Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About EC
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Eukaryotic Cell
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About EC
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
Articles

Nuclear Import of Zinc Binuclear Cluster Proteins Proceeds through Multiple, Overlapping Transport Pathways

Igor Nikolaev, Marie-Françoise Cochet, Béatrice Felenbok
Igor Nikolaev
Institut de Génétique et Microbiologie, Université Paris-Sud, UMR 8621 CNRS, Centre d'Orsay, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marie-Françoise Cochet
Institut de Génétique et Microbiologie, Université Paris-Sud, UMR 8621 CNRS, Centre d'Orsay, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Béatrice Felenbok
Institut de Génétique et Microbiologie, Université Paris-Sud, UMR 8621 CNRS, Centre d'Orsay, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: felenbok@igmors.u-psud.fr
DOI: 10.1128/EC.2.2.209-221.2003
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

In Aspergillus nidulans, the high transcriptional level of the ethanol utilization pathway genes (alc) is regulated by the specific activator AlcR. Here we have analyzed the mechanism of the nuclear import of AlcR, as well as that of other proteins belonging to the Zn2Cys6 binuclear cluster family. The nuclear localization signal of AlcR maps within the N-terminal 75 amino acid residues and overlaps with its DNA-binding domain. It consists of five clusters rich in basic residues. Four of them are necessary and sufficient for nuclear targeting. The first two basic regions are crucial for both nuclear localization and recognition of AlcR-specific DNA targets. This nuclear localization signal (NLS) motif is recognized by the nuclear transport machinery of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and requires both Ran/Gsp1p activity and specific transport receptors. AlcR can be imported into nuclei via multiple transport pathways mediated by a distinct set of karyopherins composed of Kap104p, Sxm1p, and Nmd5p transport receptors. The two former karyopherins interact with the NLS of AlcR directly. Other Zn binuclear cluster proteins from S. cerevisiae, such as Gal4p and Pdr3p, also appear to be transported to the nuclei in a nonclassical, importin-α-independent manner and can share common importin β receptors.

Transport of macromolecules between the cytoplasm and the nucleus in eukaryotic cells generally proceeds via soluble transport receptors that bind to specific nuclear localization signals (NLSs) on their substrates and translocate them across the nuclear membrane through specific structures called nuclear pore complexes (NPC) (reviewed in references 18 and 36). Several distinct transport pathways have been identified thus far, most mediated by different members of the importin β receptor family (reviewed in references 7 and 36). Of these, the most extensively characterized is the pathway that involves import of proteins with classical NLS composed of one or two clusters of basic residues. Nuclear import of such proteins is initiated by binding to the importin α/β heterodimer, where importin α acts as an adapter subunit to bridge NLS cargoes to importin β, which transports the whole complex through the nuclear envelope (16). Importin α (also known as karyopherin α in vertebrates or Kap60p/Srp1p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae) directly interacts with the NLS via its armadillo-like repeated motifs (7, 9). In turn, its highly basic, N-terminal importin β binding (IBB) domain is recognized by the importin β receptor (also called karyopherin β in vertebrates or Kap95p/Rsl1p in yeast) (8). Once formed, the resultant heterotrimeric complex is recruited to the NPC through the interaction of the importin β subunit with the NPC components (reviewed in references 12 and 18). Subsequent translocation of the docked complex into the nuclear compartment requires the integrity of the small Ras-related GTP binding protein Ran (the yeast homolog Gsp1p) and several Ran-associated proteins (21, 50). The dissociation of the importin heterodimer followed by the release of the cargo is mediated by Ran present in the GTP-bound form inside the nucleus (26, 51). Transport factors are then recycled back to the cytoplasm.

This mechanism of nuclear import, however, is not valid for proteins that do not contain conventional NLSs. An increasing number of divergent signals and their cognate transport receptors identified over the last few years provides evidence of existence of alternative nuclear import pathways distinct from that driven by the importin α/β heterodimer (7, 36). All of them are mediated by importin β-related receptors that have several common properties, such as binding to the NPC and binding to Ran-GTP. Members of the importin β family bind directly to their cargoes, which often do not show obvious sequence similarities in their import signals. Recent experimental data revealed that importin β, in the absence of importin α, can drive the nuclear import of proteins, interacting directly with various, noncanonical NLS-like signals. These include ribosomal proteins (22); core histones (23); the viral proteins HIV-1 Rev, HIV-1 Tat, and HTLV-1 Rex (39, 60); a number of transcription factors, including Gal4p (5); parathyroid hormone-related protein (27); the T-cell protein tyrosine phosphatase (56); and others. To distinguish between different substrates, transport factors can utilize distinct recognition sites. For example, the human transportin binds simultaneously to M9-related signals of heterogenous nuclear mRNA-binding proteins and the β-like import receptor binding domain of ribosomal protein L23a (22). Moreover, a single NLS motif can be imported by multiple transporters. Such a redundant mechanism of transport has been suggested to be relevant mainly for essential proteins, such as TATA-binding protein (32, 42), ribosomal proteins (22, 47), or core histones (33, 34, 35) that can be imported by a network of importin β receptors in both mammalian and yeast cells. Taken together, these examples demonstrate a great variety of nuclear transport pathways that exist in the eukaryotic cell. In most cases, the exact mechanisms of action remain to be elucidated.

The present study reports new insights into the nuclear import mechanism of AlcR, a transcriptional activator of the ethanol utilization pathway in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans. AlcR belongs to a family of Zn binuclear cluster DNA-binding proteins which are well studied at the level of their transcriptional activation mechanism and also at the level of their three-dimensional structure (49, 58). AlcR presents several original features and is the only example for which there is evidence that it binds in vitro as a monomer to single sites (13, 37) but in vivo is able to activate transcription only if repeated sites, organized either in direct or inverted orientation, are present (40). Like other proteins of this class, such as Gal4p, Ppr1p, and Hap1p in S. cerevisiae, the overall Zn binuclear cluster of AlcR establishes similar contacts to specific DNA sites via the interaction of Lys19 and Arg20 in the first α-helical structure to the triplet CGG (4). In addition, other contacts, which were not observed for the other proteins, could explain the unusual DNA-binding specificity of AlcR (30). The AlcR N terminus plays an additional role via the involvement of Arg6 in the specificity of binding to palindromic sites and in transcriptional activation (38). The three-dimensional structure of the AlcR DNA-binding domain (amino acids [aa] 1 to 60), solved by nuclear magnetic resonance, has provided evidence that, indeed, contacts between the N-terminal arm of AlcR occur in the minor groove of DNA through this Arg6 residue (3).

The mechanism by which these Zn binuclear cluster proteins are imported to the nucleus is poorly understood. Nuclear localization domains have been identified for Gal4p (5, 53), PrnA (43), and Pdr1p (10). For the two former proteins, their NLSs overlap with DNA-binding domains and are enriched in basic amino acid residues. It has been shown that Gal4p interacts directly with the importin β receptor, Rsl1p/Kap95p (6), whereas Pdr1p interacts with another member of the importin-β-related proteins, Pse1p/Kap121p, using a transport signal of a different nature (10). Previously, we have shown that a region of AlcR necessary for its import into the nucleus maps proximal to its N-terminal region (38). Here, we fully characterize its NLS and investigate the molecular mechanisms of nuclear import for AlcR and several other proteins of the Zn2Cys6 cluster family. We demonstrate that the specific organization of the AlcR NLS is more complex than those described so far. In fact, it contains five basic motifs dispersed throughout the first 75 aa residues, two of them being involved in DNA recognition. The nuclear import of AlcR is exerted via a redundant mechanism mediated by three importin-β-related receptors, Kap104p, Sxm1p, and Nmd5p. We show that AlcR NLS interacts directly with importins β Kap104p and Sxm1p. We also demonstrate that Nmd5p is shared for the transport of Gal4p which, in addition, can be partially delivered to nuclei by direct interaction with the importin β/Kap95p subunit. The latter karyopherin is the sole receptor for Pdr3p, whose NLS was found to reside within the first 100 aa residues encompassing the DNA-binding domain. In contrast, none of the yeast importin β mutant strains tested appeared to affect the nuclear translocation of PrnA. Therefore, several independent transport factors mediate transport of zinc binuclear cluster proteins into the nucleus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains and growth conditions. A. nidulans (ya2 pabaA1 uaZ11) was used as a host for expression of the full-length AlcR-green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusion whose localization was monitored in the absence or presence of the inducer. The wild-type strain was used as a reference in plate growth tests. A. nidulans strain MF115 (ya2 pabaA1 uaZ11 alc500 palcA::argB2BglII) served as a recipient for transformation of all other alcR-bearing constructs. Only single-copy transformants integrated at the ectopic uaZ locus were selected for subsequent microscopic studies and transcriptional analysis. For RNA extraction, mycelia were grown under conditions described earlier (38). In plate growth tests, the fungus was grown for 2 days on solid minimal medium containing either 1% glycerol or 1% glycerol plus10 mM allyl alcohol. For fluorescent microscopic studies, samples of A. nidulans mycelia were grown for 16 h at 25°C on coverslips in a droplet of minimal medium with either 1% glucose or 1% ethanol. Nuclei were stained by adding 10 μl of 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) solution at concentration of 3 μg/ml.

All yeast strains used in this study were a generous gift of P. A. Silver (Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.) and are listed in parentheses in Table 1 according to the original nomenclature. The genotypes of these strains are described elsewhere and are available on request. In microscopic studies, yeast cells were grown to mid-log phase on yeast nitrogen base-dextrose (YNBD) minimal medium at 30°C, unless stated otherwise. The Δkap104 (PSY964) strain was incubated at 23°C, while gsp1-1 (PSY962), srp1-31 (PSY688), rsl1-4 (PSY1103), pse1-1 kap123Δ (PSY1042), xpo1-1 (PSY1105), and mtr10-1 (PSY1133) thermosensitive cells were grown at 25°C followed by a 2-h shift to 37°C. The cse1-1 (PSY1040) strain was cultivated at 30°C and transferred for 12 h at 15°C.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Subcellular distribution of GFP fused to the N-terminal fragments of several Zn binuclear cluster proteins in yeast kap mutant strains

Plasmids.Plasmid pAN52-1:GFP was used to express various AlcR-GFP fusions in A. nidulans. This plasmid, described earlier (38), was modified by insertion of the 2.2-kb ClaI-XhoI fragment of the uaZ gene, which served as a selective marker to confer growth on uric acid. To produce these constructs, DNA fragments coding for different regions of AlcR were amplified by PCR and cloned in frame to the 5′ terminus of the gfp gene in the unique NcoI site of the vector. NcoI sites at both termini of each fragment as well as mutations of the basic residues in regions I to V (except for the region III) as well as cysteines 12 and 15 (see Fig. 3), were introduced during amplification using specific oligonucleotides. Mutations in region III, as well as substitutions within regions IV, V, and IV+V introduced into the entire AlcR protein for in vivo studies, were generated using a QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) and confirmed by DNA sequencing. HindIII-NruI alcR fragments (0.85 kb) containing the desired mutations were cloned into the palcR::uaZ vector described in our previous work (38) to replace the corresponding original sequence. The final plasmids were used for A. nidulans transformation followed by transcriptional analyses. To produce AlcR(1-75)-2xGFP (that is, AlcR aa 1 to 75 plus two GFP tags), Gal4p(1-147)-GFP, Pdr3p(1-100)-GFP, PrnA(1-130)-GFP, IBB(1-60)-GFP, and simian virus 40 (SV40)-GFP fusions, the corresponding coding regions of these transcriptional activators, importin α of S. cerevisiae, and the NLS of SV40 T-antigen, respectively, were amplified by PCR and cloned into the BamHI-SalI sites of the pUG35 reporter construct provided by U. Gueldener and J. H. Hegemann (Institute of Microbiology, Duesseldorf, Germany). Plasmids pET-AlcR(1-821), pGBKT7, pGAD424 (Clontech), pBFG1-PDR3, pFL44L-Kap60 (a gift of C. Jacq, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France), and pET-PrnA(1-167) (a gift of C. Scazzocchio, Institut de Génétique et Microbiologie, Orsay, France) served as templates for amplification. The sequence of a second egfp was inserted into the pUG35AlcR construct. For complementation of the kap deletions, KAP104, SXM1, and NMD5 were expressed from the centromeric plasmids pRS315 or pRS314 (52) carrying the corresponding karyopherin gene and either LEU2- or TRP-selective markers, depending on the strain used. Plasmids pPS329 (CEN-URA3-KAP104), pPS1575 (CEN-TRP1-SXM1), and pPS2407 (CEN-TRP1-NMD5) containing the aforementioned kap genes, were kindly provided by P. A. Silver (Harvard Medical School). The plasmid expressing AlcR(1-197) tagged with a six-His tag as described previously (37) was used as a template for site-directed mutagenesis and further expression of AlcR proteins mutated in either cysteines 12 and 15 or regions IV+V. The same oligonucleotides as mentioned above were used in the mutagenesis. For the in vitro translation experiments, AlcR(1-821) and AlcR(101-821) were expressed from plasmid pET22b (Novagen). The open reading frames of Kap104p, Sxm1p, and Nmd5p were expressed as glutathione-S-transferase (GST) fusions in pGEX4T-3 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), where their coding regions were cloned using appropriate restriction sites. A detailed description of plasmids and the sequence of oligonucleotides used in this study are available on request.

Recombinant protein expression and binding assays.Full-length or truncated AlcR protein was produced by in vitro transcription-translation of pET22b-derived plasmids with a TnT kit (Promega) using a rabbit reticulocyte lysate in the presence of [35S]methionine (Amersham) according to the recommendations of the manufacturer. GST fusions of karyopherins were overexpressed in Escherichia coli strain BL21 and purified on glutathione-Sepharose resin using standard techniques. For each binding assay, 20 μl of radioactively labeled reticulocyte lysate reaction was mixed with approximately 2 μg of GST-Kap104p, GST-Sxm1p, GST-Nmd5p, or GST in 150 μl of transport buffer TB containing 20 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.5; 110 mM potassium acetate; 2 mM MgCl2; 0.1% Tween 20; 1 mM dithiothreitol; and protease inhibitor (Complete EDTA-free protease inhibitor mixture tablets; Roche). The mixtures were preincubated for 3 h at 4°C, and then 30 μl of glutathione-Sepharose resin was added. After an additional incubation period of at least 2 h, the beads were washed extensively three times with TB buffer. and the bound fractions were eluted with sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) sample buffer, separated by SDS-PAGE, and visualized by fluorography. To estimate the amount of GST-karyopherin fusion protein added into the binding reaction, 1/10 of each sample was tested by Western blot analysis using antibodies against GST in accordance to the recommendations of the supplier (Sigma).

Electrophoretic mobility shift assay.AlcR proteins were expressed and partially purified on Ni2+-nitriloacetic acid agarose as described in a previous work (37). Their DNA-binding affinities were tested by gel shift experiments using inverted repeat target b as a probe (37). Equal amounts of protein (∼0.3 μg) were added in each binding reaction mixture.

Northern blot analysis.Total RNAs were isolated from A. nidulans mycelia using the RNA Plus Extraction Solution (Biogen) following the manufacturer's instructions. Approximately 20 μg of total RNA was loaded per each lane and separated on glyoxal agarose gels as described by Sambrook et al. (48). Blots were hybridized with the alcA and actin probes [32P] radioactively labeled by a random priming kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The actin probe served as an internal control to normalize the amounts of RNA present on a single blot. The intensities of the signals on autoradiographs were quantified using a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics).

Fluorescence microscopy.All microscopy and image manipulations were performed with a Zeiss Axioplan microscope equipped with a GFP filter set and a 100× digital-camera objective. Images were captured with a charge-coupled device camera (Princeton Instruments) driven by OpenLab imaging software. All images were taken using identical settings and transferred to Adobe Photoshop. The final figures were produced using Adobe Photoshop without further manipulation.

RESULTS

Constitutive nuclear targeting of AlcR.To study the nuclear transport mechanism of AlcR, it was fused at its C terminus to GFP. Driven by the alcR native promoter, the AlcR-GFP fusion protein conferred growth on ethanol to the fungal cells, indicating that the fusion was functional and the GFP moiety does not significantly alter the behavior of the AlcR protein. However, this construct resulted in weak fluorescence observed upon microscopic analysis (results not shown). This can be explained by a low level of expression of the fusion or/and its instability.

As it has been previously established (reviewed in reference 13), alcR gene expression is autoregulated; i.e., its transcription depends on the amount of the active AlcR protein present in the cell. To be active, AlcR absolutely requires an inducer that has been shown to be an intermediate product of ethanol degradation, acetaldehyde (15). Thus, expressed from its native promoter, alcR transcription is turned on only under inducing conditions. Therefore, in such a context it is impossible to determine if a subcellular localization of AlcR is dependent on the presence of the inducer. In order to solve this issue, as well as to enhance the level of transcription, we expressed the AlcR-GFP protein from a strong constitutive gpdA promoter which is widely used for fungal molecular biology studies (44). Cells expressing the fusion protein were grown either in the presence or absence of the inducer, i.e., on ethanol- or glucose-containing medium, respectively. Microscopic examination of the intracellular distribution of GFP revealed that in both cases the fusion protein was targeted exclusively to the nucleus (Fig. 1), whereas without AlcR the GFP carrier alone was distributed uniformly between the nucleus and cytoplasm, as has been previously shown (38). Hence, the presence of the inducer does not affect the nuclear localization of AlcR. It is constitutively addressed to the nucleus after being transcribed in the cytoplasm.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Constitutive nuclear accumulation of AlcR. The entire AlcR protein fused to GFP was expressed from the constitutive gpdA promoter in A. nidulans grown in the absence (glucose) or presence (ethanol) of the inducer and visualized in hyphae by fluorescence microscopy. Nuclei of the same filament stained with DAPI are shown on the right.

Mapping and mutational analysis of AlcR NLS.Our previous work led us to suggest that the motif responsible for nuclear accumulation of AlcR resides proximal to its N-terminal part (38). To confirm this hypothesis and more precisely identify the regions involved in nuclear import, we constructed a set of successive AlcR deletion mutants, fused to GFP, whose subcellular localization was monitored by fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 2). Preliminary Western blot analyses with anti-GFP antibodies confirmed that GFP fusion proteins are produced at comparatively equal levels for all the constructions (data not shown). A minimal region sufficient to guide the chimeric protein into the nucleus can be narrowed down to the first 75 aa (Fig. 2A and 3). A further deletion of 19 residues (downstream from aa 56) completely abolished nuclear entry. Likewise, the GFP protein fused to the entire AlcR protein lacking the N-terminal domain (residues 1 to 75) was not accumulated in the nuclear compartment, implying that no other motifs outside the first 75 aa possess nuclear import properties. It is noteworthy that this region entirely comprises the DNA-binding domain of AlcR, which contains a Zn2Cys6 binuclear cluster (residues 12 to 49) as well as the Arg6 residue indispensable for recognition of a specific type of targets (38). Several other transcriptional activators of the same family, such as Gal4p (5) and PrnA (43), exhibit a similar pattern of functional organization, where the DNA binding and NLS functions can be attributed to a single domain.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

The N-terminal domain of AlcR is necessary for nuclear localization. (A) Schematic drawings of a full-length AlcR and its truncated derivatives fused to the GFP reporter. The numbers indicate the first and the last amino acid residues of the AlcR fragment introduced into each reporter construct. The DNA-binding domain, aa 1 to 60 (DBD), is denoted by a hatched box. Basic clusters within the NLS sequence are shown in black. N and C indicates the nuclear and cytoplasmic localization, respectively. (B) Subcellular localization of the AlcR-GFP fusions presented above in fungal mycelia.

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

Mutational analysis of the AlcR(1-75) NLS. (A) Schematic representation of the DNA-binding domain of AlcR in a cloverleaf type form. Six cysteines chelating two atoms of Zn as well as arginines and lysines grouped in five clusters (clusters I to V) are shown. Amino acid substitutions introduced during mutational analysis are indicated with arrows. (B) Electrophoretic mobility shift assay of the partially purified AlcR(1-197) proteins with six-His tags with 50 fmol of the radiolabeled probe containing inverted repeat target b as described earlier (37). Aliquots (0.3 μg) of the wild-type (WT) AlcR protein and those mutated in either the Zn binuclear cluster (Cys12-15) or basic regions IV+V, as noted above the gel, were used in each binding reaction. Two retarded complexes, CI and CII, as well as a free probe, P, are indicated on the right. (C) Cellular distribution of the GFP fusions of the wild-type AlcR(1-75) NLS sequence (WT) and those mutated in the Zn binuclear cluster (Cys12-15) or basic regions (regions I to V) in A. nidulans mycelia. Not all the nuclei are in the same focal plane.

As far as both functions overlap, it was crucial to know whether AlcR is actively imported into nuclei or is retained via binding to its cognate targets. To discriminate between these two possibilities, we mutagenized two cysteine residues, namely, Cys12 and Cys15, involved in chelating two atoms of Zn (Fig. 3A). This leads to disruption of the three-dimensional structure of the Zn binuclear cluster and, as a consequence, to complete loss of DNA binding (Fig. 3B). As seen in Fig. 3C, this cysteine-mutated AlcR-GFP fusion protein localized to the nucleus even better than its wild-type counterpart. Such an improvement of the nuclear import could be due to a conformational change of the N-terminal domain that unmasks contacts crucial for interaction with a transport receptor. Alternatively, changing the global structure of this region could produce an artificial NLS which is recognized more efficiently by an alternative transport factor. Similar results have been obtained for PrnA, another transcriptional activator of the Zn binuclear cluster family. The nuclear import of PrnA remained intact when a conservative Pro residue essential for correct folding of the DNA-binding domain was mutated (43). It may therefore be concluded that the specific cloverleaf structure of Zn cluster proteins is not required for nuclear accumulation. Moreover, DNA binding of AlcR is not involved in its nuclear targeting.

A close examination of the AlcR N-terminal domain revealed a high percentage of positively charged residues dispersed throughout this region. Nineteen of seventy-five residues are either arginines or lysines (Fig. 3A). Despite the lack of evident sequence similarity, this distribution of basic residues resembles that of nuclear import signals found in human ribosomal proteins rpS6, rpL7a, or rpL23a (22); the IBB domain of importin α (17); snuportin 1 (20); or XRIPα (24) adapter proteins, which are known to interact directly with importin β receptors (Fig. 4). A common feature of these signals is their very basic nature and a greater complexity in comparison to the classical mono- or bipartite NLS. To test whether these basic stretches contribute to nuclear import of AlcR, a series of mutant constructs containing mutations in each basic cluster (regions I to V) was created. Within each region, the positively charged amino acids were changed simultaneously. The introduced mutations are presented in Fig. 3A. Disruption of any of the first two motifs mislocalized AlcR to the cytoplasm, whereas mutagenesis of the following three basic patches (regions III to V) had a less pronounced effect (Fig. 3C). Among them, region V appeared to be less important for nuclear accumulation. Though the GFP fusion was significantly retained in the cytoplasm, the residual nuclear transport domain of AlcR was efficient enough to translocate, at least partially, the protein into the nuclear compartment. Interestingly, simultaneous disruption of the last two motifs, IV and V, completely prevented AlcR nuclear import. These results are consistent with our deletion analysis data shown in Fig. 2. The AlcR N-terminal region, consisting of the first 56 aa residues, which encompasses three basic clusters, was not sufficient for nuclear localization. It is important to note that whether it is truncated in region IV or mutated in both regions IV and V, AlcR(1-197) with a six-His tag is still able to bind DNA with nearly the same affinity as the wild-type protein (Fig. 3B). These data once again demonstrate that nuclear accumulation of AlcR results not from a nuclear retention mechanism but from its active import. Thus, the N-terminal domain of AlcR plays a dual role. It is responsible for transport of the protein into the nucleus, where it binds to its cognate DNA targets via the DNA recognition motif consisting of the Zn cluster, as well as the crucial Arg6 residue. For nuclear entry AlcR absolutely requires at least four basic stretches. Of these, the first two regions are indispensable. Two other motifs can be represented by various combinations of two among the three remaining basic clusters, with a strong preference for regions III and IV, with region V being less important. However, the integrity of all five clusters present within the first 75 aa provides the most efficient nuclear import.

FIG. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 4.

NLSs of several proteins known to interact directly with importin β. Abbreviations: L23 a, rpL23a, human ribosomal protein (22); Snu1, human snuportin 1 (20); IBB α, importin β-binding domain of the importin α subunit from S. cerevisiae (17); RIP α, nuclear import receptor of replication protein A in Xenopus laevis (24); PTHrP, human parathyroid hormone-related protein (27); TCPTP, T-cell protein tyrosine phosphatase (56); Gal4p, transcriptional activator of the galactose metabolic pathway in S. cerevisiae (5). The NLS of PrnA and AlcR, the pathway-specific activators of proline and ethanol gene clusters in A. nidulans (reference 43 and the present study), and a putative NLS sequence of Pdr3p, a transcription factor from S. cerevisiae, are presented separately. For comparison, classical, mono- and bipartite NLSs from the SV40 large tumor antigen and nucleoplasmin (36) are shown underneath the line. Basic amino acid residues are indicated in boldface type.

The contribution of each basic amino acid residue was checked only for region I. As we have recently shown, the Arg6 residue is not directly involved in nuclear transport but rather is involved in DNA target recognition (38). An individual substitution of either Arg5 or Arg7 which, in contrast, do not contribute to the DNA-binding affinity (3, 38), did not result in a drastic accumulation of the GFP fusion in the cytoplasm (results not shown). However, when all three arginines were changed simultaneously, an additive effect was observed, which may reflect a complex network of interactions between the NLS sequence of AlcR and its transport receptors.

NLS integrity is required for ethanol utilization.If the NLS of AlcR is essential for the nuclear import and function of this transcriptional activator, it would be expected that disruption of this region will give rise to impaired ethanol growth. To assess the physiological relevance of the NLS and investigate any physiological consequences of AlcR mislocalization, we replaced the wild-type copy of the alcR gene with its mutant alleles and tested the ability of A. nidulans to utilize ethanol as a carbon source. Plasmids containing mutated derivatives of the alcR gene were transformed in an alcR-null background. Such a strain was obtained by introducing the alcA gene in the argB2 locus of the alc500 strain, which is has a deletion of the ethanol gene cluster. alcR single-copy transformants were selected. Mutations in AlcR were restricted to regions IV and V because basic residues within clusters I and II have been shown to be involved in direct interactions with DNA (3, 4, 38). Their disruption results in a loss of DNA binding and a concomitant complete loss of transcriptional activation. In this case, any other physiological role that could be attributed to this sequence would be masked. In our in vivo studies, we introduced exactly the same mutations as in the fluorescent microscopic experiments and in the DNA-binding assay. The effects of both individual and combined mutations of regions IV and V were monitored. Toxicity to allyl alcohol was preferred to ethanol growth as a test of AlcR activity as it appears to be more sensitive to the levels of alcohol dehydrogenase (ADHI) activity in the cell and, therefore, is more indicative of the physiological state of the ethanol metabolism system. ADHI oxidizes allyl alcohol into a highly toxic compound, acrolein, resulting in the absence of growth. As seen in Fig. 5A, when grown on plates containing glycerol and 10 mM allyl alcohol, transformants expressing AlcR with alterations in either motif IV or V had exactly the same phenotype as the wild-type or the control alcR nonmutated strain (R), i.e., were unable to grow in the presence of allyl alcohol. In contrast, when both motifs IV and V were mutated, cells were able to survive on such a medium, indicating that the transcription of alcA was impaired. This conclusion was proved by a Northern blot analysis (Fig. 5B). A steady-state level of the alcA transcript observed under induced conditions in transformants containing AlcR modified within the NLS regions IV or V was decreased only two times or less compared to that of the wild-type strain. In contrast, in the strain carrying mutations in both regions IV and V, alcA-induced transcription was severely impaired and under all growth conditions remained at levels obtained for the alcR-null strain. These results are consistent with the absolute inability of the AlcR protein mutated in regions IV and V to enter the nucleus. An unexpectedly elevated basal level of alcA transcription was observed in all transformants as well as in the recipient strain. This could be due to the fact that the alcA gene introduced into the A. nidulans genome lacks several distal CreA-binding sites in the promoter region. Those play a minor role, but their deletion could result in an increase in alcA basal expression which is under the control of the CreA repressor (14). On the other hand, the chromatin structure of the argB locus where alcA was integrated could be more accessible to the transcriptional machinery. Nonetheless, the higher basal level of alcA did not interfere with the growth tests. Taken together, these data show that the growth phenotype and the transcriptional analysis correlate with the nuclear localization of AlcR.

FIG. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 5.

The NLS motif of AlcR is essential for transcriptional activation of the alc system and ethanol utilization by A. nidulans. (A) Growth test of the following A. nidulans strains on 1% glycerol (Gly) and 1% glycerol plus 10 mM of allyl alcohol (Gly+AA): wild type (WT), alcR deletion mutant (ΔR), alcR restored mutant (R), and those with mutations in basic regions (IV, V, and IV+V). Allyl alcohol is oxidized by ADHI into acrolein, which is toxic to the fungal cell and, hence, is indicative of alcA-alcR expression. (B) Northern blot analysis of total RNAs isolated from A. nidulans mycelia pregrown on 0.1% fructose (noninduced [NI]) and induced for 2.5 h with 50 mM ethyl methyl ketone (I) or repressed with 1% glucose in the presence of 50 mM ethyl methyl ketone (IG). For transcriptional analysis, the same A. nidulans strains as those used for growth tests were used. Equal amounts of RNA (20 μg) were loaded per blot, and the blots were subsequently probed with 32P-labeled alcA and actin gene fragments. Relative amounts of the alcA transcript normalized to the actin signal are given by numbers above each bar presented in a histogram shown below.

AlcR can be targeted to the nuclei by several importin β receptors.Given that the nuclear transport pathway in S. cerevisiae is well characterized at both the genetic and molecular levels (12), we utilized this model organism to investigate the mechanism of nuclear import of AlcR. As a preliminary approach, the functional integrity of the AlcR NLS was tested in yeast. An AlcR-2xGFP fusion protein was expressed from the yeast MET25 promoter in a centromeric vector. A tandem copy of the gfp gene introduced into the construct increased the size of the chimeric protein to avoid its possible nucleocytoplasmic shuttling by passive diffusion, thereby resulting in a reduction of background cytoplasmic fluorescence. The intact NLS sequence guided the GFP fusion predominantly to the nucleus, whereas the mutation in region II led to an aberrant subcellular localization of uniform fluorescence throughout the cell (Fig. 6A). Hence, the nuclear localization of the fusion in the yeast cell is absolutely dependent on the integrity of the AlcR NLS. This sequence is perfectly recognized by the heterologous yeast transport receptors, indicating that the mechanism of the nuclear import is highly conserved between A. nidulans and S. cerevisiae.

FIG. 6.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 6.

Nuclear translocation of AlcR requires Ran/Gsp1p GTPase activity and Kap104p, Sxm1p, and Nmd5p receptors but neither importin α nor importin β. (A) AlcR(1-75) fused to two tandem repeats of GFP (2xGFP) was expressed in S. cerevisiae wild-type and mutated strains carrying temperature-sensitive alleles of GSP1 (gsp1-1), importin α (srp1-31), and importin β (rsl1-4). Cellular distribution of the GFP fusion was monitored by fluorescence microscopy. Cells were grown at 25°C and then shifted for 2 h at 37°C before the images were captured. The AlcR(1-75)-2xGFP fusion mutated in the basic region II (WT/ΔNLS) served as a control to show that the nuclear import of AlcR in yeast wild-type strain (WT) requires the NLS sequence. The coincident DAPI staining of the nuclei is shown. (B) Kap104p, Sxm1p, and Nmd5p mediate the nuclear import of AlcR(1-75). Strains with deletions of KAP104 (Δkap104), SXM1 (Δsxm1), or NMD5 (Δnmd5) mislocalized the AlcR(1-75)-2xGFP fusion to the cytoplasm. Strains were grown at 30°C, except for the KAP104-deficient strain, which was grown at room temperature. The nuclear accumulation of the GFP fusion was restored upon complementation of deletions with the corresponding kap genes (Δkap104 + KAP104; Δsxm1 + SXM1; Δnmd5 + NMD5). Nuclei were visualized by DAPI staining. (C) Control panels showing cellular distribution of the SV40 T-antigen NLS fused to GFP in yeast mutant strains grown under the same conditions as described above. (D) Kap104p and Sxm1p bind directly to the NLS of AlcR. Reticulocyte lysates containing [35S]methionine-labeled either full-length [AlcR(1-821)] or truncated [AlcR(101-821)] AlcR protein were initially incubated with purified GST fusions of Kap104p, Sxm1p, or GST alone, as indicated above the gel, followed by incubation with glutathione-Sepharose. The bound material was separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by fluorography. The input lane represents 10% of the reticulocyte reaction used in the binding assay. The amounts of GST and GST-karyopherin fusions used in each binding reaction were tested by Western blot analysis with anti-GST antibodies (panel at right).

We next addressed the mechanism whereby AlcR is targeted to the nucleus. For this purpose, the AlcR-2xGFP fusion was expressed in a panel of S. cerevisiae mutants defective in nuclear transport, and its subcellular localization was examined. With a few exceptions (26), all nuclear import events studied so far require soluble transport factors and energy in the GTP form. To determine whether this is also the case for AlcR, we first examined its localization in a temperature-sensitive gsp1-1 mutant strain with Ran/Gsp1p GTPase impaired at restrictive temperatures (62). In gsp1-1 cells AlcR-2xGFP was found mostly in the cytoplasm after a 2-h shift to the nonpermissive temperature (Fig. 6A). Thus, like other nuclear proteins, AlcR nuclear translocation is dependent on Ran/Gsp1p activity and cannot be due to a passive diffusion mechanism followed by nuclear retention.

It was next important to know if AlcR nuclear import occurs via the classical importin α/β heterodimer or involves another importin β family receptor. To ascertain whether the nuclear import of AlcR requires the importin α subunit in vivo, we observed its localization in srp1-31 cells. This strain carries a conditional allele of importin α and is defective in nuclear translocation of proteins with typical NLSs (29). The localization of the fusion was tested after a 2-h shift to the nonpermissive temperature. The protein remained exclusively nuclear in srp1-31 cells at both permissive and restrictive temperatures, while GFP fused to the classical NLS of SV40 T-antigen was mostly cytoplasmic at 37°C (Fig. 6A and C [only cells at 37°C are shown]). Likewise, a temperature-sensitive mutation of the importin β subunit RSL1/KAP95 (rsl1-4) did not alter the nuclear distribution of AlcR-2xGFP even after a prolonged incubation at the restrictive temperature, whereas cellular distribution of the SV40-GFP fusion was affected (Fig. 6A and C). These data suggest that the import of AlcR into the nucleus proceeds neither via the classical pathway requiring importin α/β heterodimer nor by direct interaction with the importin β receptor.

To further define transport receptors responsible for AlcR nuclear loading, the subcellular distribution of the AlcR-2xGFP fusion was monitored in mutant strains deficient in various members of the importin β family (Table 1). The panel of mutants included those transport receptors that are mainly involved in the nuclear import process, except for the Kap122p/Pdr6p importin (57), as well as Los1p exportin (7, 41) and karyopherin Kap120p, which is implicated in the export of the 60S ribosomal subunit (55). Deletion of either KAP104, SXM1, or NMD5 caused visible defects in AlcR trafficking but did not impair nuclear import of the SV40-GFP fusion (Fig. 6B and C). It has been reported that disruption of the KAP104 gene has a severe impact on growth of the yeast cells (1). Although many of the cells were dead after prolonged culture growth, those with intact nuclei exhibited impaired subcellular localization of AlcR-2xGFP (Fig. 6B). A strong accumulation of the fusion in the cytoplasm was observed in more than 90% of the cells lacking either SXM1 or NMD5, although a residual nuclear fluorescence was observed (Fig. 6B). Interestingly, in all three mutant strains such a mislocalization appeared to be transient. When the rate of protein synthesis was reduced either by decreasing the growth temperature or leaving logarithmically grown cells for a few hours without agitation, the mutant phenotype reversed, resulting in a regular targeting of the GFP fusion to the nuclei (results not shown). This phenomenon may be accounted for by the multiplicity of the transport pathways for AlcR. In the absence of one of the transport receptors, the nuclear import of AlcR is mediated by two other importins, albeit less efficiently, giving rise to temporarily enhanced cytoplasmic fluorescence. The original nuclear localization of AlcR-2xGFP was completely restored when deletions of KAP104, SXM1, and NMD5 were complemented with the corresponding genes (Fig. 6B). These data further confirm direct involvement of the aforementioned importin β receptors in the nuclear import of AlcR.

AlcR interacts directly with two importin β receptors.To examine the mode of AlcR interaction with the corresponding importins β, we tested their ability of direct binding in vitro in a GST pull down assay. The karyopherins Kap104p, Sxm1p, and Nmd5p were expressed as GST fusions in E. coli and purified on glutathione-Sepharose. Full-length AlcR produced and labeled in vitro with [35S]methionine by a coupled transcription-translation rabbit reticulocyte lysate system was initially incubated with recombinant GST-importin β fusions, and interacting complexes were recovered with glutathione-Sepharose beads (Fig. 6D). More than 70% of the AlcR fraction was specifically bound to GST-Sxm1p. A much-reduced binding affinity (about 30% of AlcR was bound) was observed for the GST-Kap104p containing sample. This value, however, significantly exceeds the background level (10%) corresponding to GST alone, which can be ascribed to unspecific binding of proteins present in reticulocyte lysate. Moreover, interactions with both GST-Kap104p and GST-Sxm1p fusions could be specifically attributed to the NLS sequence, since AlcR protein lacking the first 100 aa residues exhibited only a background level of binding (Fig. 6D). Unfortunately, we failed to detect interaction between AlcR and Nmd5p, but we cannot rule out the possibility that the GST-Nmd5p sample could be inactive.

Diversity of the nuclear import pathways of Zn binuclear cluster transcriptional regulators.As shown above, the AlcR NLS overlaps with its DNA-binding domain, itself highly conserved among fungal transcriptional factors belonging to the Zn binuclear cluster protein family. Basic residues that constitute the NLS of AlcR retain their conservative positions in 30% of cases (49). Gal4p and PrnA, two other transactivators of the same class, exhibited a similar type of extended sequence rich in lysines and arginines found within their DNA-binding motifs to deliver the proteins into the nuclei (6, 43). The intriguing question is whether proteins with a similar structural organization have evolved a common mechanism of nuclear import by sharing the same transport receptors. To address this point, Gal4p and PrnA, or more precisely their first 147 and 130 aa residues, respectively, were fused to GFP, and subcellular localization of the fusions was examined in the same set of mutant strains as for AlcR (Table 1). In addition, Pdr3p, another representative of the Zn cluster family whose transport mechanism was unknown but distinct from that of its ortholog Pdr1p (10), was included in the assay. All three proteins are known to be constitutively present in the nuclei (10, 43, 53).

A temperature-sensitive rsl1-4 mutant that has defects in yeast importin β/Kap95p partially mislocalized Gal4p(1-147)-GFP to the cytoplasm of 25 to 30% cells after a shift to the restrictive temperature (Fig. 7A). Similarly, the IBB(1-60) domain of importin α known to interact directly with Kap95p was retained in the cytoplasm as judged by GFP fluorescence in rsl1-4 cells (Fig. 7B). On the other hand, mutation in the importin α subunit, represented by the conditional allele srp1-31, had no significant effect on the nuclear accumulation of Gal4p (Table 1). Such patterns of Gal4p(1-147)-GFP distribution correlate with importin-α-independent, direct in vitro binding established between Gal4p and importin β by Chan et al. (6). However, it is important to note that this mode of nuclear entry via a direct loading of the importin β receptor with Gal4p dimers probably plays a marginal role in living cells. Rather, the principal transport pathway for Gal4p could be mediated by a nonessential karyopherin, Nmd5p. As for AlcR, deletion of NMD5 resulted in a drastic accumulation of Gal4p(1-147)-GFP in the cytoplasm of more than 90% of cells (Fig. 7A). This aberrant distribution of the fusion was totally restored to the wild-type pattern of localization into the nuclei when a functional copy of the NMD5 gene was introduced back into the yeast cell. Thus, AlcR and Gal4p share the same Nmd5p receptor for their nuclear import, whereas neither Kap104p, nor Sxm1p, nor any other importin β homolog altered the nuclear localization of Gal4p (Table 1).

FIG. 7.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 7.

Nuclear import of Zn binuclear cluster proteins Gal4p, Pdr3p, and PrnA in S. cerevisiae kap mutants. (A) Cellular localization of the Gal4p(1-147)-GFP fusion in a thermosensitive strain of importin β (rsl1-4) and a Δnmd5 strain. After a 2-h shift from a permissive (25°C) to restrictive (37°C) temperature, Gal4p(1-147)-GFP was partially mislocalized to the cytoplasm (left panel). Mislocalized in the Δnmd5 strain, the fusion was targeted back to the nuclei after a complementation with the NMD5 gene (Δnmd5 + NMD5). (B) Cellular distribution of the IBB(1-60) domain of importin α from S. cerevisiae fused to GFP in the importin β mutant strain (rsl1-4) was impaired upon a shift to 37°C. (C) Nuclear accumulation of Pdr3p(1-100) fused to GFP was affected in rsl1-4 cells (rsl1-4) both at 25 and 37°C and was restored when an exogenous copy of KAP95/RSL1 was expressed (rsl1-4 + RSL1) in the yeast cell. (D) Nuclear localization of PrnA(1-130)-GFP remains intact in rsl1-4 cells at both permissive (25°C) and restrictive (37°C) temperatures. The coincident DAPI staining is shown below each panel.

The NLS responsible for the nuclear transport of Pdr3p lies within the N-terminal 100 aa residues, since this sequence is sufficient for the nuclear targeting of GFP as efficiently as the full-length protein (results not shown). As in AlcR and Gal4p, this region comprises the DNA-binding domain and is rich in basic amino acid residues. This distinguishes Pdr3p from its functional homolog Pdr1p, whose NLS enriched in Ser/Tyr residues maps closer to the C terminus (10). Interestingly, none of the importin β-like receptors that supported the transport of AlcR appeared to be operative on the Pdr3p NLS (Table 1). In contrast, importin β/Kap95p seems to be involved in the import process. In rsl1-4 cells, a Pdr3p(1-100)-GFP fusion was slightly accumulated in the cytoplasm even at the permissive temperature (Fig. 7C). The phenomenon was much more pronounced at 37°C. Expression of an extragenic copy of the RSL1/KAP95 gene restored exclusive nuclear compartmentalization of Pdr3p(1-100)-GFP and confirms involvement of the importin β subunit (Fig. 7C). Like Gal4p, Pdr3p does not require the importin α adapter for nuclear delivery, since in srp1-31 cells its transport was not affected (Table 1). In this respect, both proteins share a common transport pathway, provided that for Pdr3p importin β is the sole transport receptor among those tested. The possibility of a direct interaction between Pdr3p and Kap95p was not checked experimentally.

Surprisingly, none of the receptors listed in Table 1 abolished the nuclear localization of PrnA(1-130)-GFP. A typical pattern of nuclear fluorescence exemplified by the one observed in rsl1-4 cells is present in Fig. 7D. We did not verify the localization of the fusion in the Δkap122/pdr6 strain, which lacks one of the members of the importin β family. This strain has been shown to import the large and small subunits of the general transcription factor TFIIA (57). Two other receptors, Los1p and Kap120p, not included in these assays, are probably not involved in nuclear import. Rather, they have been shown to export tRNAs and 60S ribosomal subunits, respectively (41, 55). Although a model of bidirectional function for a specified karyopherin does not meet any theoretical obstacles, it has been thus far demonstrated only for yeast transporter Msn5p (63) or human importin 13 (31). However, in the MSN5-deficient strain, the nuclear localization of PrnA(1-130)-GFP remained intact (Table1). Further studies are required to highlight the nuclear import mechanism of PrnA.

DISCUSSION

In the present study, we have elucidated the nuclear transport mechanism of several Zn binuclear cluster proteins, and in particular, we have dissected the molecular mechanism of the nuclear entry of AlcR, a transcriptional activator of the ethanol pathway in A. nidulans. Like other members of this class, such as Gal4p (5, 53), PrnA (43), Pdr1p, and Pdr3p (10), whose subcellular localization has been tested, AlcR is constitutively targeted to the nucleus independently of the presence of the inducer. No translational modification seems necessary for AlcR and these proteins to enter the nucleus, as opposed to Mig1p and Pho4p, whose transport is phosphorylation dependent (11, 25). Several lines of evidence unambiguously demonstrate that nuclear localization of AlcR results from an active import process rather than from a retention mechanism via DNA binding. First, disruption of the AlcR DNA-binding motif does not abolish its nuclear import, and vice versa, impaired in nuclear targeting AlcR can still recognize its DNA-binding sites. Second, introduced into yeast cells which a priori do not contain any AlcR-binding sequences, the AlcR-GFP fusion protein is normally delivered to the nuclei. Moreover, this nuclear accumulation results from an energy-dependent mechanism of nuclear transport that absolutely requires both Ran/Gsp1p GTPase activity and specific transport receptors.

Using GFP-labeled AlcR truncated or mutant alleles, we have demonstrated that a signal responsible for the nuclear import of AlcR resides within its N-terminal domain. It consists of five clusters of basic amino acids scattered within the first 75 aa. Four regions are necessary and sufficient for nuclear translocation and, as a consequence, to maintain transcriptional activation of the alc system and to support growth on ethanol. The first two clusters are absolutely essential for transport, while the other two are interchangeable and contribute to high binding affinity of transport receptors. The fifth cluster is required for full transport activity. Interestingly, arginines and lysines within the first 60 aa lie spatially close to each other, forming two interfaces on the opposite sides of the AlcR molecule that may be recognized by different karyopherins (Fig. 8). Such a spatial disposition of basic residues differs from an extended, strand-like three-dimensional structure of the IBB domain of importin α (8), which may explain why nuclear import of AlcR does not proceed through an importin β-dependent pathway.

FIG. 8.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 8.

Three-dimensional structure of AlcR(1-60). Shown is a structural model of AlcR illustrating positions of the basic amino acid residues (shown in blue) of its NLS sequence involved in nuclear import. Both the front and the back view of the molecule are shown. Modeling was performed using the MMDB database.

The NLS motifs of AlcR, PrnA, and Gal4p enriched in basic amino acid residues resemble import signals found in several ribosomal proteins or in the IBB domain of importin α (Fig. 4). Despite their distinct binding sites on importin β, these signals are different from classical mono- or bipartite NLSs recognized by importin α/β heterodimer and are known to interact directly with importin β receptors (36). Here, for the first time, we provide cytological and biochemical evidence that, like ribosomal proteins (22, 47), core histones (33, 34, 35), or signal recognition particles (19), fungal transcriptional activators of the Zn2Cys6 cluster family can be delivered to the nuclei by alternative transport pathways that do not require the importin α adapter subunit. However, nuclear import of this class of proteins is mediated by a different array of karyopherins. For example, AlcR can be transported equally well by three karyopherins, namely, Kap104p, Sxm1p, and Nmd5p, while the transport of Gal4p is mediated by either Nmd5p or Kap95p. Such a redundant mechanism of nuclear import may reflect a complex organization of the NLSs, where various combinations of basic clusters may represent distinct targets for different transporters which may occupy them simultaneously. Alternatively, various importins may have different affinities for the same cognate sequence. This multiple mechanism of nuclear import of Zn binuclear cluster proteins could also account for our failure to establish how PrnA is targeted to the nuclei. If its transport is mediated by more than one importin β receptors which are not individually saturated, then a deletion of a single karyopherin will not give rise to any visible phenotype, which is the result we actually observed. Another hypothesis implies involvement of either Kap120p, Kap122p, or Los1p transport factors that have not, as yet, been tested.

Our results suggest that the process of nuclear trafficking of AlcR proceeds through direct binding to Sxm1p and Kap104p importins. Sxm1p was originally found to be a transporter for a protein involved in tRNA maturation, Lhp1p, as well as for a few ribosomal proteins, where it binds them directly (45, 46). Although a 113-aa domain of Lhp1p has been identified to drive Sxm1p-dependent nuclear localization, the precise NLS sequence remains unclear. In this report, we have characterized for the first time the substrate specificity of Sxm1p represented by the NLS of AlcR. Among yeast karyopherins, Sxm1p is most similar (26% identity) to Nmd5p (2). It is thus not surprising that they exhibit an overlapping function with regard to the import of AlcR. Unfortunately, our results did not allow us to highlight the substrate specificity of Nmd5p. Kap104p appeared to bind AlcR less efficiently than Sxm1p. Kap104p or its human homolog, termed transportin, is known as the main carrier for nuclear mRNA-binding proteins in both mammalian and yeast cells, where it interacts directly with M9-related NLS sequences of the corresponding target proteins (28, 54). In addition, transportin is able to bind simultaneously to ribosomal proteins via an independent binding site (22). Our data demonstrate that its yeast ortholog, Kap104p, can also recognize extended, basic-rich NLSs. Judged exclusively by the basic nature of this NLS, it is difficult to predict whether the AlcR NLS interacts with a region that is distinct from the RGG-binding site of Nap2p (59). As it has been recently shown, the hydrophobic M9 sequence and the arginine-rich NLS of the human TAP nuclear RNA export factor share at least overlapping binding sites on transportin (61). Additional experiments are required to define the exact region of Kap104p involved in the interaction with AlcR. Taking into account our in vitro data, Sxm1p seems to represent the major transport receptor for AlcR in the yeast system. However, we do not know its principal import pathways in A. nidulans. It would be interesting to get more insights into the nuclear transport mechanism of AlcR in its native context.

Our data show that proteins with a similar structural organization of their NLS motifs can, indeed, be imported to the nuclei by common transporters. Like AlcR, Gal4p can be targeted to the nuclei through the Nmd5p-dependent pathway. This is a second and, probably, more efficient route than that mediated by a direct interaction with Kap95p, a pathway identified earlier (6). This receptor is shared between Gal4p and Pdr3p. Both proteins enter the nuclei in an importin-α-independent manner. Strikingly, a functional homolog of Pdr3p, Pdr1p, that displays 75% similarity within its DNA-binding domain, a region which overlaps with the NLS of Pdr3p, is transported to the nuclei via a separate pathway using a distinct NLS (10). Together, these examples demonstrate a wide diversity of the nuclear import pathways responsible for the nuclear localization of proteins belonging to the same Zn2Cys6 cluster family, where each karyopherin may have unique requirements for recognition of different types of basic NLSs.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are very grateful for P. A. Silver and her laboratory for providing us with yeast strains and importin β-bearing plasmids, C. Jacq for the pdr3-containing plasmid, and C. Scazzocchio for the prnA construct. We thank D. Zickler for invaluable help on fluorescence microscopy, M. DuBow for correcting the English version of the manuscript, and C. Velot and M. Flipphi for helpful discussions and critical comments of the manuscript. We thank M. Mathieu for assistance in preparation of the manuscript.

This work was supported in part by grants from the CNRS (UMR 8621), the University Paris-Sud, and European Communities contracts BIO4-CT96-0535 and QLK3-CT1999-00729.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 27 August 2002.
    • Accepted 6 January 2003.
  • Copyright © 2003 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Aitchison, J. D., G. Blobel, and M. P. Rout. 1996. Kap104p: a karyopherin invovled in the nuclear transport of messenger RNA binding proteins. Science274:624-627.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Albertini, M., L. F. Pemberton, J. S. Rosenblum, and G. Blobel. 1998. A novel import pathway for the transcription factor TFIIS. J. Cell Biol.143:1447-1455.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Cahuzac, B., R. Cerdan, B. Felenbok, and E. Guittet. 2001. The solution structure of an AlcR-DNA complex sheds light onto unique tight and monomeric DNA binding of a Zn(2)Cys(6) protein. Structure (Cambridge)9:827-836.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Cerdan, R., B. Cahuzac, B. Felenbok, and E. Guittet. 2000. NMR solution structure provides insight in the unusual DNA binding properties of this zinc binuclear cluster protein. J. Mol. Biol.295:729-736.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Chan, C. K., S. Hubner, W. Hu, and D. A. Jans. 1998. Mutual exclusivity of DNA binding and nuclear localization signal recognition by the yeast transcription factor GAL4: implications for nonviral DNA delivery. Gene Ther.5:1204-1212.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Chan, C. K., and D. A. Jans. 1999. Synergy of importin alpha recognition and DNA binding by the yeast transcriptional activator GAL4. FEBS Lett.462:221-224.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Chook, Y. M., and G. Blobel. 2001. Karyopherins and nuclear import. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.11:703-715.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Cingolani, G., C. Petrosa, K. Weis, and C. W. Müller. 1999. Structure of importin-β bound to the IBB domain of importin-α. Nature399:221-229.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Conti, E., M. Uy, L. Leighton, G. Blobel, and J. Kuriyan. 1998. Crystallographic analysis of the recognition of a nuclear localization signal by the nuclear import factor karyopherin α. Cell94:193-204.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    Delahodde, A., R. Pandjaitan, M. Corral-Debrinski, and C. Jacq. 2001. Pse1/Kap121-dependent nuclear localization of the major yeast multidrug resistance (MDR) transcription factor Pdr1. Mol. Microbiol.39:304-312.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    DeVit, M. J., and M. Johnston. 1999. The karyopherin Kap142p/Msn5p is required for nuclear export of the Mig1 glucose repressor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Biol.9:1231-1241.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Fabre, E., and E. Hurt. 1997. Yeast genetics to dissect the nuclear pore complex and nucleocytoplasmic trafficking. Annu. Rev. Genet.31:277-313.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    Felenbok, B., M. Flipphi, and I. Nikolaev. 2001. Ethanol catabolism in Aspergillus nidulans: a model system for studying gene regulation. Prog. Nucleic Res. Mol. Biol.69:149-204.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    Fillinger, S., C. Panozzo, M. Mathieu, and B. Felenbok. 1995. The basal level of transcription of the alc genes in the ethanol regulon in Aspergillus nidulans is controlled both by the specific transactivator AlcR and the general carbon catabolite repressor CreA. FEBS Lett.368:547-550.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    Flipphi, M., M. Mathieu, I. Cirpus, C. Panozzo, and B. Felenbok. 2001. Regulation of the aldehyde dehydrogenase gene (aldA) and its role in the control of the coinducer level necessary for induction of the ethanol utilization pathway in Aspergillus nidulans. J. Biol. Chem.276:6950-6958.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    Görlich, D., S. Kostka, R. Kraft, C. Dingwall, R. A. Laskey, E. Hartmann, and S. Prehn. 1995. Two different subunits of importin cooperate to recognize nuclear localization signals and bind them to the nuclear envelope. Curr. Biol.5:383-392.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    Görlich, D., P. Henklein, R. A. Laskey, and E. Hartmann. 1996. A 41 amino acid motif in importin-α confers binding to importin-β and hence transit into the nucleus. EMBO J.15:1810-1817.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    Görlich, D., and U. Kutay. 1999. Transport between the cell nucleus and the cytoplasm. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.15:607-660.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    Grosshans, H., K. Deinert, E. Hurt, and G. Simos. 2001. Biogenesis of the signal recognition particle (SRP) involves import of SRP proteins into the nucleolus, assembly with the SRP-RNA, and Xpo1p-mediated export. J. Cell Biol.153:745-761.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    Huber, J., U. Cronshagen, M. Kadokura, C. Marshallsay, T. Wada, M. Sekine, and R. Lührmann. 1998. Snuportin1, an m3G-cap specific nuclear import receptor with a novel domain structure. EMBO J.17:4114-4126.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  21. 21.↵
    Izaurralde, E., U. Kutay, C. von Kobbe, I. W. Mattaj, and D. Görlich. 1997. The asymmetric distribution of the constituents of the Ran system is essential for transport into and out of the nucleus. EMBO J.16:6535-6547.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  22. 22.↵
    Jäkel, S., and D. Görlich. 1998. Importin β, transportin, RanBP5 and RanBP7 mediate nuclear import of ribosomal proteins in mammalian cells. EMBO J.17:4491-4502.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  23. 23.↵
    Johnson-Saliba, M., N. A. Siddon, M. J. Clarkson, D. J. Tremethick, and D. A. Jans. 2000. Distinct importin recognition properties of histones and chromatin assembly factors. FEBS Lett.467:169-174.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    Jullien, D., D. Görlich, U. Laemmli, and Y. Adachi. 1999. Nuclear import of RPA in Xenopus egg extracts requires a novel protein XRIPα but not importin α. EMBO J.18:4348-4358.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  25. 25.↵
    Kaffman, A., N. M. Rank, and E. K. O'Shea. 1998. Phosphorylation regulates association of the transcription factor Pho4 with its import receptor Pse1/Kap121. Genes Dev.12:2673-2683.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    Kuersten, S., M. Ohno, and I. W. Mattaj. 2001. Nucleocytoplasmic transport: ran, beta and beyond. Trends Cell Biol.11:497-503.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    Lam, M. H., W. Hu, C. Y. Xiao, M. T. Gillespie, and D. A. Jans. 2001. Molecular dissection of the importin beta 1-recognized nuclear targeting signal of parathyroid hormone-related protein. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.282:629-634.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    Lee, D. C. Y., and J. D. Aitchison. 1999. Kap104p-mediated nuclear import. J. Biol. Chem.274:29031-29037.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    Loeb, D. J., G. Schlenstedt, D. Pellman, D. Kornitzer, P. A. Silver, and G. R. Fink. 1995. The yeast nuclear import receptor is required for mitosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA92:7647-7651.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    Marie, G., L. Serani, O. Laprevote, B. Cahuzac, E. Guittet, and B. Felenbok. 2001. Differential chemical labeling of the AlcR DNA-binding domain from Aspergillus nidulans versus its complex with a 16-mer DNA target: identification of an essential tryptophan involved in the recognition and the interaction with the nucleic acid. Protein Sci.10:99-107.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    Mingot, J. M., S. Kostka, R. Kraft, E. Hartmann, and D. Görlich. 2001. Importin13: a novel mediator of nuclear import and export. EMBO J.20:3685-3694.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  32. 32.↵
    Morehouse, H., R. M. Buratowski, P. A. Silver, and S. Buratowski. 1999. The importin/karyopherin Kap114 mediates the nuclear import of TATA-binding protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA96:12542-12547.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    Mosammaparast, N., K. R. Jackson, Y. Guo, C. J. Brame, J. Shabanowitz, D. F. Hurt, and L. F. Pemberton. 2001. Nuclear import of histone H2A and H2B is mediated by a network of karyopherins. J. Cell Biol.153:251-262.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    Mosammaparast, N., Y. Guo, J. Shabanowitz, D. F. Hurt, and L. F. Pemberton. 2002. Pathways mediating the nuclear import of histones H3 and H4 in yeast. J. Biol. Chem.277:862-868.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    Mühlhäusser, P., E.-C. Müller, A. Otto, and U. Kutay. 2001. Multiple pathways contribute to nuclear import of core histones. EMBO Rep.2:690-696.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  36. 36.↵
    Nakielny, S., and G. Dreyfuss. 1999. Transport of proteins and RNAs in and out of the nucleus. Cell99:677-690.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    Nikolaev, I., F. Lenouvel, and B. Felenbok. 1999. Unique DNA binding specificity of the binuclear zinc AlcR activator of the ethanol utilization pathway in Aspergillus nidulans. J. Biol. Chem.274:9795-9802.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    Nikolaev, I., M-F. Cochet, F. Lenouvel, and B. Felenbok. 1999. A single amino acid, outside the AlcR zinc binuclear cluster, is involved in DNA binding and transcriptional regulation of the alc genes in Aspergillus nidulans. Mol. Microbiol.31:1115-1124.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    Palmeri, D., and M. H. Malim. 1999. Importin β can mediate the nuclear import of an arginine-rich nuclear localization signal in the absence of importin α. Mol. Cell. Biol.19:1218-1225.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    Panozzo, C., V. Capuano, S. Fillinger, and B. Felenbok. 1997. The zinc binuclear cluster activator AlcR is able to bind to single sites but requires multiple repeated sites for synergistic activation of the alcA gene in Aspergillus nidulans.J. Biol. Chem.272:22859-22865.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    Pemberton, L. F., G. Blobel, and J. S. Rosenblum. 1998. Transport routes through the nuclear pore complex. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.10:392-399.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. 42.↵
    Pemberton, L. F., J. S. Rosenblum, and G. Blobel. 1999. Nuclear import of the TATA-binding protein: mediation by the karyopherin Kap114p and a possible mechanism for intranuclear targeting. J. Cell Biol.145:1407-1417.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    Pokorska, A., C. Drevet, and C. Scazzocchio. 2000. The analysis of the transcriptional activator PrnA reveals a tripartite nuclear localization sequence. J. Mol. Biol.298:585-596.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 44.↵
    Punt, P. J., M. A. Dingemanse, A. Kuyvenhoven, R. D. Soede, P. H. Pouwels, and C. A. van den Hondel. 1990. Functional elements in the promoter region of the Aspergillus nidulans gpdA gene encoding glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Gene93:101-109.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    Rosenblum, J. S., L. F. Pemberton, and G. Blobel. 1997. A nuclear import pathway for a protein involved in tRNA maturation. J. Cell Biol.139:1655-1661.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    Rosenblum, J. S., L. F. Pemberton, N. Bonifaci, and G. Blobel. 1999. Nuclear import and the evolution of a multifunctional RNA-binding protein. J. Cell Biol.143:887-899.
    OpenUrl
  47. 47.↵
    Rout, M. P., G. Blobel, and J. D. Aitchison. 1997. A distinct nuclear import pathway used by ribosomal proteins. Cell89:715-725.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. 48.↵
    Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
  49. 49.↵
    Schjerling, P., and S. Holmberg. 1996. Comparative amino acid sequence analysis of the C6 zinc family of transcriptional activators. Nucleic Acids Res.24:4599-4607.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. 50.↵
    Schlenstedt, G., D. H. Wong, D. M. Koepp, and P. A. Silver. 1995. Mutants in a yeast Ran binding protein are defective in nuclear transport. EMBO J.14:5367-5378.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  51. 51.↵
    Seedorf, M., M. Damlin, J. Kahana, T. Taura, and P. A. Silver. 1999. Interactions between a nuclear transporter and a subset of nuclear pore complex proteins depend on Ran GTPase. Mol. Cell. Biol.19:1547-1557.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. 52.↵
    Sikorski, R. S., and J. D. Boede. 1991. In vitro mutagenesis and plasmid shuffling from cloned gene mutant yeast. Methods Enzymol.194:302-318.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. 53.↵
    Silver, P. A., L. P. Keegan, and M. Ptashne. 1984. Amino terminus of the yeast GAL4 gene product is sufficient for nuclear localization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA81:5951-5956.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. 54.↵
    Siomi, M. C., M. Fermont, J.-C. Rain, L. Wan, F. Wang, P. Legrain, and G. Dreyfuss. 1998. Functional conservation of the transportin nuclear import pathway in divergent organisms. Mol. Cell. Biol.18:4141-4148.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. 55.↵
    Stage-Zimmermann, T., U. Schmidt, and P. A. Silver. 2000. Factors affecting nuclear export of the 60S ribosomal subunit in vivo. Mol. Biol. Cell11:3777-3789.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. 56.↵
    Tiganis, T., A. J. Flint, S. A. Adam, and N. K. Tonks. 1997. Association of the T-cell protein tyrosine phosphatase with nuclear import factor p97. J. Biol. Chem.272:2148-2157.
    OpenUrl
  57. 57.↵
    Titov, A., and G. Blobel. 1999. The karyopherin Kap122p/Pdr6p imports both subunits of the transcription factor IIA into the nucleus. J. Cell Biol.147:235-245.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. 58.↵
    Todd, R. B., and A. Andrianopolous. 1997. Evolution of a fungal regulatory gene family: the Zn(II)Cys6 binuclear cluster DNA binding motif. Fungal Genet. Biol.21:388-405.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  59. 59.↵
    Truant, R., R. A. Fridell, R. E. Benson, H. Bogerd, and B. R. Cullen. 1998. Identification and functional characterization of a novel nuclear localization signal present in the yeast Nab2 poly(A)+ RNA binding protein. Mol. Cell. Biol.18:1449-1458.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. 60.↵
    Truant, R., and B. R. Cullen. 1999. The arginine-rich domains present in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat and Rev function as direct importin β-dependent nuclear localization signals. Mol. Cell. Biol.19:1210-1217.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. 61.↵
    Truant, R., Y. Kang, and B. R. Cullen. 1999. The human Tap nuclear RNA export factor contains a novel transportin-dependent nuclear localization signal that lacks nuclear export signal function. J. Biol. Chem.274:32167-32171.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. 62.↵
    Wong, D. H., A. H. Corbett, H. M. Kent, M. Stewart, and P. A. Silver. 1997. Interaction between the small GTPase Ran/Gsp1p and Ntf2p is required for nuclear transport. Mol. Cell. Biol.17:3755-3767.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. 63.↵
    Yoshida, K., and G. Blobel. 2001. The karyopherin Kap142p/Msn5p mediates nuclear import and nuclear export of different cargo proteins. J. Cell Biol.152:729-739.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Nuclear Import of Zinc Binuclear Cluster Proteins Proceeds through Multiple, Overlapping Transport Pathways
Igor Nikolaev, Marie-Françoise Cochet, Béatrice Felenbok
Eukaryotic Cell Apr 2003, 2 (2) 209-221; DOI: 10.1128/EC.2.2.209-221.2003

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Email

Thank you for sharing this Eukaryotic Cell article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Nuclear Import of Zinc Binuclear Cluster Proteins Proceeds through Multiple, Overlapping Transport Pathways
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Eukaryotic Cell
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Eukaryotic Cell.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Nuclear Import of Zinc Binuclear Cluster Proteins Proceeds through Multiple, Overlapping Transport Pathways
Igor Nikolaev, Marie-Françoise Cochet, Béatrice Felenbok
Eukaryotic Cell Apr 2003, 2 (2) 209-221; DOI: 10.1128/EC.2.2.209-221.2003
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Cell Nucleus
DNA-Binding Proteins
Fungal Proteins
Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About EC
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript to mSphere

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 1535-9778; Online ISSN: 1535-9786