EC Accepts, published online ahead of print on 6 November 2009

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Google Scholar Articles by Mangat, S. Articles by Schmidt, M. C. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mangat, S. Articles by Schmidt, M. C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Eukaryotic Cell doi:10.1128/EC.00267-09
Copyright (c) 2009, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Differential Roles of the Beta Subunit Glycogen-Binding Domains in the Regulation of the Snf1 Kinase Complex

Simmanjeet Mangat, Dakshayini Chandrashekarappa, Rhonda R. McCartney, Karin Elbing, and Martin C. Schmidt^*

Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Program, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, U.S.A.

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: mcs2{at}pitt.edu.

Members of the AMP-activated protein kinase family, including the Snf1 kinase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, are activated under conditions of nutrient stress. AMP-activated protein kinases are heterotrimeric complexes composed of a catalytic subunit and regulatory and subunits. In this study, the role of the subunits in the regulation of Snf1 activity was examined. Yeast express three isoforms of the AMP-activated protein kinase consisting of the Snf1(), Snf4 () and one of three alternative subunits, either Sip1, Sip2 or Gal83. The Gal83 isoform of the Snf1 complex is the most abundant and was analyzed in the greatest detail. All three subunits contain a conserved domain referred to as the glycogen binding domain. Deletion of this domain from Gal83 results in a deregulation of the Snf1 kinase as judged by a constitutive activity independent of glucose availability. In contrast, deletion of this homologous domain from the Sip1 and Sip2 subunits had little effect on Snf1 kinase regulation. Therefore the different Snf1 kinase isoforms are regulated through distinct mechanisms which may contribute to their specialized roles in different stress response pathways. In addition, the subunits are subjected to phosphorylation. The responsible kinases were identified as Snf1 and casein kinase II. The significance of the phosphorylation is unclear since deletion of the region containing the phosphorylation sites in Gal83 had little effect on the regulation of Snf1 in response to glucose limitation.