This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental material Other Versions of this Article: EC.00223-07v1 6/11/2038    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Katoh, M. Articles by Kuspa, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Katoh, M. Articles by Kuspa, A.

Developmental Commitment in Dictyostelium discoideum ^,

Mariko Katoh,^1, Guokai Chen,^3, Emily Roberge,^1,2 Gad Shaulsky,^1,2* and Adam Kuspa^1,2,3

Department of Molecular and Human Genetics,¹ Graduate Program in Molecular and Human Genetics,² Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas³

Received 25 June 2007/ Accepted 14 September 2007

Upon starvation, Dictyostelium discoideum cells halt cell proliferation, aggregate into multicellular organisms, form migrating slugs, and undergo morphogenesis into fruiting bodies while differentiating into dormant spores and dead stalk cells. At almost any developmental stage cells can be forced to dedifferentiate when they are dispersed and diluted into nutrient broth. However, migrating slugs can traverse lawns of bacteria for days without dedifferentiating, ignoring abundant nutrients and continuing development. We now show that developing Dictyostelium cells revert to the growth phase only when bacteria are supplied during the first 4 to 6 h of development but that after this time, cells continue to develop regardless of the presence of food. We postulate that the cells’ inability to revert to the growth phase after 6 h represents a commitment to development. We show that the onset of commitment correlates with the cells’ loss of phagocytic function. By examining mutant strains, we also show that commitment requires extracellular cyclic AMP (cAMP) signaling. Moreover, cAMP pulses are sufficient to induce both commitment and the loss of phagocytosis in starving cells, whereas starvation alone is insufficient. Finally, we show that the inhibition of development by food prior to commitment is independent of contact between the cells and the bacteria and that small soluble molecules, probably amino acids, inhibit development during the first few hours and subsequently the cells become unable to react to the molecules and commit to development. We propose that commitment serves as a checkpoint that ensures the completion of cooperative aggregation of developing Dictyostelium cells once it has begun, dampening the response to nutritional cues that might inappropriately block development.

Published ahead of print on 28 September 2007.

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://ec.asm.org/.

These authors contributed equally.