061.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    Liu, Z., T. Sekito, C. B. Epstein, and R. A. Butow. 2001. RTG-dependent mitochondria to nucleus signaling is negatively regulated by the seven WD-repeat protein Lst8p. EMBO J.20:7209-7219.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    Loewith, R., E. Jacinto, S. Wullschleger, A. Lorberg, J. L. Crespo, D. Bonenfant, W. Oppliger, P. Jenoe, and M. N. Hall. 2002. Two TOR complexes, only one of which is rapamycin sensitive, have distinct roles in cell growth control. Mol. Cell10:457-468.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    Mahfouz, M. M., S. Kim, A. J. Delauney, and D. P. Verma. 2006. Arabidopsis TARGET OF RAPAMYCIN interacts with RAPTOR, which regulates the activity of S6 kinase in response to osmotic stress signals. Plant Cell18:477-490.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    Matsuo, T., Y. Kubo, Y. Watanabe, and M. Yamamoto. 2003. Schizosaccharomyces pombe AGC family kinase Gad8p forms a conserved signaling module with TOR and PDK1-like kinases. EMBO J.22:3073-3083.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  37. 37.↵
    Menand, B., T. Desnos, L. Nussaume, F. Berger, D. Bouchez, C. Meyer, and C. Robaglia. 2002. Expression and disruption of the Arabidopsis TOR (target of rapamycin) gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA99:6422-6427.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    Mostov, K. E. 2006. mTOR is out of control in polycystic kidney disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA103:5247-5248.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    Mumberg, D., R. Muller, and M. Funk. 1995. Yeast vectors for the controlled expression of heterologous proteins in different genetic backgrounds. Gene156:119-122.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.↵
    Ochotorena, I. L., D. Hirata, K. Kominami, J. Potashkin, F. Sahin, K. Wentz-Hunter, K. L. Gould, K. Sato, Y. Yoshida, L. Vardy, and T. Toda. 2001. Conserved Wat1/Pop3 WD-repeat protein of fission yeast secures genome stability through microtubule integrity and may be involved in mRNA maturation. J. Cell Sci.114:2911-2920.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  41. 41.↵
    Reinke, A., S. Anderson, J. M. McCaffery, J. Yates III, S. Aronova, S. Chu, S. Fairclough, C. Iverson, K. P. Wedaman, and T. Powers. 2004. TOR complex 1 includes a novel component, Tco89p (YPL180w), and cooperates with Ssd1p to maintain cellular integrity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem.279:14752-14762.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    Roberg, K. J., S. Bickel, N. Rowley, and C. A. Kaiser. 1997. Control of amino acid permease sorting in the late secretory pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by SEC13, LST4, LST7, and LST8. Genetics147:1569-1584.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    Rosenbaum, J. L., and G. B. Witman. 2002. Intraflagellar transport. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol.3:813-825.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 44.↵
    Sarbassov, D. D., S. M. Ali, D. H. Kim, D. A. Guertin, R. R. Latek, H. Erdjument-Bromage, P. Tempst, and D. M. Sabatini. 2004. Rictor, a novel binding partner of mTOR, defines a rapamycin-insensitive and raptor-independent pathway that regulates the cytoskeleton. Curr. Biol.14:1296-1302.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    Sarbassov, D. D., D. A. Guertin, S. M. Ali, and D. M. Sabatini. 2005. Phosphorylation and regulation of Akt/PKB by the rictor-mTOR complex. Science307:1098-1101.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    Sherman, F. 1991. Getting started with yeast. Methods Enzymol.194:3-21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. 47.↵
    Shillingford, J. M., N. S. Murcia, C. H. Larson, S. H. Low, R. Hedgepeth, N. Brown, C. A. Flask, A. C. Novick, D. A. Goldfarb, A. Kramer-Zucker, G. Walz, K. B. Piontek, G. G. Germino, and T. Weimbs. 2006. The mTOR pathway is regulated by polycystin-1, and its inhibition reverses renal cystogenesis in polycystic kidney disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA103:5466-5471.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    Smith, T. F., C. Gaitatzes, K. Saxena, and E. J. Neer. 1999. The WD repeat: a common architecture for diverse functions. Trends Biochem. Sci.24:181-185.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. 49.↵
    Takahara, T., K. Hara, K. Yonezawa, H. Sorimachi, and T. Maeda. 2006. Nutrient-dependent multimerization of the mammalian target of rapamycin through the N-terminal HEAT repeat region. J. Biol. Chem.281:28605-28614.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    Urban, J., A. Soulard, A. Huber, S. Lippman, D. Mukhopadhyay, O. Deloche, V. Wanke, D. Anrather, G. Ammerer, H. Riezman, J. R. Broach, C. De Virgilio, M. N. Hall, and R. Loewith. 2007. Sch9 is a major target of TORC1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell26:663-674.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. 51.↵
    Vallon, O. 2005. Chlamydomonas immunophilins and parvulins: survey and critical assessment of gene models. Eukaryot. Cell4:230-241.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  52. 52.↵
    Wedaman, K. P., A. Reinke, S. Anderson, J. Yates III, J. M. McCaffery, and T. Powers. 2003. Tor kinases are in distinct membrane-associated protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell14:1204-1220.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. 53.↵
    Wilson, P. D. 2004. Polycystic kidney disease: new understanding in the pathogenesis. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol.36:1868-1873.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. 54.↵
    Wullschleger, S., R. Loewith, and M. N. Hall. 2006. TOR signaling in growth and metabolism. Cell124:471-484.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  55. 55.↵
    Wullschleger, S., R. Loewith, W. Oppliger, and M. N. Hall. 2005. Molecular organization of target of rapamycin complex 2. J. Biol. Chem.280:30697-30704.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. 56.↵
    Xu, Q., S. Liang, J. Kudla, and S. Luan. 1998. Molecular characterization of a plant FKBP12 that does not mediate action of FK506 and rapamycin. Plant J.15:511-519.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  57. 57.↵
    Yang, Q., K. Inoki, T. Ikenoue, and K. L. Guan. 2006. Identification of Sin1 as an essential TORC2 component required for complex formation and kinase activity. Genes Dev.20:2820-2832.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. 58.↵
    Zhang, Y., C. J. Billington, Jr., D. Pan, and T. P. Neufeld. 2006. Drosophila target of rapamycin kinase functions as a multimer. Genetics172:355-362.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Target of Rapamycin and LST8 Proteins Associate with Membranes from the Endoplasmic Reticulum in the Unicellular Green Alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
Sandra Díaz-Troya, Francisco J. Florencio, José L. Crespo
Eukaryotic Cell Feb 2008, 7 (2) 212-222; DOI: 10.1128/EC.00361-07

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Email

Thank you for sharing this Eukaryotic Cell article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Target of Rapamycin and LST8 Proteins Associate with Membranes from the Endoplasmic Reticulum in the Unicellular Green Alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Eukaryotic Cell
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Eukaryotic Cell.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Target of Rapamycin and LST8 Proteins Associate with Membranes from the Endoplasmic Reticulum in the Unicellular Green Alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
Sandra Díaz-Troya, Francisco J. Florencio, José L. Crespo
Eukaryotic Cell Feb 2008, 7 (2) 212-222; DOI: 10.1128/EC.00361-07
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Algal Proteins
Cell Membrane
Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
Endoplasmic Reticulum

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About EC
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript to mSphere

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 1535-9778; Online ISSN: 1535-9786