Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Eukaryotic Cell, March 2007, p. 563-567, Vol. 6, No. 3
1535-9778/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/EC.00301-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Department of Biology, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clearwater Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
Received 18 September 2006/ Accepted 12 January 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
40°C) during digestion (20). Dinoflagellates are the major causative agents of harmful algal blooms and are the symbiotic alga of corals. Members of the group are infamous for their production of toxins responsible for common seafood poisoning syndromes (e.g., ciguatera poisoning). The nucleosomeless liquid crystalline chromosomes of dinoflagellates are the only known alternative to the histone-based packaging of eukaryotic DNA, but very little is known about their molecular mechanism of gene regulation. Despite their ecological importance, biochemical richness, and biotechnological significance, dinoflagellates are still largely intractable to molecular genetic investigation.
Electron microscopy studies of many dinoflagellate species suggest that the deposition of the cellulosic thecal plates is mediated by vesicular fusion (22). In the course of investigating the cellulose deposition process in Crypthecodinium cohnii cells, we developed a protocol for producing spheroplasts with a significantly lower level of cellulose content. The method is based essentially on the separation of motile daughter cells from the mother cell wall. C. cohnii is one of the two heterotrophic dinoflagellates that have been successfully cultured in a synthetic culture medium (6), and more importantly, it is able to form colonies on agar plates. After cytokinesis, the daughter cells do not immediately separate but instead they stay inside the mother cell for some time before they "break off" and discard the mother cell wall (2). As only the early G1 daughter cells are motile, highly synchronized cell cultures can be produced by colony release and filtration (24). We made use of this ability to investigate whether agents that mediate membrane fusion (e.g., polyethylene glycol [PEG]) can enhance the deposition of the thecal vesicles through the daughter cell membranes.
Crypthecodinium cohnii Biecheler strain 1649 was obtained from the Culture Collection of Algae at the University of Texas at Austin, maintained in MLH liquid medium (18), and incubated at 28°C in the dark. Two days before the spheroplasts were required, an exponentially growing culture of C. cohnii cells was harvested by centrifugation (2,500 x g for 10 min). After the cell pellet was resuspended in 20% (wt/vol) PEG and vortexed on a Vortex Genie mixer (Scientific Industries) for 10 min, cells were spread on MLH agar plates containing 0.4% (wt/vol) PEG 8000 (Sigma-Aldrich). After incubation at 28°C for 2 days in the dark, we carefully poured fresh MLH medium over the C. cohnii colonies on the agar plates. This first elutant was poured off, thus discarding the loosely attached colonies. Additional MLH medium was then poured carefully over the colonies, and this second elutant was retained. To further enhance the collection of highly synchronized control cells, a filtration step through a 10-µm filter excluded contamination by the larger mother cells (24).
Calcofluor white M2R (CFW; Sigma-Aldrich), a fluorescent brightening agent (UV excitation), has been used extensively to visualize the cellulosic thecal plates of armored dinoflagellates (5, 7). The reliability of CFW in staining cellulose in C. cohnii cells was confirmed with an acetic-nitric cellulose assay (7). In the present study, CFW-stained motile cells eluted from colonies after incubation on 0.4% (wt/vol) PEG-containing MLH agar plates had significantly lower levels of fluorescence (hence lower cellulosic content) than control cells eluted from normal MLH agar plates (Fig. 1A). Flow cytometry comparison suggested that the mean value of relative cellulosic content of the spheroplasts was only 20% of that of the control cells (Fig. 1B).
![]() View larger version (60K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Spheroplast of Crypthecodinium cohnii. Fluorescence photomicrographs (same exposure time, 4 s) (A) and flow cytograms (B) of CFW-stained C. cohnii control cells and spheroplasts. (C) Spheroplasts possessed significantly lower DCVJ fluorescence intensity (P < 0.001) and thereby higher fluidity than control cells. (D) Many cells moved like amoebae after spheroplast preparation. Bar, 10 µm.
|
![]() View larger version (77K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Transmission electron microscopy of spheroplasts. (A) Schematic diagram showing the swarmer cells and cells in colonies during spheroplast preparation. (B) Swarmer cells and cells in colonies were harvested and observed under transmission electron microscopy at x5,800 (whole cell) and x14,000 (focused at the cortical layers) magnification. For swarmer cells, the layers in red (as shown in the right-hand panel) became thinner or even absent in PEG-treated cells (spheroplasts). For cells in a colony, the green layer (as shown in the right-hand panel) of PEG-treated cells was much thicker than that of the control. Specimens were examined in a JEOL 100CX transmission electron microscope.
|
![]() View larger version (37K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Cell cycle progression of spheroplasts was not affected by the preparation method. (A) Flow cytograms of propidium iodide-stained synchronous C. cohnii cells. "T" refers to the time (hour) that the sample was harvested after cell cycle synchronization. (B) The percentages of G1 and G2/M cells during the cell cycle were determined by the software WinMDI (version 2.8; The Scripps Research Institute [http://facs.scripps.edu/software.html]). Specific regions corresponding to the G1 and G2/M peaks were gated on flow cytograms by using the "Marker" function. (C) Calcofluor white staining revealed that spheroplasts generally possessed significantly less cellulose than the control throughout the cell cycle. Results are representative of triplicate experiments.
|
![]() View larger version (26K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Permeability of spheroplasts to an FITC-conjugated oligonucleotide. Control cells (A) and spheroplasts (B) were transfected with an FITC-conjugated oligonucleotide (FP) by using Lipofectamine (Lipo). An FITC-conjugated oligonucleotide (1 µg) was first mixed with 15 µl Lipofectamine and allowed to stand at room temperature for 15 min as described in the manufacturer's manual (Lipofectamine reagent; Invitrogen). Around 1 x 106 C. cohnii cells (in 200 µl MLH medium) per reaction were added, and the mixture was shaken gently on a 24-well microplate at room temperature for 15 min. Cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline three times prior to flow cytometry analysis. Means of fluorescence intensity (log scale) are indicated within parentheses. Photomicrographs of transfected control cells and spheroplasts were taken with the same exposure time. Fluorescence signals corresponding to the FITC-conjugated oligonucleotides are shown. Bar, 10 µm.
|
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Permeability of spheroplasts to FITC-conjugated antibody. FITC-conjugated antibody was delivered into control cells (A) and spheroplasts (B) by Lipofectamine. FITC-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody (Ab) (3 mg) was first mixed with 15 µl Lipofectamine and allowed to stand at room temperature for 15 min as described in the manufacturer's manual (Lipofectamine reagent; Invitrogen). Around 1 x 106 C. cohnii cells (in 200 µl MLH medium) per reaction were added, and the mixture was shaken gently on a 24-well microplate at room temperature for 15 min. Cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline three times prior to flow cytometry analysis. Means of fluorescence intensity (log scale) are indicated within parentheses.
|
Published ahead of print on 26 January 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»