Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Eukaryotic Cell, September 2007, p. 1606-1617, Vol. 6, No. 9
1535-9778/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/EC.00260-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Gabrielle Oria,2
Sylvain Fauquenoy,2
Katia Cailliau,3
Edith Browaeys,3
Stanislas Tomavo,2* and
Jamal Khalife1*
Unité INSERM 547/IPL, Institut Pasteur, 1 rue du Prof. Calmette, B.P. 245, 59019 Lille Cedex, France,1 Equipe de Parasitologie Moléculaire, CNRS UMR 8576, Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, 59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq Cedex, France,2 UPRES EA 1033, IFR 118, SN3, Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, 59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq, France3
Received 19 July 2007/ Accepted 19 July 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Here we report the molecular and functional characterization of the T. gondii ortholog of PfLRR1, designated TgLRR1, and its target gene product, TgPP1. Our findings indicate for the first time that TgLRR1 interacts with TgPP1 in the nuclear compartment of the rapidly replicating tachyzoites and may inhibit its activity. Furthermore, we show that TgLRR1 can also trigger the progression of physiologically arrested Xenopus oocytes to meiosis. These data suggest that the inhibition of nuclear TgPP1 by TgLRR1 may contribute to cell cycle progression in T. gondii.
|
|
|---|
Identification of T. gondii PP1 and TgLRR1 homolog genes. To identify the T. gondii PP1 gene, the T. gondii database (ToxoDB.org) was queried by TBLASTN, with the open reading frames (ORFs) of human and P. falciparum PP1 (accession numbers P62136 [GenBank] and AAM54063 [GenBank] , respectively). Public database analyses allowed us to find three possible open reading frames in the ToxoDB database (TgGlmHMM_2112, TgTigrScan_5645, and TgGeneFinder_5784) which showed a high degree of identity with PP1. To obtain the correct and full-length cDNA, we performed three PCRs using three sets of primers covering the three complete putative ORFs predicted by ToxoDB. Primers used were 5'-ATGATCAACGAAGCATGGAAGGTCACTGTG-3' and 5'-TTATTTGGCCATGCCTTTCTTCTTTTCCAC-3' for TgGlmHMM_2112, 5'-ATGGAATTGCTGACTGAACGGCTGTATGCG-3' and 5'-TTACGGATGTAGGCACTGCTACATCGTCGG-3' for TgTigrScan_5645, and 5'-ATGGTGTCATTAGACGTCGATGTCGACGCC-3' and 5'-TTATTTGGCCATGCCTTTCTTCTTTTCCAC-3' for TgGeneFinder_5784. Only the third set of primers gave us a PCR product corresponding to the predicted size. The PCR product was then cloned in TOPO 2.1 TA cloning vector (Invitrogen) and sequenced using a dye terminator cycle sequencing kit and analyzed on an ABI Prism 377 DNA sequencer (Perkin-Elmer Biosystems).
To experimentally identify the correct gene prediction for TgTwinScan_3263 (TgLRR1), the following primers were synthesized: 5'-ATGCCGGACGACACGAGGACAGCAGGACCCCCAGC-3' and 5'-TCAAGCGTTGTGCTTCATAATGGACTTCTGCTTTG-3'. These primers were employed in reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) as previously described (11). The PCR products were then cloned in TA cloning vector and sequenced. To confirm the start and stop codons, 5' and 3' rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) procedures were carried out using a Smart kit (Biosciences Clontech). The 5' and 3' ends of TgLRR1 were obtained by using the reverse primer 5'-GGATTTCTCGAATTCTGTTGC-3' and the forward primer 5'-CGCGACGCTCACGGAGCTCAAAG-3', respectively, and the adaptor primer according to the manufacturer's instructions. For TgPP1, the forward primer 5'-ATGGTGTCATTAGACGTCGATGTCGACGCC-3' and the reverse primer 5'-TTATTTGGCCATGCCTTTCTTCTTTTCCAC-3' were used. Analysis of TgPP1 and TgLRR1 proteins was performed by DNA Star ClustalW software and the Pfam database (http://www.sanger.ac.uk) and the Conserved Domain Database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi).
Recombinant protein expression and antiserum production. The entire TgLRR1 cDNA obtained by PCR with the primers cited above was inserted into pET32a using the BamHI and HindIII sites and was verified by sequencing. Expression was carried out in the Escherichia coli BL21 strain. For TgPP1, the same system was used to express the active recombinant protein. The primers spanning the complete cDNA with BamHI and NotI restriction sites for subcloning were 5'-ATGGTGTCATTAGACGTCGATGTCGACGCC-3' and 5'-TTATTTGGCCATGCCTTTCTTCTTTTCCAC-3'. In all experiments, expression and purification steps were carried out according to the manufacturer's instructions. For the purification of TgPP1, denaturing conditions were required as the protein was found in the inclusion bodies. In the case of TgLRR1, the recombinant protein was purified under native conditions. The His6-tagged proteins were purified using Ni2+ chelation chromatography. The imidazole-eluted proteins were dialyzed against phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 10% glycerol. Purity, checked by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) followed by Coomassie blue staining, was >95%.
For antiserum production, the purified TgLRR1 was mixed with complete Freund's adjuvant (100 µg per injection) and subcutaneously injected into mice. Animals were boosted 4 weeks later with the same quantity in Freund's incomplete adjuvant. The serum was obtained 2 weeks after the last boost. Serum was tested for its titer and specificity by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Western blotting against recombinant protein. The serum raised against TgLRR1 was preadsorbed on thioredoxin recombinant protein. Because of the high degree of homology among PP1 of all species, the antiserum raised against PfPP1 was used in this study.
Assays for PP1 activity. The activity of recombinant TgPP1 (rTgPP1) with p-nitrophenyl phosphate (pNPP) as substrate was assayed essentially as previously described (11, 12). The initial rate of liberation of p-nitrophenol was determined spectrophotometrically at 405 nm. To normalize the phosphatase activity of rTgPP1 obtained from different batches, a standard curve was constructed with rabbit recombinant PP1 (New England Biolabs), and 5 units of rTgPP1 was defined as the activity giving 1 absorbance unit over 1 h of reaction. The activity of rTgPP1 was assayed at 37°C in a reaction mixture volume of 200 µl containing 50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM MnCl2, and 5 mM pNPP. In some experiments, the effect of okadaic acid, a well-known phosphatase inhibitor (29), was added at different concentrations in the PP1 assay. Results are the averages of triplicate assays of three batches of rTgPP1.
To study the effect of rTgLRR1 on rTgPP1 activity, the same procedure was used. Briefly, different amounts of rTgLRR1 were added to 5 units of rTgPP1 and preincubated for 1 h at room temperature before the rTgPP1 phosphatase activity was tested. As a negative control, the TgLRR1 was replaced with recombinant thioredoxin protein produced from the pET32a plasmid at the same concentrations. Results are the averages of three experiments.
Western blotting analysis. To detect and evaluate the protein levels of TgLRR1 and TgPP1, a total of 5 x 106 equivalent tachyzoites and 5 x 102 cysts (corresponding to bradyzoites) isolated from chronically infected mice were boiled in loading buffer (6.25 mM Tris-HCl [pH 6.8], 2% SDS, 10% sucrose) for 5 min, and one-fifth of the extract was separated by SDS-PAGE on a 12% polyacrylamide gel. After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred onto a nitrocellulose sheet by using a semidry transfer apparatus. The membranes were probed with anti-TgLRR1 or anti-PP1 antibodies at 1:100 dilution. To ensure that equal amounts of protein extracts from each parasitic stage were being loaded, a monoclonal antibody specific to actin was used at 1:1,000 dilution. A horseradish peroxidase-labeled anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG) (1:1,000 dilution) was used as a secondary antibody, followed by chemiluminescence detection.
Subcellular protein extraction. The cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts were prepared according to a method previously described by Kibe et al. (26). Briefly, 109 purified tachyzoites were resuspended with 2 ml of lysis buffer A (10 mM HEPES [pH 7.9], 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol [DTT], 0.1 M EDTA, 0.65% NP-40, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF], and protease inhibitor cocktail [Roche]) and incubated for 10 min on ice. After centrifugation at 4,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C, the supernatant corresponding to the cytoplasmic extract was harvested. To extract the nuclear proteins, the remaining pellet was resuspended in 200 µl of lysis buffer B (20 mM HEPES [pH 7.9], 1.5 mM MgCl2, 420 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.2 M EDTA, 25% glycerol, 0.2 mM PMSF, and protease inhibitor cocktail [Roche]) and incubated for 15 min on ice. The nuclear extract was cleared by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant corresponding to the nuclear extract was harvested and completed to a final volume of 2 ml with lysis buffer A. Both cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts were kept at –20°C until used in Western blotting experiments. To check the quality of extracts, the blots were probed with anti-lactate dehydrogenase type 1 (anti-LDH1), a cytoplasmic marker (1, 19), and anti-T. gondii DNA repair enzyme (anti-TgDRE), which is specific to a nuclear protein (15). For total protein extracts, 109 tachyzoites were incubated in 2 ml of lysis buffer A for 30 min at 4°C, followed by three consecutive freeze-thaw cycles with intermediate sonication steps. The supernatants were recovered and kept at –20°C until use.
Microcystin agarose affinity column and coimmunoprecipitation experiments. To isolate the TgLRR1-TgPP1 complex, microcystin beads, known to bind to PP1, were used. To this end, total protein extracts (corresponding to 1.75 x 109 parasites) prepared as described above, cytoplasmic or nuclear fractions (extracts from 109 parasites), were incubated overnight at 4°C with 100 µl of microcystin agarose beads (Upstate Biotechnology) in the presence of 0.1 mM EGTA and 0.5 M NaCl. Beads were then washed five times with washing buffer (50 mM Tris buffer [pH 7.4] containing 0.1 mM EGTA, 5% glycerol, 0.5 M NaCl, 0.1% ß-mercaptoethanol, and protease inhibitors). For coimmunoprecipitation assays, 50 µl of anti-TgLRR1 antiserum or control serum was incubated for 4 h at 4°C with 100 µl of protein G-Sepharose in 0.5 ml of TNE (50 mM Tris, 0.1% NP-40, 2 mM EDTA). Total protein extracts or subcellular fractions were then added to the mixture. After an overnight incubation at 4°C, Sepharose beads were extensively washed in TNTE (TNE plus 0.1% Triton X-100). In all experiments, bound proteins were eluted with loading buffer (200 mM Tris, 2% SDS, 5% glycerol, 1% ß-mercaptoethanol), separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose filters, and subjected to immunoblot analysis with TgLRR1 and PP1 antibodies.
Measurement of mRNA levels by RT-PCR. T. gondii cysts were isolated from brains of chronically infected mice. In vivo bradyzoites were freed by pepsin digestion (0.05 mg/ml pepsin in 170 mM NaCl and 60 mM HCl) for 5 to 10 min at 37°C. These in vivo bradyzoites and tachyzoites cultivated in HFF were lysed with 1% SDS, 50 mM sodium acetate (pH 5.2), and 10 mM EDTA, and total RNA was isolated following two phenol extractions at 65°C and ethanol precipitation. For controls, total RNA from uninfected brain cells of mice and HFF were also isolated. For RT-PCR, total RNA was digested with DNase and checked by PCR that no DNA remained in these samples before reverse transcription was done, as previously described (16). Semiquantitative RT-PCR was performed by using 10-fold serial dilutions of tachyzoite and bradyzoite cDNAs. The cDNA products were amplified with 50 pmol of each primer in the presence of 1 µl of Clontech Taq mixture DNA polymerase (Clontech) in 50-µl reaction mixture volumes. Thermal cycling conditions were denaturation at 94°C for 10 min (1); denaturation at 94°C for 45 s, followed by annealing at 60°C for 1 min and 30 s (2); elongation for 1 min and 30 seconds at 72°C (3); and at the end, an additional extension for 10 min at 72°C (4). Usually, 40 cycles were performed. Primers used in this study were as follows: 5'-ATGCCGGACGACACGAGGACAGCAGGACCCCCAGC-3' and 5'-TCAAGCGTTGTGCTTCATAATGGACTTCTGCTTTG-3' for TgLRR1, 5'-ATGGTGTCATTAGACGTCGATGTCGACGCC-3' and 5'-TTATTTGGCCATGCCTTTCTTCTTTTCCAC-3' for TgPP1, and 5'-ATGGCGGATGAAGAAGTGCAA-3' and 5'-GATGCACTTGCGGTGGACGAT-3' for T. gondii actin. PCR products were separated by electrophoresis in agarose gels, stained with ethidium bromide, scanned, and quantified using Image J software.
Immunofluorescence assays. Purified extracellular tachyzoites were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde solution in PBS for 30 min and loaded onto slides until dry. The parasites were incubated with mouse antisera anti-PP1 or anti-TgLRR1. For double-labeling staining, parasites were sequentially incubated with mouse antiserum anti-PP1 and with rabbit antiserum anti-ROP1 (a generous gift from Jean-François Dubremetz, University of Montpellier, France). After the slides were washed, the secondary antibody goat anti-mouse labeled with Alexa Fluor 488 (green) and/or the secondary antibody goat anti-rabbit labeled with Alexa Fluor 594 (red) (Molecular Probes, The Netherlands) was used. After the slides were washed, the parasite nuclei were stained with propidium iodine for 15 min. Cover slides were mounted, and slides were examined by confocal microscopy (LSM 510; Zeiss) and by fluorescence microscopy (Leica) at a magnification of x100, using a charge-coupled-device (CDD) camera (Leica) piloted by Metaview software.
Transient transfection of T. gondii. For transfection of T. gondii, the T. gondii PP1 (TgPP1) and TgLRR1 genes were generated by PCR using the following flanking primers: TgLRR1 (NsiI) forward (5'-ATGCATGACGACACGAGGACAGCAGGACCC-3'), TgLRR1 (PacI) reverse (5'-TTAATTAACTAAGCGTTGTGCTTCATAATGGACTTCTG-3'), TgPP1 (EcoRI) forward (5'-GAATTCATGCAGGAGCAGAAGCTCATCTCCGAGGAGGACCTGGCCATGGC CATGGTGTCATTAGACGTCGATGTCGACGCCG-3'), and TgPP1 (PacI) reverse (5'-TTAATTAATTATTTGGCCATGCCTTTCTTCTTTTCCACTGG-3'), respectively. The forward primer of TgPP1 contains a nucleotide sequence coding for the cMyc-Tag. PCR products were cloned in TA cloning vector and sequenced. The amplified DNA was digested with NsiI/PacI for TgLRR1 and EcoRI/PacI for TgPP1, after which the gel was purified and ligated into a T. gondii vector whose expression is driven by tubulin promoter (37). The constructs were used to transform Escherichia coli JM109 cells, and the plasmid inserts were verified by sequencing with pTUBF (5'-CGCACGAAGGGGATGTGTCAGAAAC-3') and pTUBR (5'-GGTGGCGGCCGCTCTAGAACTAG-3').
For T. gondii transient transfections, 50 µg of circular plasmids of TgLRR1-cMyc and TgPP1-cMyc were electroporated into 5.0 x 106 tachyzoites of the 76K strain and resuspended in 800 µl of cytomix buffer (120 mM KCl, 0.15 mM CaCl2, 10 mM K2HPO4/KH2PO4 [pH 7.6], 25 mM HEPES [pH 7.6], 2 mM EGTA, 5 mM MgCl2) containing 2 mM ATP (pH 7.5) and 5 mM glutathione. Electroporation was done in a 4-mm gap cuvette using a BTX electrocell manipulator 600 (BTX, San Diego, CA) set at a voltage of 2.5 kV·cm–1, 25-µF capacitance, and 48-
serial resistance (37). Electroporated parasites were immediately allowed to infect slides containing confluent monolayer HFF for about 4 h. After cells were washed with fresh culture medium, transfected tachyzoites were allowed to grow for 24 h. The intracellular tachyzoites were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS and washed three times with PBS. After the cells were permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS for 30 min at room temperature, the slides were incubated with a monoclonal antibody specific to c-Myc, which was prepared in PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 and 10% FCS. After three washes, the slides were incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate-coupled goat anti-mouse IgG. For parasite-stable transfection, linearized plasmids TgLRR1-cMyc and TgPP1-cMyc using KpnI were purified by phenol-chloroform extraction. Ten micrograms of linearized Tub5-Bleo-3'SAG1 plasmid for bleomycin selection was added to 90 µg of linearized TgLRR1-cMyc and TgPP1-cMyc, and transfection of tachyzoites was performed as described above. The transfected parasites were loaded onto confluent monolayer HFF and grown until cell lysis. Purified extracellular tachyzoites were incubated with 5 µg·ml–1 of bleomycin in DMEM-10% FCS for 8 to 10 h at 37°C. Then, they were loaded again onto HFF cells under drug pressure for 48 h. The drug selection was repeated three times, and emerging resistant parasites were processed for immunofluorescence assays.
Preparation of TgLRR1 cRNA and microinjection into Xenopus oocytes. Capped mRNA (cRNA) was synthesized using a T7 or SP6 mMessage mMachine kit (Ambion). TgLRR1-pCDNA3-V5 was linearized by PmeI. cRNAs transcribed from 1.5 µg of linearized plasmid were precipitated by 2.5 M LiCl, washed in 70% ethanol, resuspended in 20 µl of diethyl pyrocarbonate-treated water, and quantified by spectrophotometry. Finally, 1 µg of cRNA was analyzed with a denaturing agarose gel. Gel staining with 10 µg·ml–1 ethidium bromide allowed confirmation of the size of cRNA and the absence of abortive transcripts. cRNA control was obtained from the Grb2 P49L-pSP64T construct, as previously described.
Preparations of Xenopus oocytes and microinjection experiments were performed as previously described (41). In each assay, 20 oocytes removed from two to three different animals were microinjected with different concentrations of okadaic acid (OA), anti-PP1 antibodies, TgLRR1 cRNA, or Grb2 P49L cRNA. GVBD was detected by the appearance of a white spot at the center of the animal pole. Western blotting analysis was performed after electrophoresis. The membranes were developed with anti-PP1 serum diluted to 1:50. To detect TgLRR1, we used the anti-V5 monoclonal antibody (1:5,000). Antibody complexes were detected using an advanced chemiluminescence Western blotting detection system (Amersham).
For assessment of phosphatase activity, Xenopus oocytes that had undergone 100% GVBD were collected after microinjection of OA or anti-PP1 serum or TgLRR1 cRNA and lysed in PBS buffer supplemented with protease inhibitors (Sigma). Lysates were cleared by three successive centrifugations, and the total phosphatase activity was assayed using 100-µl equivalents to extracts of seven oocytes, as described above.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. The nucleotide sequences reported in this paper have been submitted to the GenBank Data Bank with accession numbers DQ437870 for TgLRR1 and DQ437871 for TgPP1.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (67K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Protein sequence alignment of TgPP1 with human and P. falciparum PP1s (accession nos. P62136 and AAM54063, respectively). Identical amino acid residues are shaded. The six-amino-acid sequence specific for Ser/Thr phosphatases is boxed.
|
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Biochemical characterization of rTgPP1. (A) Effect of okadaic acid on rTgPP1 activity. pNPP (5 mM) was incubated with rTgPP1 (5 units) in the presence of different concentrations of OA (0 to 5 µM). (B) Activity of rTgPP1 in the presence or absence of divalent cations. rTgPP1 (5 units) was incubated in the presence of MgCl2 or MnCl2 (0 to 5 mM). Results are the means of three different experiments in triplicate with three different batches of rTgPP1.
|
On the basis of the nucleotide sequences that we determined, the deduced open reading frame contained a polypeptide of 388 amino acids with a calculated molecular mass of 43.5 kDa. In reciprocal BLASTP searches of the GenBank database, the highest score was obtained with its paralogue in P. falciparum, PfLRR1 (49% identity) (Fig. 3A). The aligned region of TgLRR1 spanned almost the complete sequence, covering residues 72 to 366, and contains 11 putative LRRs (Fig. 3B). These LRRs contain the consensus sequence LXXLXLXXNXL (where X is any amino acid), where the LXXLXL motif constitutes a ß strand, and XXNXL corresponds to the
turn structure. In general, the LRR motifs are involved in protein-protein interaction. The 19 carboxy-terminal residues (positions 337 to 355) of TgLRR1 constitute a conserved structure, designated LRR cap (Fig. 3B). The position of the LRR cap relative to those of the other LRRs is also indicated in Fig. 3A. It was proposed that this structure plays a role in shielding the hydrophobic core of the LRR superhelix from solvent (8). Analyses of the N-terminal portion, using the Signal P program, did not predict the presence of a signal peptide in TgLRR1.
![]() View larger version (74K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. (A) Protein sequence alignment of TgLRR1 with S. pombe Sds22 and PfLRR1 (accession nos. AAA35342 and AAX86874, respectively). Identical residues are shown in gray. The LRR motifs are in bold type and numbered from I to XI. The LRR motifs and the LRR cap sequences are underlined. (B) LRR motifs of TgLRR1. Numbers in the column at the right indicate the amino acid positions of each LRR motif. The N (position IX) and L/I (position XI) are highly conserved, and only 8 repeats out of 11 exactly fit the consensus.
|
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Effect of TgLRR1 on TgPP1 phosphatase activity. Recombinant TgPP1 was preincubated for 1 h at room temperature with different concentrations of TgLRR1 before testing for phosphatase activity. , activity in medium alone (100%); , relative activity in the presence of thioredoxin protein control (no inhibition was observed whatever the concentration used); , relative activity in the presence of different concentrations of recombinant TgLRR1. Results of three representative experiments performed in triplicate (means ± standard deviations [error bars]) are shown.
|
![]() View larger version (27K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Induction of GVBD in Xenopus oocytes. (A) Appearance of GVBD at 24 h postmicroinjection. A total volume of 100 nanoliters was used for each microinjection. Okadaic acid, anti-PP1 antisera, and TgLRR1 cRNA were used at 10 µM, 100 nl, and 150 ng, respectively. Buffer alone represents the negative control of okadaic acid (0% GVBD compared to OA, 100%). Prebled serum represents the negative control of anti-PP1 antisera (0% GVBD, compared to anti-PP1 antisera, 100%). Grb2 P49L cRNA represents the negative control of TgLRR1 cRNA (0% GVBD, compared to TgLRR1 cRNA, 94%). Results of three independent experiments are presented as the mean percentages ± standard deviations (error bars) (total number of oocytes used was 60, obtained from two to three different animals). (B) Expression of TgLRR1 protein by Xenopus oocytes microinjected with TgLRR1 cRNA. Immunoblot analysis was performed with oocytes injected with vehicle (lane 1) or TgLRR1 cRNA (lane 2) and revealed with anti-V5 antibodies. The arrow indicates TgLRR1. (C) Interaction of TgLRR1 with Xenopus oocyte PP1. Immunoblot analysis of eluates from oocyte extracts after binding to microcystin beads, as revealed either by anti-PP1 antibodies or anti-V5 antibodies. The first two lanes correspond to TgLRR1 cRNA-injected oocyte eluates, and the last two panels correspond to eluates of buffer-injected oocytes. (D) Inhibition of total phosphatase activity in oocyte extracts microinjected either with anti-PP1 serum (100 nl) or with TgLRR1 cRNA (150 ng). Phosphatase activity was measured at 24 h postmicroinjection (100% GVBD). Results are presented as the percentage of inhibition in comparison with oocytes that received either control prebled sera or control cRNA and are the means of three independent experiments. For comparison, inhibition of total phosphatase activity was performed with okadaic acid (55% inhibition was obtained at 10 µM). Phosphatase activity was assessed with microinjected oocyte extracts (100% GVBD).
|
![]() View larger version (28K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. (A) Expression of TgPP1 and TgLRR1 transcripts by tachyzoite and bradyzoite stages. Semiquantitative RT-PCR was performed with 10-fold serial dilutions of tachyzoite (Tz) and bradyzoite (Bz) cDNAs. To ensure that equal amounts of cDNA from each parasitic stage were being compared, actin primers were used as a control. (B) Expression of TgLRR1 and TgPP1 proteins in tachyzoite and bradyzoite stages. Western blotting analysis was performed using serum anti-TgLRR1 (lanes 1 and 2) raised against recombinant protein or serum anti-PP1 raised against PP1 (lanes 3 and 4). To ensure that equal amounts of proteins from each parasitic stage were being compared, monoclonal antibodies specific for actin were used as a control (lanes 5 and 6).
|
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Extracellular tachyzoites immunolabeled with various primary antibodies visualized with fluorescein isothiocyanate (green) or rhodamine (red). In panels A and B, the nuclei were stained with propidium iodine (PI) (red), and in panel C, they were stained with DAPI (blue). In panels A and B, immunofluorescence was obtained by confocal microscopy. (C and D) Immunofluorescence was examined with a fluorescence microscope (Leica) at a magnification of x100, equipped with a charge-coupled-device camera (Leica) piloted by Metaview software. (A) Tachyzoites showing a nucleocytoplasmic localization for TgLRR1, with a strong nuclear labeling. The strong nuclear localization of TgLRR1 can be seen in the yellow merged color. (B) Tachyzoites showing a nucleocytoplasmic localization of TgPP1 with a substantial staining of the nucleus but a strong labeling of secretory organelles named rhoptries. (C) Immunofluorescence labeling of bradyzoite using anti-TgLRR1. (D) Immunofluorescence labeling of bradyzoite using anti-TgPP1.
|
![]() View larger version (54K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Localization of T. gondii tachyzoites TgLRR1 and TgPP1 using transient transfection assays. Two independent sets of data for TgLRR1-cMyc are shown (two upper sets, magnification x100). Panel 1, phase contrast; panel 2, DAPI staining; panel 3, IFA using anti-cMyc; panel 4, merged DAPI and IFA. Two independent sets of data for TgPP1-cMyc are shown (two lower sets, magnification x65). Panel 1, phase contrast; panel 2, DAPI staining; panel 3, IFA using anti-cMyc; panel 4, merged DAPI and IFA. Note that TgLRR1 and TgPP1 signals are predominantly seen in the parasite's cytoplasm, whereas a weak but consistent nuclear fluorescence can be observed.
|
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. Interaction of TgLRR1 with TgPP1 in T. gondii extracts. (A) Immunoblot analysis of proteins eluted from microcystin-agarose incubated with whole-parasite extracts. Identical quantities of the eluate were loaded onto four different lanes, separated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to nitrocellulose. Lanes 1 and 2 are negative controls (beads incubated with buffer, without T. gondii protein extracts). Lanes 3 and 4 show the detection of TgPP1 and TgLRR1, which were, respectively, probed with specific polyclonal anti-PP1 and anti-TgLRR1 antibodies. (B) Coimmunoprecipitation of the TgLRR1-TgPP1 complex with anti-TgLRR1 antibodies from T. gondii extracts. Immunoprecipitates from control preimmune sera or from anti-TgLRR1 antisera were eluted, separated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to nitrocellulose. Immunoblot analysis was performed with anti-PP1 (lanes 1 and 3) and anti-TgLRR1 antibodies (lanes 2 and 4). The bands at 55 kDa detected in all lanes represent the heavy chains of the antibodies bound to protein G-Sepharose. (C) Immunoblot analysis of cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions. Cytoplasmic (C) (lanes 1, 3, 5, and 7) and nuclear (N) (lanes 2, 4, 6, and 8) fractions were probed with different antibodies. Lanes 1 and 2 were probed with using anti-LDH1 antibodies, a cytoplasmic marker. Lanes 3 and 4 were probed with anti-TgDRE, a T. gondii DNA repair enzyme. Lanes 5 and 6 were probed with anti-PP1 antibodies. Lanes 7 and 8 were probed with anti-TgLRR1. Note that TgLRR1 and TgPP1 were detected in both cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions. (D) Immunoblot analysis of cytoplasmic (C) (lanes 1 and 2) or nuclear (N) (lanes 3 and 4) fractions eluted from microcystin-agarose. Identical quantities of the eluate were loaded onto four different lanes, separated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to nitrocellulose. Lanes 1 and 3 were probed with anti-PP1 antibodies. Lanes 2 and 4 were probed with anti-TgLRR1 antibodies.
|
|
|
|---|
The location of TgPP1 in the nucleus and cytoplasm of wild-type or transiently transfected tachyzoites of T. gondii supports the idea that its different locations may account for the diversified action of this phosphatase. PP1 has also been reported to be located in the nucleus in mammals (20). Then, how does TgPP1 localize to the nucleus? Using a Signal P-NN program for predicting subcellular localization signals (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk), TgPP1 did not show a nuclear location signal (NLS). However, using psortII (http://psort.ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp), a classical "pat7" NLS at the C-terminal side was predicted (PXXKKK) (23). Given the different locations of TgPP1, it is likely that its localization may depend upon another protein(s) for targeting to the various organelles. In quiescent bradyzoites, TgPP1 was found mainly in the cytoplasm. Even if we cannot exclude the possibility that a tiny amount of TgPP1 could also be present in the bradyzoite's nucleus, it appears that the nuclear signal of TgPP1 is stronger in tachyzoites than that found in bradyzoites. A similarly distributed nucleocytoplasmic pattern has been reported for PP1 in mammalian cells where it is located in the cytoplasm in quiescent cells, but increased amounts are detected in the nucleus upon entry of cells into the mitotic cycle (20).
Extensive knowledge has been accumulating about the importance of mammalian and yeast PP1 in metabolism, protein synthesis, control of microtubule dynamics, and cell division via the dephosphorylation process. Moreover, PP1 activities are known to be regulated through several regulatory proteins. A variety of studies have identified more than 10 proteins in yeast and about 25 proteins in mammals that control the activity of PP1 and/or determine its specific substrate (7). One such regulatory partner is the gene protein product Sds22 that was found to play a key role in the control of mitosis in yeast (33, 38). Furthermore, it has been shown that Sds22 can directly bind to PP1 in both mammals and yeast (9, 32). In the present work, evidence for the presence of an Sds22 ortholog in T. gondii, TgLRR1, has been obtained. TgLRR1 is made up of a tandem array of 11 so-called LRRs of about 22 amino acids, spanning 66% of the protein. In agreement with the known function of LRR motifs as ligand-interacting modules (25), the repeat region of TgLRR1 seems very likely to participate in the interaction with TgPP1. Indeed, bioinformatics analyses predicted that it adopts a horseshoe shape, commonly observed in the Sds22 protein family. Further analysis of the C terminus revealed the presence of the LRR cap composed of 19 amino acids (positions 337 to 355) that perfectly matches the consensus sequence described by Ceulemans et al. (8). The LRR cap was proposed to play a role in the protection of the hydrophobic core formed by the LRR motifs (8). More importantly, the finding that expression of the SDS22 gene lacking the C terminus excluded the corresponding protein from the nucleus of yeast indicates an essential nuclear targeting signal in the LRR cap region (38). Using psortII, we did not observe an NLS in this region of TgLRR1, but the overall examination of the sequence revealed a nuclear prediction of 70% (35). In T. gondii, immunofluorescence assays showed the presence of TgLRR1 in the cytoplasm of all bradyzoites examined; however, in tachyzoites, TgLRR1 was found in both the cytoplasmic and nuclear compartments, with intense staining in the latter area. As the TgLRR1 product was detected at the same size in both stages, its presence in the nuclei of tachyzoites and not of bradyzoites could be explained either by the expression of a specific transporter in the former and/or by the fact that TgLRR1 has to reach an expression threshold to get into the nucleus. Transient transfection of T. gondii with a TgLRR1 construct fused to cMyc, which allowed microscopy detection, showed staining in both the cytoplasm and nucleus. Further studies of TgPP1 or TgLRR1 in T. gondii have been hampered by the inability to obtain stable parasites expressing TgLRR1-cMyc or TgPP1-cMyc, suggesting that overexpression of either TgLRR1 or TgPP1 protein could be toxic to parasite growth.
To explore experimentally the predicted interaction between TgLRR1 and TgPP1, we performed coimmunoprecipitation experiments using anti-TgLRR1 antibodies and affinity chromatography on a matrix of microcystin, a cyclic heptapeptide that dramatically inhibits PP1. Both approaches revealed that TgLRR1 interacts with TgPP1 in tachyzoite extracts, in that we could show the coprecipitation of TgLRR1 and TgPP1 by immunoblotting. This association raised the question of a possible regulatory effect on TgPP1. Using recombinant TgPP1 and TgLRR1 expressed in E. coli, we demonstrated down-regulation of the phosphatase activity. These results, unlike those observed for the Sds22 of S. pombe, confirmed previous observations for P. falciparum. The repressor function of TgLRR1 was further confirmed in a cellular context using Xenopus oocytes. In this model, the microinjection of TgLRR1 cRNA, like that of anti-PP1 antibodies and okadaic acid, promoted the progression of oocytes to M phase by inducing germinal vesicle breakdown. This induction paralleled an interaction of TgLRR1 with the endogenous PP1 and a decrease of about 50% in the phosphatase activity of cell extracts. This strongly suggests that downregulation of PP1 by TgLRR1 is required to initiate the cell cycle.
In light of the presence of two distinct stages in the T. gondii life cycle, the rapidly growing tachyzoite and the quiescent bradyzoite, together with the dynamic localization of TgLRR1 and TgPP1, we have further investigated (i) the variation in transcript levels of these genes and their products in tachyzoites versus bradyzoites and (ii) the interaction of TgLRR1 and TgPP1 in cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions of tachyzoites. Both mRNA and protein levels showed that TgPP1 was equally expressed in the two stages; however, TgLRR1 was shown to be expressed more in tachyzoites. Moreover, the TgLRR1-TgPP1 complex was detected only in the nuclear fraction, thus confirming the colocalization of both of the proteins observed in tachyzoites. The use of bradyzoites in these experiments was hampered by the quantity and quality of fractions that can be obtained.
In conclusion, although the possible link between the expression of TgLRR1 in the nuclei of tachyzoites and the capacity of these parasites to replicate rapidly, compared to bradyzoites, remains to be determined, our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that downregulation of dephosphorylation through interaction with TgLRR1 in the nuclei of tachyzoites may be a prerequisite for cell division. Conversely, lower levels of nuclear TgLRR1 may be a hallmark of slowly growing encysted bradyzoites.
We thank the Toxoplasma Genome Sequencing Consortium for making available the genome database at http://ToxoDB.org.
Published ahead of print on 27 July 2007. ![]()
Present address: Department of Microbiology and Molecular Medicine, Centre Medical Universitaire, University of Geneva, 1 Rue Michel-Servet, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»