Previous Article | Next Article 
Eukaryotic Cell, August 2005, p. 1477-1482, Vol. 4, No. 8
1535-9778/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/EC.4.8.1477-1482.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Transcriptional Switch of the dia1 and impA Promoter during the Growth/Differentiation Transition
Shigenori Hirose,1,
Taira Mayanagi,2,
Catherine Pears,3
Aiko Amagai,2
William F. Loomis,1* and
Yasuo Maeda2
Cell and Developmental Biology, Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla California 92093-0368,1
Department of Developmental Biology and Neurosciences, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Aoba, Sendai 980-8578, Japan,2
Biochemistry Department, Oxford University, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom3
Received 6 April 2005/
Accepted 23 May 2005

ABSTRACT
When growth stops due to the depletion of nutrients,
Dictyostelium cells rapidly turn off vegetative genes and start to express
developmental genes. One of the early developmental genes,
dia1,
is adjacent to a vegetative gene,
impA, on chromosome 4. An
intergenic region of 654 bp separates the coding regions of
these divergently transcribed genes. Constructs carrying the
intergenic region expressed a reporter gene (green fluorescent
protein gene) that replaced
impA in growing cells and a reporter
gene that replaced
dia1 (DsRed) during development. Deletion
of a 112-bp region proximal to the transcriptional start site
of
impA resulted in complete lack of expression of both reporter
genes during growth or development. At the other end of the
intergenic region there are two copies of a motif that is also
found in the
carA regulatory region. Removing one copy of this
repeat reduced
impA expression twofold. Removing the second
copy had no further consequences. Removing the central portion
of the intergenic region resulted in high levels of expression
of
dia1 in growing cells, indicating that this region contains
a sequence involved in repression during the vegetative stage.
Gel shift experiments showed that a nuclear protein present
in growing cells recognizes the sequence GAAGTTCTAATTGATTGAAG
found in this region. This DNA binding activity is lost within
the first 4 h of development. Different nuclear proteins were
found to recognize the repeated sequence proximal to
dia1. One
of these became prevalent after 4 h of development. Together
these regulatory components at least partially account for this
aspect of the growth-to-differentiation transition.

INTRODUCTION
Differentiation of most cells in metazoan organisms occurs after
exit from the cell cycle. This growth-to-differentiation transition
(GDT) is controlled both spatially and temporally but is poorly
understood. The social amoeba
Dictyostelium discoideum also
displays a GDT when the food source is depleted. The cells arrest
in G
2 and stop replicating nuclear DNA (
5,
18,
24). Within the
next few hours they express a set of early genes such that the
cells become able to signal each other chemotactically by extracellular
cyclic AMP (cAMP) and to respond by aggregating into mounds
containing up to 10
5 cells (
14,
22). As the cell density increases
in a growing population and the bacterial food source starts
to be depleted, the cells respond to a signal protein, prestarvation
factor (PSF), that is continuously secreted and used to predict
approaching starvation (
7). Conditioned medium containing PSF
can induce expression of discoidin I and several early developmental
genes (
23). Mutants lacking either Gdt1 or Gdt2 express discoidin
I precociously, indicating that these putative protein kinases
regulate GDT (
6,
29). One of the responses to PSF is the expression
of the protein kinase YakA, which inhibits the ability of the
RNA binding protein PufA to modulate translation of various
mRNAs, including that for the catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent
protein kinase, PKA (
25,
26). The resulting increase in PKA
activity leads to the expression of early developmental genes
(
14,
19). We have identified several genes (
carA,
dia1,
dia2,
and
dia3) that are expressed soon after the initiation of differentiation
(
1,
4,
12,
13).
carA encodes the major cAMP receptor (
16). The
products of
dia1 and
dia2 do not show significant similarity
to proteins of known function.
dia3 is a multicistronic mitochondrial
gene cluster encoding several subunits of NAD dehydrogenase
as well as two mitochondrial small ribosomal subunit proteins.
Genetic studies have shown that
dia1 plays an inhibitory role
in early differentiation by reducing the expression of genes
related to the cAMP signal relay system, and both
dia2 and
dia3 are required for proper expression of early genes, including
those for the cAMP receptor CAR1 and the aggregation adenylyl
cyclase ACA.
Based on studies with populations in which cell division was synchronized following a temperature shift from 11.5°C to 22°C, it has been proposed that Dictyostelium cells must reach a point late in G2 (the PS point) before embarking on development (18). Cells which have reached this point and recognize that the environment is depleted in nutrients repress many growth phase genes and induce developmental genes. dia1 is found on chromosome 4 adjacent to impA, which encodes a protein with sequence similarity to the FKBP (FK506 binding protein) class of immunophilins that participate in protein folding (10). A 654-bp region separates the start codons of these genes, which are transcribed in opposite directions. This divergent arrangement allowed us to determine whether the intervening region carries separate or shared cis-acting sequences regulating their transcription.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell culture and developmental conditions.
Dictyostelium discoideum Ax-2 was grown axenically in PS medium
(1.0% special peptone [Oxoid], 0.7% yeast extract [Oxoid], 8.3
mM
D-glucose, 0.8 mM KH
2PO
4, 1.4 mM Na
2HPO
4 · 12H
2O,
4.0 µg/ml vitamin B
12, and 8.0 µg/ml folic acid)
with shaking at 22°C. Strains carrying reporter constructs
were grown in PS medium containing 10 µg/ml of G418. Cells
were harvested during the exponential phase of growth, washed
twice in BSS (
3), suspended at 10
7 cells/ml in BSS, and shaken
at 22°C.
Northern analyses.
Total RNA was extracted with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Samples containing 20 µg of RNA were separated by electrophoresis under denaturing conditions and blotted onto Hybond N+ membranes (Amersham). DNA probes were labeled by random priming of the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase on 200 ng probe DNA in 30 µM dTTP, dCTP, and dGTP; 30 µM 32P-labeled dATP; 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5; 5 mM MgCl2; and 7.5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) for 30 min at 37°C. Hybridization was performed in 6x SSC (1x SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate), 5x Denhardt's solution, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, and 100 mg/ml denatured salmon sperm DNA at 55°C after 1 h of prehybridization.
Deletion constructs.
To be able to monitor transcription in the impA direction by fluorescence, green fluorescent protein (GFP) modified to have a short half-life (rpL11N; S65T) (8) was ligated to the impA end of portions of the 654-bp intergenic region. The intergenic region was digested with SspI, which cuts at bp 340 relative to the ATG of impA, generating the 1-to-340 construct. PCR primers were prepared such that intergenic fragments containing bp 1 to 153 and 1 to 555 were generated and could be ligated to GFP. The primer sequence for bp 1 to 555 (5'-AATCAAGGAGATCGAGCTGATCAGTAAGCTTT-3') was cut at the HindIII site (underlined) to produce the portion from bp 1 to 525. The PCR primer (5'-AAAGTGACTCATGCTTAGGGCCCAAAAA-3') is found at bp 107 to 133 but has an inserted C (underlined) to generate an ApaI site. The product was digested with ApaI to generate the portion from bp 1 to 112, which was ligated to GFP. The construct carrying 112 bp was digested with exonuclease III to generate constructs with 59 bp and 92 bp upstream of GFP. These constructs were cloned in the low-copy extrachromosomal vector pDXA-3C (20) from which the actin 15 promoter had been removed. These vectors were transformed together with the helper plasmid in cells of strain Ax-2, and transformants were selected and maintained in medium containing 10 µg/ml G418. Expression of GFP was measured by flow cytometry and the values confirmed by quantitation of Western blots stained with anti-Aequorea victoria antibody (BD Biosciences) by using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse immunoglobulin G as the second antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology).
Another series of constructs was prepared to determine expression in the dia1 direction. The DsRed Express gene (Clontech) was modified to carry a His6 tag (NH-Red) at the N terminus and ligated at the dia1 end of the intergenic region. Digestion of this construct with SspI left the fragment from bp 440 to 654 fragment ligated to NH-Red. PCR primers were used to generate the fragments from bp 104 to 654, 527 to 654, and 553 to 654 adjacent to NH-Red. Expression of these constructs carried on the low-copy extrachromosomal vector was monitored in transformants that had developed in buffer for 8 h. Samples were collected and lysed in sample buffer (2% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 62 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 10% glycerol, 42 mM dithiothreitol), heated to 100°C for 5 min, and electrophoretically separated on 12% polyacrylamide gels before being transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. The levels of NH-Red were determined by staining Western blots with antibody to the His epitope on NH-Red (QIAGEN). NH-Red has a half-life of >24 h. (Clontech).
Flow cytometry.
Exponentially growing cells were harvested, washed in 20 mM sodium-potassium phosphate buffer (PB) (pH 6.4), and resuspended in PB. An equal volume of ice-cold methanol was added to the suspension, and the cells were pelleted before being fixed for 10 min at 20°C in 100% ice-cold methanol. Fixed cells were washed in PB twice and incubated in PB containing 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (BSA-PB) for 30 min. Anti-A.v. antibody (BD Biosciences) was diluted 1:1,000 in BSA-PB and incubated with the cells for 30 min. Washed cells were incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (Sigma) diluted 1:500 with BSA-PB. The cells were washed three times with PB before being analyzed on a FACSCalibur (Becton Dickinson).
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay.
Portions of the impA/dia1 intergenic region between bp 1 and 112 as well as bp 106 to 484 were PCR amplified and labeled with [32P]dATP. The sequence TGATCAGCTCGATC (bp 533 to 546), which is found in two related copies proximal to dia1, was synthesized along with its complement, to which 3 Ts were added at the 5' end such that the double-stranded DNA could be labeled with [32P]dATP by using the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I. Nuclear extracts were prepared by the method of Gollop and Kimmel (11). Approximately 8 x 108 cells were collected and resuspended in ice-cold 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, buffer containing 6.5 mM magnesium acetate, 10% sucrose, 2% Nonidet P-40, and 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF). Following lysis, the extract was centrifuged at 500 x g for 5 min to remove whole cells and debris and the supernatant centrifuged at 3,000 x g for 5 min to pellet the nuclei. The nuclei were suspended in 400 µl of nuclear extraction buffer (5 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 0.3 M NaCl, 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 2.5 mM magnesium acetate, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 10% sucrose, 1.25% Nonidet P-40, 0.05 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT, 2.5 mM spermidine, and 0.5 mM PMSF). After incubation at 4°C for 1 h, the extracts were cleared by centrifuging at 10,000 rpm for 30 min. The supernatant was dialyzed against buffer (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 20% glycerol, 0.5 mM EDTA, 1.0 mM DTT, and 0.5 mM PMSF) at 4°C for 2 h and the protein content determined. Ten micrograms of nuclear protein was incubated with each of the probes in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 50 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 1 mM MgCl2, 25 mM ZnCl2, 0.5 mM DTT, 4% glycerol, and 12.5 µg/ml poly(dI · dC), with or without a 50-fold excess of unlabeled probe added 10 min prior to addition of labeled probe. After 30 min at 4°C, the reaction mixture was electrophoretically separated on 5% polyacrylamide, 0.13% bisacrylamide nondenaturing gels in 0.5x TBE (45 mM Tris base, 45 mM borate, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.3) at 35 mA at 4°C. Gels were dried onto filter paper and exposed to film.

RESULTS
dia1 and impA are divergently transcribed adjacent genes.
We have previously shown that
dia1 mRNA is not present in exponentially
growing cells but starts to accumulate within 2 h following
removal of growth medium, reaching a peak at 4 h and then disappearing
(
12). Inspection of the genome sequence (
10) showed that there
is a divergently transcribed gene 654 bp upstream of the ATG
of
dia1. This gene encodes a protein of 285 amino acids that
includes a Pfam domain found in the FKBP class of immunophilins
and so was named
impA.
The cis-acting regions that control transcription of Dictyostelium genes have all been found in the flanking 5' sequences, and some divergently transcribed genes such as cprB and zfaA have been found to be coordinately regulated in Dictyostelium (9). Microarray studies with human tissues have demonstrated that 90% of bidirectional regulatory regions result in coordinate expression of the flanking genes (27). To determine whether impA and dia1 are coordinately regulated at the GDT, we isolated RNA from exponentially growing cells and from cells that had differentiated after being shifted to BSS. As expected, Northern blot analyses showed that dia1 mRNA was low in growing cells and accumulated within the first 2 hours of development (Fig. 1). On the other hand, impA mRNA was high in growing cells and decreased during the first few hours of development (Fig. 1). It appears that these genes are inversely expressed before and after the GDT.
Deletion analyses of the impA/dia1 intergenic region.
To determine the
cis-acting sequences essential for transcriptional
regulation of
impA and
dia1, we prepared low-copy extrachromosomal
vectors in which portions of the intervening sequence were used
to drive GFP rather than
impA or to drive NH-Red rather than
dia1 (see Materials and Methods). Due to the weakness of the
impA promoter, fluorescence signals were below the detection
limit in the fluorescence-activated cell sorting, but GFP expression
could be analyzed after staining fixed cells with anti-A.v.
antibody and fluorescein isothiocyanate-coupled second antibody
(Fig.
2B). Expression levels in exponentially growing cells
carrying either the full-length intergenic region (bp 1 to 654)
or a portion from which the distal 100 bp was removed were indistinguishable
(Fig.
2B). Deletion of another 30 bp (to give bp 1 to 525) reduced
the level of GFP about twofold, indicating that this distal
sequence plays a role in
impA transcription. Further deletion
of bases up to 92 bp upstream of the gene (bp 1 to 92) had no
further effect on GFP levels, but deletion of another 33 bp,
leaving only 59 bp of the
impA upstream sequence (1 to 59),
abolished GFP expression (Fig.
2B). The relative levels of GFP
expression determined by flow cytometry were confirmed by quantitation
of electrophoretically separated GFP (Fig.
2C). The values were
also confirmed by spectrophotometrically measuring the total
fluorescence at 510 nm in extracts of sonicated cells after
excitation at 488 nm (data not shown). Expression of GFP decreases
rapidly following the initiation of development in cells carrying
constructs with at least 92 bp of the adjacent intervening sequence
(data not shown). It appears that the
cis-acting sequence which
is essential for control of
impA transcription during growth
and repression during development resides in the proximal 92-bp
sequence.
Expression of NH-Red could not be measured by fluorescence because
the levels were not significantly above the background level.
Therefore, we carried out Western analyses on 8-h-developed
cells by using antibodies to the His
6 epitope carried by NH-Red.
While cells carrying the full-length (654-bp) construct accumulated
the NH-Red reporter, cells carrying constructs in which the
distal 107 bp, which is adjacent to
impA, had been deleted failed
to accumulate any measurable NH-Red during development (Fig.
3), nor did growing cells carrying these constructs have measurable
NH-Red (data not shown). It appears that the same region of
the intervening sequence is essential for expression of both
impA and
dia1.
A cis element necessary for repression of dia1.
While the distal 107 bp is necessary for expression of
dia1 following the GDT, what accounts for the lack of expression
in growing cells? To determine whether the central region of
the intervening sequence plays a role in repressing
dia1, we
ligated the first 153 bp adjacent to
impA to the region from
bp 440 to the start of
dia1. This construct was ligated to NH-Red
and introduced into cells. Western analyses showed that exponentially
growing cells carrying the full-length construct had no measurable
levels of NH-Red and that NH-Red accumulated following the initiation
of development (Fig.
4). On the other hand, exponentially growing
cells carrying the construct lacking the central 287 bp (

153-440)
had high levels of NH-Red, and the level did not change significantly
following the initiation of development (Fig.
4). It appears
that
cis-acting signals in the middle region are critical to
repression of
dia1 before the GDT.
Characteristics of the impA/dia1 intergenic sequence.
There appear to be at least three regions within the 654 bp
separating
impA and
dia1 that play significant roles in their
regulation. The first 100 bp of this region is essential for
both
impA and
dia1 transcription. This region includes the basal
promoter region for
impA expression as well as TTCAAAAAGTTC
and its related inverse, GAATTTTTTGAA. Sequences similar to
these inverted repeats are found in the 5' regions adjacent
to other genes expressed immediately after the initiation of
development,
carA and
pdsA (Fig.
5). In addition, the 5' region
of the GDT-related gene
gdt1 has two copies of the motif, one
of which is inverted. It is possible that a common
trans-acting
protein binds these sequences and stimulates coordinate transcription
of each of these genes. The sequence in the middle of the intergenic
region separating
impA and
dia1 is high in As and Ts, but there
are two pairs of similar sequences (TTCTAATTGATTGAA-TTCTAATTTATTGAA
and TTGATAAACTT-TTGATAAACTC) that may be recognized by a
trans-acting
factor. The region proximal to
dia1 which appears to stimulate
expression of
impA twofold contains two related sequences next
to each other (Fig.
5). A similar sequence (AATCAAGCTCGAATCTCCA)
is present at the equivalent
carA position (Fig.
5), suggesting
that a
trans-acting factor may bind there and affect transcription
to the right as well as to the left.
DNA binding factors that recognize the impA/dia1 intergenic sequence.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay were carried out with the
112-bp region proximal to
impA as well as the middle region
necessary for repression of
dia1. The probes were labeled with
32P, incubated with nuclear extracts from vegetative cells or
4-h-developed cells with or without excess unlabeled probe,
and separated on 5% polyacrylamide gels (Fig.
6). Although we
tested several conditions, we could not observe a gel shift
of the 112-bp probe with nuclear extracts from either growing
or differentiating cells (data not shown). However, the middle
region (bp 106 to 484) was retarded by nuclear extracts of vegetative
cells in a manner that could be competed by unlabeled probe
(Fig.
6). When the central portion of this region (bp 290 to
311) was used as a probe, the same band was seen with nuclear
extracts of vegetative cells. Neither of these probes was retarded
by nuclear extracts of 4-h-developed cells in a manner that
could be competed with unlabeled probe (Fig.
6). It appears
that a nuclear factor in vegetative cells recognizes the sequence
from bp 290 to 311 sequence (GAAGTTCTAATTGATTGAAG) and may play
a role in repression of
dia1 in vegetative cells. This factor
disappears when
dia1 is expressed after 4 h of development.
Another sequence in the middle region (TTGATAAACTT) did not
show a gel shift with nuclear extracts from either vegetative
or 4-h-developed cells (data not shown).
There are two copies of the sequence ACTGATCAGCTCGATC proximal
to
dia1 that are responsible for a twofold increase in the level
of transcription in the
impA direction (Fig.
2). We prepared
a probe with the sequence from bp 533 to 546 and found that
it was retarded by nuclear extracts of vegetative cells in a
manner that could be competed with unlabeled probe (Fig.
6B).
There were two bands near the top of the gel and two bands lower
down, suggesting that more than one nuclear protein recognizes
this sequence. Omitting zinc from the gel shift buffer reduced
the amount of retarded probe, suggesting that the proteins might
carry zinc fingers (data not shown). When this probe was incubated
with nuclear extracts of cells that had differentiated for 4
h in buffer, one of the upper bands was stronger, the lower
bands were not seen, and a new band that was much stronger appeared
(Fig.
6C). It appears that this sequence is recognized by several
different factors which are controlled at the GDT.

DISCUSSION
Genome-wide microarray studies have shown that there is a significant
change in the global pattern of transcription when growth ceases
as the result of nutrient deprivation and cells start to differentiate
(
15,
28). Many genes that are expressed during growth, including
impA and the genes encoding ribosomal proteins, are turned off
immediately after the GDT, while a set of early genes, including
dia1,
dia2, and
dia3 as well as
carA,
pdsA, and
gpaB, are rapidly
induced (
1,
2,
4,
12,
14). Although reversible, the GDT is one
of the most significant transitions in the life cycle, since
growth potential is curtailed. There are multiple preparatory
steps that involve YakA, PufA, PKA, AmiB, Gdt1, Gdt2, and the
DNA binding proteins CbfA and CRTF (
6,
17,
25,
29). There is
also evidence that cells must progress through the cell cycle
before arresting at the PS point such that the cells initiate
development in late G
2 (
18). Transcriptional regulation at the
GDT is likely to involve changes in the proteins that bind to
cis-acting sequences upstream of the pertinent set of genes.
The fortuitous arrangement of a gene that is repressed and a
gene that is induced at the GDT has allowed us to dissect the
intergenic region into some of its component parts.
There is a pair of 7-bp direct repeats in the 92-bp region proximal to impA which is essential for expression of both impA and dia1 (Fig. 2 and 3). Related sequences can be recognized upstream of carA, pdsA, and gdt1, genes whose expressions are regulated soon after the GDT (Fig. 5). Site-directed mutations in the copy that is upstream of carA have been shown to significantly reduce expression of carA and affect binding of the transcription factor CRTF (21). It is likely that CRTF or related proteins function in transcriptional regulation of each of these genes. Unfortunately, we could not detect protein binding to this region in electrophoretic mobility shift assays.
There is a region in the middle of the impA/dia1 intergenic region that is essential for repression of dia1 expression in growing cells (Fig. 4). A sequence within this region (GAAGTTCTAATTGATTGAAG) is recognized by a factor present in growing cells but absent in cells which have differentiated for 4 h. The most likely reason that impA is expressed in growing cells while dia1 is not expressed is that a repressor binds in the middle of the intergenic region and blocks transcription to the right but not the left. This repressor disappears following a shift from growth medium to buffer and likely accounts for this aspect of GDT.
Finally, there is a pair of nearly identical 20-bp sequences in the region proximal to dia1 that appear to stimulate expression of impA about twofold. Deletion of one member of this pair reduces the level of the GFP reporter twofold (Fig. 2B and C). The repeated sequence is recognized by several proteins present in growing cells, at least one of which disappears following the initiation of development. These proteins may be transcriptional factors responsible for the stimulation of impA expression in growing cells. Another protein that recognizes this sequence accumulates during early development and may play a role in expression of dia1. A highly related sequence is found just upstream of carA and may stimulate expression of this gene at the GDT.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Sam Payne for useful discussions and database searches.
The short-half-life GFP (rpL11N; S65T) used in this study was
a kind gift from Harry MacWilliams (Universität München,
Germany).
This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid (No. 14654170) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan, a grant from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), and a grant from the Mitsubishi Foundation to Y.M.; grant no. 063612 from the Wellcome Trust to C.P.; and a grant from the National Institutes of Health (GM62350) to W.F.L.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Cell and Developmental Biology, UCSD, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0368. Phone: (858) 534-2543. Fax: (858) 822-2094. E-mail:
wloomis{at}ucsd.edu.

These authors contributed equally to this work. 

REFERENCES
1 - Abe, F., and Y. Maeda. 1994. Precise expression of the cAMP receptor gene, CAR1, during transition from growth to differentiation in Dictyostelium discoideum. FEBS Lett. 342:239-241.[CrossRef][Medline]
2 - Agarwal, A. K., S. N. Parrish, and D. D. Blumberg. 1999. Ribosomal protein gene expression is cell type specific during development in Dictyostelium discoideum. Differentiation 65:73-88.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 - Bonner, J. T. 1950. Observations on polarity in the slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum. Biol. Bull. 99:143-151.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Chae, S. C., Y. Inazu, A. Amagai, and Y. Maeda. 1998. Underexpression of a novel gene, dia2, impairs the transition of Dictyostelium cells from growth to differentiation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 252:278-283.[CrossRef][Medline]
5 - Chen, G., G. Shaulsky, and A. Kuspa. 2004. Tissue-specific G1-phase cell-cycle arrest prior to terminal differentiation in Dictyostelium. Development 131:2619-2630.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6 - Chibalina, M. V., C. Anjard, and R. H. Insall. 2004. Gdt2 regulates the transition of Dictyostelium cells from growth to differentiation. BMC Dev. Biol 4:8.[CrossRef][Medline]
7 - Clarke, M., and R. H. Gomer. 1995. PSF and CMF, autocrine factors that regulate gene expression during growth and early development of Dictyostelium. Experientia 51:1124-1134.[CrossRef][Medline]
8 - Deichsel, H., S. Friedel, A. Detterbeck, C. Coyne, U. Hamker, and H. K. MacWilliams. 1999. Green fluorescent proteins with short half-lives as reporters in Dictyostelium discoideum. Dev. Genes Evol. 209:63-68.[CrossRef][Medline]
9 - Driscoll, D. M., and J. G. Williams. 1987. Two divergently transcribed genes of Dictyostelium discoideum are cyclic AMP inducible and coregulated during development. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7:4482-4489.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10 - Eichinger, L., J. Pachebat, G. Glockner, M-A. Rajandream, R. Sucgang, M. Berriman, J. Song, R. Olsen, K. Szafranski, Q. Xu, B. Tunggal, S. Kummerfeld, M. Madera, A. Konfortov, F. Rivero, A. Bankier, R. Lehmann, N. Hamlin, R. Davies, P. Gaudet, P. Fey, K. Pilcher, G. Chen, D. Saunders, E. Sodergen, P. Davis, A. Kehornou, X. Nie, N. Hall, C. Anjard, L. Hemphill, N. Bason, P. Farbrother, B. Desany, E. Just, T. Morio, R. Rost, C. Churcher, J. Cooper, S. Haydock, N. van Driessche, A. Cronin, I. Goodhead, D. Muzny, T. Mourier, A. Pain, M. Lu, D. Harper, R. Lindsay, H. Hauser, K. James, M. Quiles, M. Mohan, T. Saito, C. Buchrieser, A. Wardroper, M. Felder, Thangavelu, D. Johnson, A. Knights, H. Loulseged, K. M. Mungall, K. Oliver, C. Price, M. Quail, H. Urushihara, J. Hernadez, E. Rabbinowitsch, D. Steffen, M. Sanders, J. Ma, Y. Kohara, S. Sharp, M. Simmonds, S. Spiegler, A. Tivey, S. Sugano, B. White, D. Walker, J. Woodward, T. Winckler, Y. Tanaka, G. Shaulsky, M. Schleicher, G. Weinstock, A. Rosenthal, E. Cox, R. Chisholm, R. Gibbs, W. F. Loomis, M. Platzer, R. R. Kay, J. Williams, P. Dear, A. A. Noegel, B. Barrell, and A. Kuspa. 2005. The genome of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Nature 435:43-57.[CrossRef][Medline]
11 - Gollop, R., and A. R. Kimmel. 1997. Control of cell-type specific gene expression in Dictyostelium by the general transcription factor GBF. Development 124:3395-3405.[Abstract]
12 - Hirose, S., Y. Inazu, S. Chae, and Y. Maeda. 2000. Suppression of the growth/differentiation transition in Dictyostelium development by transient expression of a novel gene, dia1. Development 127:3263-3270.[Abstract]
13 - Inazu, Y., S. C. Chae, and Y. Maeda. 1999. Transient expression of a mitochondrial gene cluster including rps4 is essential for the phase-shift of Dictyostelium cells from growth to differentiation. Dev. Genet. 25:339-352.[CrossRef][Medline]
14 - Iranfar, N., D. Fuller, and W. F. Loomis. 2003. Genome-wide expression analyses of gene regulation during early development of Dictyostelium discoideum. Eukaryot. Cell 2:664-670.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15 - Iranfar, N., D. Fuller, R. Sasik, T. Hwa, M. Laub, and W. F. Loomis. 2001. Expression patterns of cell-type-specific genes in Dictyostelium. Mol. Biol. Cell 12:2590-2600.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16 - Klein, P., D. Fontana, B. Knox, A. Theibert, and P. Devreotes. 1985. cAMP receptors controlling cell-cell interactions in the development of Dictyostelium. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 50:787-799.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17 - Kon, T., H. Adachi, and K. Sutoh. 2000. amiB, a novel gene required for the growth/differentiation transition in Dictyostelium. Genes Cells 5:43-55.[Abstract]
18 - Maeda, Y., T. Ohmori, T. Abe, F. Abe, and A. Amagai. 1989. Transition of starving Dictyostelium cells to differentiation phase at a particular position of the cell cycle. Differentiation 41:169-175.[CrossRef][Medline]
19 - Mann, S. K., J. M. Brown, C. Briscoe, C. Parent, G. Pitt, P. N. Devreotes, and R. A. Firtel. 1997. Role of cAMP-dependent protein kinase in controlling aggregation and postaggregative development in Dictyostelium. Dev. Biol. 183:208-221.[CrossRef][Medline]
20 - Manstein, D. J., H. P. Schuster, P. Morandini, and D. M. Hunt. 1995. Cloning vectors for the production of proteins in Dictyostelium discoideum. Gene 162:129-134.[CrossRef][Medline]
21 - Mu, X., B. Lee, J. M. Louis, and A. R. Kimmel. 1998. Sequence-specific protein interaction with a transcriptional enhancer involved in the autoregulated expression of cAMP receptor 1 in Dictyostelium. Development 125:3689-3698.[Abstract]
22 - Parent, C. A., and P. N. Devreotes. 1996. Constitutively active adenylyl cyclase mutant requires neither G proteins nor cytosolic regulators. J. Biol. Chem. 271:18333-18336.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23 - Rathi, A., S. C. Kayman, and M. Clarke. 1991. Induction of gene expression in Dictyostelium by prestarvation factor, a factor secreted by growing cells. Dev. Genet. 12:82-87.[CrossRef][Medline]
24 - Shaulsky, G., and W. F. Loomis. 1995. Mitochondrial DNA replication but no nuclear DNA replication during development of Dictyostelium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:5660-5663.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25 - Souza, G. M., A. M. da Silva, and A. Kuspa. 1999. Starvation promotes Dictyostelium development by relieving PufA inhibition of PKA translation through the YakA kinase pathway. Development 126:3263-3274.[Abstract]
26 - Souza, G. M., S. Lu, and A. Kuspa. 1998. YakA, a protein kinase required for the transition from growth to development in Dictyostelium. Development 125:2291-2302.[Abstract]
27 - Trinklein, N. D., S. F. Aldred, S. J. Hartman, D. I. Schroeder, R. P. Otillar, and R. M. Myers. 2004. An abundance of bidirectional promoters in the human genome. Genome Res. 14:62-66.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28 - Van Driessche, N., C. Shaw, M. Katoh, T. Morio, R. Sucgang, M. Ibarra, H. Kuwayama, T. Saito, H. Urushihara, M. Maeda, I. Takeuchi, H. Ochiai, W. Eaton, J. Tollett, J. Halter, A. Kuspa, Y. Tanaka, and G. Shaulsky. 2002. A transcriptional profile of multicellular development in Dictyostelium discoideum. Development 129:1543-1552.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29 - Zeng, C., C. Anjard, K. Riemann, A. Konzok, and W. Nellen. 2000. gdt1, a new signal transduction component for negative regulation of the growth-differentiation transition in Dictyostelium discoideum. Mol. Biol. Cell 11:1631-1643.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Eukaryotic Cell, August 2005, p. 1477-1482, Vol. 4, No. 8
1535-9778/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/EC.4.8.1477-1482.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Hirose, S., Payne, S. H., Loomis, W. F.
(2006). cis-Acting Site Controlling Bidirectional Transcription at the Growth-Differentiation Transition in Dictyostelium discoideum.. Eukaryot Cell
5: 1104-1110
[Abstract]
[Full Text]