Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Eukaryotic Cell, April 2008, p. 721-726, Vol. 7, No. 4
1535-9778/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/EC.00441-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Department of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology,1 Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, 1 University Road, Tainan 701, Taiwan,2 Mycology Reference Centre, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds LS1 3EX, United Kingdom,3 School of Medicine, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, United Kingdom4
Received 3 December 2007/ Accepted 13 February 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
A lack of adequate methods for strain differentiation in T. violaceum has prevented efforts to address epidemiological questions in T. violaceum infections. DNA-based strain typing methods have long been recognized as the best approach to differentiating individual strains of pathogenic fungi, but a strain typing method for T. violaceum has not been described. Molecular strain differentiation making use of polymorphisms in the rRNA gene (rDNA) repeat region of the closely related species Trichophyton rubrum has been reported previously (13, 14). In T. rubrum, there are two different types of subrepeat element (TrS1 and TrS2) in the rDNA intergenic spacer (IGS) region. Analysis of variations in the copy number of the two subrepeats was successfully applied in the strain differentiation of T. rubrum. The homogeneous nature of IGS sequences within genomes of any one strain made PCR-based typing amenable. The aim of this study was to identify and characterize subrepeats in the IGS of T. violaceum and to determine whether they would provide a useful method of molecular strain differentiation in this species. The actual outcome of this study was the revelation of a high degree of heterogeneity of repeat sequences in the IGS region of T. violaceum, raising questions about the evolution of rRNA in fungi.
|
|
|---|
These isolates were labeled as JC1 to JC32. The 32 isolates were cultured from 29 patients, with three pairs of isolates from the same patient.
As T. violaceum does not produce single-celled conidia during routine culture in vitro, it was necessary to use the single celled arthroconidia present in the black-dot lesions of patients with tinea capitis. In order to investigate single conidial isolates, two black-dot samples taken from within two follicles on 28 January 2002 were selected randomly from a patient with T. violaceum tinea capitis infection and ground together with 500 µl sterile distilled water in a 2-ml-working-capacity sterile glass tissue grinder (Kimble/Kontes, Vineland, NJ) until the material was separated into individual arthroconidia as much as possible. The separated arthroconidia were then enumerated in a counting chamber. Suspensions of single and clumped arthroconidia were plated onto four Mycosel agar plates (BBL, Becton Dickinson). The strains cultured by this method were labeled with the prefix S.
In order to investigate single conidial isolates exclusively, single arthroconidial cultures were obtained by micromanipulation of the black-dot material from another sample of black-dot material from within a follicle, from a patient with T. violaceum tinea capitis. The black-dot material was spread out on a SAB plate containing 300 mg/liter cycloheximide using a sterile needle, and 23 individual arthroconidia were separated out using a customized Prior microscope with long-working-distance lenses (40x and 20x with 12.5x eyepieces) and a custom-engineered micromanipulation device. The single arthroconidium strains from the micromanipulation technique were cultured on SAB agar plates.
Four isolates of T. violaceum from cases of tinea capitis in Iran were also included in the study. These Iranian isolates were stored at –80°C in 1 ml sterile distilled water with 10% (vol/vol) dimethyl sulfoxide in the culture collection at the Mycology Reference Centre, Leeds, United Kingdom.
The rDNA internal transcribed spacer I (ITSI) and ITSII regions of five randomly selected strains (S1, JC1, JC7, JC16, and JC32) were sequenced using primers ITS1 and ITS4 (13) and compared to sequences at the NCBI; they were similar to sequences labeled as being derived from Trichophyton violaceum, Trichophyton glabrum, Trichophyton gourvilii, Trichophyton soudanense, or Trichophyton yaoundei, all at 99% or greater similarity (the latter four species are considered by many authors as being conspecific with T. violaceum). Differences were seen only in the number of TA repeats in a region of the ITSII.
Genomic DNA extraction. The method for extraction of fungal genomic DNA was as described previously (13) with modification to the preparation of fungal biomass. T. violaceum from a SAB agar plate was inoculated into 100 ml of SAB broth in a 250- or 300-ml Erlenmeyer flask and incubated with shaking (180 to 200 rpm/min) for 1 to 2 weeks at 30°C. When there was sufficient growth by visual inspection, hyphal biomass was harvested by negative pressure filtration and washed twice with 100 ml of sterile distilled water through a Whatman no. 1 filter paper (Brentford, Middlesex, United Kingdom) in a Buchner funnel. This biomass was stored at –75°C overnight or longer before extraction of nucleic acids. Small amounts of the hyphae grown in broth were subcultured onto a SAB agar slant before filtration and incubated at 25°C for 1 week to assess purity. The concentration of the extracted DNA was adjusted to 1 mg/ml, and the extract was stored at –20°C.
Detection of rDNA polymorphisms in T. violaceum. The restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) Southern blotting methods were as described previously (13) with minor modifications. Ten micrograms of each DNA sample was digested with 25 U of restriction endonuclease EcoRI (Takara Biotechnology, Japan) for 24 h in a total volume of 20 µl. The rDNA probe was amplified from template DNA of T. violaceum JC16 by using universal primers ITS1 and ITS4 (28). The 700-bp probe consisted of a 30-bp fragment from the 3' end of the small-subunit (SSU) rDNA plus the adjacent ITSI, 5.8S rDNA, and ITSII regions (see Fig. 2).
![]() View larger version (10K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. EcoRI restriction map of the Trichophyton violaceum rDNA showing how an EcoRI digest generates two fragments from each rDNA repeat unit including a fragment containing the IGS region where putative subrepeat elements are proposed to be present.
|
Sequence determination of the IGS region. The method of sequence determination was adapted from a previous method with slight changes (14). Genomic DNAs extracted from T. violaceum strains S1, S6, S8, and S10 were selected as templates from which to amplify the IGS regions using primers 25SCON2 and NS1-R (14). The commercial Expand Long Template PCR System kit was used (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany). Master Mix 1 contained 250 nmol of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate and 2.5 pmol of each upstream (25SCON2) and downstream (NS1-R) primer and was made up in a total volume of 24.0 µl with sterile water. One microliter of 10-fold-diluted stock T. violaceum genomic DNA was added to give approximately 100 ng of template.
Master Mix 2 contained 5 µl of 10x Expand Long Template PCR System buffer 3, 1 µl of enzyme mix, and 19 µl of sterile distilled water. Immediately prior to thermal cycling, the Master Mix 2 was added to Master Mix 1. The amplification reaction was carried out in a Hybaid thermocycler (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) with an initial denaturation for 2 min at 93°C, followed by 35 cycles of primer annealing at 51°C for 0.5 min, extension at 68°C for 12 min, and denaturation at 93°C for 0.5 min. A terminal extension step of 68°C for 7 min completed the PCR.
The PCR product was purified using a High Pure PCR product purification kit (Roche Applied Science). It was then subcloned into the yT&A vector system (Yeastern Biotech Co., Ltd., Taiwan) and transformed into the Escherichia coli host strain ECOS101 (Yeastern Biotech Co., Ltd., Taiwan). The presence of cloned IGS inserts in the vector-transformed E. coli was confirmed by PCR using primers 25SCON2 and NS1-R on the extracted plasmid DNA. Sequencing of the IGS inserts was carried out using a primer-walking strategy, on an Applied Biosystems 3730 automated sequencer by Mission Biotech, Taipei, Taiwan.
Nucleotide sequence accession number. The nucleic acid sequence data for the IGS region of plasmid S8-1 have been deposited in the GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ databases with the accession number EF363337.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (36K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. The rDNA RFLP patterns of 32 randomly selected Taiwanese Trichophyton violaceum isolates from patients with tinea capitis. Genomic DNA was digested with EcoRI and electrophoresed, and the blotted gel was hybridized with a probe derived from the ITSI, 5.8S rRNA, and ITSII regions.
|
![]() View larger version (98K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. The rDNA RFLP patterns of single conidial strains of Trichophyton violaceum S1 to S13 from a black-dot lesion from a single patient with tinea capitis analyzed as described for Fig. 1. The results show nine band patterns differing by at least one band in the 13 strains.
|
Detection of nuclear number in a conidium. A single nucleus was observed in DAPI-stained arthroconidia examined from a black-dot specimen (Fig. 4). This was also confirmed by transmission electron microscopy (data not shown). This strongly suggested that the different IGS lengths seen by IGS RFLP in single conidial isolates must exist within a nucleus. Furthermore, this suggested that variable copy numbers of subrepeat elements must exist in different copies of the IGS region within a T. violaceum genome.
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Micrograph of T. violaceum arthroconidia from a black-dot lesion from a patient with tinea capitis. (Left) UV fluorescence microscopy; (right) bright-field microscopy. Note that there is a single nucleus in each arthroconidial cell.
|
![]() View larger version (75K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel of PCR products from 13 E. coli plasmid preparations representing potential clones of the total Trichophyton violaceum IGSs from four different T. violaceum strains, S1, S6, S8, and S10, showing variations in the size of this region between strains and between clones from the same strain.
|
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. The IGS map of four clones from three different T. violaceum strains, S1, S6, and S8, including two clones from strain S1, S1-1 and S1-4, showing differences in the number of TvS1 repeats between strains and between clones from the same strain (upper map, S1-1 and S6-5; lower map, S1-4 and S8-1). (T)17 to (T)19 indicate a polydeoxythymidine microsatellite containing 17 to 19 T residues, respectively. TvS1 and TvS2 represent the large (variable) and small (conserved) subrepeat elements, respectively. Numerical values show the sizes in base pairs of the repeat and interrepeat regions.
|
|
|
|---|
The number of copies of the rDNA repeats in T. violaceum or other dermatophytes has not been defined, but in Candida albicans there are approximately 120 copies (16) and in other fungi the copy number varies between 45 and 180 (5).
We propose that the size variation seen in DNA fragments that include the IGS region can be accounted for at least in part by differences in the copy number of the TvS1 repeat unit within different IGS regions within the genome of a strain. However, we cannot rule out the presence of other genetic variations within the IGS or elsewhere in the rDNA that may account for some of the variation seen, particularly in strains where there are high-molecular-weight fragments observed.
Comparison of the results seen here in T. violaceum to the results of similar analysis in T. rubrum highlights an important difference, in that most strains of T. rubrum (82%) were homogeneous in their IGS regions (13), while all T. violaceum strains were shown to have heterogeneous IGSs. Although apparent IGS heterogeneity has been suggested for a few strains of T. rubrum (10, 13, 14, 30), Trichophyton mentagrophytes (19), and Microsporum canis (31), prior to this study it had never been proven by cloning and sequencing of multiple IGSs from a strain derived from a single, mononucleate conidium. Heterogeneity within the rRNA repeats is relatively rare in eukaryotes but has been reported in Fusarium (23), Neotyphodium lolii (a grass endophyte) (6), Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous (a basidomycete yeast) (3), and Pythium helicoides (17). In other eukaryotes intragenomic variation has been observed in organisms as diverse as crayfish (11), ladybird beetles (26), and larches (27), in each case involving ITS heterogeneity. In Xanthophyllomyces and Pythium intragenomic heterogeneity was ascribed to indel variation in the ITS or the ITS and IGS regions (3, 17). Interestingly in Neotyphodium lolii variable numbers of 111- and 119-bp repeats were seen in the IGS regions within individual strains (6), very similar to the situation seen in T. violaceum.
In the present study, the rDNA RFLP Southern blotting method was initially evaluated for its ability to differentiate T. violaceum strains cultured from patients with tinea capitis in order to address questions of the epidemiology of the disease. However, the unexpected variation and complexity seen in different isolates and strains, together with a lack of knowledge of the details of the infection process and the frequency of changes in the IGS during infection, are likely to limit its use in epidemiologic studies.
It has been suggested that variation in the IGS of rDNA may have a considerable effect on development, evolution, and ecology through the effects on growth rate regulation, resulting from the role of the IGS in production of rRNA (7). Although the T. violaceum IGS has been completely sequenced in this study, the precise locations of the external transcribed spacer or equivalent and any promoters, enhancers, or terminators of rDNA transcription have not been determined. The chromosomal location or locations of the tandemly repeated rDNAs in T. violaceum or T. rubrum are not known, though in many fungi they are on a single chromosome. If the rDNA was distributed on multiple chromosomes in T. violaceum, this may account for the IGS heterogeneity seen. In most eukaryotic organisms, the ribosomal genes are tandemly arrayed and undergo concerted evolution (5). This is a universal biological phenomenon and is responsible for the homogenization of rDNA repeats within a repeat array, among arrays dispersed in an individual genome, and throughout a recombining population (1). It has been shown that the rRNA repeats within the genomes of several fungi are highly conserved including the IGS regions (5). In this study, it appears that the IGS of T. violaceum is partially excluded from the concerted evolution of the rRNA gene locus, especially in the TvS1 region. Recently, the relaxation of concerted evolution in the different ITS regions within the genome of the fungus Glomus etunicatum was demonstrated (24). Furthermore, variation seen in the 5S rRNA multigene family of four filamentous fungi, Aspergillus nidulans, Fusarium graminearum, Magnaporthe grisea, and Neurospora crassa, indicates "birth-and-death" evolution (25). The formation of IGS heterogeneity in T. violaceum may be similar or may reflect differences in, for example, the rates of mitotic recombination in contrast with the relative homogeneity of the closely related T. rubrum. Recently, Graser et al. (8) have analyzed differences in microsatellite markers in isolates of T. rubrum from around the world and shown that there are two broad population groups, one of which derived predominantly from Africa and was largely associated with tinea capitis and corporis. Isolates of T. violaceum had similar marker loci (unlike the other dermatophytes examined) but were clearly distinct as a species. It would be of interest to examine the IGS regions of these "population 2" isolates of T. rubrum, which may shed light on how IGS heterogeneity evolved in T. violaceum.
We especially thank Keith H. Holland for critical comments and helpful advice on the study. Our thanks also go to David Walker for his guidance in transmission electron microscopy work, to Richard Warmseley for the use of the micromanipulation device, and to Shu-Ying Li for her support in sequencing work.
Published ahead of print on 22 February 2008. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»