Eukaryotic Cell
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

EC Accepts, published online ahead of print on 26 January 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental material
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
EC.00355-06v1
6/4/600    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zakrzewska, A.
Right arrow Articles by Klis, F. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zakrzewska, A.
Right arrow Articles by Klis, F. M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Eukaryotic Cell doi:10.1128/EC.00355-06
Copyright (c) 2007, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Identification of cellular processes and pathways that protect yeast cells against the plasma membrane-perturbing compound chitosan

Anna Zakrzewska*, Andre Boorsma, Daniela Delneri, Stanley Brul, Stephen G. Oliver, and Frans M. Klis

Molecular Microbial Physiology, Molecular Biology and Microbial Food Safety, Swammerdam Institute of Life Sciences, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018WV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Faculty of Life Sciences, The University of Manchester, Michael Smith Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: A.M.Zakrzewska{at}uva.nl.


   Abstract

Global fitness analysis makes use of a genomic library of tagged deletion strains. We used this approach to study the effect of chitosan, which causes plasma membrane stress. The data were analyzed using T-profiler, which was based on determining the sensitivity to chitosan of groups of deletion strains, as defined by Gene Ontology (GO) and by genomic synthetic lethality screens, in combination with t-statistics. The chitosan-hypersensitive groups included a group of deletion strains characterized by a defective HOG signaling pathway, indicating that the HOG pathway is required for counteracting chitosan-induced stress. Consistent with this, activation of this pathway in wild-type cells by hypertonic conditions offered partial protection against chitosan, whereas hypotonic conditions sensitized the cells to chitosan. Other chitosan-hypersensitive groups were defective in RNA synthesis and processing, actin cytoskeleton organization, protein N-glycosylation, ergosterol synthesis, endocytosis, or in cell wall formation, predicting that these cellular functions buffer the cell against the deleterious effect of chitosan. These predictions were supported by showing that tunicamycin, miconazole, and staurosporine (which target protein N-glycosylation, ergosterol synthesis, and the cell wall integrity pathway, respectively) sensitized yeast cells to chitosan. Intriguingly, the GO-defined group of deletion strains cytosolic large ribosomal subunit was more resistant to chitosan. We propose that global fitness analysis of yeast in combination with T-profiler is a powerful tool to identify specific cellular processes and pathways that are required for survival under stress conditions.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. J. Bacteriol.
Mol. Cell Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. ALL ASM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Microbiology.