Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Eukaryotic Cell, April 2004, p. 527-535, Vol. 3, No. 2
1535-9778/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/EC.3.2.527-535.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Plant Pathology, University of WisconsinMadison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
Received 5 November 2003/ Accepted 16 December 2003
|
|
|---|
laeA) blocks the expression of metabolic gene clusters, including the sterigmatocystin (carcinogen), penicillin (antibiotic), and lovastatin (antihypercholesterolemic agent) gene clusters. Conversely, overexpression of laeA triggers increased penicillin and lovastatin gene transcription and subsequent product formation. laeA expression is negatively regulated by AflR, a sterigmatocystin Zn2Cys6 transcription factor, in a unique feedback loop, as well as by two signal transduction elements, protein kinase A and RasA. Although these last two proteins also negatively regulate sporulation,
laeA strains show little difference in spore production compared to the wild type, indicating that the primary role of LaeA is to regulate metabolic gene clusters. |
|
|---|
A large number of known fungal secondary metabolites have been ascribed to the Ascomycete genus Aspergillus. Studies of Aspergillus nidulans have demonstrated the power of using a model system to elucidate the biochemistry and molecular genetics of fungal secondary metabolism, principally penicillin (PN, an antibiotic) and sterigmatocystin (ST, a carcinogen biochemically related to the agricultural contaminant aflatoxin) biosynthesis (6, 17). These studies have established several characteristics of fungal secondary metabolism, including the clustering of biosynthetic and regulatory genes and a genetic connection linking secondary metabolite biosynthesis with sporulation through a shared signal transduction pathway (9).
The discovery of the G protein-cyclic AMP (cAMP)-protein kinase A regulation of ST, aflatoxin, and other fungal secondary metabolites (4, 17, 29, 34) has been helpful for establishing a model of global regulation of secondary metabolism. However, all of the signal transduction mutants described in the literature have pleiotropic effects on fungi, the most notable effect being the gross impact on spore production and vegetative hyphal growth (1, 9, 18, 29). Similarly, mutations in other major regulators of ST biosynthesis, such as RcoA, a WD protein (19), and SpdA, or spermidine synthase (20), also have gross effects on fungal morphology. Thus, currently available Aspergillus mutants are so impaired in fungal development that further elucidation of genes that are specific for the regulation of secondary metabolism is difficult.
In a previous mutagenesis hunt, 23 A. nidulans mutants that displayed a phenotype of loss of ST production but had normal sporulation were isolated (8). Here we describe the identification of a gene called laeA that complements one of these mutants. laeA encodes a nuclear protein that is required for the expression of secondary metabolite genes. We propose that LaeA is a regulator of secondary metabolism in Aspergillus, as it is required not only for ST biosynthesis but also for PN biosynthesis and the biosynthesis of mycelial pigments in A. nidulans and gliotoxin and mycelial pigments in Aspergillus fumigatus. Furthermore, this protein is required for expression of the heterologous lovastatin (LOV) gene cluster in A. nidulans as well as for native LOV expression in Aspergillus terreus. Interestingly, the protein appears to be conserved in filamentous fungi, but it is not present in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a fungus devoid of secondary metabolites. Unlike other genes that regulate secondary metabolism, the loss of laeA has a negligible impact on morphological developmental processes.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Fungal strains used for this study
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Primers
|
Construction of transformation vectors and strains.
Plasmids were generated by standard techniques, and the primers used for this study are listed in Table 2. Pfu Turbo (Stratagene) was used for PCRs. The A. nidulans disruption plasmid pJW34 was constructed by ligating a 1.2-kb DNA fragment upstream of the laeA start codon (primers LAE1 and LA2) and a 1.2-kb DNA fragment downstream of the laeA stop codon (primers LA3 and LAE2) to either side of the methG gene in the pUG11-41 vector (31). The 5'-end PCR product and 3'-end PCR product were inserted into the SacI site and HindIII site of pUG11-41, respectively, by blunt end ligation. pJW34 was used to disrupt the laeA gene (
laeA) in strain TJH3.40 to create TJW35.5. TJW35.5 was subsequently sexually crossed to RDIT2.1 to create RJW46.4. Plasmid pJW47.4 was constructed to overexpress laeA from the alcA promoter. The 2.5-kb coding sequence of laeA was amplified with primers OEF and OER and ligated into the HindIII site of pCN2, which contains the 5' half of the trpC gene and the alcA promoter (19). This resulted in an alcAp::laeA fusion, referred to as OE::laeA hereafter. pJW47.4 was used to transform RJW32 to tryptophan auxotrophy to yield the strain TJW44.39. TJW44.39 was subsequently sexually crossed to RDIT2.1 to create RJW47.3. pJW47.4 and a hygromycin B (hygB) resistance gene in plasmid pUCH2-8 (3) were used for cotransformation to introduce the overexpression laeA construct into A. terreus ATCC 20542. Transformants were selected in hygromycin B (500 µg/ml)-containing medium and confirmed by PCR and Southern hybridization. Five transformants, namely TJW58.2, TJW58.4, TJW58.7, TJW58.8, and TJW58.14, containing hygB and OE::laeA, were examined for LOV production, and TJW58.9 containing hygB alone was used as a control (Table 1). pJW45.4, containing a wild-type copy of the laeA gene, was used to complement the
laeA strain RJW33.2. pJW45.4 was created by ligating the 3-kb laeA gene (primers MT1 and OER) into the HindIII site of pSH96. pSH96 contains the 5' half of the trpC gene (39). RJW33.2 is a sexual progeny of a cross between strains TJW35.5 and RJW3. pJW45.4 was used to transform RJW33.2 to produce TJW42.7. TJW42.7 was crossed with RDIT7.24 sexually to create RJW49.1. Plasmids pJW48 and pJW49 were created to visualize LaeA by fusing of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene (10, 13) to the N-terminal and C-terminal ends, respectively, of LaeA. pJW48 was made by ligating the 0.7-kb gfp gene (primers GF1 and GF2) to the 5' end of the 2.5-kb encoding region of the laeA gene (primers GF3 and OER) and then inserting the ligated fragment into the pCN2 HindIII site to yield an alcAp::gfp::laeA chimera. pJW49 was constructed by consecutively ligating a 2-kb laeA coding region (primers OEF and GFP2), a 0.7-kb gfp gene (primers GFP31 and GFP4), and a 0.5-kb laeA termination cassette (primers GFP5 and OER) into the HindIII site of pCN2 to yield an alcAp::laeA::gfp::laeAterm chimera. pJW48 and pJW49 were used to transform RJW32 to yield transformants TJW46.16 (5' GFP) and TJW47.9 (3' GFP), respectively. The A. fumigatus laeA gene disruption vector, pJW58, was constructed by insertion of a 0.9-kb DNA fragment upstream of the laeA start codon (primers FUM1 and FUM2) and a 1.0-kb DNA fragment downstream of the laeA stop codon (primers FUM3 and FUM4) on either side of the Aspergillus parasiticus pyrG marker gene obtained from pBZ5 (32). pJW58 was used to disrupt the A. fumigatus laeA gene in strain AF293.1 to create strain TJW54.2.
Fungal transformation procedures. Fungal transformation was done essentially as described by Miller et al. (24), with the modification of embedding the protoplasts in top agar (0.75%) rather than spreading them by a glass rod on solid medium.
Secondary metabolite analysis.
Published procedures were used to extract and analyze ST (12), gliotoxin (5), LOV (21), and monocolin J (MONJ) (21). All metabolites were extracted with chloroform from both mycelial and culture filtrates. MONJ and LOV concentrations in each strain were estimated by comparisons to standard spots on thin-layer chromatography (TLC) plates by dilution spotting. Pictures of TLC plates were taken at 254 nm. ST was extracted from either 50-ml shake cultures in GMM inoculated with 107 spores/ml and grown for 60 h or solid medium cultures spread with 106 spores/plate and grown for 5 days. Dried ST extracts were resuspended in 100 µl of chloroform, and 10 µl was separated in chloroform-acetone (8:2) on TLC plates. ST (Sigma) was spotted as a standard. MONJ was extracted from 50-ml GMM shake cultures inoculated with 107 spores/ml and grown for 72 h. MONJ from WT/lov+ and OE::laeA/lov+ strains was extracted from cultures grown in 50 ml of shaking liquid GMM for 14 h at 37°C and then transferred to shaking liquid TMM for 24 h. Dried MONJ extracts were resuspended in 100 µl of methanol, and 10 µl was separated in methanol-0.1% phosphoric acid (9:1) on C18 reversed-phase TLC plates. The MONJ standard was extracted from A. nidulans strain WMH1739 (Table 1). All experiments were performed in triplicate. Gliotoxin production in A. fumigatus was analyzed by modification of the TLC method of Belkacemi et al. (5). Gliotoxin was extracted from 50-ml GMM shake cultures inoculated with 107 spores/ml and grown for 3 days. Dried chloroform extracts were resuspended in 100 µl of methanol, and 10 µl was separated in chloroform-methanol (9:1). Gliotoxin (Sigma) was spotted as a standard. All experiments were performed in triplicate. For the assessment of PN production, Micrococcus luteus ATCC 9341 was grown in TBS (17 g of Bacto Tryptone, 3 g of Bacto Soytone, 5 g of NaCl, 2.5 g of K2HPO4, and 2.5 g of glucose in a 1-liter total volume) at 37°C at 180 rpm until it reached an optical density of 1. Three and one-third milliliters of M. luteus culture was mixed with 40 ml of TSA (15 g of Bacto Tryptone, 5 g of Bacto Soytone, 5 g of NaCl, and 10 g of agar in a 1-liter total volume) and poured into 150-cm-diameter plates to solidify. Fifty-milliliter cultures of the wild-type (WT),
laeA, and OE::laeA strains (107 spores/ml) were grown in GMM with shaking for 14 h at 37°C and then were transferred to LMM shake cultures amended with 30 mM cyclopentanone for 24 h. For each strain, 6 ml was removed, lyophilized, and resuspended in 1 ml of distilled water. One-hundred-microliter samples, with or without 6 U of ß-lactamase, were placed in 10-cm-diameter wells of the M. luteus plates. Plates were placed for 2 h at 4°C and then incubated overnight at 37°C to evaluate PN inhibition zones. All experiments were duplicated. LOV was extracted from A. terreus cultures grown in 50-ml GMM shake flasks for 18 h at 32°C and then transferred to LMM shake cultures with 30 mM cyclopentanone for 36 h at 32°C. Extraction and identification on TLC were followed by the previously described method of MONJ examination. LOV (Merck Co.) was spotted onto TLC plates as a control. All experiments were duplicated.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. GenBank numbers for the A. nidulans and A. fumigatus laeA genes are AY394722 and AY422723, respectively.
|
|
|---|
G) and a 1-bp deletion (at position 1453) in the gene. The deletion resulted in a premature stop codon. An examination of genomic and cDNA sequences revealed that laeA has one intron and three putative AflR binding sites (12), one in the promoter (607) and two in the encoding region (positions 607 and 1487) (Fig. 1A). cDNA analysis showed that laeA possesses a 5' untranslated region (642 bp) (Fig. 1A). Analyses of available genomic databases indicated that only filamentous fungi, including A. fumigatus (human pathogen causing aspergillosis; TIGR [http://www.tigr.org/tdb/e2k1/afu1/]), Neurospora crassa (model fungus; GenBank), Magnaporthe grisea (plant pathogen causing rice blast fungus [http://www-genome.wi.mit.edu/annotation/fungi/magnaporthe]), Coccidioides immitis (human pathogen causing coccidioidomycosis; GenBank), and Fusarium sporotrichioides (plant pathogen producing trichothecene mycotoxin [http://www.genome.ou.edu/fsporo.html]), have possible LaeA homologs (Fig. 1B). An examination of the LaeA amino acid sequence (375 amino acids) revealed a conserved S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) binding site found in nuclear protein methyltransferases (Fig. 1B) (15). Although the amino acid sequence of LaeA did not show the presence of a nuclear localization motif, GFP tagging of either the 5' or 3' end of A. nidulans laeA showed LaeA to be primarily localized in the nucleus (Fig. 1C).
![]() View larger version (42K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Overview of LaeA. (A) Schematic of laeA gene. Although LaeA contains the exact SAM motif found in histone methyltransferases and arginine methyltransferases, it lacks other conserved domains (e.g., a SET domain and a double E loop) typically found in these proteins. In addition, likely histone methyltransferase and arginine methyltransferase candidates are found in the Aspergillus database (1e42 and 1e94). Therefore, LaeA appears to be a unique protein methyltransferase. (B) Amino acid comparison of A. nidulans, A. fumigatus, N. crassa, Magnaporthe grisea, C. immitis, and F. sporotrichioides LaeA proteins showing conserved protein methyltransferase SAM binding sites in red. (C) A. nidulans LaeA protein localizes to the nucleus. GFP was fused to the N-terminal end of LaeA. Nuclei were stained with the DNA-specific dye 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI).
|
laeA) were created by replacing laeA with methG and pyrG in A. nidulans TJH3.40 (a methG1 auxotroph) and A. fumigatus AF293.1 (a pyrG auxotroph), respectively. Southern blot and PCR analyses were carried out to confirm single gene replacement events in several transformants, including A. nidulans TJW35.5 and A. fumigatus TJW54.2. Prototroph RJW46.4 was obtained from TJW35.5 by a sexual cross, as described in Materials and Methods. Strains RJW46.4 and TJW54.2 were used for our study. For both species,
laeA strains were visually detectable due to the loss of mycelial pigment from the backside of the colonies (Fig. 2A and data not shown). A TLC examination of chloroform extracts of A. nidulans and A. fumigatus
laeA strains showed that the production of several metabolites, including ST in A. nidulans (Fig. 2B) and the immunotoxin gliotoxin in A. fumigatus, was reduced (Fig. 2C). The identities of the other metabolites are not known. Interestingly, the levels of two of the A. nidulans metabolites were not reduced and even appeared to be somewhat increased in the
laeA strain (Fig. 2B). Verification that these defects were caused by the loss of laeA was obtained by the transformation of A. nidulans
laeA with wild-type laeA and the observed remediation of metabolite production (data not shown).
![]() View larger version (38K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Phenotypes of laeA. (A) Asexual sporulation (top) and mycelial pigmentation (bottom) patterns of A. nidulans wild-type (RDIT2.3) (WT) and laeA (RJW46.4) strains after 5 days of cultivation on GMM. A. fumigatus laeA presented a similar loss of mycelial pigmentation (data not shown). (B) TLC analysis of chloroform extracts of RDIT2.3 and RJW46.4 after 5 days of cultivation on solid GMM. (C) TLC analysis of chloroform extracts of A. fumigatus AF293 (WT) and TJW54.2 ( laeA) grown in liquid shaking GMM for 3 days. The experiment was performed in triplicate. Std, gliotoxin standard.
|
laeA background. Neither gene was expressed (Fig. 3A). A transcriptional profile of the entire ST gene cluster, which covers ca. 60 kb and contains ca. 26 genes (7), suggested that LaeA transcriptional control is ST cluster specific, as transcription of the upstream and downstream genes of the ST cluster was unaffected (data not shown). Because many uncharacterized metabolites were reduced in the
laeA strains (Fig. 2B and C), we thought it possible that LaeA is a global regulator for secondary metabolite gene expression. To address this hypothesis, we examined PN gene expression in the A. nidulans
laeA strain. Figure 3A shows that ipnA (encoding isopenicillin N synthetase, a biosynthetic enzyme required for PN biosynthesis) (6) expression was greatly reduced in the
laeA strain.
![]() View larger version (47K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. laeA regulation of secondary metabolism. (A) aflR, stcU, and ipnA gene expression in A. nidulans wild-type (WT) (RDIT2.3) and laeA (RJW46.4) strains grown in liquid shaking GMM for 12, 24, 48, and 72 h at 37°C. Ethidium bromide-stained rRNA is indicated as a loading control. (B) laeA, lovE, and lovC gene expression in A. nidulans WT/lov+ (RJW51) and laeA/lov+ (RJW53) strains grown in liquid shaking GMM for 12, 24, 48, and 72 h at 37°C. Ethidium bromide-stained rRNA is indicated as a loading control. MONJ was extracted from WT/lov+ (RJW51) and laeA/lov+ (RJW53) A. nidulans strains grown in liquid shaking GMM for 3 days. The experiment was performed in triplicate. (C) laeA, ipnA, stcU, lovE, and lovC gene expression in A. nidulans wild-type (WT) (RDIT2.3), OE::laeA (RJW47.3), WT/lov+ (RJW51), and OE::laeA/lov+ (RJW52) strains grown in liquid shaking GMM for 14 h at 37°C and then transferred to liquid shaking TMM for the induction of laeA expression. Time points were 0, 6, 12, and 24 h after transfer. ST and MONJ were extracted from A. nidulans WT (RDIT2.3), OE::laeA (RJW47.3), WT/lov+ (RJW51), and OE::laeA/lov+ (RJW52) strains grown in liquid shaking GMM for 14 h at 37°C and then transferred to liquid shaking TMM for 24 h. ST, ST standard. The MONJ standard was extracted from A. nidulans strain WMH1739. The experiment was performed in triplicate. (D) PN bioassay. Wild-type (FGSC26), laeA (RJW40.4), and OE::laeA (RJW44.2) strains were grown in liquid shaking GMM for 14 h at 37°C and then transferred to LMM amended with 30 mM cyclopentanone for the induction of laeA for 24 h at 37°C. (E) TLC examination of LOV production in A. terreus laeA overexpression strains. The wild type (ATCC 20542; lane 1), TJW58.9 (hygB resistance gene-containing transformant used as a control; lane 2), and OE::laeA strains containing hygB (TJW58.2, TJW58.4, TJW58.7, TJW58.8, and TJW58.14, in lanes 3 to 7, respectively) were grown in liquid shaking GMM for 18 h at 32°C and then transferred to LMM with 30 mM cyclopentanone for the induction of laeA for 36 h at 32°C. Std, LOV standard. The experiment was performed in duplicate.
|
laeA background. The partial LOV cluster, derived from A. terreus, was originally transformed into A. nidulans to study aspects of LOV biosynthesis (21). This strain was used to cross the LOV cluster (LOV+) into appropriate mutant laeA backgrounds. Figure 3B shows that the
laeA/ LOV+ strain displayed very diminished levels of both lovE (encoding a LOV-specific Zn2Cys6 transcription factor) and lovC (a LOV biosynthetic gene) transcripts. Chloroform extracts of this strain also showed diminished production of MONJ (Fig. 3B), the LOV intermediate produced by the partial LOV cluster (21).
Overexpression of laeA upregulates PN and LOV gene expression but not ST gene expression.
We next constructed laeA overexpression strains (OE::laeA) of both A. nidulans and A. terreus to examine secondary metabolite gene expression and product formation. As shown in Fig. 3C, ipnA, lovE, and lovC, but not stcU, expression levels were remarkably elevated in the A. nidulans OE::laeA background. Secondary metabolite production was correlated with transcript levels. MONJ production was increased
400%, and high levels of PN were produced during times when the wild type showed no PN activity (Fig. 3D). ST levels remained the same as that of the wild type in the OE::laeA background (Fig. 3C). Overexpression of the A. nidulans laeA gene in the LOV-producing fungus A. terreus led to 400 to 700% increases in LOV (Fig. 3E).
Feedback regulation of laeA by aflR.
An examination of the laeA transcript in wild-type strains showed that it is an inducible, low-expression-level gene that is observed in Northern blots before and after aflR transcripts are observed (data not shown). Due to the presence of three AflR binding sites in the gene (Fig. 1A), we thought it possible that AflR regulates laeA expression. As shown in Fig. 4, overexpression of aflR (OE::aflR) downregulates laeA expression, although elimination of aflR (
aflR) does not affect the laeA transcript level (Fig. 5). This indicates that there are both negative (laeA) and positive (stc genes) regulatory effects of AflR on gene transcription.
|
View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Regulation of laeA. Effects of overexpression of aflR, pkaA, and rasG17V on laeA expression. Wild-type (RKIS1), OE::aflR (TJH34.10), OE::pkaA (TKIS20.1), and OE::rasG17V (RKIS28.5) strains were grown in liquid shaking GMM for 14 h at 37°C and then transferred to TMM. Time points were 0, 6, 12, and 24 h after transfer.
|
![]() View larger version (36K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. laeA expression is not affected in flbA, sfaD, and aflR strains. laeA, aflR, and stcU gene expression was examined in A. nidulans wild-type (TPK1.1 and RKIS1), flbA (TBN39.5), sfaD (TSRB1.38), and aflR (RMFV2) strains grown in liquid shaking GMM for 12, 24, 48, and 72 h at 37°C. Ethidium bromide-stained rRNA is indicated as a loading control.
|
flbA, fadAG42R,
fadA,
sfaD,
pkaA, OE::pkaA, and OE::rasAG17A (Table 1). mRNA analyses of these mutants showed that OE::pkaA and OE::rasAG17A completely inhibited laeA expression (Fig. 4), whereas laeA transcription was not repressed in any of the other strains (Fig. 5 and data not shown). Interestingly, the laeA transcript level was elevated in the
sfaD strain (Fig. 5). The presence of laeA transcripts in these mutants (Fig. 5 and data not shown) shows that laeA is not sufficient for aflR expression, as aflR was not expressed in these strains (18). Figure 6 depicts our current understanding of LaeA involvement in secondary metabolite regulation.
![]() View larger version (31K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Proposed model of secondary metabolite regulation by LaeA. Gliotoxin is formed from serine and alanine and is proposed to be produced by a nonribosomal peptide synthase (NRPS). Fungal pigments belong to several chemical classes, including polyketides, terpenes, and DOPA melanins.
|
|
|
|---|
LaeA regulation of metabolite production is transcriptional, as assessed by the effects of
laeA and OE::laeA alleles on ST, PN, and LOV gene expression in A. nidulans and A. terreus. In all cases, gene transcripts were reduced or eliminated in
laeA strains. However, although overexpression of laeA increased PN and LOV gene transcript and concomitant production formation (Fig. 3C, D, and E), this was not the case for ST gene transcription or production (Fig. 3A). The steady-state level of ST transcripts and product formation in the OE::laeA background, in contrast to the increased PN and LOV transcripts and product formation, suggested a unique interaction between laeA and ST gene regulation.
Due to the presence of three potential AflR binding sites in the A. nidulans gene (Fig. 1A) and the lack of ST cluster gene upregulation in the OE::laeA background, we thought it possible that AflR negatively regulates laeA expression. As shown in Fig. 4, overexpression of aflR (OE::aflR) downregulates laeA expression, although elimination of aflR (
aflR) does not affect laeA transcript levels (Fig. 5). This indicates that there are both negative (laeA) and positive (stc genes) (12) regulatory effects of AflR on gene transcription. To our knowledge, this is the first description of a putative secondary metabolite feedback mechanism. As overproduction of ST negatively affects fungal growth (N. P. Keller, unpublished data), we speculate that this feedback loop may have evolved as a fitness trait. In contrast, neither the promoter nor the encoding region of A. fumigatus laeA contained AflR binding sites, and no aflR ortholog was found in the genome. Some A. fumigatus strains are reported to produce ST (14); it would be interesting to see if laeA genes from those isolates contained AflR binding sites. Initial examinations of the Aspergillus
laeA strains showed them to be more susceptible to killing by neutrophils in vitro than the wild type (S. Balajee, L. Delbridge, J. Bok, N. Keller, and K. Marr, unpublished data). Presumably this is due to a loss of toxin secondary metabolites or melanins, known virulence factors in several fungal systems (5, 22).
laeA expression is also negatively regulated by two signal transduction molecules, PkaA and RasA. Both proteins have been shown to transcriptionally and posttranscriptionally regulate aflR (29, 30). It appears that LaeA mediates PkaA transcriptional regulation of aflR, since overexpression of laeA in a pkaA overexpression background, a condition that normally suppresses stc expression, partially restored stc gene expression (29; data not shown). With regard to PkaA regulation of laeA, the lack of conventional PkaA phosphorylation consensus sequences in LaeA indicates that PkaA regulation of LaeA is not direct. Alternatively, LaeA may contain unconventional PkaA phosphorylation sites. RasA regulation of laeA gene expression may occur through PkaA and/or another pathway(s).
The requirement of a kinase for laeA function is reminiscentto a degreeof a Streptomyces global regulatory system involving the protein AfsR. AfsR is a transcription factor that regulates secondary metabolism in Streptomyces coelicolor but regulates morphogenesis in Streptomyces griseus (contrast this to the similar role LaeA has in the three Aspergillus spp. examined here). Phosphorylation of AfsR enhances its activity (37). Like the case for AfsR, LaeA regulation occurs at the transcriptional level, but it shows no homology to transcription factors. Its nuclear location, its role in transcriptional regulation, and the presence of a SAM motif in LaeA suggest that it may be a protein methyltransferase. Well-known protein methyltransferases include histone and arginine methyltransferases that play important roles in the regulation of gene expression in eukaryotes, in part through modification of the chromatin structure (15, 25, 35).
Regardless of the mechanism, these findings with LaeA present an advance toward understanding the complex regulation of secondary metabolite production and provide a means for the discovery of new metabolites. Indeed, initial comparative microarray studies between
laeA and the wild type have identified putative secondary metabolism gene clusters in the Aspergillus genome (L. Maggio-Hall, J. Bok, and N. Keller, unpublished data). The manipulation of LaeA in filamentous fungi may enable the increased production of pharmaceuticals or the elimination of fungal toxins by providing improved strains of engineered organisms and may also contribute to the broader understanding of molecular mechanisms by which secondary metabolites are produced.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2010 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»