Eukaryotic Cell
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

EC Accepts, published online ahead of print on 21 December 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
EC.00334-07v1
7/2/358    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Slattery, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Heideman, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Slattery, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Heideman, W.
Eukaryotic Cell doi:10.1128/EC.00334-07
Copyright (c) 2007, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

PKA, TOR and Glucose Transport Control the Response to Nutrient Repletion in Saccharomyce cerevisiae

Matthew G. Slattery, Dritan Liko, and Warren Heideman*

Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy; Department of Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Wisconsin

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: wheidema{at}facstaff.wisc.edu.


   Abstract

Nutrient repletion leads to substantial restructuring of the transcriptome in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Expression levels of approximately one third of all S. cerevisiae genes are altered by at least 2-fold when a nutrient-depleted culture is transferred to fresh medium. Several nutrient sensing pathways are known to play a role in this process, but the relative contribution that each pathway makes to the total response has not been determined. To better understand this, we used a chemical-genetic approach to block the PKA (protein kinase A), TOR (target of rapamycin), and glucose transport pathways, alone and in combination. Of the three pathways, we found that loss of PKA produced the largest effect on the transcriptional response; however, many genes required both PKA and TOR for proper nutrient regulation. Those genes that did not require PKA or TOR for nutrient regulation were dependent on glucose transport for either nutrient induction or repression. Therefore, loss of these three pathways is sufficient to prevent virtually the entire transcriptional response to fresh medium. In the absence of fresh medium, activation of the cAMP/PKA pathway does not induce cellular growth; nevertheless, PKA activation induced a substantial fraction of the PKA-dependent genes. In contrast, the absence of fresh medium strongly limited gene repression by PKA. These results account for the signals needed to generate the transcriptional responses to glucose, including induction of growth genes required for protein synthesis, repression of stress genes, as well as the classical glucose repression and hexose transporter responses.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. J. Bacteriol.
Mol. Cell Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. ALL ASM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Microbiology.