This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katoh, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kuspa, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Katoh, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kuspa, A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Eukaryotic Cell, November 2007, p. 2038-2045, Vol. 6, No. 11
1535-9778/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/EC.00223-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Developmental Commitment in Dictyostelium discoideum{triangledown} ,{dagger}

Mariko Katoh,1,{ddagger} Guokai Chen,3,{ddagger} Emily Roberge,1,2 Gad Shaulsky,1,2* and Adam Kuspa1,2,3

Department of Molecular and Human Genetics,1 Graduate Program in Molecular and Human Genetics,2 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas3

Received 25 June 2007/ Accepted 14 September 2007

Upon starvation, Dictyostelium discoideum cells halt cell proliferation, aggregate into multicellular organisms, form migrating slugs, and undergo morphogenesis into fruiting bodies while differentiating into dormant spores and dead stalk cells. At almost any developmental stage cells can be forced to dedifferentiate when they are dispersed and diluted into nutrient broth. However, migrating slugs can traverse lawns of bacteria for days without dedifferentiating, ignoring abundant nutrients and continuing development. We now show that developing Dictyostelium cells revert to the growth phase only when bacteria are supplied during the first 4 to 6 h of development but that after this time, cells continue to develop regardless of the presence of food. We postulate that the cells’ inability to revert to the growth phase after 6 h represents a commitment to development. We show that the onset of commitment correlates with the cells’ loss of phagocytic function. By examining mutant strains, we also show that commitment requires extracellular cyclic AMP (cAMP) signaling. Moreover, cAMP pulses are sufficient to induce both commitment and the loss of phagocytosis in starving cells, whereas starvation alone is insufficient. Finally, we show that the inhibition of development by food prior to commitment is independent of contact between the cells and the bacteria and that small soluble molecules, probably amino acids, inhibit development during the first few hours and subsequently the cells become unable to react to the molecules and commit to development. We propose that commitment serves as a checkpoint that ensures the completion of cooperative aggregation of developing Dictyostelium cells once it has begun, dampening the response to nutritional cues that might inappropriately block development.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030. Phone: (713) 798-8082. Fax: (713) 798-1021. E-mail: gadi{at}bcm.tmc.edu

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 28 September 2007.

{dagger} Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://ec.asm.org/.

{ddagger} These authors contributed equally.

Eukaryotic Cell, November 2007, p. 2038-2045, Vol. 6, No. 11
1535-9778/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/EC.00223-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.





Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»