Eukaryotic Cell, April 2004, p. 564-566, Vol. 3, No. 2
1535-9778/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/EC.3.2.564-566.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas CSIC/UAM, 28029 Madrid, Spain,1 Cell and Developmental Biology, Division of Biology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California 920932
Received 13 November 2003/ Accepted 12 January 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Microarrays containing 6,345 D. discoideum cDNA clones (9), including 690 previously characterized developmental genes and 5,655 cDNA clones from the Japanese EST Project (12), were used to identify genes dependent on SrfA for their expression. With Trizol reagent (Gibco BRL), RNAs were isolated from wild-type (AX4) and srfA (IIB100, derived from AX4) strains at 2-h intervals throughout development on filters (16) and compared to time-averaged RNA from wild-type cells, as previously described (9). Temporal changes for each gene were analyzed in an Axon Genepix 4000B scanner with GeneSpring software from Silicon Genetics. The total Cy3 signal was normalized to the total Cy5 signal after background subtraction to allow independent slides to be compared. The Cy3/Cy5 ratios of individual genes were then calculated. Each sample was hybridized to two or more microarrays, and each developmental time course was repeated at least twice. A list of the genes and mean values used for subsequent analyses are available at http://www.biology.ucsd.edu/loomis-cgi/microarray/paper2.html (see Tables S1 and S2 in the supplemental material).
Genes that were expressed at lower levels in the mutant cells than in wild-type cells were all induced after 20 h of development. Therefore, RNAs from the two last developmental stages of each strain (22 and 24 h for wild-type cells and 26 and 28 h for srfA cells, due to a slight delay in culmination observed in the mutant strain [6]) were directly compared to each other. Microarrays were simultaneously hybridized with Cy3 and Cy5 probes generated from wild-type and srfA strains, respectively. Thirty genes showed a more-than-threefold higher signal level with wild-type samples than with mutant samples and were considered candidates for SrfA-dependent genes. Microarray data are publically available at http://www.biology.ucsd.edu/loomis-cgi/microarray/srfA_paper.html (see Table S3 in the supplemental material).
The pattern of expression of the potential SrfA-dependent genes was further analyzed by Northern blot hybridization as previously described (5). Twenty-two genes were confirmed to be SrfA dependent (Fig. 1 and 2). The cDNA clones have been grouped according to their temporal pattern of expression. The expression of the first group of 11 genes, shown in Fig. 1 and Table 1, is detected exclusively during culmination in wild-type cells. The expression of the second group of 11 genes, shown in Fig. 2 and Table 1, is detected at low levels at earlier stages and induced at high levels during culmination. This late induction was not observed in srfA strains. As a control, we analyzed several genes that are expressed late in development but did not give higher signals for wild-type samples than for srfA samples on the microarrays, including the well-characterized prespore-specific gene pspA (1, 2). Northern blot analyses confirmed these results (data not shown). We also determined the cell type specificity of these genes by interrogating the published microarray data for separated prestalk and prespore cells (10, 11). Ten of the SrfA-dependent genes are preferentially enriched in prespore cells and spores, while three are preferentially expressed in prestalk and stalk cells (Table 1).
![]() View larger version (71K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Developmental expression of SrfA-dependent genes expressed only late in development. Total RNA was isolated from wild-type (AX4) or srfA-null cells at the indicated times of development (hours). After electrophoretic separation and transfer to nylon membranes, each blot was hybridized to a PCR probe corresponding to the cDNA indicated on the left. The right column indicates the ratio of the signal on microarrays from AX4 cells at 22 and 24 h of development to that from srfA cells at 26 and 28 h of development.
|
![]() View larger version (61K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Developmental expression of SrfA-dependent genes that are expressed early in development and up-regulated late in development. Total RNA was isolated from wild-type (AX4) or srfA-null cells at the indicated times of development (hours). Northern blots were hybridized to the cDNA probe indicated on the left. The right column indicates the ratio of the signal on microarrays from AX4 cells at 22 and 24 h of development to that from srfA cells at 26 and 28 h of development for each gene.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Possible functions of the proteins encoded by SrfA-dependent genesa
|
, which is required for regulation of spore germination (18). cofB codes for cofilin B, which associates with the actin rods in mature spores (15). Absence of actin rods results in round spores with very low viability. Spores deficient in SpiA show decreased viability under submerged conditions (14). Null mutations in malA, sigB, sigC, or sigD cause no apparent defects in spores (3). The other SrfA-dependent genes can be clustered on the basis of putative function of their closest homologs (Table 1). Possible functions include stress responses, actin cytoskeleton organization, metabolic regulation, prespore vesicle fusion, and spore coat stability. In summary, a total of 24 SrfA-dependent genes have been identified, all of which are expressed late in development. No genes differentially expressed in slug or mid-culmination structures were found, even if srfA is expressed at these developmental stages (6). In addition, these studies have uncovered a novel program of gene expression that is activated late in Dictyostelium development. Thirty-nine genes were found that increased their expression at least threefold between 22 and 24 h of development. A significant proportion of these genes are dependent on SrfA for their expression and might be involved in many of the processes required for terminal spore differentiation.
This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (GM62350) and the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología (BMC2002-01501).
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://ec.asm.org/. ![]()
|
|
|---|
regulates germination of Dictyostelium spores. BMC Cell Biol. 2:25-31.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»