Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Eukaryotic Cell, August 2004, p. 919-931, Vol. 3, No. 4
1535-9778/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/EC.3.4.919-931.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Yukinobu Takagi,2,
Makiko Shinozaki,2 Cheol-Won Yun,3 Wiley A. Schell,4 John R. Perfect,4,5 Hidehiko Kumagai,1,2 and Hisanori Tamaki1,2*
Division of Applied Life Sciences, Graduate School of Agriculture,1 Division of Integrated Life Sciences, Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan,2 School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Anam-Dong, Sungbuk-ku, Seoul, South Korea,3 Departments of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology,4 Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina5
Received 6 March 2004/ Accepted 17 June 2004
|
|
|---|
subunit are required for hypha formation and morphogenesis in C. albicans. Mutants lacking Gpr1 (gpr1/gpr1) or Gpa2 (gpa2/gpa2) are defective in hypha formation and morphogenesis on solid hypha-inducing media. These phenotypic defects in solid cultures are suppressed by exogenously added dibutyryl-cyclic AMP (dibutyryl-cAMP). Biochemical studies also reveal that GPR1 and GPA2 are required for a glucose-dependent increase in cellular cAMP. An epistasis analysis indicates that Gpr1 functions upstream of Gpa2 in the same signaling pathway, and a two-hybrid assay reveals that the carboxyl-terminal tail of Gpr1 interacts with Gpa2. Moreover, expression levels of HWP1 and ECE1, which are cAMP-dependent hypha-specific genes, are reduced in both mutant strains. These findings support a model that Gpr1, as well as Gpa2, regulates hypha formation and morphogenesis in a cAMP-dependent manner. In contrast, GPR1 and GPA2 are not required for hypha formation in liquid fetal bovine serum (FBS) medium. Furthermore, the gpr1 and the gpa2 mutant strains are fully virulent in a mouse infection. These findings suggest that Gpr1 and Gpa2 are involved in the glucose-sensing machinery that regulates morphogenesis and hypha formation in solid media via a cAMP-dependent mechanism, but they are not required for hypha formation in liquid medium or during invasive candidiasis. |
|
|---|
subunit causes dissociation of the
subunit from the ß
complex, and either the free
subunit or the free ß
complex, or in some cases both, regulates downstream effectors. Then, GTP hydrolysis with its intrinsic GTPase activity promotes the reassociation of the heterotrimer and attenuation of signaling.
In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, two G
subunits, Gpa1 and Gpa2, have been characterized. Gpa1 regulates the mating response by coupling with Ste2 (
-factor receptor) and Ste3 (a-factor receptor) (26). In this pathway, the free ß
complex transmits the signal to a conserved mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase cascade (14, 42). In contrast, Gpa2 was shown to regulate the intracellular cyclic AMP (cAMP) level in response to glucose stimulation through interaction with a putative GPCR, Gpr1 (22, 32, 49). This signaling pathway is independent of the function of the small G protein, Ras2 (47), which regulates both the MAP kinase cascade and the cAMP signaling pathway. Recent genetic evidence suggests that this Gpr1-Gpa2 interaction controls the morphological transition from yeasts to pseudohyphae through the cAMP pathway in response to nutritional conditions (25, 31, 32, 45), and Gpr1 specifically appears to be a nutritional sensor in the pathway.
Candida albicans is a major fungal pathogen of humans and produces both irritating mucosal infections and life-threatening invasive disease. C. albicans can grow in several morphological forms, ranging from the yeasts to pseudohyphae to true hyphae. Many environmental conditions are known to induce the filamentous growth of C. albicans, and some of these inducers of hypha formation, such as mammalian serum, neutral pH, N-acetylglucosamine, nutrient deprivation, and temperature, have been characterized (36). However, the mechanism used by C. albicans to sense these environmental cues and create these morphogenetic changes is still unknown.
The strong molecular conservation between C. albicans and S. cerevisiae in many cellular processes and a genome sequencing program have enabled the identification of many signaling pathways and regulators involved in the hypha formation of these ascomycetes. Recent studies have revealed that the morphological switching in C. albicans is regulated by both the MAP kinase cascade and the cAMP pathway. Signaling proteins in these pathways, including the small G protein Ras1 (28), MAP kinases, Cek1 (12), Hst7 and Cst20 (21, 27), adenylate cyclase Cdc35 (38), and cAMP-dependent protein kinases Tpk1 and Tpk2 (6, 41), were shown to be well conserved in function with those of S. cerevisiae. These findings strongly suggest that the multiple signaling systems regulating hypha formation in C. albicans correspond to the signaling mechanisms controlling the morphological transition from the yeasts to pseudohyphae in S. cerevisiae. In the present study, we demonstrate that Gpr1 and Gpa2 regulate morphogenesis and hypha formation in C. albicans through the cAMP signaling pathway, but they are not associated with the virulence composite of this pathogen.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Yeast strains used in this study
|
5.7-kb fragment by HindIII digestion that hybridized with the probe (data not shown). Genomic DNA was then digested with HindIII, and a genomic library was constructed in the pUC19 cloning vector. The GPR1 gene was isolated by colony hybridization. A plasmid pMS30 carrying the 5.7-kb HindIII fragment containing the GPR1 gene was subjected to DNA sequencing. The nucleotide sequence has been deposited in the GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ database under accession number AB084519. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Oligonucleotides used in this study
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Plasmids used in this study
|
The promoter region of ADH1 of C. albicans was also amplified by PCR with primers ADH1-NdeI+ and ADH1-NdeI to introduce a NdeI site and then inserted into the SmaI site of pUC19 to obtain the plasmid pHT229.
A 0.7-kb sequence of the 5' region of GPR1 ORF was amplified by PCR with primers GPR1-2+ and GPR1-2 to introduce a NdeI site at the start codon, digested with NdeI and PstI, and then ligated into pUC19. The resultant plasmid was digested with NdeI, and the NdeI fragment from pHT229 containing the ADH1 promoter was inserted to form ADH1prGPR1-5'/19. A 3.2-kb PstI-SphI fragment containing the 3' region of GPR1 from pMS30 was inserted into the PstI-SphI site of pHT229, the resultant plasmid was digested with PstI, and then a 0.3-kb PstI fragment from ADH1prGPR1-5'/19 was inserted to form ADH1prGPR1/19. An HindIII fragment containing the URA3 gene from pCaU1 was ligated into pUC19 to form pHT225, and a KpnI-SphI fragment containing ADH1prGPR1 was ligated into pHT225 to form pHT231. A 1.4-kb fragment containing the TRP1 gene was amplified by PCR with the primers TRP1+ and TRP1 and inserted into the KpnI (blunted) site of pHT225, pHT256, pHT231, and EcoRI (blunted) site of pUC19 (NdeI) to generate pHT244, pHT257, pHT232, and pHT258, respectively.
The 5.7-kb HindIII fragment containing the GPR1 gene and the 5.6-kb HindIII fragment containing the GPA2 gene were inserted into the HindIII site of pHT258 to obtain pYT098 and pYT099, respectively. A 1.1-kb HindIII (blunted) fragment containing URA3 from pCaU1 was also inserted into the BamHI-SacI site (blunted) of pYT098 and pYT099 to form pYT100 and pYT101, respectively.
The vectors pAS2-1 and pACT2 for the two-hybrid assay were purchased from Clontech. Plasmids for examining the interaction between Gpr1 and Gpa2 were constructed as follows. The fragment encoding the third cytoplasmic loop of Gpr1 (residues 301 to 433) was amplified by PCR with the primers GPR1-3+ and GPR1-3 to introduce NcoI and BamHI sites, and cloned into the SmaI site of pUC19. This NcoI-BamHI fragment was cloned into the NcoI-BamHI site of pAS2-1 to yield the plasmid pYT025. The fragment encoding the carboxyl-terminal tail of Gpr1 (residues 660 to 823) was amplified by PCR with primers GPR1-4+ and GPR1-4 to introduce NcoI and BamHI sites and cloned into the SmaI site of pUC19. The NcoI-BamHI fragment was cloned into the NcoI-BamHI sites of pAS2-1 to yield the plasmid pYT029. To obtain pYT030 for the expression of the GAL4 binding protein fused with the full Gpa2, a 2-kb NcoI-AflII (blunted) fragment from pHT200 was inserted into the NcoI-SmaI site of pACT2.
Strain construction. The deletion of GPR1 alleles in strain CAI4 (15) was carried out by homologous recombination by a multiple-step procedure. To disrupt one of the GPR1 genes, pMS58 was linearized by SpeI digestion and transformed into C. albicans strain CAI4. Ura prototroph strains were selected on SD (Ura) medium, and integration of the hisG-URA3-hisG cassette into the GPR1 allele was confirmed by PCR. To remove the URA3 gene by intrachromosomal hisG recombination, a small number of the transformed cells were spread onto SD medium containing 0.01% uridine and 0.1% 5'-fluoroorotic acid, and viable colonies were further analyzed by Southern blot analysis to obtain the strain TCA05. The other functional GPR1 gene was disrupted by repeating the same procedure to create a gpr1/gpr1 strain (TCA07). To delete the GPA2 genes, we carried out homologous recombination with a multiple-step procedure as described above with SphI-digested pTM247. As a result of the first recombination, we produced a GPA2/gpa2 strain (TCA08), and a gpa2/gpa2 strain (TCA12) was obtained after the second recombination. To create GPR1-overexpressing strains YTC014, YTC104, and YTC020, the plasmid pHT232 was digested with KpnI to linearize it and then introduced into strains CAI4, TCA07, and TCA12, respectively. Also, CAI4, TCA07, and TCA12 were transformed with pHT257 digested with KpnI to produce strains HTC7, YTC100, and HTC12, respectively, which overexpress the constitutively activated allele of the GPA2 gene. Strains CAI4, TCA05, TCA07, TCA08, and TCA12 were transformed with KpnI-digested pHT244, which integrates the URA3 gene into the TRP1 locus, to obtain YTC028, YTC068, YTC049, YTC072, and YTC032, respectively.
For the complementation test, the gpr1/gpr1 mutant (TCA07) and the gpa2/gpa2 mutant (TCA12) strains were transformed with KpnI-digested pYT100 and pYT101, which contained GPR1 and GPA2 genes with their native promoter, to obtain YTC108 and YTC109, respectively.
Microscopy. Hypha formation in embedded conditions and cell morphology in liquid culture were examined by using x4 and x40 objective lenses, respectively, with a BX51 phase-contrast microscope (Olympus), and images were obtained with an Evolution LC digital camera system (Media Cybernetics). Colonial morphology was examined by using a VH-8000 Digital HF microscope with a VH-Z05 x5-40 zoom lens (Keyence). Photographed images were processed by using Adobe Photoshop 7.0.
cAMP assay. The procedure to determine the intracellular cAMP levels was as described previously (49). Briefly, C. albicans cells were inoculated in YPD at an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.1, grown at 30°C for 24 h, and then washed once with water and once with MES buffer (10 mM MES [morpholineethanesulfonic acid] containing 0.1 mM EDTA; pH 6). Cells were suspended with MES buffer to an OD600 of 8 and then incubated for 2 h at 30°C. Glucose was added to a final concentration of 2%, and 500-µl aliquots were taken from the culture before and after glucose addition at the indicated time points. Samples were transferred to 2-ml microcentrifuge tubes containing 0.5 g of glass beads and 500 µl of 10% trichloroacetic acid, briefly vortexed, and frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen. The samples were thawed on ice and sonicated under chilled conditions (twice at 130 W for 2.5 min) by using an INSONATOR 201 M (Kubota). After centrifugation, trichloroacetic acid was extracted four times with water-saturated ether. The cAMP content was measured with the BIOTRAK cAMP enzyme immunoassay system (Amersham Biosciences) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Two-hybrid assay.
To examine the interactions between Gpr1 and Gpa2, a two-hybrid assay was performed by using MATCHMAKER Two-Hybrid System2 (Clontech). S. cerevisiae strain PJ69-4Aa/
(19) was cotransformed with plasmids in which the GAL4 activation domain or GAL4 binding domain was fused with Gpa2 or Gpr1 as shown in Table 2. Transformants were selected on SD (Leu Trp) medium. The interaction of the proteins was examined by both Ade prototrophy and a ß-galactosidase assay.
Northern blot analysis. C. albicans strains were grown under the indicated conditions, and total RNA was isolated by using a FastRNA Kit-Red (Bio 101). Each RNA sample was separated by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel containing formaldehyde and blotted onto a Hybond-N+ membrane (Amersham Biosciences) by capillary action. Hybridization and washing were performed as described previously (45). DNA probes for HWP1, ECE1, and ACT1 were amplified by PCR with the primers HWP1±, ECE1±, and ACT1±, respectively (Table 3). Each probe was purified with a Wizard SV column (Promega) and labeled with [32P]dATP by using a Strip-EZ DNA random priming kit (Ambion).
Virulence studies.
The virulence of the gpr1/gpr1 or the gpa2/gpa2 mutant strains was tested in a murine tail vein injection model. Strains were grown overnight in Sabouraud agar, and a light suspension of each was made in Sabouraud broth. One drop of this suspension was added to 50 ml of Sabouraud broth, which was then shaken at 250 rpm overnight at 35°C. Cells were washed three times, resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline, and counted with a hemocytometer. ICR outbred mice were inoculated by tail vein injection with
3 x 106 blastospores. There were 10 mice in each group; the groups included animals injected with YTC028, YTC049, YTC068, YTC032, YTC072, and HTC7 strains and were observed for survival. All mice were observed twice daily, and any animal that displayed lethargy or an inability to maintain grooming was sacrificed.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (63K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Predicted two-dimensional model of C. albicans Gpr1. Closed circles indicate identical amino acids, and shaded circles indicate conserved amino acids compared to S. cerevisiae Gpr1. The amino acid positions of the transmembrane regions are as follows: 100 to 122, 135 to 157, 177 to 199, 220 to 242, 264 to 286, 439 to 458, and 473 to 495. The secondary structure of Gpr1 was analyzed by using TMHMM (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/).
|
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Deletions of GPR1 and GPA2 in C. albicans. (A) Restriction endonuclease map of GPR1. The white rectangle indicates the coding region of the gene. The predicted transmembrane regions (gray boxes), the third intracellular loop (3IL), and the cytoplasmic tail (CT) are indicated. The black box shows the amplified region of the probe for Southern blot analysis. (B) Restriction endonuclease map of GPA2. The white rectangle indicates the coding region of the gene. The amplified fragments of the probe for Southern blot analysis and the construction of the gene disruption cassette are indicated by the black box and the gray rectangle, respectively. (C) Southern blot analysis of wild-type and mutant strains. The genomic DNA samples were prepared from strains CAI4 (wild type; lanes 1 and 4), TCA05 (GPR1/gpr1; lane 2), TCA07 (gpr1/gpr1; lane 3), TCA08 (GPA2/gpa2; lane 5), and TCA12 (gpr1/gpr1; lane 6); digested with SpeI (left) or EcoRI (right); and probed with the GPR1 (left) or GPA2 (right) DNA fragment described above.
|
![]() View larger version (68K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Defects in morphogenesis and hypha formation under solid or embedded conditions caused by deletion of the GPR1 and GPA2 genes. The wild-type strain YTC028 (WT), an isogenic strain with both alleles of GPR1 (YTC049; gpr1/gpr1) or of GPA2 (YTC032; gpa2/gpa2) deleted, and mutant strains with restored corresponding genes (YTC108 [gpr1/gpr1+GPR1] and YTC109 [gpa2/gpa2+GPA2]) were grown on solid YPD medium containing 10% FBS or solid Spider medium at 37°C for 7 days or grown in YPS agar matrix (Embedded) at 25°C for 54 h. The mutant strains (YTC049 [gpr1/gpr1] and YTC032 [gpa2/gpa2]) were also grown with the same medium containing 10 mM dbcAMP.
|
![]() View larger version (101K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Defects in hypha formation in the liquid medium caused by deletion of the GPR1 and GPA2 alleles. The wild-type strain YTC028 and the isogenic strain with both alleles of GPR1 (YTC049; gpr1/gpr1) or of GPA2 (YTC032; gpa2/gpa2) deleted were grown in liquid YPD medium containing 10% FBS at 37°C for 2 h or grown in liquid Spider medium either at 37°C for 2 h or at 30°C for 6 h.
|
![]() View larger version (102K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Epistasis analysis of GPR1 and GPA2. The wild-type (CAI4), gpr1/gpr1 (TCA07), and gpa2/gpa2 (TCA12) strains were transformed with the integration vector pHT244 containing the URA3 gene (control), pHT257 expressing the hyperactive GPA2Q355L allele under the control of the ADH1 promoter, or pHT232 expressing GPR1 under the control of the ADH1 promoter. The resulting strains were grown in embedded conditions at 25°C for 2 days.
|
![]() View larger version (42K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. A carboxyl-terminal region of Gpr1 interacts with Gpa2. S. cerevisiae two-hybrid strain PJ69-4Aa/ expressing BD-Gpr1 (301-433) or BD-Gpr1 (660-823) and AD-Gpa2 was grown on SD+ Ura+ Met+ His+ medium (Ade) for 5 days at 30°C and then tested for ß-galactosidase activity (ß-gal). Control growth was on SD+ Ura+ Met+ His+ medium containing Ade. BD, DNA-binding domain of Gal4; AD, activating domain of Gal4.
|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Gpr1 and Gpa2 are required for the glucose-dependent cAMP spike. The wild type (YTC028 []), gpr1/gpr1 mutant (YTC049 [ ]) and gpa2/gpa2 mutant (YTC032 [ ]) were grown in YPD medium for 24 h. Cells were washed and incubated in MES buffer at 30°C for 2 h and starved for glucose. Subsequently, glucose was added to a final concentration of 2%, and samples were taken at the indicated time points prior to (0 min) or after the addition of glucose and subjected to cAMP assay as described in Materials and Methods. Samples were assayed in duplicate and averaged. Error bars indicate the standard deviations for three experiments.
|
When cells were grown in liquid FBS medium, mostly the same expression level of hypha-specific genes, HWP1 and ECE1, was observed in both wild-type and mutant strains (Fig. 8). This result is in good agreement with our observation that strong hypha formation was observed in both wild-type and mutant strains in the liquid FBS medium (Fig. 4). In the liquid Spider medium, although a high expression level of HWP1 and ECE1 was observed in wild-type and gpr1 mutant strains, it was slightly reduced in the gpa2 mutant strain (Fig. 8). Again, this result correlates with our observation that the gpa2 mutant strain shows an apparent defect in hypha formation in liquid Spider medium at 37°C, whereas the gpr1 mutant does not (Fig. 4).
![]() View larger version (39K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Hypha-specific gene expression. Total RNA from the wild type (YTC028), the gpr1/gpr1 mutant (YTC049), and the gpa2/gpa2 mutant (YTC032) under various growth conditions was probed with HWP1, ECE1, and ACT1. For liquid cultures, cells were grown in either YPD, YPD plus 10% FBS, or Spider medium at 37°C for 2 h. For solid cultures, cells were grown on agar plates of YPD, YPD+FBS, or Spider medium at 37°C for 3 days. HWP1 and ECE1 were used as hypha-specific genes. ACT1 was used as an internal control. (A) Northern blot for wild-type and gpr1/gpr1 mutant strains. (B) The level of HWP1 and ECE1 transcripts under the indicated growth conditions in wild-type ( ) and gpr1/gpr1 mutant ( ) and gpa2/gpa2 mutant (
|
Gpr1 and Gpa2 are not required for virulence in C. albicans. Our observation that Gpr1, as well as Gpa2, is required for morphological switching on solid and liquid Spider media but not in the liquid FBS medium led us to examine whether the Gpr1-Gpa2 signaling pathway is required for the virulence composite of C. albicans. We used an isogenic series of prototrophic mutants lacking one or both alleles of either the GPR1 or GPA2 gene or the mutant that overexpressed the constitutively activated allele of GPA2 under the control of the ADH1 promoter (ADH1prGPA2Q355L). Virulence studies were performed in mice with the wild-type strain (YTC028), the gpr1/gpr1 mutant strain (YTC049), the GPR1/gpr1 mutant strain (YTC068), the gpa2/gpa2 mutant strain (YTC032), the GPA2/gpa2 mutant strain (YTC072), or the ADH1prGPA2Q355L mutant strain (HTC7).
About 70% of the mice infected with the wild-type C. albicans strain succumbed to lethal infection by day 11 postinfection. The mice infected with mutant strains lacking either one or both alleles of GPR1 or GPA2 showed mostly the same survival rate as the wild-type strain (Fig. 9). These results indicate that GPR1 and GPA2 were not required for virulence in C. albicans in this invasive infection model. This result is well correlated with our findings that Gpr1 and Gpa2 were not required for FBS-induced hypha formation, as well as hypha-specific gene expression in the liquid FBS medium (Fig. 4 and 8). On the other hand, the ADH1prGPA2Q355L strain showed significantly reduced virulence. Of 10 animals infected with the ADH1prGPA2Q355L mutant strain, 7 survived until the experiment was terminated on day 20 postinfection. Our result that the ADH1prGPA2Q355L mutant had increased ability in hypha formation under embedded conditions but showed reduced virulence led us to examine the growth rate and hypha formation of the mutant strain in the presence of FBS.
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. Gpr1 and Gpa2 were not required for the virulence of C. albicans. The wild-type strain YTC028 (WT [ ]), the gpr1/gpr1 mutant YTC049 ( ), the GPR1/gpr1 mutant YTC068 ( ), the gpa2/gpa2 mutant YTC032 ( 10 mice each by lateral tail vein injection, and survival was monitored over time.
|
![]() View larger version (47K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 10. The ADH1prGPA2Q355L mutant strain showed an apparent delay in hypha formation in FBS medium. The wild-type and ADH1prGPA2Q355L mutant cells were pregrown in YPD medium at30°C overnight, transferred to the liquid FBS or YPD medium, and allowed to grow at 37°C. At the appropriate time point after transfer to FBS or YPD medium, the growth rate was monitored by measuring the absorbance at 600 nm (A), and the cell morphology in FBS medium was observed under a microscope (B).
|
|
|
|---|
subunit, regulates morphogenesis in C. albicans through a cAMP-dependent mechanism. We showed that the mutations in both GPR1 and GPA2 produced defects in hypha formation and morphogenesis in C. albicans and that these defects were reversed by exogenous addition of dbcAMP (Fig. 3). We also demonstrated that GPR1 and GPA2 are required for a glucose-dependent increase in cAMP. Epistasis analysis revealed that Gpa2 acts downstream of Gpr1, and two-hybrid analysis showed binding between the C-terminal tail of Gpr1 and Gpa2. Moreover, Northern analysis revealed that the expression level of cAMP-regulated genes was reduced in the mutant strains; taken together, these data present a compelling case that Gpr1 and Gpa2 interact as a signaling complex through a cAMP pathway and regulate morphogenesis and hypha formation in C. albicans. The impact of growth medium on this pathway for morphogenesis is clear. When grown on solid media that induce hypha formation, the gpr1 and the gpa2 mutant strains had dramatically reduced changes in morphogenesis, and in liquid Spider medium a reduced level of hypha formation was observed. In contrast, the difference in hypha formation between the wild type and mutant strain was not very clear in liquid FBS medium (Fig. 4), suggesting that the Gpr1-Gpa2 signaling pathway is specifically not required for FBS-induced hypha formation in a liquid medium. Recently, the roles in morphogenesis of two cAMP-dependent protein kinase isoforms, Tpk1 and Tpk2, have been examined (6). The tpk2 mutant did not show a major defect in hyphal morphogenesis on solid medium at 37°C, although a slight defect was observed at lower temperatures. In contrast, the tpk1 mutant was morphologically defective on both solid Spider and FBS media. In the liquid FBS and Spider media, tpk1 mutants showed mostly the same degree of hypha formation as the wild-type strain, whereas tpk2 mutants showed markedly reduced hyphal growth. Based on these findings, it was suggested that Tpk1 is required for morphogenesis mainly on solid hypha-inducing media, whereas Tpk2 plays important roles in hypha formation in liquid media (6). Since both the gpr1 and the gpa2 mutant strains showed defects in morphogenesis on solid media but normal hypha formation in liquid FBS medium, we hypothesize that the Gpr1-Gpa2 signaling pathway regulates hypha formation and morphogenesis through Tpk1 and not Tpk2.
Environmental stimuli, such as pH, temperature, serum, and nutrition, have been shown to prominently affect the hypha formation in C. albicans (36). A serum factor has been shown to be a strong hyphal inducer for C. albicans. Although previously the cAMP signaling pathway was reported to be required for FBS-activated hypha formation, our results showed that Gpr1 and Gpa2 were not required for FBS-induced hypha formation in the liquid medium and excluded FBS as an environmental stimulus that activates the Gpr1-Gpa2 signaling pathway. However, a difference in colony morphology and hypha formation was observed in the mutant strains grown on Spider medium, and this finding suggests that other nutrients might be candidates for the external signal. In fact, we found that both Gpr1 and Gpa2 are required for a glucose-dependent cAMP spike in C. albicans (Fig. 7), and thus glucose is the signal that activates morphological switching through the Gpr1-Gpa2 pathway. However, we could also see clear morphological differences when cells were embedded in the YPS agar with sucrose also as a carbon source (Fig. 3 and 5). Since previous studies indicated that the Gpr1-Gpa2 signaling pathway is also activated by other fermentable sugars such as fructose (32, 49), maltose (49), and sucrose (32) in S. cerevisiae, it is quite possible that sucrose activates this pathway in C. albicans.
The Gpr1-Gpa2 signaling pathway is conserved in both the budding yeast S. cerevisiae and the fission yeast S. pombe. In S. cerevisiae, this pathway was shown to regulate pseudohyphal development, as well as invasive growth (25, 31, 32, 45), suggesting that a similar regulating mechanism may exist in C. albicans. We have also shown that this pathway regulates glucose-dependent cell size in S. cerevisiae (unpublished data). In the fission yeast, many genes, including homologues of Gpr1 (git3) and Gpa2 (gpa2/git8), have been identified by analyzing mutations in the genes that confer the constitutive expression of the fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase gene fbp1 (18, 46). The mutation of these git (for glucose-insensitive transcription) genes was shown to derepress fbp1 transcription, starvation-independent conjugation and sporulation, and shortening of the major axis, all of which can be suppressed by exogenous cAMP (11, 17).
The cAMP pathway is also conserved in pathogenic fungi. Cryptococcus neoformans is one of the most common opportunistic pathogens infecting AIDS patients (33) in the human central nervous system. In C. neoformans, G
Gpa1 was shown to regulate mating and the production of a virulence factor via a cAMP-dependent mechanism (2), and the involvement of PKA was also shown (13). In the plant pathogen Ustilago maydis, the homologous G
protein Gpa3 controls the cAMP signaling that is necessary for growth as a budding yeast, and dominant activation of Gpa3 impairs virulence (23, 24, 37). Despite the conserved cAMP signaling pathway related to pathogenicity, the receptor coupled with these G
subunits has not yet been identified in these pathogenic fungi. In the present study, we present evidence that the Gpr1-Gpa2 signaling pathway regulates morphogenesis and hypha formation through the cAMP pathway in C. albicans, but virulence is not affected by this pathway.
The morphological change has been associated with virulence in C. albicans. Early studies on a morphogenesis-deficient mutant in C. albicans suggested the importance of the hyphal form, since mutants unable to form filaments are avirulent (30, 44). However, characterization of the tup1 mutant, which is constitutively filamentous but also avirulent (7, 8), has indicated that the ability to switch from the yeast to hyphal form is probably critical for virulence (16). A recent study using C. albicans cells in which the NRG1 gene (a negative regulator of filamentation) was expressed under the control of a tetracycline-regulatable promoter revealed distinct roles for yeast and filamentous forms during infection (34). Our result that Gpr1 and Gpa2 are not required for virulence in C. albicans is consistent with our findings that they are not required for FBS-induced hypha formation in liquid medium (Fig. 4). The ADH1prGPA2Q355L mutant strain showed an apparent delay in hypha formation in the liquid FBS medium despite enhanced hypha formation when embedded in the agar matrix. These observations suggest that there may be at least two independent signaling pathways: one that regulates filamentation in liquid FBS medium and one that regulates filamentation in the embedded condition. The mechanism of the delay in FBS-induced hypha formation in the mutant strain is unclear, but this delay may explain why this mutant strain showed reduced virulence.
This study was supported by a grant-in-aid for scientific research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan and the New Energy and Industrial Technology Department Organization. Y.T. is supported by the 21st Century COE Program of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology.
T.M. and Y.T. contributed equally to this study. ![]()
|
|
|---|
, the git5 Gß and the git3 putative glucose receptor. Genetics 156:513-521.
subunit and functions in a Ras-independent pathway. EMBO J. 17:1996-2007.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»