Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Eukaryotic Cell, April 2005, p. 799-813, Vol. 4, No. 4
1535-9778/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/EC.4.4.799-813.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Yonghui Jia,2,
Siew Lay Poh,2,
R. Krishna Murthy Karuturi,2
Nicole den Elzen,3
Xu Peng,2
Liling Zheng,1
Matthew O'Connell,3,¶
Edison T. Liu,2
Mohan K. Balasubramanian,1,4* and
Jianhua Liu2,5*
Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory, 1 Research Link, NUS, Singapore 117604, Singapore,1 Genome Institute of Singapore, 60 Biopolis Street, Singapore 138672, Singapore,2 Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, St. Andrews Place, Melbourne, Vic 3002, Australia,3 Department of Biological Sciences,4 Department of Biochemistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore5
Received 3 December 2004/ Accepted 14 February 2005
|
|
|---|
gisljh/kinome. |
|
|---|
A number of protein kinases involved in mediating signals during cellular response to various environmental changes have been previously characterized. At least three mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades have been analyzed in fission yeast. While the Wis4-Wis1-Sty1 MAPK cascade is involved in the oxidative stress response, the Byr2-Byr1-Spk1 and Mhk1-Pek1-Pkm1 MAPK cascades have been shown to mediate signals in response to pheromones and ion homeostasis and cell wall integrity, respectively (40, 63). Cells containing loss-of-function mutations in these signaling molecules show either defective pheromone responses (40) or sensitivity to cell wall-degrading agents, such as ß-glucanases (30, 63). Besides the involvement of MAPK cascades in response to environmental and/or cellular perturbations, a number of protein kinases implicated in response to a variety of stress factors, such as agents that block DNA replication, damage chromosomal DNA, destabilize microtubule structures, and disrupt cell wall structures, have been characterized. For example, Cds1 and Chk1 regulate cell cycle control in response to blocks to DNA replication and/or DNA damage (49). Hhp1 and Hhp2 are involved in DNA damage repair pathways (13, 19). Cells carrying mutations in these kinases display hypersensitivity to agents that block DNA replication and/or damage DNA. Bub1 and Mph1, on the other hand, regulate cell cycle control in response to defective kinetochore capture, and bub1 and mph1 mutants show hypersensitivity to microtubule poisons (7, 17). A number of protein kinases have also been reported to regulate cell wall integrity and/or ion homeostasis (Table 1), and these mutant cells exhibit sensitivities to a variety of cell wall degrading agents (see Table 1 for references).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. All 106 protein kinases in the S. pombe genome
|
While a number of studies have focused on individual protein kinases that function in the regulation of numerous biological processes, including cellular responses to various stress factors, a systematic approach has not been applied to study the functions of all the protein kinase domain-containing proteins in response to different stresses in fission yeast. In this study, we report a systematic deletion analysis of genes encoding eukaryotic protein kinase catalytic-domain-containing proteins. The fission yeast genome (74) encodes a total of 106 eukaryotic protein kinase catalytic-domain-containing genes, about half of which have previously been characterized (Table 1). Three previously uncharacterized putative protein kinases were revealed, in this study, to be essential for vegetative growth. The addition of these 3 kinases to the 14 previously characterized kinases results in the classification of 17 protein kinases as being essential, out of a total of 106 kinases in the entire fission yeast genome. The remaining 89 dispensable genes have been individually deleted, and growth phenotypes of viable mutants assessed. This has revealed that half the total number of mutants exhibit hypersensitivity to at least one of the 17 stress factors tested. A comparison of the pattern of hypersensitivity to various stresses permitted the functional grouping of all putative protein kinases and suggested four major signaling pathways or networks that appear to be mediated by known and putative protein kinases in response to a variety of stress factors. Microarray analysis in a number of mutants has revealed a significant correlation of expression signatures in mutants with their growth phenotype, enabling a useful approach for a functional classification of protein kinases.
|
|
|---|
Construction of deletion mutants. A PCR-mediated deletion approach (3) was used to construct targeted open reading frame (ORF) deletion mutants (Fig. 1). In brief, each synthesized primer (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA) contained 80 nucleotides complementary to a particular ORF's flanking regions, followed by a barcode (20 nucleotides in length) and finally 18 nucleotides homologous to a uracil selection marker cassette. About 10 µg of PCR fragment was transformed into haploid or diploid cells using the lithium acetate method (24). Subsequently ura4+ colonies were selected on EMM plates lacking uracil. Colonies were further examined using allele-specific primer pairs (see Table S1 in the supplemental material) to ensure deletion and replacement of the target gene by the ura4+ gene.
![]() View larger version (26K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Strategy for deletion allele construction. (A) Cell containing a wild-type target gene. (B) Pair of primers containing flanking sequences of a target gene was used to synthesize a DNA fragment by PCR, using a template carrying a selective marker gene. The barcode embedded into the long PCR primers has not been discussed in this study. (C) Haploid cell containing a deletion allele. (D) Diploid cell containing a heterozygous deletion allele. The target gene is indicated in red, and the marker gene is in green (in this study, the marker gene is ura4+). wt, wild type; ups, upstream; dns, downstream; seq, sequence.
|
DNA damage responses. A number of mutants were assayed for sensitivity to UV-C and ionizing radiation using survival curves as previously described (69, 70). For testing sensitivities to radiomimetic drugs, exponential cultures were grown in YES medium, and 5 µl of cultures at various concentrations ranging from 106 to 103 cells/ml were spotted onto duplicate YES plates and incubated at 30°C for 3 days. Sensitivity was assayed relative to that on YES plates lacking the drug as described above.
Microarray analysis. Acid phenol was added to the frozen cell pellets, which were then incubated at 65°C for 15 min with occasional shaking using a thermomixer (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). The aqueous phase was recovered by spinning at 5,000 rpm for 5 min at 4°C and reextracted by phenol-chloroform (1:1). RNA was precipitated by the addition of an equal volume of isopropanol and recovered by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 20 min at 4°C. Fluorescently labeled cDNA was synthesized using SuperScriptII (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions with oligo(dT)20 (Invitrogen) as primers in the presence of either Cy3- or Cy5-coupled dUTP (Invitrogen). The reaction was stopped by the addition of EDTA. The cDNA was subsequently hydrolyzed with NaOH and neutralized by HCl. Fluorescence-labeled cDNA was then washed and concentrated using microcon-YM30 spin columns (Millipore, Billerica, MA).
Spotted microarray slides were prehybridized using digoxigenin hybridization buffer (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) with a raised coverslip (Erie Scientific, Portsmouth, NH) in a slide hybridization chamber (GeneMachines) for 1 h at 42°C. Slides were washed first in distilled H2O for 2 min and then in isopropanol for 2 min and spin dried. Microarray slides were hybridized using digoxigenin hybridization buffer containing Cy3- and Cy5-labeled cDNA overnight at 42°C. Hybridized slides were washed in 2x SSC (1x SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate)-0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate for 1 min, in 1x SSC for 4 min, in 0.2x SSC for 4 min, and in 0.05x SSC for 1 min and spin dried. Microarray slides were scanned using a GenePix scanner (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA) at 635-nm and 532-nm wavelengths at a resolution of 10 µm using GenePix Pro3 or Pro4 software (Axon Instruments). Data from each GenePix result file were normalized based on a median of ratios. The ratios of each spot were collected only if the intensity of the spots in either channel was
2-fold greater than the background.
Phylogenic analysis of protein kinases. Primary amino acid sequences of 106 known and putative protein kinases were obtained from databases (www.genedb.org and www.incyte.com). The catalytic-domain sequences of each protein kinase were extracted based on the Pfam definition for eukaryotic protein kinase catalytic domain (www.pfam.org). Alignment of catalytic-domain sequences and phylogenetic tree construction were carried out using Clustal W (18). The length of the dendrogram was unified for visualization.
Analyses of putative orthologs. Mutual best hit (MBH) analysis (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Homology/ComMapDoc.html) using BLAST (version 2.2.6) was utilized for identification of Schizosaccharomyces pombe protein kinase orthologs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and human systems. A total of 106 eukaryotic protein kinase catalytic-domain sequences in S. pombe were compared to 119 sequences in S. cerevisiae and 491 sequences in humans as documented in the KinBase database (http://198.202.68.14/kinbase). Furthermore, a relaxed mutual best hit (repeated application of mutual best hit or RMBH) protocol was applied for identification of non-MBH orthologs in S. cerevisiae and human. In each iteration, a set of orthologs were identified using MBH analysis and removed from both genomes. In the next iteration, the updated genomes were submitted to MBH analysis for another set of orthologs and the procedure continued till either of the genomes was empty or no more mutual best hits were found. The minimum BLAST score threshold of 206 was set on the orthologs obtained from the second iteration of RMBH analysis. This threshold value was obtained as the score that covered 80% of all the orthologs obtained using MBH analysis only.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (54K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Unrooted phylogenic tree of the 106 protein kinases in S. pombe. Seventeen essential protein kinases are marked in red, and 31 kinases containing tyrosine phosphorylation signatures are underlined. Two regions of the phylogenic tree shaded blue indicate that the region is enriched with tyrosine kinase signatures. AGC, CaMK, and CMGC indicate protein kinase groups, and Polo, Casein I, Wee/Mik, Mekk/Ste11, Mek/Ste7, and Pak/Ste20 indicate protein kinase families that do not belong to the AGC, CaMK, and CMGC groups. The inset shows a schematic representation of protein kinase orthologs in S. pombe (Sp), S. cerevisiae (Sc), and human. One hundred six eukaryotic protein kinase catalytic-domain-containing proteins were selected in S. pombe, 119 in S. cerevisiae, and 491 in human. Analysis of orthologs showed that of 106 S. pombe protein kinases, 67 (25 plus 42) have orthologs in S. cerevisiae and 47 (42 plus 5) in human. Among these, 42 appeared to have orthologs in both S. cerevisiae and human. Numbers in parentheses indicate the numbers of nearest homologs.
|
Putative protein kinases essential for viability. We investigated the functions of all putative protein kinases found in the S. pombe genome through a systematic deletion analysis. At the time we started this study, 14 protein kinases were known to be essential for viability. We therefore selected the remaining 92 genes encoding known and putative protein kinases for the construction of deletion mutants (Table 1).
Individual deletion of three genes out of 92, namely, SPCC70.05c, SPBC17F3.02, and SPBC32H8.10, was not accomplished when haploid strains were transformed, suggesting that these gene products might be essential for cell viability. To further examine the essentiality of these putative protein kinases, we constructed deletion alleles in diploid cells. Verification of diploid mutants with a heterozygous deletion allele was performed via a PCR-based assay using two primer pairs, which were specific either for the wild-type allele or the deletion allele (Fig. 3A). The diploid mutant cells were subsequently grown on YPD plates for sporulation to segregate heterozygous alleles. Tetrad dissection of spores from asci generated from the heterozygous diploid mutants displayed a 2:2 segregation pattern, indicating that spores bearing a deletion allele were unable to form colonies (Fig. 3B). This was subsequently confirmed by replication of tetrad colonies onto a uracil drop-out plate. Spores carrying a deletion allele failed to form colonies, confirming that these three putative protein kinases were essential for viability.
![]() View larger version (61K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Essential putative protein kinases. (A) Heterozygous deletion alleles in diploid mutant cells were verified by PCR using allele-specific primers as explained in the legend to Fig. 1. Wild-type (wt) alleles were confirmed by PCR using the target-specific primer pairs pA-pB for the 5'-end (head) joint and pC/pD for the 3'-end (tail) joint; deletion alleles were confirmed by PCR using primer pairs of target-specific pA-marker-specific pB-ura (head) and marker-specific pC-ura-target-specifc pD (tail). (B) Tetrad analysis confirmed that the putative protein kinases were essential for vegetative growth. (C) Free-spore assay of the mutants. DNA was stained using the fluorescent dye DAPI. Arrows and arrowheads indicate horse tail-like and condensed chromosomes, respectively. (D) Subcellular localization of GFP-tagged kinases in wild-type haploid cells. See the text for details.
|
We then further investigated the subcellular localization of these three essential putative protein kinases by tagging them with a green fluorescent protein (GFP) in wild-type cells. Haploid cells bearing a putative protein kinase with GFP fused at its C terminus as a sole copy in the genome were viable, indicating that the tagged proteins were functional. Fluorescence microscopy analysis revealed distinct subcellular localization of these protein kinases: SPCC70.05c-GFP was predominantly distributed at cortical membranes, SPBC17F3.02-GFP was localized in the cytoplasm and at the division septum, and SPBC32H8.10-GFP showed a nuclear localization (Fig. 3D). During the process of this study, two S. pombe protein kinases, SPBC17F3.02/nak1 and SPBC32H8.10/cdk9, were reported by Huang et al. (20) and Pei and Shuman (45). Both kinases have orthologs in S. cerevisiae: YHR102W/KIC1 and YPR161C/SGV1.
Hypersensitivity of deletion mutant strains. Besides the three putative protein kinases that were found to be essential for viability, SPAC29A4.16 (ppk10) was initially unable to form colonies when deleted in haploid cells. Tetrad dissection analysis of a diploid knockout strain showed that all spores from tetrads, containing either a wild-type allele or a deletion allele, were viable and formed colonies on a YES plate. Examination of colonies replicated onto EMM plates lacking uracil revealed that ura4+ colonies were very sensitive to minimal medium, which explained why the haploid deletion mutants failed to grow on the selective medium, suggesting a role for ppk10 in some aspects of cellular metabolism.
Next we assessed the growth phenotype of all viable deletion mutants. At least two independent isolates were examined to ascertain that there was no random mutation in the background which could potentially alter the mutant phenotype. We also constructed deletion alleles of all the previously characterized dispensable protein kinases as a control for assessment of possible phenotypic alterations. The growth assay performed in this study (Table 2) indicated that the phenotypes of deletion mutants lacking a known protein kinase were identical to what was previously reported. Hence, we are confident that our putative protein kinase mutant strains constructed in haploid cells are unlikely to harbor any random mutations or suppressors.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Summary of growth phenotypes of the deletion mutants lacking one of the nonessential known and putative protein kinases indicated
|
; ppk21) was moderately defective in cytokinesis and will be published separately (A.B., J.L., and M.K.B., unpublished data). The growth of all viable protein kinase deletion mutants was investigated under various stress conditions. Their temperature sensitivity was tested on YES plates incubated at 19°C (low temperature) and 36°C (high temperature). In order to determine the sensitivity of deletion mutant strains to various stress factors, we supplemented YES medium with common stress factors, such as salt (KCl), an osmolyte (sorbitol), an oxidant (hydrogen peroxide), agents that inhibit DNA replication (hydroxyurea [HU]) or damage DNA (ethyl methanesulfonate [EMS]), cytoskeleton poisons (methyl 2-benzimidazole carbamate [MBC], thiobendazole [TBZ], and latrunculin A [LatA]), chemicals that disrupt cell wall/membrane structures (calcofluor, sodium dodecyl sulfate), and agents that block the secretory pathway (brefeldin A), protein biosynthesis (cycloheximide), and chelate Ca2+ (EGTA).
For each stress factor, ranges of dosages were applied. For further analysis we chose only those concentrations at which no more than 6% of mutants displayed wild-type growth dynamics and at least 6% of mutants were able to grow. The ability of kinase deletion strains to grow at 36°C and on plates supplemented with TBZ or HU as an example is shown in Fig. 4, while Table 2 contains a summary of all data obtained from the sensitivity assays.
![]() View larger version (112K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Phenotypic assessment of nonessential protein kinase mutants. Approximately 5 µl of 10-fold serial dilutions of the 88 viable haploid h mutant cells (sck1 mutant was not available) were spotted and grown under 17 different stress conditions with various dosages. Examples of cell growth under stress conditions such as high temperature (36°C), a microtubule poison (TBZ), and an agent that blocks DNA replication (HU) are shown. A mutant was described as hypersensitive to a stress condition when its growth was similar to that of wild-type cells at 2 (or >2) dilution factors lower. Mutant growth phenotypes under various conditions are individually summarized in Table 2.
|
![]() View larger version (71K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Phenotypic clustering of hypersensitive mutants. Pearson correlation clustering of the growth pattern of the protein kinase mutants was performed to analyze 41 known and putative protein kinase mutants that exhibited hypersensitivity to at least one of the 17 stress conditions tested (see the text). Upon comparison of growth phenotypes under various conditions, 41 mutants were divided into eight groups with a minimal similarity of 50%. The 17 conditions used in the phenotypic assessment were separated into four clusters. rep., repair; MT, microtubule; Calc, calcofluor; BFA, brefeldin A; SDS, sodium dodecyl sulfate; Bleo, bleomycin; MM, minimum medium; Sorb, sorbitol.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Hypersensitivities of known and putative protein kinase mutants to DNA damage agents
|
Group D contained mutants such as the wis4, win1, and sty1 mutants, which exhibited hypersensitivity to a number of common stress factors, such as high temperature, high salt concentration, and oxidative stress, consistent with previous reports (54, 58, 60). Besides the wis4, win1 and sty1 mutants, two other kinases, the kin1 mutant and the previously uncharacterized ppk19 (BC119.07) mutant, could be clustered into the same group. Interestingly both the kin1 and ppk19 mutants in addition to the above-mentioned stress factors displayed hypersensitivity to a number of other conditions, i.e., EGTA and cycloheximide.
Mutants in group E showed diverse phenotypes and likely function in cell cycle regulation and cell growth, similar to those in groups B and C, and in response to common stresses, such as temperature and the presence of salt, an oxidant, and an osmolyte.
Mutants in group F exhibited hypersensitivity limited to microtubule poisons such as MBC and TBZ, implicating their involvement in noncytoplasmic microtubule-associated processes. This group includes molecules such as Fin1 and Bub1, which are known to regulate mitotic spindle assembly or spindle checkpoint control (7, 27). Many mutants in groups B, C, and E showed hypersensitivity to both microtubule poisons and to the actin inhibitor LatA. It is conceivable that mutations affecting the function of protein kinases involved in cytoplasmic microtubule-mediated cellular growth would result in hypersensitivity to both microtubule poisons and polarized growth inhibitors.
Group G kinases appear to be involved in the assembly of the mitotic spindle, and in this respect they are similar to the members of group F described above. However, they have an additional role in maintaining cell wall integrity.
The last group, group H, is comprised of three members, individual deletions in which resulted in very poor growth at 19°C. Pck1 and Pck2 are known to be involved in cellular morphogenesis. The comparison of growth phenotypes thus allowed us to assign functions to putative protein kinases based on established information of previously characterized protein kinases classified in the same group (see references in Table 1).
We applied each of the stresses at an intermediate dosage range that resulted in comparable effects on mutant cell growth; that is, the dose was neither too strong to inhibit the growth of a majority of mutants (e.g., >6%) nor too weak to display any effect on many mutants (>6%). Given the fact that all available protein kinase mutants were tested under identical conditions, the different effects of stress factors could thus be compared. Following two-dimensional cluster analysis, 17 stress factors were separated into four categories (Fig. 5). Category 1 had only two factors, EGTA (Ca2+ chelate) and cycloheximide (protein biosynthesis inhibitor), and only two mutants, the ppk19 and kin1 mutants, exhibited hypersensitivity to these factors. Category 2 consisted of the microtubule poisons TBZ and MBC, and agents affecting DNA replication and integrity viz., HU and EMS, respectively. In this study, we found that EMS was less potent than methyl methanesulfonate (MMS); therefore, we tested a number of mutants using the stress factors MMS and 4NQ (Table 3). Those deletion mutants that showed hypersensitivity to HU exhibited hypersensitivity to both MMS and 4NQ. It is not clear why microtubule poisons and DNA damage (or replication block) agents grouped together. It may reflect a group of stress factors that could potentially destabilize genome integrity since both chromosomal DNA and mitotic spindles are nuclear and required for this process. Category 3 contains a number of factors that affect general cellular growth: calcofluor disrupts cell wall structures, latrunculin A prevents polymerization of the actin cytoskeleton, and brefeldin A interferes with secretory pathways. Category 4 contains those stress factors that are commonly present in the environment, such as high or low temperatures, high salt, a high osmolyte concentration, and the oxidant H2O2. Each category may reflect a major signaling pathway that is involved in the response to the stress factors within the category. Consistent with this, it is likely that Wis4-Wis1-Sty1 is the major signaling pathway in response to a number of common stress factors, such as temperature and the presence of salt, an osmolyte, and an oxidant (9).
Conjugation, meiosis, and sporulation. Fission yeast cells undergo meiosis upon nutritional starvation, leading to the formation of ascospores (75). A number of regulators, including protein kinases that are required for conjugation (e.g., Byr2, Byr1, and Spk1), meiosis (e.g., Mde3 and Mek1), and sporulation (e.g., Spo4 and Pit1) have been previously characterized (see references in Table 1 and www.genedb.org/ and www.incyte.com/proteome/). Mutations in some of them (e.g., the byr2, byr1, med3, mek1, and pit1 genes) were found to have no obvious vegetative growth phenotype under various stress conditions tested (Fig. 6) (see references in Table 1) but failed to conjugate or undergo meiosis or sporulation (Fig. 6). In order to identify protein kinases which are involved in any of these three processes, we constructed 84 individual kinase deletion alleles in a haploid homothallic (h90) strain that could undergo mating and sporulation upon nitrogen starvation (75). Aliquots from a set of serially diluted cultures were spotted onto YPD plates for induction of sporulation. Wild-type cells formed spores after 3 to 4 days at 24°C as indicated by a dark-brown staining of spores upon a brief exposure to iodine vapor (data not shown) due to amyloid-rich spore walls (8). Of 84 protein kinase and putative protein kinase mutants tested, 15 showed major defects in spore formation based on iodine vapor staining and 10 showed partial defects (Fig. 6). Thus, about 30% of protein kinases found in the entire fission yeast genome were required for conjugation, meiosis, or sporulation.
![]() View larger version (95K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Sporulation assay. Iodine staining of mutants under conditions promoting sporulation was performed. About 5 µl of 10-fold serial dilutions of 84 haploid h90 mutant cells (5 h90 mutants were not available) were tested for conjugation, meiosis, or sporulation. Mutants defective in conjugation, meiosis, or sporulation display negative staining with iodine vapor (I2) and are indicated with "-." Partially negative stainings are marked with "-/+." Mutant cells which displayed the vegetative growth phenotype (Veg.) under at least one of the 17 conditions tested are indicated with "-" (see Fig. 5). A white crossed spot was a bacterial contaminant.
|
![]() View larger version (42K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Expression signatures identify mutant phenotypes. Pearson correlation clustering of the expression signatures of the protein kinase mutants was performed. An expression profile of each mutant under optimal growth conditions was attained using oligonucleotide-based whole-genome DNA microarrays with a wild-type strain (ura4+) as a common reference. Eight hundred forty-five genes whose expression levels changed 1.6-fold or greater in at least one of the nine mutant profiles were selected for cluster analysis. Eight protein kinases are known to be involved in oxidative-stress responses (in red), cell wall integrity or polarized growth (in orange), and pheromone responses (in purple). A putative protein kinase, SPBC119.07, which showed growth defects in drug sensitivity assays similar to those of the kin1 mutant (Fig. 5) displayed an expression signature similar to that of the kin1 mutant. MT, microtubule.
|
|
|
|---|
Various stress factors could disrupt different cellular metabolic pathways and/or cellular components. Defective growth observed under a particular stress condition implies that the deletion kinase is potentially involved in mediating signals during the cellular response given to that stress factor. In addition, dosage ranges of stress factors exhibit different degrees of disruption to cellular growth. By assaying a large number of deletion mutants with a range of dosages, we have shown that the stress factors may be divided into four groups. This raises the possibility of the existence of four major signaling pathways or networks organized in fission yeast in response to the stress factors tested. This is consistent with the proposition by Chen et al. (9) that wis4-wis1-sty1 is the major signaling pathway mediating signals in response to a number of stress factors in category 4.
Of 89 dispensable protein kinases, 15 are found to function both in vegetative growth under stress conditions and in sporulation, and 12 appear to function specifically in sporulation. Thirty-six out of 89 dispensable kinase mutants displayed no obvious phenotype in both the vegetative-growth assay and the sporulation assay, suggesting redundant functions for these protein kinases. Alternatively, they may be required for growth under conditions not examined in this study.
We have shown that single genome-wide expression signatures of individual mutants can be utilized to classify the protein kinases involved in oxidative stress and pheromone responses. Furthermore, it can effectively differentiate kinases that are involved in morphogenesis from those that do not play roles in this process. It is likely that the expression signature will reveal information about those kinases whose deletion mutants do not exhibit any detectable phenotype. The determination of expression signatures is potentially a very important approach for functional analysis of various protein kinase-mediated signaling pathways.
Eukaryotic protein kinase catalytic-domain-containing proteins are conserved from yeast to human. We have extracted 106 known and putative protein kinases from the entire S. pombe genome. Comparative analyses using mutual best-hit analysis and nearest-homolog analysis demonstrated that 44% and 64% of S. pombe protein kinases could be paired with their orthologues or nearest homologues in human, respectively (Fig. 2). Therefore, the study of protein kinase functions in fission yeast could promote our understanding of the biological functions of protein kinase-mediated signaling pathways in mammalian systems. We hope that our mutants and the results presented in this study will be useful to our colleagues in further elucidating protein kinase-mediated signaling pathways or networks in yeast as well as in higher eukaryotic systems. Our microarray data sets for expression signature of protein kinase mutants tested are available at http://giscompute.gis.a-star.edu.sg/
gisljh/kinome.
N.D.E. is a Doherty Fellow of the NHMRC. M.O. is a scholar of the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society. This work was supported by a NHMRC grant (114229) to M.O. The kinase gene deletions were constructed in the laboratory of M.K.B., with funds from the Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory, and the S. pombe microarray was generated in the laboratory of J.L. with funds from the Genome Institute of Singapore/the Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore (GIS/03-113402).
Please address strain requests to M.K.B. and queries relating to microarray to J.L.
* Corresponding author. Mailing address for Mohan K. Balasubramanian: Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory, 1 Research Link, The National University of Singapore, Singapore 117604. Phone: (65) 6872 7478. Fax: (65) 6872 7012. E-mail: mohan{at}tll.org.sg. Mailing address for Jianhua Liu: Genome Institute of Singapore, 60 Biopolis Street, no. 02-01, Singapore 138672. Phone: (65) 6478 8123. Fax: (65) 6478 9003. E-mail: liujh{at}gis.a-star.edu.sg. ![]()
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://ec.asm.org/. ![]()
A.B. and Y.J. contributed equally to this work. ![]()
Present address: Laboratoire de Virologie Moléculaire et Structural, CNRS, F-91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France. ![]()
¶ Present address: Department of Oncological Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1130, New York, NY 10029. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»