Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About EC
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Eukaryotic Cell
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About EC
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
Articles

Nuclear Pores and Perinuclear Expression Sites of var and Ribosomal DNA Genes Correspond to Physically Distinct Regions in Plasmodium falciparum

Julien Guizetti, Rafael Miyazawa Martins, Stéphanie Guadagnini, Aurélie Claes, Artur Scherf
Julien Guizetti
aDépartement de Parasitologie et Mycologie, Unité de Biologie des Interactions Hôte-Parasite, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
bCNRS URA2581, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rafael Miyazawa Martins
aDépartement de Parasitologie et Mycologie, Unité de Biologie des Interactions Hôte-Parasite, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
bCNRS URA2581, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stéphanie Guadagnini
cInstitut Pasteur, Plate-Forme de Microscopie Ultrastructurale, Imagopole, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aurélie Claes
aDépartement de Parasitologie et Mycologie, Unité de Biologie des Interactions Hôte-Parasite, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
bCNRS URA2581, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Artur Scherf
aDépartement de Parasitologie et Mycologie, Unité de Biologie des Interactions Hôte-Parasite, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
bCNRS URA2581, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/EC.00023-13
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum modifies the erythrocyte it infects by exporting variant proteins to the host cell surface. The var gene family that codes for a large, variant adhesive surface protein called P. falciparum erythrocyte membrane protein 1 (PfEMP1) plays a particular role in this process, which is linked to pathogenesis and immune evasion. A single member of this gene family is highly transcribed while the other 59 members remain silenced. Importantly, var gene transcription occurs at a spatially restricted, but yet undefined, perinuclear site that is distinct from repressed var gene clusters. To advance our understanding of monoallelic expression, we investigated whether nuclear pores associate with the var gene expression site. To this end, we studied the nuclear pore organization during the asexual blood stage using a specific antibody directed against a subunit of the nuclear pore, P. falciparum Nup116 (PfNup116). Ring and schizont stage parasites showed highly polarized nuclear pore foci, whereas in trophozoite stage nuclear pores redistributed over the entire nuclear surface. Colocalization studies of var transcripts and anti-PfNup116 antibodies showed clear dissociation between nuclear pores and the var gene expression site in ring stage. Similar results were obtained for another differentially transcribed perinuclear gene family, the ribosomal DNA units. Furthermore, we show that in the poised state, the var gene locus is not physically linked to nuclear pores. Our results indicate that P. falciparum does form compartments of high transcriptional activity at the nuclear periphery which are, unlike the case in yeast, devoid of nuclear pores.

INTRODUCTION

As shown in yeast and mammals, nuclear pores can define compartments of high transcriptional activity at the nuclear periphery (1, 2). Furthermore, relocation and tethering of specific genes to the nuclear pore complex provide transcriptional memory that enables quicker reactivation of those genes (3). In the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum, the major virulence factor, encoded by the var gene family, is transcribed at a yet undefined site at the nuclear periphery in a monoallelic fashion. Hence, the possibility that nuclear pores play a role in monoallelic var gene activation is an appealing hypothesis.

P. falciparum causes the most severe form of malaria, a parasitic disease killing hundreds of thousands people a year (4, 5). Clinical symptoms of malaria arise during its 48-h replication cycle within human red blood cells. After invasion of a blood cell by a merozoite, the parasite remains in ring stage for 24 h postinvasion (hpi). In the trophozoite stage (25 to 38 hpi), it grows and replicates its genome. Segregation of the chromosomes into the newly forming daughter nuclei and cytokinesis occur in the schizont stage (38 to 48 hpi). Subsequently, 16 to 32 newly formed merozoites will be released upon rupture of the infected red blood cell and start a new infectious cycle.

This intracellular parasite expresses several proteins that are transported to the red blood cell surface and that have multiple functions, such as sequestrating infected red blood cells to the vascular endothelium (6). These proteins are exposed to recognition by the host immune system. Hence, to prolong infection and ensure effective transmission, the parasite has evolved sophisticated strategies for immune evasion. Antigenic variation allows the parasite to change its gene expression profile by switching between different members of gene families coding for surface proteins (7).

var is the best-studied variant gene family coding for the major virulence surface protein P. falciparum erythrocyte membrane protein 1 (PfEMP1). Monoallelic expression governs the transcription of only a single gene of the 60-member gene family, whereas all other genes remain silenced (8). Expression of the var gene peaks around 10 to 14 hpi (9), but during later developmental stages it remains in a state “poised” for reactivation in the next cycle (10). Recently, a histone methyltransferase, PfSet10, has been shown to colocalize specifically with the poised var gene (11).

Epigenetic regulation, such as histone posttranslational lysine modification, is an essential component in monoallelic expression (12). A second essential factor is the spatial regrouping of var genes at the nuclear periphery (13, 14). Apparently, this organization is important to establish a default silencing pathway via facultative heterochromatin.

Silent and active var genes localize to the nuclear periphery, and var gene activation requires the relocation to a perinuclear site that remains undefined to date (13). This has raised the hypothesis that a predefined var gene expression site, similar to the expression site body for variant surface glycoprotein (VSG) genes in Trypanosoma brucei (15), might exist in P. falciparum. Besides var genes, rRNA is among the most highly expressed RNA species in plasmodia. rRNA genes, such as the 18S RNA, cluster in the nucleolus, a specific perinuclear subcompartment (16). Data from model organisms suggested that proximity to the nuclear pore could enable more efficient transcription of highly expressed genes (17).

Ultrastructural analysis using focused-ion-beam scanning electron microscopy (EM) (“slice and view”) has enabled the first visualization of nuclear pore organization in three dimensions (3D) during the P. falciparum asexual blood stages (18). This technique, however, does not allow labeling of molecular markers to link morphological features to functional studies.

In this study, we investigate nuclear pore distribution throughout the parasite's blood stage development by immunofluorescence using a specific antibody raised against a nuclear pore subunit, PfNup116. By combining immunofluorescence and RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), we tested the hypothesis whether nuclear pores are associated with the var gene expression site and if var gene poising requires its sequestration to a nuclear pore. We show that perinuclear gene transcription sites and var gene poising do not depend on nuclear pore association in P. falciparum.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Parasite culture and synchronization.P. falciparum blood stage parasites were cultivated as described previously (19). Parasite culture was synchronized by sorbitol lysis during ring stage, subsequent plasmagel enrichment in schizont stage, and then by another sorbitol treatment at 6 h postinvasion. Synchronized parasites were harvested at 4% hematocrit and ∼5% parasitemia. Parasite development was monitored by Giemsa staining.

Antibody.In order to produce specific antibodies against a plasmodial nuclear pore protein (PfNup116; PF3D7_1473700) rabbits were immunized with the synthetic peptide PQNTSSGTYQPQNTS conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) to generate a polyclonal anti-PfNup116 antibody according to standard protocols of GenScript (catalog number SC1031). Serum from immunized rabbits was affinity purified on a column with resin coupled to the antigenic peptide. After multiple washes, the eluate was collected, neutralized, and dialyzed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).

Western blotting.After lysis of infected red blood cells with 0.15% saponin, nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions of the isolated parasites were separated by mechanical douncing as described previously (20). After being washed in PBS, nuclei were directly extracted in Laemmli buffer. Protein extracts were separated on a 4 to 12% SDS-PAGE gel (Criterion, Bio-Rad) and analyzed by Western blotting using the rabbit anti-PfNup116 at 1:500. Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-P. falciparum aldolase (ab38905; Abcam) at 1:1,000 and rabbit anti-histone 3 (ab1791; Abcam) at 1:2,000 were used to assess purity of cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions as described previously (21). Secondary antibody detection was done with anti-rabbit-HRP (GE health care) at 1:5,000. A SuperSignal West Pico ECL Western blotting kit (Thermo Scientific) was used to develop blots.

Freeze-fracture and cryo-scanning electron microscopy.Infected red blood cells were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in PBS overnight at 4°C and washed three times with PBS. One drop of blood cell pellet was pipetted into a cryo-freezer hat type B (G3467; Agar Scientific), a 100-mesh EM grid (G2410PD; Agar Scientific) was placed on top, and the sample was closed up by a second drop and cryo-freezer hat. Sandwiched samples were high-pressure frozen in an HPM 010 (Bal-Tec) freezing machine. After samples were frozen, they were transferred into an Alto 2500 cryo-transfer system (Gatan) and fractured manually. Sublimation was carried out at −105°C for 2 min. Then samples were coated with 9.5 nm of chromium in a 681 High Resolution Ion Beam Coater (Gatan). Fractured cells were imaged with a JSM-6700F electron microscope (Jeol) using a yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) detector at 5 kV and −120°C.

Immunofluorescence and RNA FISH.Infected red blood cells were lysed with 0.015% saponin in RPMI medium, and the released parasites were fixed in suspension with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS overnight at 4°C. Parasites were then deposited on number 1.5 cover glasses, permeabilized for 15 min with 0.1% Triton X-100, and subjected to immunofluorescence staining and RNA FISH as described previously (22). FISH probes were PCR amplified from genomic DNA using the primers 5′-CAGTAGTCATATGCTTGTC-3′ and 5′-TAATGATCCTTCCGCAGG-3′ for 18S rRNA and 5′-CACACCACTGGACGTCTGCAA-3′ and 5′-CTAGTGGATGAGGATTGGGTG-3′ for PF3D7_0412700 mRNA and labeled by nick translation using a Fluorescein-High Prime kit (Roche). For sequential immunofluorescence assay and RNA FISH, parasites were first hybridized with FISH probes at 37°C overnight. After they were washed, they were postfixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 15 min and then subjected to immunofluorescence staining. Antibodies were diluted 1:200 in 0.5% pork skin gelatin in PBS for anti-PfNup116 and at 1:300 for mouse anti-hemagglutinin ([HA] ab18181; Abcam) and detected with Alexa Fluor 568-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen) diluted 1:2,000. Images were captured using a Nikon Eclipse 80i microscope with a CoolSnap HQ2 camera (Photometrics). NIS Elements, version 3.0, software (Nikon) was used for acquisition, and Fiji software (http://fiji.sc) was used for analysis.

Quantitative analysis of images.Nuclear pore polarization was quantified by scoring whether all detectable PfNup116 fluorescent dots localized within one quadrant of the nucleus (see Fig. 2C). Colocalization was scored in cell nuclei positive for both fluorescent signals when they overlapped while using similar contrast adjustments throughout all images. Scoring was performed by direct optical observation using Fiji software (http://fiji.sc). For each analysis, images from three independent replicas were combined. For the movie in the supplemental material, a z-stack was acquired and deconvolved using Huygens software (SVI).

RESULTS

Nuclear pore distribution changes throughout the developmental blood stages.Scanning electron microscopy images of freeze-fractured infected red blood cells show clusters of pores on the nuclear surface (Fig. 1A). Their symmetric structure and diameter are consistent with the expected organization of the nuclear pore complex. Surprisingly, only one subunit protein of nuclear pores, PfNup100 (23, 24), has been annotated in the genome of P. falciparum (www.plasmoDB.org). To investigate nuclear pore positioning, we evaluated a novel antibody against a putative nuclear pore protein (PF3D7_1473700). It shows homology with the Saccharomyces cerevisiae nucleoporin Nup116 (34% identity and 50% similarity). Rat serum raised against this protein has been previously used for nuclear pore labeling in P. falciparum (19, 25). In this work, a polyclonal affinity-purified rabbit antibody was raised against a 15-amino-acid synthetic peptide from the central region of PfNup116 (Fig. 1B). We validated antibody specificity by Western blotting. In protein extracts from asynchronous parasite culture, we detected a major band of 110 kDa, which migrates slightly lower than the predicted size of 142 kDA. This protein is highly enriched in the nuclear fraction (Fig. 1C). The efficient separation of the nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions was controlled for with anti-histone 3 and anti-aldolase antibodies, respectively (Fig. 1C, lower panels). To further characterize this nuclear pore protein, we carried out immunofluorescence localization studies on highly synchronized blood stage parasites throughout their intraerythrocytic development. We compared immunofluorescence staining of nuclear pores in early ring stages (around 12 hpi) with trophozoite stages (around 32 hpi) and late, segmented schizont stages (around 42 hpi) (Fig. 2A). The anti-PfNup116 signal concentrates in foci at the nuclear periphery. Interestingly, nuclear pores formed a polarized cluster in very early rings. Most ring stages showed a single dot, whereas about 30% showed two dots, and very few cells showed three dots (Fig. 2B). As parasites progress through their cycle, nuclear pores redistribute around the nuclear envelope, and signal intensity increases. During schizont stages the number of nuclear pore foci per nucleus diminishes again, most likely to a single dot, but due to spatial proximity the signals can only sometimes be attributed to individual nuclei (see Movie S1 in the supplemental material). While early-stage cells (n = 74) have only one or two nuclear pore foci, the number of foci increases markedly in late-stage cells (n = 170), whereas frequently individual clusters are not distinguishable any longer (Fig. 2A). Also, the polarization of nuclear pores in the ring stage is lost in the trophozoite stage (Fig. 2C).

Fig 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1

Antibody targeting nuclear pore protein PfNup116. (A) Scanning electron microscopy image of freeze-fractured infected red blood cells with a parasite at the trophozoite stage. N, nucleus; C, parasite cytoplasm; B, red blood cell. Scale bar, 500 nm. The nuclear surface with a nuclear pore cluster (boxed) is magnified in the lower panel. Scale bar, 100 nm. (B) Scheme showing position of the peptide within the PF3D7_1473700 (PfNup116) protein sequence used to immunize rabbits. (C) Western blot of nuclear and cytoplasmic parasite extracts detected with anti-PfNup116 antibody. Anti-histone 3 and anti-aldolase antibody detection show efficient separation of cytoplasmic (C) and nuclear (N) fractions. aa, amino acids.

Fig 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2

Nuclear pore redistribution throughout the intraerythrocytic stages. (A) Immunofluorescence staining of nuclear pores using anti-PfNup116 at different intraerythrocytic stages. The schizont stage image is a maximum-intensity projection. The nucleus is stained with 4′,6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Scale bar, 1 μm. (B) Fraction of nuclear pore-stained nuclei with different numbers of PfNup116 foci in the ring and trophozoite stages. (C) Fraction of cells with all PfNup116 foci within one quadrant of the nucleus in the ring and trophozoite stages. Schemata, which represent nuclei (blue) with two nuclear pore signals (red), illustrate polarized localization within one quadrant (upper circle) versus nonpolarized localization (lower circle).

Our immunofluorescence data using a nuclear pore marker are in agreement with previous ultrastructural data on nuclear pore distribution throughout the intraerythrocytic development cycle (18). This localization pattern indicates that our molecular pore marker is a valuable tool for functional studies in P. falciparum.

Active var gene and 18S RNA expression sites do not associate with nuclear pores.Nuclear pores could form an “anchor” site required for monoallelic var gene expression. Further, proximity to nuclear pores could facilitate transcription and mRNA export of highly expressed genes. To test whether the var gene expression site colocalizes with nuclear pores, we combined RNA FISH of an active var gene with anti-PfNup116 immunostaining. rRNA, expressed in the nucleolus, is the most highly transcribed RNA species in Plasmodium. Hence, we also tested whether nuclear pores would position closely to the 18S RNA transcription sites.

As var gene expression peaks around 10 to 14 hpi, we analyzed tightly synchronized ring stage parasites. We used the 3D7-G7 clone, which predominantly expresses the var gene PF3D7_0412700 against which our FISH probe was targeted (19). No significant colocalization of nuclear PF3D7_0412700 mRNA signal with the nuclear pore signal could be detected (Fig. 3A). Similarly, 18S RNA expression sites rarely colocalized with the PfNup116 signal (Fig. 3B). Since at this early stage the pores are still polarized, scoring colocalization with 18S RNA (n = 32) and PF3D7_0412700 mRNA (n = 33) was greatly facilitated (Fig. 3C). The frequency of random colocalization can be estimated by geometric calculation. The colocalization images we analyzed are two-dimensional. Ring stage nuclei have a diameter of 1 μm and therefore a circumference of 3.14 μm. The diameters of the fluorescence signals we see for the nuclear pore antibody and the FISH probe range from 0.2 to 0.3 μm. If both signals localize randomly on a circle of 3.14-μm circumference (nuclear periphery), their predicted colocalization frequency ranges from 12 to 19%. These values are in the range of observed colocalization frequencies reported in Fig. 3C. Our results strongly suggest that nuclear pores do not recruit or host the var gene expression site. Also, the other known perinuclear expression site, containing the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) genes, does not associate to nuclear pores.

Fig 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3

Colocalization of gene expression sites with nuclear pores. (A) Combination of anti-PfNup116 immunofluorescence staining with RNA FISH using a probe against the active var gene expressed in the 3D7-G7 clone (PF3D7_0412700). The nucleus is stained by DAPI. Scale bar, 1 μm. (B) The experiment as described for panel A but with a FISH probe against 18S rRNA. (C) Fraction of cells with an overlap of FISH and nuclear pore foci.

var gene poising is not associated with nuclear pores.In yeast, it has been shown that certain regulated genes are tethered to the nuclear pore complex for extended periods of time, which enables rapid reactivation of transcription upon external stimulation (3). Similarly, var genes remain in a poised state during the trophozoite and schizont stages before being reactivated at the start of the next cycle. We tested whether var gene poising occurs at the nuclear pore. A putative methyltransferase, PfSet10, which is expressed only in later stages, has recently been shown to colocalize specifically with the poised var gene (11).

We used a parasite line expressing endogenous PfSet10 tagged with hemagglutinin (HA) to carry out double immunostaining with anti-HA and anti-PfNup116 antibodies on late-stage parasites (11). For quantification, we selected cells positive for both signals but with a limited number of nuclear pore foci to clearly distinguish between colocalizing and noncolocalizing signals (Fig. 4A). In the parasites we scored (n = 45), PfSet10-HA signal rarely colocalized with the PfNup116 signal (Fig. 4B). We conclude that var gene poising is not associated with nuclear pores.

Fig 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4

Colocalization of PfSet10-HA with nuclear pores. (A) Combination of anti-PfNup116 and anti-HA immunofluorescence staining on an early-trophozoite-stage parasite expressing recombinant PfSet10-HA. The nucleus is stained by DAPI. Scale bar, 1 μm. (B) Fraction of cells with an overlap of PfSet10-HA and nuclear pore foci.

DISCUSSION

This is, to our knowledge, the first study that investigates the role of nuclear pores in monoallelic gene expression. P. falciparum is a unique organism that uses perinuclear expression sites for gene families that are mutually exclusively expressed. So far, no specific molecular marker has been identified that characterizes these sites. Given the recent evidence for roles of nuclear pores in regulating gene expression, we explored the idea of whether pores associate with the var gene expression site.

Our study supports and expands the ultrastructural data on the unusual distribution pattern of nuclear pores in P. falciparum by immunofluorescence staining (18). Strong polarization of pores, found in early-stage parasites, has been very rarely described in other cell types and organisms. In late development of mouse spermatids, nuclear pores are clustered at the caudal pole of the nucleus, opposite to the acrosomal cap (26). In budding yeast, deletion of Nup133, a nucleoporin, causes extensive clustering of nuclear pores (27). A recent paper shows that motor proteins and cytoskeletal elements are important for uniform distribution of nuclear pores in fungal nuclei, suggesting that an active process prevents their clustering (28). Weiner et al. argue that ring and schizont stage nuclei are in close contact with the plasma membrane, and therefore nuclear pores polarize to the side of the nuclear envelope with free access to the cytoplasm (18). Even though data on nuclear pore biology of P. falciparum is still very scarce, a recent study of the P. falciparum nuclear proteome yielded interesting candidate proteins, whose further characterization can improve understanding of nuclear pore organization (23).

Ribosomal DNA genes and var genes are among the most highly transcribed RNA species in P. falciparum (16). As neither of them is expressed in the proximity of the nuclear pore, this shows that the spatial proximity is not limiting for efficient RNA export into the cytoplasm, as has been suggested by models and in vivo diffusion measurements in other organisms (29). As 18S RNA is expressed in the nucleolus, we can conclude that nucleolar positioning is independent of nuclear pore localization.

What defines the var gene expression site at the nuclear periphery is a long-standing question in the field. Since nuclear pores have been previously associated with transcriptional activation, as proposed first in the gene-gating hypothesis (30), they are attractive candidates for recruitment sites of the activated var gene. Our observations, however, show that tethering to the nuclear pore does not occur for active var and rDNA genes. The only factor known to spatially organize var genes remains actin, which contributes to the tethering of central var genes to the nuclear periphery (25). A number of other chromatin components have been identified that are enriched at the nuclear periphery; however, no functional data are yet available that demonstrate a role of these proteins in the spatial organization of silent or active var genes through, e.g., chromosome end clustering (31, 32). Recently, it has been shown that spatial segregation is also important for activation of other clonally variant genes. As relocating the silent PfRh4 gene to a transcriptionally active site increases its probability of being switched on, the authors hypothesized that translocation precedes activation (33).

Gene poising is another important aspect of antigenic variation. Keeping a single gene marked for reactivation reduces switching to another member of the family and therefore prevents premature depletion of the “immunogenic repertoire.” Potentially, the poised gene could be maintained at a defined site, marked by PfSet10 (11), throughout the late parasite stages. This would provide positional memory for reactivation of the same var gene. If, however, positional memory exists in the context of var gene poising, it is not associated with the nuclear pore.

In conclusion, our work points to a distinctive perinuclear compartment involved in monoallelic exclusion. The identification of molecular markers associated to this expression site is of key importance to gain new insight into the virulence process of malaria parasites.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Jose Juan Lopez-Rubio for providing the 3D7-G7 clone as well as Jennifer Volz and Alan Cowman for providing the Set10-HA clone.

This work was supported by an ERC Advanced Grant (PlasmoEscape 250320), ANR grant (number 09-BLAN-0274-01), the French parasitology network of excellence ParaFrap, and a Human Frontier Science Program fellowship to J.G.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 1 February 2013.
    • Accepted 27 February 2013.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 8 March 2013.
  • Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/EC.00023-13.

  • Copyright © 2013, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

The authors have paid a fee to allow immediate free access to this article.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Arib G,
    2. Akhtar A
    . 2011. Multiple facets of nuclear periphery in gene expression control. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 23:346–353.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Dieppois G,
    2. Stutz F
    . 2010. Connecting the transcription site to the nuclear pore: a multi-tether process that regulates gene expression. J. Cell Sci. 123:1989–1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Brickner DG,
    2. Brickner JH
    . 2012. Interchromosomal clustering of active genes at the nuclear pore complex. Nucleus 3:487–492.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Snow RW,
    2. Guerra CA,
    3. Noor AM,
    4. Myint HY,
    5. Hay SI
    . 2005. The global distribution of clinical episodes of Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Nature 434:214–217.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Murray CJ,
    2. Rosenfeld LC,
    3. Lim SS,
    4. Andrews KG,
    5. Foreman KJ,
    6. Haring D,
    7. Fullman N,
    8. Naghavi M,
    9. Lozano R,
    10. Lopez AD
    . 2012. Global malaria mortality between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet 379:413–431.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Maier AG,
    2. Cooke BM,
    3. Cowman AF,
    4. Tilley L
    . 2009. Malaria parasite proteins that remodel the host erythrocyte. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7:341–354.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Scherf A,
    2. Lopez-Rubio JJ,
    3. Riviere L
    . 2008. Antigenic variation in Plasmodium falciparum. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 62:445–470.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Scherf A,
    2. Hernandez-Rivas R,
    3. Buffet P,
    4. Bottius E,
    5. Benatar C,
    6. Pouvelle B,
    7. Gysin J,
    8. Lanzer M
    . 1998. Antigenic variation in malaria: in situ switching, relaxed and mutually exclusive transcription of var genes during intra-erythrocytic development in Plasmodium falciparum. EMBO J. 17:5418–5426.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  9. 9.↵
    1. Schieck E,
    2. Pfahler JM,
    3. Sanchez CP,
    4. Lanzer M
    . 2007. Nuclear run-on analysis of var gene expression in Plasmodium falciparum. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 153:207–212.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Lopez-Rubio JJ,
    2. Gontijo AM,
    3. Nunes MC,
    4. Issar N,
    5. Hernandez Rivas R,
    6. Scherf A
    . 2007. 5′ Flanking region of var genes nucleate histone modification patterns linked to phenotypic inheritance of virulence traits in malaria parasites. Mol. Microbiol. 66:1296–1305.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Volz JC,
    2. Bartfai R,
    3. Petter M,
    4. Langer C,
    5. Josling GA,
    6. Tsuboi T,
    7. Schwach F,
    8. Baum J,
    9. Rayner JC,
    10. Stunnenberg HG,
    11. Duffy MF,
    12. Cowman AF
    . 2012. PfSET10, a Plasmodium falciparum methyltransferase, maintains the active var gene in a poised state during parasite division. Cell Host Microbe 11:7–18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Scherf A,
    2. Riviere L,
    3. Lopez-Rubio JJ
    . 2008. SnapShot: var gene expression in the malaria parasite. Cell 134:190.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Ralph SA,
    2. Scheidig-Benatar C,
    3. Scherf A
    . 2005. Antigenic variation in Plasmodium falciparum is associated with movement of var loci between subnuclear locations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102:5414–5419.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Freitas-Junior LH,
    2. Hernandez-Rivas R,
    3. Ralph SA,
    4. Montiel-Condado D,
    5. Ruvalcaba-Salazar OK,
    6. Rojas-Meza AP,
    7. Mancio-Silva L,
    8. Leal-Silvestre RJ,
    9. Gontijo AM,
    10. Shorte S,
    11. Scherf A
    . 2005. Telomeric heterochromatin propagation and histone acetylation control mutually exclusive expression of antigenic variation genes in malaria parasites. Cell 121:25–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Navarro M,
    2. Gull K
    . 2001. A pol I transcriptional body associated with VSG mono-allelic expression in Trypanosoma brucei. Nature 414:759–763.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Mancio-Silva L,
    2. Zhang Q,
    3. Scheidig-Benatar C,
    4. Scherf A
    . 2010. Clustering of dispersed ribosomal DNA and its role in gene regulation and chromosome-end associations in malaria parasites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107:15117–15122.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Akhtar A,
    2. Gasser SM
    . 2007. The nuclear envelope and transcriptional control. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8:507–517.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Weiner A,
    2. Dahan-Pasternak N,
    3. Shimoni E,
    4. Shinder V,
    5. von Huth P,
    6. Elbaum M,
    7. Dzikowski R
    . 2011. 3D nuclear architecture reveals coupled cell cycle dynamics of chromatin and nuclear pores in the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Cell Microbiol. 13:967–977.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Lopez-Rubio JJ,
    2. Mancio-Silva L,
    3. Scherf A
    . 2009. Genome-wide analysis of heterochromatin associates clonally variant gene regulation with perinuclear repressive centers in malaria parasites. Cell Host Microbe 5:179–190.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Chene A,
    2. Vembar SS,
    3. Riviere L,
    4. Lopez-Rubio JJ,
    5. Claes A,
    6. Siegel TN,
    7. Sakamoto H,
    8. Scheidig-Benatar C,
    9. Hernandez-Rivas R,
    10. Scherf A
    . 2012. PfAlbas constitute a new eukaryotic DNA/RNA-binding protein family in malaria parasites. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:3066–3077.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Dastidar EG,
    2. Dzeyk K,
    3. Krijgsveld J,
    4. Malmquist NA,
    5. Doerig C,
    6. Scherf A,
    7. Lopez-Rubio JJ
    . 2013. Comprehensive histone phosphorylation analysis and identification of pf14-3-3 protein as a histone h3 phosphorylation reader in malaria parasites. PLoS One 8:e53179. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053179 .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Mancio-Silva L,
    2. Scherf A
    . 2013. In situ fluorescence visualization of transcription sites and genomic loci in blood stages of Plasmodium falciparum. Methods Mol. Biol. 923:335–351.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Oehring SC,
    2. Woodcroft BJ,
    3. Moes S,
    4. Wetzel J,
    5. Dietz O,
    6. Pulfer A,
    7. Dekiwadia C,
    8. Maeser P,
    9. Flueck C,
    10. Witmer K,
    11. Brancucci NM,
    12. Niederwieser I,
    13. Jenoe P,
    14. Ralph SA,
    15. Voss TS
    . 2012. Organellar proteomics reveals hundreds of novel nuclear proteins in the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Genome Biol. 13:R108. doi:10.1186/gb-2012-13-11-r108 .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Volz J,
    2. Carvalho TG,
    3. Ralph SA,
    4. Gilson P,
    5. Thompson J,
    6. Tonkin CJ,
    7. Langer C,
    8. Crabb BS,
    9. Cowman AF
    . 2010. Potential epigenetic regulatory proteins localise to distinct nuclear sub-compartments in Plasmodium falciparum. Int. J. Parasitol. 40:109–121.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Zhang Q,
    2. Huang Y,
    3. Zhang Y,
    4. Fang X,
    5. Claes A,
    6. Duchateau M,
    7. Namane A,
    8. Lopez-Rubio JJ,
    9. Pan W,
    10. Scherf A
    . 2011. A critical role of perinuclear filamentous actin in spatial repositioning and mutually exclusive expression of virulence genes in malaria parasites. Cell Host Microbe 10:451–463.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Ho HC
    . 2010. Redistribution of nuclear pores during formation of the redundant nuclear envelope in mouse spermatids. J. Anat. 216:525–532.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Doye V,
    2. Wepf R,
    3. Hurt EC
    . 1994. A novel nuclear pore protein Nup133p with distinct roles in poly(A)+ RNA transport and nuclear pore distribution. EMBO J. 13:6062–6075.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    1. Steinberg G,
    2. Schuster M,
    3. Theisen U,
    4. Kilaru S,
    5. Forge A,
    6. Martin-Urdiroz M
    . 2012. Motor-driven motility of fungal nuclear pores organizes chromosomes and fosters nucleocytoplasmic transport. J. Cell Biol. 198:343–355.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Gorski SA,
    2. Dundr M,
    3. Misteli T
    . 2006. The road much traveled: trafficking in the cell nucleus. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 18:284–290.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    1. Blobel G
    . 1985. Gene gating: a hypothesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82:8527–8529.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Freitas-Junior LH,
    2. Bottius E,
    3. Pirrit LA,
    4. Deitsch KW,
    5. Scheidig C,
    6. Guinet F,
    7. Nehrbass U,
    8. Wellems TE,
    9. Scherf A
    . 2000. Frequent ectopic recombination of virulence factor genes in telomeric chromosome clusters of P. falciparum. Nature 407:1018–1022.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    1. Figueiredo LM,
    2. Freitas-Junior LH,
    3. Bottius E,
    4. Olivo-Marin JC,
    5. Scherf A
    . 2002. A central role for Plasmodium falciparum subtelomeric regions in spatial positioning and telomere length regulation. EMBO J. 21:815–824.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Coleman BI,
    2. Ribacke U,
    3. Manary M,
    4. Bei AK,
    5. Winzeler EA,
    6. Wirth DF,
    7. Duraisingh MT
    . 2012. Nuclear repositioning precedes promoter accessibility and is linked to the switching frequency of a Plasmodium falciparum invasion gene. Cell Host Microbe. 12:739–750.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Nuclear Pores and Perinuclear Expression Sites of var and Ribosomal DNA Genes Correspond to Physically Distinct Regions in Plasmodium falciparum
Julien Guizetti, Rafael Miyazawa Martins, Stéphanie Guadagnini, Aurélie Claes, Artur Scherf
Eukaryotic Cell Apr 2013, 12 (5) 697-702; DOI: 10.1128/EC.00023-13

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Email

Thank you for sharing this Eukaryotic Cell article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Nuclear Pores and Perinuclear Expression Sites of var and Ribosomal DNA Genes Correspond to Physically Distinct Regions in Plasmodium falciparum
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Eukaryotic Cell
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Eukaryotic Cell.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Nuclear Pores and Perinuclear Expression Sites of var and Ribosomal DNA Genes Correspond to Physically Distinct Regions in Plasmodium falciparum
Julien Guizetti, Rafael Miyazawa Martins, Stéphanie Guadagnini, Aurélie Claes, Artur Scherf
Eukaryotic Cell Apr 2013, 12 (5) 697-702; DOI: 10.1128/EC.00023-13
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About EC
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript to mSphere

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 1535-9778; Online ISSN: 1535-9786