Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Eukaryotic Cell, August 2007, p. 1464-1473, Vol. 6, No. 8
1535-9778/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/EC.00162-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Bettina C. Fries,1,2
Fang Wang,3,
and
Arturo Casadevall1,2*
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease,1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology,2 Laboratory for Macromolecular Analysis and Proteomics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 104613
Received 6 May 2007/ Accepted 2 June 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Diagram of identified structural repeating units for GXM (based on data from reference 5). Repeating units designated M1 to M4 are highly abundant in specific serotypes, listed in parentheses. M5 and M6 do not confer serotype specificity. Mannose, open circles; glucuronic acid, half-filled diamond; xylose, open triangles.
|
Solving the structure of GXM has posed a formidable problem because it is a large and polydispersed polysaccharide. Structural studies of GXM have relied heavily on the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analysis of de-O-acetylated GXM and the comparison of chemically modified GXM (4, 5). Given that GXM molecules have a mass on the order of 106 daltons (20), NMR analysis is limited in its ability to discern inter- and intramolecular relationships between different repeating units. Further complicating NMR analysis is evidence that purified GXM preparations are not homogeneous. Analysis of GXM purified from C. neoformans cultures by electrophoresis and immunoblotting has demonstrated significant heterogeneity in electrophoretic migration consistent with a heterogeneous composition (20). Likewise, antibodies to GXM produce different staining patterns on cells within a single culture (8, 11). The finding that some C. neoformans switch variants manifest changes in their GXM structure also suggests that GXM preparations cannot be homogeneous (8). Hence, we currently do not know whether the structural diversity found in GXM preparations is the result of mixtures of homopolymers or whether GXM is itself a heteropolymer.
The GXM basic unit is composed of a single hexose, uronic acid, and pentose residues and is modified only by O-acetyl groups on the mannose sugar. Hence, unlike many PSs, each component of GXM has a unique mass, permitting the use of mass spectrometry (MS) to solve the composition of GXM-derived oligosaccharides. The negative charge of GXM, imparted by glucuronic acid, and physical laws of repulsion provide a secondary means with which to examine structural aspects of GXM and to test assumptions imposed by hypothesized structural models of GXM. MS analysis of GXM-derived oligosaccharides suggested that GXM molecules are composed of combinations of different repeating units. Viscosity studies of GXM from isogenic phenotypic switch variants further supported copolymerization, as salt-dependent differences were suggestive of altered GlcA substitution patterns. This unique approach toward capsular PS synthesis may affect C. neoformans pathogenesis and antigenicity by providing a mechanism with which to alter the expression of immunologically relevant PS epitopes.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Methods of analysis performed with GXM from different strains used in this study
|
GXM hydrolysis. GXM (2 mg) was hydrolyzed in 100 µl of 0.5 M trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) at 95°C for 1 h, unless otherwise stated. The sample was vacuum dried and then dissolved in 20 mM ammonium bicarbonate. Partial hydrolysis was confirmed by the presence of multiple products visible by fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis (FACE) (14) and by thin-layer chromatography (15). For FACE, samples were run on a 30% polyacrylamide gel. The results were recorded as an inverted image using UV transillumination and image documentation software.
Mass spectrometry. Masses were determined by flow injection analysis with an LTQ quadruple linear ion trap mass spectrometer (ThermoFinnigan, San Jose, CA). An HP model 1100 high-performance liquid chromatography unit was used to pump 50% methanol containing 0.5% ammonium hydroxide at a flow rate of 50 µl min–1 and deliver it to the mass spectrometer. A sample (2 µl) was injected for analysis. The MS, equipped with an electrospray ionization source, was operated in negative mode to detect ions in the m/z range of 300 to 2,000. A tandem mass spectrometry (MS-MS) spectrum was acquired at the mass isolation window of 3 mass units and the relative collision energy of 30%.
Oligosaccharide composition determination. To determine the composition of an oligosaccharide from individual MS peaks, masses of the individual sugars were added in various compositions. GlcA has a mass of 194.04264 g/mol, Xyl has a mass of 150.05285 g/mol, and Man has a mass of 180.06335 g/mol. However, during bond formation, the mass of water (18.01055 g/mol) is lost from the reducing end (C1) of the sugar. Therefore, in calculations, the following masses were used: GlcA, 176.03209 g/mol (bond formed with Man); Xyl, 132.0423 g/mol (bond formed with Man); Man, 162.05280 g/mol (if C1 has bond with adjacent Man); Man, 180.06335 g/mol (if Man is at the terminal end of the oligosaccharide). As an example, the M1 repeat has a mass of 1 GlcA, 176.03209 g/mol + 1 Xyl, 132.04230 g/mol + 2 Man, 162.05280 g/mol (with bonds to adjacent Man) + 1 Man, 180.06335 g/mol (terminal) = 812.24334 g/mol. The mass of the oligosaccharide is 1 mass unit larger than its m/z peak, as 1 proton was lost during the ionization process. Thus, the M1 triad would ionize at an m/z of approximately 811.2. Larger mass oligosaccharides were occasionally double ionized, which results in the m/z appearing as one-half of the expected m/z value. Due to the imprecision of the hydrolysis procedure, oligosaccharide structures observed for mass spectral analysis varied between experiments, necessitating the use of several MS scans to determine the structures present in a given GXM sample.
Molecular mass and radius of gyration. The molecular mass and radius of gyration (Rg) of GXM were determined by multiangle laser light scattering, as previously described. The weight-averaged mass (Mw) was calculated by the Zimm equation as described in reference 20 and is the inverse of the y intercept.
Viscosity.
Viscosity was measured using a modified Ostwald-type capillary glass viscometer (Cannon-Manning Semi-Micro, Technical Glass Co., Dover, NJ) at 25°C with 2.25 ml of each sample. GXM (10 mg ml–1), in ultrapure water, from the phenotypic switch variants of the RC-2 strain was solubilized for 4 days at room temperature. Samples were diluted and equilibrated to 25°C prior to testing. Flow time was measured in triplicate and averaged. The actual flow times for a given sample typically did not differ by more than 1 s from the mean. The relative viscosity increment (
i [also known as specific viscosity,
sp]) is defined as the change in the ratio of the flow time of the sample to the solvent that is specifically due to the sample particles.
Time course of antigenic variation expression. Cells from an individual colony grown on SD agar were patched onto a new SD agar plate. Plates were incubated at 30°C. After 3 days, half of the cells were scraped from the plate and washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 1.5 mM KH2PO4, 8.5 mM Na2HPO4). A loopful of cells was used to initiate a 50-ml SD broth culture, which was incubated at 30°C with gentle shaking (150 rpm). Cells were scraped from the agar plate again at day 5. Aliquots of cells were removed from the broth culture after growth for 1, 2, and 4 days. Cells from each time point were immediately prepared for analysis by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS): 1 x 107 to 2 x 107 cells in 100 to 200 µl of PBS were labeled overnight at 4°C with 10 µg ml–1 of either monoclonal antibody (MAb) 12A1 or 21D2. The cells were washed twice in PBS and then incubated with 0.1 mg ml–1 of fluorescein isothiocyanate-coupled goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin M antibody (Southern Biotechnologies, Birmingham, AL) for 1 h at room temperature. Following this incubation, the cells were washed twice in PBS, resuspended in 500 µl of PBS, and kept on ice until analyzed. Data were collected and analyzed using CellQuest software from DakoCytomation. Statistical significance was determined by analysis of variance (ANOVA).
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (110K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis of GXM from strain B-3501 under different hydrolysis conditions at 95°C. Lane 1, 0.3 M TFA for 5 h; lane 2, 0.1 M TFA for 1 h; lane 3, 0.5 M TFA for 1 h; lane 4, 0.5 M TFA for 5 h; lane 5, no TFA for 5 h. The dark band at the lower edge of the figure is unreacted fluorophore. *, visible oligosaccharide bands in lane 1, 3, and 4.
|
![]() View larger version (39K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Representative mass spectra of the GXM hydrolysis products from strains B-3501 (serotype D), 24067 (serotype D), H99 (serotype A), I23 (serotype B), and 106.97 (serotype C). The bottom right panel shows a close-up of the I23 spectrum between a m/z of 700 and 1,400.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. m/z peaks observed with GXM from different strains of C. neoformans and proposed composition for the oligosaccharide represented by the peaka
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Masses of oligosaccharides from GXM demonstrate different combinations of repeating units
|
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. The MS-MS spectra of m/z of 1,341 and 1,473 from B-3501 GXM and a m/z of 868 from I23 GXM. The fragmentation patterns show the loss of Man, GlcA, and Xyl from the ions, confirming the oligosaccharide composition. (A) A m/z of 1,341, singly charged ion; (B) m/z of 1,473, singly charged ion; (C) m/z of 868, doubly charged ion.
|
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Mass spectrum m/z of 1,001 from B-3501 GXM. This ion represents an oligosaccharide of 2,004 g/mol mass, owing to its double ionization. The double ionization is observable by the difference of a m/z of 0.5 between ionized peaks, instead of the anticipated m/z of 1 for singly ionized peaks. The predicted composition is Man9GlcA3, equivalent to three M6 repeating units.
|
1.25:1). However, contamination during the charge-based precipitation step of the isolation procedure by small amounts of DNA, peptide, or non-GXM acidic polysaccharide material cannot be completely eliminated by the established protocol and would not have been detected by less sensitive methods. However, the greatest potential source of contamination comes from the nitrogen-containing chemical hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) used during the GXM precipitation step. CTAB is notoriously difficult to remove from GXM during dialysis. Consequently, some of the noise in the MS spectra may have been from CTAB adducts of GXM-derived oligosaccharides in the sample. Despite these difficulties, the MS results produced interpretable results. GXM from phenotypic switch variants manifests differences in the GXM repeat unit not detected by NMR. The heterogeneity in GXM repeat units in the above-described results received additional support in studies of GXM from isogenic switch variants of C. neoformans strain RC-2. This strain switches from a parent smooth (SM) to a more virulent mucoid (MC) colony phenotype during chronic infection (9, 10). 1H-NMR spectroscopy of SM and MC GXM revealed that both of the PSs were composed of the M1 repeat (Fig. 6A and C). Identical structures were unexpected as the biophysical and immunomodulatory abilities of SM and MC GXM differed greatly and NMR-detectable changes in GXM repeat were reported in other switch variants with increased virulence (8, 9, 23).
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. 1H-NMR and light scattering analyses of GXM from smooth and mucoid phenotypic switch variants, strain RC-2, do not suggest differences in the repeating units or molecular masses. (A) 1H-NMR of GXM from the smooth phenotypic variant. (B) Zimm plot of light scattering data obtained from the GXM from the smooth phenotypic variant. (C) 1H-NMR of GXM from the mucoid phenotypic variant. (D) Zimm plot of light scattering data obtained from the GXM from the mucoid phenotypic variant.
|
i) was expected to decrease for both SM and MC GXM (Fig. 7A and B). The SM and MC measurements were compared directly by arbitrarily assigning the
i at an ionic strength of 0 to 100% and determining the percentage of change of
i at different ionic strengths (Fig. 7C and D). SM GXM had a larger decrease in
i than the MC GXM in response to the changing salt concentrations. From this result, we inferred that the larger Rg of SM GXM was due to greater electrostatic repulsion within the PS. The elementary compositions of both SM and MC GXM were identical (data not shown), and therefore, repulsion can only be caused by the proximity of GlcA sugars. From the viscosity data, we conclude that the spacing of GlcA along the Man backbone must differ between the GXM of the SM and that of the MC strain. Because overall sugar ratios and elementary composition do not differ for SM and MC GXM and because NMR measures an average repeat unit over the entire Man backbone, these important structural difference are not revealed by standard 1H-NMR.
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. The viscosity of the smooth GXM solution decreased more rapidly than the mucoid GXM solution in the presence of salt. (A and B) The relative viscosity increment was determined for various concentrations of GXM from the smooth (A) or mucoid (B) variants. GXM was dissolved in NaCl solutions of different ionic strengths. Ionic strength is listed to the right of the linear regression line for each concentration series. (C and D) Comparison of the relative viscosity increment for GXM from the smooth (solid bars) and mucoid (gray hatched bars) variants at densities of 5 x 10–5 g/cm3 (C) or 2 x 10–4 g/cm3 (D). The accurate reproducibility of sample flow times results in minimal standard error for i, which is not visible when plotted.
|
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Expression of epitopes in GXM for MAbs 12A1 and 21D2 under different growth conditions. (A and B) Percentage of cells stained positive for either MAb 12A1 (solid bars) or 21D2 (gray hatched bars) as determined by FACS analysis. Error bars represent the standard errors. (A) Serotype D strain B-3501; (B) serotype C strain 106.97. The growth conditions are listed by the number of days (D) of incubation and the medium used (agar or broth). Data are averages of two to three experiments. (C and D) Histograms from a representative experiment of the FACS data obtained for MAb 21D2 (thick gray line, unfilled) and MAb 12A1 (thin black line, unfilled) after 3 days of growth on agar (C) and 1 day of growth in broth (D) for strain 106.97. The unstained population is represented by the filled area.
|
|
|
|---|
MS revealed that the Man/GlcA ratio of GXM-derived oligosaccharides was consistent with the averaged 3:1 ratio predicted from the repeat structures by NMR. The identification here of numerous oligosaccharides with the expected masses provided additional sequence-level information and the first independent confirmation that the triad scheme for GXM structure is fundamentally correct. Our analysis also provided evidence for intramolecular structural heterogeneity. Since there is no evidence for microbial capsule synthesis via the sequential joining of monosaccharide units, a conservative assumption is that the repeating units are first synthesized and then joined together to form the C. neoformans capsule. The copolymerization of different repeating units was deduced from the mass analysis of oligosaccharides derived from GXM originating from one serotype B strain and two serotype D strains. The most straightforward interpretation for the unique oligosaccharide masses detected by MS is that these arise from the presence of different repeating units in one molecule. The doubly charged ion at an m/z of 868, discovered in strain I23, corresponded to the mass expected for an oligosaccharide with the composition of distinct repeating units. Thus, even without knowing the precise structural detail of this strain, the MS analysis of GXM provided evidence for a synthetic process that was dissimilar to that of prokaryotes. MS analysis of oligosaccharides derived after partial hydrolysis from the serotype D strains demonstrated that homopolymeric tracts of M6 exist within the M1 copolymer (e.g., m/z of 1,341 and 1,001). Homopolymeric tracts of other types of repeating units may also occur but were not distinguishable by this method. It should be noted, however, that the three mass groups identified in the serotype D strains are distinguishable by the mass of one or two Xyl.
HPAEC studies of monosaccharide release from hydrolyzed GXM did not detect Xyl, even though a wide range of hydrolysis products were detected by FACE. Thus, we conclude that the serotype D oligosaccharides are representative of the original structure. The reduced sensitivity of the Xyl linkage to hydrolysis was surprising since our initial conditions had not produced oligosaccharides with this critical sugar. However, recent evidence that GXM exists as a fiber containing several molecules of GXM (20) raises the possibility that Xyl is located in the interior spaces of the fibers, a location where it may be relatively less susceptible to acid hydrolysis. If this is the case, a rapid hydrolysis protocol may permit preferential attack of backbone mannose linkages without immediate cleavage of the Xyl linkage. Acid hydrolysis is currently the only available means with which to obtain oligosaccharides from GXM of a size suitable for MS. Interestingly, charge analysis of different regions of the capsule provided evidence that the negative charge of the capsule was not evenly distributed (18). The uneven distribution of charge in the capsule could be the result of homopolymeric tracts of M6, which were identified in the MS analysis of GXM oligosaccharides, a finding that is also consistent with a GXM synthetic model of nonuniform copolymerization of repeating units.
Physical studies of GXM from phenotypic switch variants provided strong support for the conclusions drawn from the MS analysis and, at the same time, demonstrated a structural difference to support the clear association between the variant GXMs and virulence (10, 23). GXM from MC and SM switch variants has indistinguishable NMR profiles, similar sugar and glycosyl linkage compositions (data not shown), and similar masses. However, their Rg values differed, suggesting different secondary structures in nonionic solvents. The differences in viscosity as a function of electrolyte concentration implied a disparity in charge neutralization and repulsion, caused by the interaction of salt and GlcA, and confirmed that secondary structural dissimilarities existed. Since GlcA is the only charged residue in GXM, these differences imply positional differences for GlcA in SM and in MC GXM. The previously defined repeating units state that GlcA is linked to every third Man in the backbone. The viscosity data suggest that at least one GXM does not contain GlcA at the expected interval. The identification of oligosaccharides from other strains that had Man/GlcA ratios of 4:1, 4:2, or 5:2 could also be consistent with deviations from the 3:1 ratio existing. This structural difference between the variants was undetectable by 1H-NMR but is only explainable by copolymerization. The structural studies that deduced the repeating units did not determine the relationship of GlcA to the reducing end of the units. Therefore, if, for example, the M1 repeat exists with GlcA linked either to the nonreducing Man or to the reducing Man [-Man
1,3(GlcAß1,2)Man
1,3Man (Xylß1,2) versus -Man
1,3(Xylß1,2)Man
1,3Man (GlcAß1,2)-], then copolymerization of these similar units could lead to secondary structural differences. Such a difference would also not be identifiable either by MS of hydrolyzed GXM or by linkage analysis, as neither method could provide details of sequence order that would be necessary. Hence, viscosity measurements provided invaluable structural insight.
By combining repeating units to synthesize a fiber of GXM, the PS capsule of C. neoformans has the potential for enormous structural complexity. For example, the GXM from strain 3501 has a mass of 2.6 x 106 g/mol (20) and contains four of the six identified repeating units (M1, M2, M5, and M6), according to NMR studies (5). Assuming that any repeating unit can occur in any position in the PS and that all Man units have an equal chance of being acetylated, GXM could consist of 162,894 or 5.2 x 103,484 combinations. By expanding the molecular diversity to the capsule (1), there are potentially
or
PS combinations on the surface of C. neoformans. These enormous combinatorial estimates do not include unknown structural repeats or the polydispersed size of PSs, either of which could add more complexity. Although the inherent assumption here is that GXM synthesis occurs by polymerized units, a large number of combinations would also occur if synthesis occurred by sequential addition of sugars to a growing oligosaccharide. This could be the case if C. neoformans was utilizing its glycan synthesis machinery to manufacture GXM. Either way, the number of PS structural combinations that could exist in the capsule of C. neoformans approaches infinity, and biological relevance to these calculations is supported by the MS data and the differences in the GXM from phenotypic switch variant.
By having the flexibility to alter the composition of an individual GXM molecule, C. neoformans demonstrates a unique approach to capsule diversification and construction that distinguishes it from the capsulated bacteria. Combinatorial diversity may involve the synthesis of different repeating units at different intracellular locations, with some potentially present in vesicles (7, 12, 24, 27). Hence, the eukaryotic secretion apparatus may provide the means for generating significantly more complex capsules in fungi than in bacteria and could include a distinct mechanism.
Immunofluorescence studies have shown tremendous variability in capsular staining within a C. neoformans culture (11). Such variability appears to be a dynamic process that is inducible and reversible. Nutrient accessibility does not influence epitope expression since nutrients are readily available from agar or during logarithmic growth in broth. The change in capsule structure, as inferred from MAbs 21D2 and 12A1, during logarithmic growth implies that metabolism, unrelated to nutrient availability, influences GXM synthesis. These changes could affect the outcome of infection if they occurred in vivo. For example, increased expression of specific epitopes during periods of active replication, such as the epitope for MAb 21D2, could elicit antibodies early during human infection that would be ineffective later when the epitopes have changed. Consistent with this, the initial polyclonal response of mice to cryptococcal infection is biased toward antibodies that share a characteristic of nonprotective MAbs (28). The structural changes responsible for the altered expression of these epitopes are not known. However, the acetyl modification of GXM is important for antibody recognition. Acetylation reduces MAb 21D2 binding, and MAb 12A1 can recognize acetyl-dependent and non-acetyl-dependent epitopes (21). Therefore, metabolic changes due to growth conditions may affect the acetyl modification of GXM. A specific motif for acetylation has not been determined, and the extent of acetylation would be predicted to change if the altering of structural combinations resulted in the creation or loss of the acetylation motif.
In summary, the combinatorial capability within the GXM structure provides a new mechanism for C. neoformans to change the physical and antigenic properties of its capsule. Variation in the capsule structure could provide a survival advantage for a fungal population subjected to predation by amoebae in the environment and contribute to their survival in humans.
This work was supported by NIH grants AI33774, AI33142, and HL59842 to A.C. and by AI59681 to B.C.F. D.C.M. was supported by a Burroughs Wellcome Fund fellow award through the Life Science Research Foundation.
Published ahead of print on 29 June 2007. ![]()
Present address: Columbia University, 722 W. 168th Street, New York, NY 10032. ![]()
Present address: Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Pearl River, NY 10965. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»