Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Eukaryotic Cell, November 2007, p. 2001-2008, Vol. 6, No. 11
1535-9778/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/EC.00129-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
,
Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire des Champignons, UMR-5095 CNRS et Université de Bordeaux 2, IBGC, 1 rue Camille Saint-Saëns, 33077 Bordeaux Cedex, France
Received 18 April 2007/ Accepted 4 September 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Vegetative incompatibility is triggered by the coexpression of incompatible alleles from the same locus (allelic incompatibility) or from different loci (nonallelic incompatibility) (22, 41, 42). So far, het genes have been cloned only in the two model species Neurospora crassa and Podospora anserina. Although unrelated, genes forming VI systems share two characteristics. First, extensive polymorphism can be observed between het alleles. For instance, in N. crassa alleles at the het-6 incompatibility locus are only 68% identical (44), and alleles at the het-C locus are characterized by the presence of a highly divergent region that defines allele specificity (43) and are subjected to balancing selection (46). Polymorphism is also observed between alleles of pin-C, a gene closely linked to het-C, both forming allelic and nonallelic vegetative incompatibility systems with each other (23). In P. anserina, alleles of het-C are more variable within the open reading frame than in noncoding flanking or intron sequences (39, 40). Finally, alleles at het-D and het-E loci involved in nonallelic incompatibility with het-C belong to the NWD gene family, whose members share the presence of a WD repeat domain made of a variable number of WD40 sequence units. The WD repeat domain defines allele specificity (16, 39), and four positions of the elementary WD40 sequence are subjected to positive selection (34), promoting accumulation of nonsynonymous mutations. The second feature shared by VI systems is a protein domain termed HET, found in most VI systems so far. The HET domain, a fungus-specific sequence, is characterized by three conserved blocks of 15 to 30 amino acids comprised within a sequence of about 200 amino acids (44). The HET domain is encoded either by the het gene itself or by another gene involved in the system. In N. crassa, a HET domain is encoded by pin-C, a gene closely linked and essential to het-C incompatibility (23), by tol, a mediator of mating type VI, and by het-6 (22, 44). In P. anserina, a HET domain is located at the N-terminal end of HET-D and HET-E proteins (34). Note that for the P. anserina HET-s prion system, no HET domain-containing partner has been described yet, while in N. crassa the VI gene un-24 lacks a HET domain but forms haplotypes with het-6, their combination being described as a supergene (29). As all these VI systems trigger a PCD, one might hypothesize that the HET domain is the trigger of VI-associated PCD (22). Circumstantial evidence supports this idea. A point mutation in the HET domain of pin-C abolishes the VI reaction (23), while mutations in vib-1 suppressing VI reactions in N. crassa result in low expression of het-6, tol, and pin-C, all HET domain-encoding genes (22, 47, 48). Put together, these features lead to a modular conception of VI whereby recognition is ensured by the polymorphic regions of HET proteins and PCD is triggered by the HET domain included in the system (Fig. 1). Interestingly, in addition to being found in various VI systems, analysis of several fungal genomes uncovered numerous HET domain-encoding genes whose functions remain unknown. For example, 55 HET domain-encoding genes have been annotated in the N. crassa genome (19), and up to 38 were found in aspergilli genomes (18, 20).
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Schematic representation of the het-C/het-E vegetative incompatibility system. The recognition module is made of the HET-C protein and the WD repeat domain of HET-E. The death module is made of the HET domain of HET-E. Arrowheads represent mutated tryptophan residues.
|
The existence of nonallelic VI systems allowed for easy identification of mutations suppressing vegetative incompatibility. Indeed, appropriate crosses led to the production of spores harboring incompatible alleles from different loci in the same nucleus. Such spores can germinate, but after about 12 h, growth stops and the VI is induced. Both C/D and C/E VI systems are suppressed by mutations in mod-A1 and mod-B1 (3, 5, 7). mod-A1 partially suppresses the VI reaction, while its association with mod-B1 results in complete suppression of the process. Note that no phenotype could be associated to the mod-B1 mutation alone in or out of the VI reaction. Cloning and analysis of mod-A1 revealed a proline-rich protein with little homology to known proteins (2, 27), and current work suggests that mod-B is paralogous to mod-A (M. Paoletti, unpublished data). Other mod genes were selected from complex screens (for a review, see reference 27), but mod-A1 and mod-B1 remain the only two mutations suppressing all nonallelic incompatibility systems in P. anserina.
In the present paper we report that overexpression of the HET domain from het-E, alone, triggers a MOD-A- and MOD-B-dependent PCD reaction. HET domain- and VI-induced PCD reactions display identical cytological and morphological characteristics, including induction of autophagy (36). Finally, the HET domain-associated PCD is independent of HET-C, the normal protein partner for HET-D and HET-E in VI. These results establish the HET domain as a central mediator of PCD in fungi.
|
|
|---|
het-C is an s strain deleted for het-C. P. anserina cotransformations were performed using 1.5 µg of selectable plasmid conferring resistance to hygromycin or phleomycin and 5 µg of the plasmid of interest, as described in reference 4 or in reference 14, when heat shock was omitted to avoid heat-induced expression. Under these conditions, most protoplasts are transformed by both plasmids, which integrate at the same locus (V. Razanamparany, unpublished data); consequently, efficiency of cotransformation is a measurement of the toxicity of the transformed plasmids (14, 44). The presence of the entire expression cassette was confirmed in 85% of transformants by PCR using the primers pMODE-F and HET-Kpn-R (Table 1). |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Primers for constructions and site-directed mutagenesis
|
![]() View larger version (38K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Alignment of the HET domains from the HNWD family. Amino acids defining the HET domain (44) are underlined, tryptophan residues conserved with N. crassa HET domain sequences are in bold, residues mutated to alanine are highlighted, and mutations abolishing lethality are indicated with a . Numbering is according to the HET-E sequence.
|
Cytological analysis and microscopy. Lipid droplets and septa were observed after Nile Red and Congo Red staining, and all microscopy observations were made as previously described (37). Light and fluorescence microscopy observations were conducted on a Leica DMRXA confocal microscope. Dead mycelium was revealed by Evans blue staining followed by fluorescence microscopy observation. Quantification of the amount of dead fungal material was conducted as described in reference 35. Basically, mortality was estimated as the ratio of the length of dead fungal material over the total length of fungal mycelium.
|
|
|---|
We placed the same HET domain-encoding DNA under the control of the heat-inducible mod-E promoter (27) on the pMODE plasmid, yielding the pHET plasmid. mod-E encodes a heat shock protein of the HSP90 family, and expression of the mod-E gene is induced upon transfer from 26°C to 37°C (26). The same promoter was successfully used to drive expression of idi-4, another P. anserina gene whose overexpression is lethal (14). WT s strain was transformed with pHET or with empty pMODE as a control. Transformants were recovered and growth compared at 26°C (repressing conditions) and 37°C (inducing conditions). After 48 h of incubation, 20 out of 28 transformants did not grow at 37°C but grew at 26°C, while 8 displayed severe alterations when grown at 37°C compared to 26°C. Control transformants grew equally well at 26°C and 37°C (Fig. 3A). These results indicate that induction of the HET domain leads to growth arrest in P. anserina.
![]() View larger version (38K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. HET domain toxicity in different genetic backgrounds. (A) Strains were grown under conditions promoting (37°C) or restricting (26°C) expression of the HET domain. (B) Transformation efficiencies of the WT strain with pCSN43 and plasmids expressing WT or mutated HET domains compared to pMODE and pHET controls. The data are cumulative over three separate transformation experiments, and average numbers of transformants are indicated along with standard error bars. (C) The relative HET domain expression was analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR in WT and mod-A1 mod-B1 strains. The presence or absence of the pHET plasmid is indicated by + and – signs; inducing (37°C) or repressing (26°C) temperatures are also indicated. The expression level of the histone gene was used as an internal control to normalize expression levels in the different samples. Expression of the HET domain in the untransformed strains grown at the restrictive temperature was used as a reference and was arbitrarily set to 1. Standard errors were determined over three replicates of the RT-PCR analysis.
|
Lethality is suppressed in a mod-A1 mod-B1 mutant but not in a
het-C mutant background.
Cell death by incompatibility is partially suppressed by the mod-A1 mutation alone, while complete suppression of VI is achieved when the mod-A1 and mod-B1 mutations are combined (3, 5, 6, 27). We first transformed a mod-A1 mod-B1 double mutant strain with the pHET plasmid. Transformation efficiency was equally high with control or HET domain-expressing plasmids. Out of 20 randomly selected transformants, 18 did not display any growth alteration after transfer to 37°C compared to 26°C and grew as well as control strains (Fig. 3A); the remaining two displayed the same growth alterations at 26°C and 37°C, most likely due to the site of transgene integration in the genome. The presence of the entire expression cassette was confirmed in 17 of the transformants by PCR using the primers pMODE-F and HET-Kpn-R.
Next, we chose to introduce the pHET expression plasmid into a mod-A1 genetic background by genetic crossing to avoid any risks of mod-A1 protoplasts failing to regenerate due to partial suppression. A total of 64 homokaryotic progenies of the cross WT::pHET x mod-A1 were tested for growth at 26°C and 37°C and compared to 32 homokaryotic progenies of a control cross, WT::pHET x WT. All progenies grew normally at 26°C, but for both crosses half the progenies failed to grow at 37°C, indicating that mod-A1 alone does not suppress the HET domain expression lethality.
It is interesting that suppression by mod-A1 mod-B1 mutations is specific to the HET domain-induced PCD. idi-4 encodes a bZIP transcription factor specifically induced during the VI reaction and whose overexpression triggers a cell death reaction. However, mod-A1 and mod-B1 mutations fail to suppress lethality caused by idi-4 overexpression (14). This observation combined with the fact that W residues at positions 99 and 140 are essential to the HET domain toxicity suggest that HET domain toxicity results from its activity rather than an unspecific effect of its overexpression.
In wild-type isolates, the VI-associated PCD is triggered by a genetic interaction between het-E (or het-D) and het-C encoding a glycolipid transfer protein. One might hypothesize that HET-C is involved in mediating PCD, especially as ACD11, a protein homologous to HET-C in Arabidopsis thaliana, controls PCD (9). Alternatively, in the modular system as presented in Fig. 1, HET domain lethality would be independent of the glycolipid transfer protein activity. Consequently, we analyzed the lethality of HET domain overexpression in a
het-C strain. We introduced the pHET plasmid in a
het-C strain by genetic crossing with an s isolate in which HET domain induction is lethal. Following the segregation of selection and PCR markers, we selected four
het-C progeny harboring the pHET plasmid. These progeny grew normally at 26°C but could not grow at all when placed at 37°C (Fig. 3A). HET-C is then not necessary for HET domain-induced PCD.
From the above results, we conclude that HET domain expression leads to toxicity in P. anserina because of its intrinsic activity. This activity is independent of HET-C and is signaled through the same pathway as VI-associated PCD that involves the MOD-A and MOD-B proteins.
Expression of the HET domain. Using quantitative RT-PCR, we analyzed HET domain expression, corresponding to the het-E gene expression alone in WT and mod-A1 mod-B1 untransformed strains, or to the combined expression of the het-E gene and mod-E promoter-driven expression of the HET domain in the pHET transformant strains (Fig. 3C). Unexpectedly, we observed that het-E relative expression was reduced when the WT and mod-A1 mod-B1 untransformed strains were transferred to 37°C. In contrast, transfer from 26°C to 37°C results in a 1.6-fold increase of HET domain expression in the WT transformant strain and a 2-fold increase of HET domain expression in the mod-A1 mod-B1 transformant strain. Although the observed induction is less than previously reported for het-E gene induction upon transfer to 37°C (26), we conclude that transfer of transformants to 37°C does result in the induction of the HET domain expression driven by the mod-E promoter in both WT and mod-A1 mob-B1 genetic backgrounds. Importantly, this is the first report of het-E expression, and we note that the het-E gene expression pattern does not appear to be modified by the mod-A1 and mod-B1 mutations under the conditions investigated.
Cytological consequences of isolated HET domain expression. One of the major features of VI is the induction of autophagy (for review, see reference 36). Autophagy is evidenced by relocalization of the GFP-PaATG8 fusion protein from the cytoplasm into the vacuole (37). We introduced the pHET plasmid into a WT strain expressing a GFP-PaATG8 fusion. Upon transfer to 37°C (induction of HET domain expression), GFP-PaATG8 relocalizes from the cytosol to the vacuole (Fig. 4A). GFP-PaATG8 relocalization is not observed in the control GFP-PaATG8 strain when it is transferred to 37°C. Induction of HET domain expression also leads to vacuole enlargement, production of lipid droplets, and increased frequency of septation (Fig. 4B). Note that morphological alterations associated with HET domain expression were observed in the whole mycelium. These cytological alterations are all observed during VI-associated PCD (36). In conclusion, all known cytological/morphological markers of the VI reaction are induced by the expression of the HET domain.
![]() View larger version (74K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Cytological effects of HET domain expression. All experiments were conducted as described elsewhere (37). (A) Induction of autophagy by HET domain expression. A WT strain expressing a GFP-PaATG8 fusion protein and the HET domain was grown on complete medium at 26°C for 24 h and transferred to 37°C for 4 h to induce expression of the HET domain. (I and III) light microscopy using a Nomarsky filter; (II and IV) fluorescence microscopy. (B) Production of lipid droplets and septa by HET domain expression. A HET domain-expressing transformant was grown for 24 h on complete medium at 26°C and transferred for 2 h, 4 h, or 6 h to 37°C before observation. After 2 h of incubation at 37°C, lipid droplets were visible. Pictures were taken after 6 h of incubation at 37°C. (I and III) Light microscopy with a Nomarsky filter; (II) Nile Red staining of lipid droplets; (IV) Congo Red staining of septa observed under fluorescence microscopy.
|
het-C strain. In contrast, a basal level of cell death (ca. 10%) was observed in the absence of HET domain expression or when it was expressed in a mod-A1 mod-B1 genetic background. We conclude that HET domain expression triggers cell death. This cell death is independent of the presence of HET-C but depends on the MOD-A and MOD-B proteins.
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Cell death induced by HET domain expression. Isolates harboring control or pHET plasmids were grown for 24 h on complete medium at 26°C before transfer to 37°C. (A) Aspect of mycelia after 24-h induction under fluorescence or light microscopy. Dead and living cells were detected by combining Evans Blue staining and GFP-PaATG8 fluorescence. (B) Mortality expressed as the percent dead mycelium length over total mycelium length.
|
|
|
|---|
What mechanism could lead to activation of the HET domain during VI? HET-D and HET-E belong to the group of STAND proteins, a class of nucleotide binding proteins that control PCD (25), among which the mammalian APAF-1 controls cytochrome c-induced apoptosis (1). APAF-1 displays a structural organization similar to HET-D and HET-E, with a central NB-ARC domain (a class of P-loop NTP binding site) (25), a C-terminal WD repeat domain, and an N-terminal CARD domain effector of apoptosis. Under normal growth conditions, the WD domain binds to and inhibits the CARD domain activity. In contrast, binding of cytochrome c to the WD domain releases the CARD domain and triggers apoptosis (1). Release of the CARD domain is thought to result from a conformational change mediated by hydrolysis of the NTP bound to the NTP binding domain, a feature common to STAND proteins. By analogy, HET domain activity could be inhibited by binding of the NACHT and/or WD domain during vegetative growth. Interaction between the partners of the recognition module, the WD repeat domain and an incompatible HET-C protein (Fig. 6), would free the HET domain and allow it to trigger VI-associated PCD. Consistent with that view is the fact that a mutant affected in the NACHT domain of het-E and unable to bind GTP is inactive in incompatibility (15). All but two VI systems are known to include a HET domain partner, and so one might hypothesize that all VI systems work in a similar fashion. Under vegetative growth conditions, activity of the HET domain would be inhibited by binding to an inhibitor (intra- or extramolecular). Interactions between incompatible proteins would release the HET domain from its inhibitor and induce the cell death reaction (Fig. 6). In the C/D and C/E systems, the PCD would be mediated by MOD proteins.
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Proposed model for control of HET domain activity. (A) Under vegetative growth conditions, the HET domain activity would be inhibited by binding with its own NACHT and/or WD domain. (B) Under incompatible conditions, binding of HET-C to the WD domain of HET-E releases the HET domain to mediate PCD via MOD proteins.
|
Several fungal genome sequences have been made publicly available in recent years, and it appears that HET domain-encoding genes are far more numerous than the dozen genetically characterized VI systems in each species. For instance, 50 genes have been annotated as heterokaryon incompatibility genes in N. crassa (19), up to 38 in Aspergillus species (18), and current annotation of P. anserina reveals even more HET domain-encoding genes (unpublished), 3 of which are considered paralogues to het-D and het-E (34). These numbers highlight the importance of this domain to fungal biology and raise two obvious questions. Do all these HET domains correspond to VI genes, and are they all controlling PCD? Preliminary work suggests that expression of some other HET domains from P. anserina is toxic to P. anserina (unpublished). In addition, as the HET domain is fungus specific, PCD-controlling HET domain proteins could represent favorable targets for the development of specific antifungal drugs.
M.P. is funded by an EU grant (Transdeath contract 511983).
Published ahead of print on 14 September 2007. ![]()
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://ec.asm.org/. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»