Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Eukaryotic Cell, October 2007, p. 1736-1744, Vol. 6, No. 10
1535-9778/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/EC.00236-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Carlsberg Laboratory, Yeast Biology, Gamle Carlsberg Vej 10, DK-2500 Valby, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Microbiology, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany; and Junior Research Group, Fungal Pathogens, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology—Hans-Knöll Institute, Jena, Beutenbergstr., 11a, D-07745 Jena, Germany
Received 29 June 2007/ Accepted 17 August 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dimorphism in C. albicans is an attractive model to study morphogenetic events on the molecular level (3). In vitro-specific conditions can be used to maintain C. albicans cells either in the yeast form or by using external cues, such as serum or amino acids, to induce filament formation and mycelium development. On the molecular level, several regulators of hypha-specific gene expression have been identified. Two basic classes can be distinguished—proteins that act as inducers of hypha-specific gene expression, e.g., Efg1, Cph1, Flo8, Tec1, and Czf1, and proteins that act as negative regulators, particularly Tup1 and Nrg1 (3, 10). The cyclic AMP (cAMP) pathway appears to play a major role in regulating hyphal morphogenesis, since both Ras1 and the adenylate cyclase Cdc35 (in association with Cap1) are essential for hyphal growth and virulence (1, 14, 29). Efg1 is a downstream target of the Ras1-cAMP signaling pathway, and efg1/efg1 mutants are defective in filament formation in liquid media (32). Flo8 was shown to regulate the hypha-specific gene subset controlled by Efg1 and does so via direct interaction with Efg1. This finding is consistent with the evidence that deletion of FLO8 blocks hyphal development in C. albicans (10).
CaNrg1 is a zinc finger DNA-binding protein that represses hypha-specific genes in a CaTup1-dependent manner. Expression of NRG1 is downregulated upon hyphal induction, and deletion of either TUP1 or NRG1 enhances filamentous growth under noninducing conditions (8, 26). This indicates that relief of transcriptional repression is a major event in the dimorphic switching of C. albicans (22).
Hyphal induction media may include various additives that trigger filamentation at 37°C, e.g., serum, amino acids, or N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc). It has been observed that when serum is used as an inducer, cells readily aggregate and form clumps, while this is true to a much lesser extent when GlcNAc is used (4). The ability of C. albicans cells to adhere to other cells or to surfaces poses an important medical problem, particularly in biofilm formation on medical devices that allow these cells to gain access to the bloodstream of patients (25). On an industrial scale, the ability to form cell aggregates is used during beer fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae to separate yeast cells from the beer. This process is termed flocculation and leads to a rapid sedimentation of lager yeast cells. Flocculation is dependent on the expression of FLO genes. There are two classes of FLO genes, which confer either cell-cell adhesion (e.g., Flo1, Flo5, Flo9, and Flo10) or cell-substrate adhesion (Flo11) (20). Different pathways are known to regulate the expression of, e.g., the FLO11 gene in S. cerevisiae, among them the Ras1-cAMP signaling pathway and the mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent filamentous growth pathway, as well as the glucose repression pathway and the TOR pathway (33). Downstream of the cAMP-signaling pathway, Tpk2 activates Flo8 and represses Sfl1, which encodes a suppressor of flocculation (11, 15).
We were interested to determine whether flocculation in C. albicans is regulated by a similar mechanism as that for S. cerevisiae and whether flocculation and filamentation can be separated genetically. We identified a SFL1 homolog in the C. albicans genome. The deletion of SFL1 led to a flocculent phenotype best seen in minimal media. This flocculation was accompanied by filamentation under noninducing conditions. SFL1-GFP localizes to the nucleus in both yeast and hyphal cells. Overexpression of SFL1, on the other hand, led to a block in filamentation. This result suggests that Sfl1 is a negative regulator of both flocculation and filamentation in C. albicans. Consistently, hypha-specific genes, particularly ALS1 and ALS3, were found to be expressed in a sfl1 mutant under noninducing conditions.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Strains used in this study
|
served as a host. Disruption of CaSFL1. The C. albicans homolog of the S. cerevisiae SFL1 was identified in the C. albicans genomic sequence (http://www.candidagenome.org) as orf19.454. Transformation was done by electroporation (24) followed by selective incubation on minimal media lacking the appropriate amino acids or uridine for 2 to 3 days at 30°C. Consecutive complete open reading frame (ORF) deletions of both alleles of CaSFL1 were achieved by using PCR-generated disruption cassettes from pFA plasmids amplified with primers S1-SFL1 and S2-SFL1 as described previously (31). All primers (Table 2) were obtained from biomers.net GmbH (Ulm, Germany). For each new strain, at least two independent mutants were generated. Verifications of correct integration at the target locus and of the absence of the target ORF in homozygous null mutants were done by diagnostic PCR. The fusion of the MET3 promoter to the SFL1 ORF was done by PCR-based gene targeting using primers S1-SFL1 and S2-MET3p-SFL1. A 3'-end fusion of SFL1 with green fluorescent protein (GFP) was generated by homologous recombination of a GFP-CdHIS1 cassette in a heterozygous SFL1 mutant, thus tagging the sole allele of SFL1 with GFP.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Oligonucleotide primers used in this study
|
Embedded growth. Growth conditions were as described previously (9). Cells of the strains were pregrown in YPD and then poured as dilutions thereof in YPS agar (containing 2% sucrose instead of glucose). These plates were incubated at room temperature for up to 5 days.
One-hybrid assay. The SFL1 ORF was amplified using primers CaSFL1-OH1-MluI and CaSFL1-OH2-SphI and cloned into Clp-lexA after digestion with MluI and SphI (New England BioLabs, Germany). This generated a SalexA-SFL1 fusion construct. This plasmid was linearized by StuI and transformed into CAI-8 and CAJ043. Control strains containing NRG1 and GCN4 fusion constructs were kindly provided by Al Brown and are described in reference 30. The strains were pregrown in selective media and then inoculated in YPD and grown for 4 to 6 h at 30°C. Cultures were then adjusted to an optical density at 600 nm of 0.5. For qualitative analysis of lacZ expression, 3 µl of each cell suspension was dropped onto CSM plates and incubated for 2 days at 30°C. Colonies were then subjected to an agarose overlay (0.5 M phosphate buffer [pH 7.0], 6% N,N-dimethylformamide, 0.5% agarose, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 20 µl 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-ß-D-galactopyranoside [X-Gal; 0.1 mg/ml stock solution]). 2-Nitrophenyl-ß-D-galactopyranoside (ONPG) assays were used to quantify ß-galactosidase activities for different strains. A 2-ml volume of the cell suspension was pelleted and washed with H2O, resuspended in 300 µl Z buffer (60 mM sodium phosphate monobasic dihydrate, 40 mM sodium phosphate dibasic, 10 mM potassium chloride, 1 mM magnesium sulfate), and divided into three aliquots of 100 µl. Cells were opened by using liquid nitrogen. The enzyme reaction was started by adding 160 µl ONPG-Z buffer solution (4 mg/ml ONPG in Z buffer) to each of the aliquots, followed by incubation at 37°C for 30 min. The reaction was stopped by adding 400 µl of 1 M sodium carbonate. Twofold dilutions were measured at 420 and 550 nm.
RNA isolation and RT-PCR. Total RNA was isolated using an RNAgents total RNA isolation kit (Promega). Reverse transcription (RT)-PCR was performed with an Enhanced Avian RT first-strand synthesis kit (Sigma, Germany) using Oligo(dT)23 according to the manufacturer's protocol. Primers for RT-PCR were derived from the 3' end of the genes tested (Table 2). As a control, RHO3 was used and was amplified from plasmids containing either a genomic or a cDNA fragment.
Microscopy. Cells were grown to exponential phase either in minimal medium or in hypha-inducing medium for 4 to 6 h at 30°C or 37°C, respectively. Nuclear staining was done by adding 1 µl of 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI; 1 mg/ml, Sigma) to 100 µl of cell suspension. Microscopy was done by using a bifunctional confocal laser scanning and fluorescence microscope on a Zeiss AxioImager platform with the appropriate filter combinations for the acquisition of GFP or DAPI fluorescence. Image acquisition and processing were done using Metamorph software (Universal Imaging Corporation).
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (61K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Protein alignment of ascomycetous Sfl1 proteins. Protein sequences of Sfl1 proteins from A. fumigatus (Af; GenBank accession number, XP_001481550), C. albicans (Ca; XP_715888), A. gossypii (Ag; NP_985683), K. lactis (Kl; XP_454089), and Candida glabrata (Cg) were aligned using the Clustal W algorithm. Matching residues are shaded. The alignment shows the N-terminal part where sequence conservation is highest.
|
![]() View larger version (77K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Yeast and hyphal growth of the sfl1/sfl1 mutant strain. The wild type and the sfl1/sfl1 mutant were grown on YPD with or without 10% serum at 30°C or 37°C, respectively, in either liquid culture or on solid medium plates. Images were taken after an overnight incubation in liquid medium or after 4 days on solid medium plates. Bars, 30 µm (left) and 100 µm (right).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Cell-cell aggregates in C. albicans strains
|
![]() View larger version (112K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Deletion of SFL1 promotes flocculation in minimal medium. The indicated strains were grown overnight in liquid YPD (rich medium) or SD (minimal medium) at 30°C. Images of cell solutions in reagent tubes (upper panels) and microscopic images (lower panels) are shown. Bar, 10 µm.
|
Embedded growth induces increased filamentation in a sfl1/sfl1 strain. Several mutants in genes encoding proteins within the cAMP pathway were shown to exhibit enhanced filamentation under embedded growth conditions, e.g., the efg1/efg1 and flo8/flo8 mutants (10, 18). Interestingly, both of these mutant strains are defective in filamentation under all standard inducing conditions. Thus, we went on to examine the growth phenotype of the sfl1/sfl1 mutant under embedded conditions in YPS agar at 25°C. SFL1 strains, including the wild-type SC5314, the SN148, and the heterozygous mutant strains, started to show increased filamentation after more than 2 days under embedded conditions. In contrast, the sfl1/sfl1 strain formed consistently more abundant filaments under these conditions (Fig. 4). This result suggests that Sfl1p acts as a repressor of filamentation also under microaerophilic conditions when cells are embedded in an agarose matrix and grown at room temperature.
![]() View larger version (137K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. A sfl1/sfl1 mutant shows increased filamentation under embedded growth conditions. Cells of the SC5314 wild-type, SN148, heterozygous SFL1/sfl1, and homozygous sfl1/sfl1 strains were plated submersed in molten YPS agar (2%) and grown for 56 h at 25°C. Bar, 50 µm.
|
![]() View larger version (94K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. MET3 promoter-controlled expression of SFL1. The wild-type, sfl1/sfl1, and MET3p-SFL1/sfl1 strains were pregrown in minimal media at 30°C with or without methionine/cysteine (+M/C and –M/C, respectively), diluted, and inoculated to the same cell density in fresh medium. Filamentation was induced with the addition of GlcNAc to the medium. Note that filamentation is blocked in cells overexpressing SFL1 (bottom right panel). Bar, 10 µm.
|
Sfl1-GFP localizes to the nucleus. Consistent with the idea of a transcriptional regulator and DNA-binding protein should be a nuclear localization of the Sfl1 protein. Therefore, we wanted to determine the subcellular localization of Sfl1p during yeast and hyphal growth. To this end, we generated an SFL1-GFP/sfl1 strain. This strain was phenotypically like the wild-type strain, suggesting that SFL1-GFP is functional. We observed a Sfl1-GFP signal in the nuclei of yeast cells, which would be consistent with the idea of Sfl1 suppressing flocculation and filamentation under conditions that allow yeast growth. Upon filament induction, Sfl1-GFP could still be observed in the nuclei of hyphal cells but was found to be stronger in yeast or pseudohyphal cells (Fig. 6). This would be consistent with either a diminished expression of SFL1 or a reduced amount of Sfl1p in the nuclei of hyphal cells, which is in line with the notion of a derepression of Sfl1-controlled genes under hypha-inducing conditions.
![]() View larger version (45K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Localization of Sfl1p-GFP in yeast and hyphal cells. Strain CAJ042 expresses SFL1-GFP from its endogenous promoter in a heterozygous strain. Fluorescence images were acquired from yeast cells and hyphal cells that were induced with GlcNAc for 4 h. Cells were fixed prior to the imaging and were costained by DAPI to visualize the nuclei. DIC, differential interference contrast. Bar, 10 µm.
|
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. One-hybrid assay with Sfl1. A SalexA-SFL1 fusion construct was transformed into a LexOP-carrying strain in a manner similar to that done previously with GCN4 and NRG1 (30). The level of reporter gene expression was determined by the analysis of ß-galactosidase activity and quantitated by the use of an X-Gal overlay assay as indicated.
|
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Hypha-specific genes are upregulated in an sfl1 mutant. Cells of the wild type (SC5314; +/+) and the sfl1/sfl1 mutant (–/–) were grown in minimal medium for 6 h at RT and then collected for RNA preparation. The quality of the RNA was assessed by using the CaRHO3 gene as a control. CaRHO3 genomic DNA (lane 1) contains one intron that is missing in its corresponding cDNA (lane 2; PCR derived from a cloned cDNA fragment).
|
|
|
|---|
The prevailing view in the regulation of C. albicans hyphal morphogenesis is that transcriptional repression by Tup1, Nrg1, Rpg1, and Ssn6 and complexes thereof provide the cells with the means to repress specific gene sets (5-8, 21, 22, 26). The mechanistic difficulties in explaining the complex pattern of regulation of hypha-specific gene expression came from comparative transcript profiling experiments that indicated that in nrg1, tup1, and ssn6 mutant strains, overlapping but extensively different subsets of genes were regulated (16). Our studies now present one additional player in this scheme, Sfl1p. It is noteworthy that deletion of SFL1 does not induce filamentation to an extent seen, for example, in the tup1 mutant. On the other hand, the flocculation phenotype seems to be rather specific for the sfl1 mutant. Formation of cell clumps occurs in the sfl1 mutant strain under different medium conditions but is most obvious in minimal media. As flocs also contain hyphal cells in minimal media, more pronounced flocculation might be the result of hypha-specific gene expression in these cells.
In S. cerevisiae, Sfl1p recruits the Ssn6-Tup1 complex via an Ssn6 interaction domain (11). This domain is only rather weakly conserved on the amino acid level between different fungal Sfl1 proteins. However, it leads to a testable hypothesis in C. albicans, namely, that Sfl1p might repress hypha- and/or flocculation-specific genes via a Sfl1-Ssn6-Tup1 complex. We analyzed the potential of CaSfl1p to act as a repressor of transcription using a recently developed one-hybrid system, which proved useful to identify Gcn4 as a transcriptional activator (30). In these assays, CaSfl1 was only weakly downregulating reporter gene transcription and certainly not activating it. Consistent with the idea of a repressor could be a differential localization of CaSfl1 in the nucleus of yeast cells but not of hyphal cells. Even though we found evidence to support this idea, we cannot rule out a nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of Sfl1 that could contribute to its specific activity. Such a shuttling mechanism is quite common and has been described, e.g., for the Msn2/4 global stress response regulator in S. cerevisiae (19).
In S. cerevisiae, Sfl1 is regulated via phosphorylation by Tpk2 (28). By analogy, this could place Sfl1 downstream of the cAMP-signaling pathway in concert with Flo8. Furthermore, in S. cerevisiae, Sfl1p regulates the expression of FLO8 in a negative manner (23). A similar scenario seems likely for C. albicans, since overexpression of SFL1 using the MET3 promoter resulted in the inability of these cells to form hyphae under GlcNAC-induced filamentation. This result is consistent with the role of CaFlo8 as an inducer of hypha-specific genes, as the flo8/flo8 mutant is blocked for hypha-specific gene expression and filamentation (10). First insights into the target genes of Sfl1 came from RT-PCR, which showed expression of the adhesins ALS1 and ALS3 as well as of other hypha-specific genes. FLO8 appears to be upregulated in a sfl1 mutant. Interestingly, the deletion of SFL1 points toward a role of Sfl1 that is not exclusive for filamentation, but it reveals a novel role in flocculation. This function could be important for cell-cell adhesion or cell-surface adhesion, such as that seen in biofilm formation. Determining the Sfl1 regulon, particularly with respect to adhesins and hyphal specific genes, therefore, will be an essential task to understand the role of Sfl1.
In conclusion, our functional analysis of the C. albicans SFL1 gene provides evidence that Sfl1 is a conserved negative regulator of flocculation and filamentation in C. albicans that may regulate a specific gene set required for flocculation but may regulate hypha-specific genes in concert with other known repressors, particularly Tup1 and Nrg1.
This research was supported by the EU-Signalpath Marie Curie Training Network.
Published ahead of print on 31 August 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»