Eukaryotic Cell, July 2006, p. 1169-1173, Vol. 5, No. 7
1535-9778/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/EC.00040-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5124,1 Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5324,2 UMR 5539 CNRS, Université de Montpellier 2, CP 107, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34090 Montpellier, France3
Received 8 February 2006/ Accepted 1 May 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
One of the most distinctive features of apicomplexan invasion is the moving junction (MJ) that occurs at the site where the parasite invades into the developing parasitophorous vacuole (PV) (1, 2, 21). The appearance of electron-dense structures at the MJ is consistent with the organization of a secreted parasite complex at the interface with the host membrane. In Toxoplasma gondii, a complex minimally composed of TgAMA1 and the rhoptry neck protein, TgRON4, specifically localizes to the ring-like MJ (2, 19). This ring marks the boundary where specific surface antigen complexes are removed from the parasite surface as it enters into the nascent PV (10). Host membrane proteins are also sorted at the MJ, and many that are found in complexes or associated with the extracellular matrix are excluded from the developing PV membrane (8). Thus, the MJ marks a site of intimate attachment by the parasite to the host and a sieve at which parasite and host surface proteins are selectively sorted, allowing some but not others to pass into the nascent vacuole.
AMA1 has been presumed to function similarly in all Apicomplexa organisms. Given our findings in Toxoplasma, we asked whether similar immunoprecipitation experiments might reveal previously undetected binding partners for PfAMA1. P. falciparum strains 3D7 and D10 were cultured in human erythrocytes according to standard protocols (5, 18). Synchronous cultures containing a majority of the parasites in the mature schizont stage were harvested
40 h postinfection by lysis in 0.15% saponin (to disrupt the erythrocyte and PV membrane [4]) and stored at 80°C for further analysis. The rat monoclonal antibody (MAb) against PfAMA1, 28G2dc1 (4, 22), was coupled to protein G-Sepharose using dimethyl pimelimidate dihydrochloride (13). A total of 2.7 x 109 mature schizont-stage parasites were thawed directly into 5 ml of TEN lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA) with RIPA detergents (1% NP-40, 0.5% deoxycholate, 0.01% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS]) with Complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Parasites were extracted for 30 min on wet ice, and the extract was clarified by centrifugation at 10,000 x g for 20 min at 4°C. The resulting supernatant was incubated for 6 h at 4°C with MAb-coupled protein G-Sepharose beads (
0.4 µg immunoglobulin G/µl bead) or beads alone and then washed three times (15 min each) in RIPA lysis buffer and three times (15 min each) in TEN buffer. Bound polypeptides were eluted in 0.1 M triethylamine (pH 11.5), lyophilized, and resuspended in TEN buffer.
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis of the polypeptides eluted from the MAb 28G2-coupled beads identified three major bands on Coomassie-stained gels (Fig. 1A). Relative to the molecular mass standards, these migrated at
240 kDa (p240),
85 kDa (p85), and
70 kDa (p70), the last being also found in control precipitations (i.e., without the coupled MAb). Two additional faint bands at
50 kDa and
25 kDa were determined to be the rat immunoglobulin G heavy and light chains and so were not further pursued. Immunoblotting of the affinity-selected proteins using MAb 28G2 showed binding to the p85 and p70 bands, which are consistent with the proform (PfAMA183) and processed form (PfAMA166) of PfAMA1, respectively (15) (Fig. 1B). Based on the band intensities, the majority of the PfAMA1 in the starting material was recovered from the parasite lysate.
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Identification of PfAMA1-associated proteins. A. MAb 28G2-affinity-selected proteins from RIPA detergent extracts of segmented schizonts were separated on reducing SDS-PAGE gels and stained with Coomassie blue. Molecular mass markers (kDa) are denoted on the left, and the sizes of the major bands are indicated on the right (arrows) and are based on relative mobility. The profiles for the RIPA parasite extract (7 x 106 parasite equivalents) before (lane 1) and after (lane 2) immuno-selection are shown. MAb 28G2-immuno-selected proteins (7 x 108 parasite equivalents) are shown (lane 3) in comparison with those precipitated by protein G-Sepharose beads alone (lane 4). B. Immunoblot of parasite extract and affinity-selected proteins probed with anti-PfAMA1 MAb 28G2. Note that this is a different gel from that shown in panel A, in order to better resolve proteins in the 50- to 100-kDa range. C. Immunoblot of the lanes shown in panel B that were probed with anti-PfRON4 MAb 24C6.
|
As expected, LC-MS/MS analysis of p85 identified a single protein, PfAMA1, with 32% peptide coverage (Table 1). No peptides were identified for any other protein in this band. One nontryptic peptide matched the predicted N terminus of the proform PfAMA183.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Correlative peptide matches for proteins immunoprecipitated with MAb 28G2 and analyzed by LC-MS/MSa
|
LC-MS/MS analysis of p70 from the MAb 28G2-immunoprecipitated material also identified peptides for PfAMA1, whereas no such peptides were identified in the p70 band precipitated with protein G beads alone. This is consistent with the immunoblotting data that showed a form of PfAMA1 (presumably the previously described PfAMA166 [22]) was present in the MAb 28G2-selected material at about 70 kDa (Fig. 1B).
Analysis of p240 identified tryptic peptides corresponding to a single predicted protein, chr11.genefinder_174r (Table 1). BLAST analysis of this predicted protein sequence revealed it to be most similar (e value of 109) to a recently described rhoptry neck protein in Toxoplasma gondii, TgRON4, that has been shown to form a strong and stable complex with TgAMA1 in invading Toxoplasma tachyzoites (2); this, plus the data presented here, strongly indicates that the interaction between PfAMA1 and p240, which we will henceforth refer to as PfRON4, is a real and evolutionarily conserved association.
The TgAMA1/TgRON4 complex is unusual in that it is derived from two distinct secretory compartments: the micronemes and the rhoptry necks (2). A P. falciparum rhoptry antigen migrating in the 225- to 240-kDa range has previously been described based on binding of MAb 24C6 (26). The identity of the antigen was not determined, but immuno-electron microscopy showed it discretely localizes within the apical neck region of rhoptries in segmented schizonts (Fig. 2) (26). These properties are consistent with the SDS-PAGE mobility and predicted location of PfRON4, and so we asked whether the antigen seen by MAb 24C6 might be PfRON4. Immunoblots of the PfAMA1-coprecipitating material probed with MAb 24C6 showed a specific, strongly reacting band that was recognized at
240 kDa (Fig. 1C). Given that mass spectrometry indicated that this band is comprised exclusively of PfRON4, this result confirms that PfRON4 and the rhoptry neck antigen seen by MAb 24C6 are one and the same. Immunoprecipitation with anti-PfAMA1 did not substantially deplete PfRON4 (Fig. 1C) from RIPA extracts (even though the bulk of the PfAMA1 was removed [Fig. 1B]), and given that the Coomassie staining indicates there is a rough equivalence of the two proteins within the PfAMA1-immunoprecipitated material, it appears that PfRON4 protein is in considerable excess over PfAMA1. This is similar to our findings in Toxoplasma, where only a fraction of the total TgRON4 in parasite extracts associates with TgAMA1 (2). Also consistent with our Toxoplasma findings is that the immuno-electron microscopic localization of PfRON4 did not show localization in the micronemes, suggesting the PfAMA1/RON4 complex is formed following the secretion of these two proteins from the microneme and rhoptry neck compartments.
![]() View larger version (89K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. PfRON4 localizes to the rhoptry necks. Immuno-electron microscopy with MAb 24C6 and protein A-gold shows specific labeling in the rhoptry necks of P. falciparum schizonts. Infected human erythrocytes were embedded in LRWhite and stained with MAb 24C6 as previously described (26). The enlarged area shows a longitudinally sectioned rhoptry with PfRON4 labeling restricted to the narrow apical end of the rhoptries in a maturing merozoite (arrows).
|
134 kDa (minus the signal peptide). The discrepancy between the predicted size and observed mobility on SDS-PAGE (comigrating with markers in the range of
240 kDa) is explained by the fact that the predicted PfRON4 protein has an extended N-terminal domain consisting of 22 tandem iterations of a near-perfect, 13-amino-acid repeat that is rich in proline and glutamic acid (the consensus motif is NEPIHNEHATTPT). Such repeats are known to significantly retard the mobility of proteins on SDS-PAGE (as seen, for example, with TgROP1 [24]), thus easily explaining the discrepancy in size versus mobility. All of this, plus the MS/MS peptide coverage and the fact that no peptides were seen from any adjacent predicted open reading frames, makes it extremely likely that the chr11.genefinder_174r prediction is correct and the protein is indeed
134 kDa in size. TgRON4 has an N-terminal stretch of 56 amino acids, in this case repeated just twice, but this bears no resemblance to the 13-mer repeat of PfRON4; all of the homology (including all five cysteines present in them both) falls within the C-terminal two-thirds of the two proteins. Given that they both associate with AMA1 from their respective cells, this strongly suggests that it is the C-terminal domain of RON4 that is responsible for interacting with AMA1.
The results presented here differ in one important respect from those for Toxoplasma, where two additional proteins (TgRON2 and an as-yet-uncharacterized, third rhoptry protein [Twinscan 4705]) coprecipitate with TgAMA1 (2, 19). Within the Plasmodium genome database, PF14_0495 and MAL8P1.73 are predicted homologues of RON2 and Twinscan_4705, respectively (6). We were surprised, therefore, to find neither of these proteins coprecipitating with PfAMA1. We cannot currently distinguish between the possibility that the four-molecule complex exists in Plasmodium, but without the stability needed for the detergent conditions used here, and the possibility that there is a major difference between the two genera, with only two proteins, PfAMA1 and PfRON4, comprising the complex in Plasmodium.
The similarity between TgRON4 and PfRON4 is relatively modest. This contrasts with the strong conservation of AMA1 across the entire phylum (e.g., TgAMA1 and PfAMA1 share 29% identity, with a BLAST e value of 1033), suggesting that the role of AMA1 requires a very particular structure, whereas the RONs may have drifted to accommodate differences in the host cells that these various parasites invade. A full understanding of how the AMA1/RON4 complex functions will require identification of all of their binding partners, both on the host and parasite, but knowing that the AMA1/RON4 collaboration is conserved throughout the Apicomplexa provides an important advance in dissecting the role of these unusual proteins in the invasion process.
This work was supported by grants from the NIH to J.C.B. (AI21423 and AI45057) and to D.L.A. (F32AI10552) and from Searle (10185915) for support of S.A.K.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»