Eukaryotic Cell, December 2008, p. 2179-2183, Vol. 7, No. 12
1535-9778/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/EC.00262-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
,
Programme Chimiorésistance des Levures Pathogènes, EA209 Eucaryotes Pathogènes: Transports Membranaires et Chimiorésistance, UFR des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques, Université Paris Descartes, 75006 Paris, France
Received 4 August 2008/ Accepted 15 October 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
In two previous studies, we reported the characterization of genes (SLN1, NIK1, CHK1, YPD1, SSK1, and SKN7) encoding members of the two-component system in the opportunistic yeast Candida lusitaniae (5, 29). In the present study, we investigated the contribution of the downstream HOG MAPK pathway elements Ssk2p, Pbs2p, and Hog1p in the stress adaptation, drug sensitivity, mating ability, and yeast-to-pseudohyphae morphological transition of this fungal species.
The sequences of the C. lusitaniae SSK2 (CLUG_02562.1), PBS2 (CLUG_03729.1), and HOG1 (CLUG_01883.1) genes were retrieved from the annotated Candida database of the Broad Institute (http://www.broad.mit.edu/). To determine the role of these genes in C. lusitaniae, null mutants were constructed for each one by using the URA3 blaster strategy (5, 24) (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). All disruptant and reintegrant strains are listed in Table 1.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Candida lusitaniae strains
|
, pbs2
, and hog1
mutants. All strains exhibited similar doubling times in liquid yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YPD) medium (Table 1). Furthermore, no difference was observed in the growths (colony lengths and aspects) of the wild-type and mutant strains when the strains were cultured in solid YPD or yeast nitrogen base medium (data not shown). The growths of the ssk2
, pbs2
, and hog1
mutants are affected on high-osmolarity medium (1.5 M sorbitol, 1 M NaCl or KCl) (Fig. 1). Interestingly, we found that the ssk2
mutant is slightly less sensitive to these osmolytes than the pbs2
and hog1
mutants. However, these results indicate that C. lusitaniae Ssk2p, Pbs2p, and Hog1p could be involved in the capacity of adaptation of yeast cells to hyperosmotic conditions. All the strains tested (wild-type, mutant, and reintegrant strains) displayed similar phenotypes when grown under oxidant conditions (H2O2 or menadione). The three mutants exhibited hypersensitivity to UV irradiation (2,880 J m–2) and high temperature (43°C), implying that Ssk2p, Pbs2p, and Hog1p are also essential for responses to these signals. Moreover, the ssk2
, pbs2
, and hog1
mutants were sensitive to methylglyoxal (30 mM), suggesting that HOG pathway components are required to protect cells from this metabolic by-product (2, 19). C. lusitaniae ssk2
, pbs2
, and hog1
cells displayed similarly increased resistance to the cell wall biogenesis inhibitor Congo red relative to wild-type cells. However, we found these mutants slightly sensitive to calcofluor white (a compound that interferes with cell wall formation) and to the purine analogue caffeine. Finally, the ssk2
, pbs2
, and hog1
mutants showed impaired growth on cadmium- or arsenite-containing media, suggesting a role for Ssk2p, Pbs2p, and Hog1p in the regulation of heavy metal detoxification (Fig. 1).
![]() View larger version (37K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Sensitivity of the wild-type strain; representative single mutants ssk2 , pbs2 , and hog1 ; and the reintegrant ssk2 + SSK2, pbs2 + PBS2, and hog1 + HOG1 strains to different stresses. All strains were grown overnight in YPD liquid medium, the cells were counted, and then dilutions (105 to 102 cells) were spotted onto a YPD plate supplemented or not supplemented (control) with 1.5 M sorbitol, 1 M NaCl or KCl, 8 mM H2O2, 100 µM menadione, 80 µg ml–1 calcofluor white, 200 µg ml–1 Congo red, 10 mM caffeine, 30 mM methylglyoxal, 4 µg ml–1 fenpiclonil, 12 µg ml–1 iprodione, 50 µM Cd(NO3)2, or 800 µM AsNaO2. To test UV sensitivity, cells on YPD plates were exposed to UV for 12 s (2,880 J m–2). Each plate was further incubated for 1 day at 35°C and photographed. For high-temperature sensitivity, spotted cells were incubated for 1 day at 43°C and photographed. This experiment was done in triplicate, and pictures show representative plates for each condition. WT, wild type.
|
, pbs2
, and hog1
cells displayed strong fenpiclonil and iprodione resistance (Fig. 1). Nevertheless, neither hypersensitivity nor resistance toward the clinical antifungals amphotericin B, 5-fuorocytosine, and fluconazole was observed (not shown). Therefore, we conclude that the HOG pathway modulates filamentous-fungus-specific antifungals (dicarboximides and phenylpyrroles) but not clinical antifungal susceptibility in C. lusitaniae.
We then investigated if the deletion of the SSK2, PBS2, or HOG1 genes could have an impact upon the in vitro mating ability of C. lusitaniae. Indeed, morphological changes occur during the sexual reproduction of C. lusitaniae, notably during conjugation (9). Genetic crosses were performed under the same conditions as those described previously, using the reference mating type tester strains 6936 (MATa) and CL38 (MAT
) (9, 23). No variation in the number of conjugation tubes and produced tetrads (echinulate ascospores) was detected for any unilateral (ssk2
with CL38, pbs2
with CL38, or hog1
with CL38) or bilateral (ssk2
with ssk2
, pbs2
with pbs2
, or hog1
with hog1
) genetic cross. Both groups of data indicate that Ssk2p, Pbs2p, and Hog1p do not participate in the mating process of C. lusitaniae.
C. lusitaniae can efficiently switch to pseudohyphal growth when cultured on solid medium depleted of a nitrogen source, such as yeast carbon base (YCB) (5, 11). Therefore, the capacity of mutants to differentiate pseudohyphae was investigated. For this purpose, approximately 106 cells (in drops of 4 µl) of wild-type, ssk2
, pbs2
, and hog1
strains were spotted on various YCB solid media. Figure 2 shows representative pictures of pseudohyphae formation after 48 h of growth on YCB medium supplemented or not supplemented with a discriminatory concentration of each compound used in the drop plate assays described above. The concentrations indicated in Fig. 2 were used because higher and lower concentrations either were found too toxic or had no effect on the pseudohyphal development of the wild-type strain. The lengths of the pseudohyphae emerging from the edges of the colonies are reported in Table S2 in the supplemental material.
![]() View larger version (73K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Pseudohyphal-growth ability of mutants. Amounts of 106 cells (contained in drops of 4 µl) of the wild-type (WT) strain and representative mutants ssk2 , pbs2 , and hog1 were spotted onto YCB solid medium supplemented or not supplemented with a discriminatory concentration of sorbitol (0.8 M), NaCl (0.4 M), KCl (0.4 M), H2O2 (1 mM), menadione (60 µM), calcofluor white (50 µg ml–1), Congo red (100 µg ml–1), caffeine (1 mM), methylglyoxal (15 mM), iprodione (2 µg ml–1), fenpiclonil (0.5 µg ml–1), Cd(NO3)2 (25 µM), or AsNaO2 (500 µM). Pictures were taken 48 h after spotting. This experiment was done in triplicate, and pictures show representative structures observed for each sample. The lengths of the pseudohyphae emerging from the edges of the colonies are reported in Table S2 in the supplemental material. Bar, 300 µm.
|
. Similar results were observed in the presence of 0.4 M NaCl or KCl, in which ssk2
formed some sporadic bunch-like pseudohyphae (Fig. 2). The most important result of these experiments was that both mutants exhibited even stronger sensitivities to osmostress since the pseudohyphal growths of the pbs2
and hog1
strains were completely abolished on this high-osmolarity medium. These observations imply that Ssk2p, Pbs2p, and Hog1p likely play a role in osmotolerance during the pseudohyphal development of C. lusitaniae. A significant effect of methylglyoxal was also observed since the growths of the ssk2
, pbs2
, and hog1
mutants were restricted to bunch-like pseudohyphae, compared to the homogenous pseudohyphal formation of the wild type at the same concentration. As expected, although the switch of the wild-type strain was altered on YCB medium containing a discriminatory concentration of fenpiclonil or iprodione, the pseudohyphal developments of the ssk2
, pbs2
, and hog1
mutants were similar to those observed on drug-free YCB medium. The dicarboximide and phenylpyrrole resistance mediated by inactivation of HOG pathway components also occurred during the morphogenetic transition in C. lusitaniae. Finally, the effects of an oxidant (H2O2 or menadione), cell wall assembly inhibitors (Congo red and calcofluor white), caffeine, and metalloids on yeast cells, as detailed above, were also investigated on pseudohyphal formation. Strikingly, the mutants showed no significant reduction of pseudohyphal development in the presence of discriminatory concentrations of these compounds relative to the growth of the wild type (Fig. 2). To summarize, the results obtained in this work strengthen the putative architecture of the C. lusitaniae two-component signaling pathway recently proposed (see reference 29; an update is provided in Fig. 3). Indeed, Ssk2p, Pbs2p, and Hog1p are clearly implicated in osmoadaptation, as reported for a large pallet of yeast and for filamentous-fungus models (3, 6, 12, 16, 26). In addition, the HOG MAPK components appear to be essential for UV and heat shock tolerance, as recently described for Cryptococcus neoformans (3). However, as suggested in a previous work, the Ssk1p-Ssk2p-Pb2p-Hog1p branch seems not to be required for oxidant adaptation in C. lusitaniae. In this way, the Sln1p-Ypd1p-Skn7p pathway likely takes charge of this function in C. lusitaniae (5, 29). Our data also provide evidence that the HOG pathway is involved in response to the heavy metals cadmium and arsenite, as recently reported for C. albicans and S. cerevisiae (6, 34). The present study (in addition to previous studies [5, 29]) supports the hypothesis that a Nik1p-Ypd1p-Ssk1p-Ssk2p-Pbs2p-Hog1p circuitry is probably crucial for dicarboximide and phenylpyrrole sensitivity (4, 16, 22).
![]() View larger version (48K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Putative model for the action of the two-component system in C. lusitaniae. A possible mechanism that incorporates our experimental results from this study and our previous studies (5, 29) is proposed. The HOG MAPK cascade could operate downstream of the Sln1p HKR, the HPt protein Ypd1p, and the Ssk1p response regulator to regulate the osmotic stress response, pseudohyphal growth, UV adaptation, the heat shock response, and the heavy metal tolerance. In addition, the Nik1p-Ypd1p-Ssk1p-Ssk2p-Pbs2p-Hog1p-mediated transduction pathway probably regulates dicarboximide (dicarb.) and phenylpyrrole (phenylp.) sensitivity. Genes encoding Sho1p, Cdc42p, Ste11p, Ste50p, and Ste20p (dotted boxes) are located in the C. lusitaniae genome (unpublished data), but it is likely that the Sho1p branch does not regulate the HOG MAPK cascade (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). It is possible that the HOG pathway could integrate signal from a novel osmotic-stress signaling branch, as recently proposed for C. albicans (6, 28). Dotted arrows indicate mechanisms or interactions not yet fully elucidated.
|
mutant does not display any strong overlapping stress-sensitive phenotypes exhibited by pbs2
and hog1
cells (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). These results thus suggested that in C. lusitaniae, Sho1p branch could not interact with the Pbs2p-Hog1p cascade. In this way, it is possible that the HOG pathway could integrate a signal from a novel osmotic-stress signaling module, as recently proposed for C. albicans (6, 28). Future investigations will aim to characterize the putative ability of the Sln1p, Nik1p, and Chk1p histidine kinase receptors to regulate the HOG cascade in this emerging pathogen.
Published ahead of print on 24 October 2008. ![]()
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://ec.asm.org/. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»