Eukaryotic Cell
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Amar, L.
Right arrow Articles by Dubrana, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Amar, L.
Right arrow Articles by Dubrana, K.
Eukaryotic Cell, October 2004, p. 1136-1146, Vol. 3, No. 5
1535-9778/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/EC.3.5.1136-1146.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Epigenetic Control of Chromosome Breakage at the 5' End of Paramecium tetraurelia Gene A

Laurence Amar1,2* and Karine Dubrana2,{dagger}

UMR 8080, IBAIC, Orsay,1 Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France2

Received 8 December 2003/ Accepted 16 July 2004

Macronuclei and micronuclei of ciliates have related genomes, with macronuclei developing from zygotic micronuclei through programmed DNA rearrangements. While Paramecium tetraurelia wild-type strain 51 and mutant strain d48 have the same micronuclear genome, qualitative differences between their macronuclear genomes have been described, demonstrating that programmed DNA rearrangements could be epigenetically controlled in ciliates. Macronuclear chromosomes end downstream of gene A (A51 Mac ends) and at the 5' end of gene A (Ad48 Mac ends) in strains 51 and d48, respectively. To gain further insight into the process of chromosome end formation, we performed an extensive analysis of locus A rearrangement in strains d48 and 51, in strain d12, which harbors a gene A deletion, and in interstrain cross progeny. We show that (i) allele Ad12 harbors a deletion of >16 kb, (ii) A51 Mac ends distribute over four rather than three DNA regions, (iii) strains d48 and 51 display only quantitative differences (rare Ad48 and A51 Mac ends do form in strains 51 and d48, respectively), (iv) the level of A51 Mac ends is severalfold enhanced in d12- and d48-derived progeny, and (v) this level inversely correlates with the level of Ad48 Mac ends in the d48 parent. Together, these data lead to a model in which the formation of Ad48 Mac ends is epigenetically controlled by a d48 factor(s). We propose that the d48 factor(s) may be derived from RNA molecules transcribed from the Ad48 Mac ends and encompassing the truncated A gene and telomeric repeats.


* Corresponding author. Present address: UMR 8080, IBAIC, Bat 444, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France. Phone: 33 1 69 15 66 38. Fax: 33 1 69 15 68 03. E-mail: laurence.amar{at}bc4.u-psud.fr.

{dagger} Present address: CEA, Laboratoire de Radiobiologie et Oncologie, 92255 Fontenay aux Roses, France.


Eukaryotic Cell, October 2004, p. 1136-1146, Vol. 3, No. 5
1535-9778/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/EC.3.5.1136-1146.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. J. Bacteriol.
Mol. Cell Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. ALL ASM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Microbiology.